Subscribe to New Scientist

Environment

Feeds

Home |Environment | News

Seas could rise 1.4m, warns Antarctic climate review

A review of climate change in Antarctica forecasts that by 2100 the world's seas will have risen to levels previously considered too extreme to be realistic.

The review, Antarctic Climate Change and the Environment (PDF), was compiled by 100 scientists associated with the international Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research. Using 20 of the most up-to-date models that take into account the complex behaviour of the ozone hole over Antarctica, as well as the most recent observations of ice loss, the review predicts that the area of sea ice around Antarctica could shrink by 33 per cent – 2.6 million square kilometres – by 2100, leading to a sea-level rise of 1.4 metres.

"This is the first comprehensive review of Antarctic climate change that covers how the climate of the icy continent has changed from deep time," says John Turner of the British Antarctic Survey, lead editor of the report. The report also makes predictions about how the Antarctic climate will change over the next century.

For the past 30 years, the hole in the atmosphere's ozone layer above Antarctica has protected the bulk of the continent from the effects of climate change by generating fierce winds. In that time, sea ice around the continent has increased by 10 per cent.

The new report warns that when the ozone hole heals – and it will, possibly by the end of the century – Antarctica will feel the full force of global warming, with temperatures rising by as much as 3 °C by 2100.

From sea ice to sea

The report backs the predictions of Stefan Rahmstorf at Potsdam University, Germany, whose own work suggests that given the speed at which West Antarctica's ice sheets are shrinking, sea levels are likely to rise by 1.4 metres by 2100. In contrast, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's Fourth Assessment, published in 2007, predicted 59 centimetres.

"I am not the one to judge my own paper, but there is indeed [some] indication that these higher numbers – not only from my study, by the way – are now the new mainstream," says Rahmstorf.

The IPCC's sea-level rise projections are considered to be conservative, as they don't take into account the fact that Antarctica's loss of ice will accelerate as temperatures rise over the continent.

By 2100, the West Antarctic Ice Sheet alone could lose enough ice mass to raise sea levels globally by "tens of centimetres," Turner says.

Despite the transformations climate change will create on Antarctica, the study concludes on an upbeat note: only a few of the continent's species are likely to become extinct by 2100.

Many marine creatures can survive a change in temperature of 5 to 10 °C before dying, but "a rise of this magnitude in the Southern Ocean is extremely unlikely by 2100", the study says.

If you would like to reuse any content from New Scientist, either in print or online, please contact the syndication department first for permission. New Scientist does not own rights to photos, but there are a variety of licensing options available for use of articles and graphics we own the copyright to.

Have your say
Comments 1 | 2 | 3

Will Anyone Be Around To See. . . ?

Tue Dec 01 15:57:01 GMT 2009 by Peter Tomshany
http://www.myspace.com/indicatorativator

Well, it's a big science experiment. Will anyone be around to check who's correct? Yes, probably. Will the world that we end up with after this experiment has run its course be one worth living in? Will it be a world in which we have the luxury to argue about such things?

In any case, our stewardship of this planet gets a failing grade. It doesn't really matter to me how much the sea level will rise, because we're screwing this precious little rock in space up. This is our one chance, people. We should not act as if our survival is a given, instead focusing on leaving the planet better off than we found it.

Will Anyone Be Around To See. . . ?

Tue Dec 01 16:18:33 GMT 2009 by Katamai Honjou

Why not just LEAVE the planet.

We would do a lot less damage to the planet in the long run if we poured just 10% of the world GDP in achieving this goal via space elevators, and rocket transport. We move everyone to the moon, mars, and other lifeless rocks like Ceres.

Anyone who doesn't want to move get a mandatory life termination order put out on them.

After evacuating the earth we tear down our space elevators and install a series of "Earth defense elevators" in orbit to prevent any future humans from ever going back there.

We can live in space and leave nature to die in it's eventual fate in the sun's expanding atmosphere 4 billion years from now.

I think we only need to move a couple million people into space, I am sure we could cleanse the earth of the remaining 6 billion people pretty easily using viruses and other chemical agents.

Will Anyone Be Around To See. . . ?

Tue Dec 01 16:53:37 GMT 2009 by mc

No need to leave. We can stay here, continue on the current path and get the same result

This comment breached our terms of use and has been removed.

This comment breached our terms of use and has been removed.

This comment breached our terms of use and has been removed.

This comment breached our terms of use and has been removed.

This comment breached our terms of use and has been removed.

Melting Sea Ice Doesn't Change Sea Level

Tue Dec 01 16:01:13 GMT 2009 by Jan Willem

"the review predicts that the area of sea ice around Antarctica could shrink by 33 per cent - 2.6 million square kilometres - by 2100, leading to a sea-level rise of 1.4 metres."

That suggests a causality that is rather unlikely. Sea ice displaces as much water as it contains, if it melts sea level doesn't change. -- At least not from the melting ice.

Melting Sea Ice Doesn't Change Sea Level

Tue Dec 01 17:08:51 GMT 2009 by Jim Moisse

...but further in the article, the proper term Antarctic Ice Sheet is mentioned. Yes, sea ice will not cause an ocean level rise, but the loss of the continental ice sheet will, as will the glaciers of Greenland. Visit the Netherlands while you can!

Melting Sea Ice Doesn't Change Sea Level

Tue Dec 01 18:08:58 GMT 2009 by Liza

It's pretty likely Jan Willem is already living there :-)

Melting Sea Ice Doesn't Change Sea Level

Wed Dec 02 03:26:59 GMT 2009 by Sarah McIntee

Sea level will rise when any ice on the continent melts. Ice that is not in the water already will add.

The West Antarctic ice sheet is currently being hollowed out and undermined by a warmer ocean and will add to the ocean level. The East Antarctic ice sheet, thought to be stable a couple years ago, is now measured as also losing mass and it starting to be undermined as well. Anything on the land that melts, from antarctic continent, from Greenland, and from other glaciers around the world, add sea level.

Also, sea level rise will not be uniform. The tropics will have a larger sea level rise because of both thermal expansion and the mid-waist bulge that results when you have a spinning liquid covered object.

Melting Sea Ice Doesn't Change Sea Level

Wed Dec 02 07:09:40 GMT 2009 by billisfree

It's pretty much agreed - AND I checked it out by personally doing my own calculations.

If ALL the Antiarctic ice (that above the sea level) were to melt, it would raise the sea level approx. 180 ft.

The ice shelves where most is below sea level is of course, as you say, will have little effect.

If ALL the Greenland ice field (above sea level)were to melt, it would raise the sea level and additional 25 ft.

I'll have to sit down and do calculations, but I find your claim that most sea level rise will occur in the tropics because of a spinning planet, a bit hard to believe.

So What

Tue Dec 01 16:15:56 GMT 2009 by Timmy

Major sceptic on all this inconvienient taxes rubbish - so why dont we take a step back.

so what if this does happen? The sea levels have risen what 300-400 feet anyhow over the past x bunch of years.

Move inland folks - you've been given the date by the really really accurate climate models of which every scenario returned the same result.

2100 - all move - 90 years warning!

So What

Tue Dec 01 17:26:13 GMT 2009 by mike

Agreed 100%. I'd like to add, we can't control how other countries pollute. Let's start brainstorming how we're going to move forward.

We need to stop finger pointing and blame storming.

So What

Tue Dec 01 21:59:15 GMT 2009 by billisfree

Seas have risen 400 ft since last ice age 10,000 years ago.

There's evidence on the Pacific Ocean coast that the seas were 600 ft lower at one time.

So What

Wed Dec 02 00:54:43 GMT 2009 by Kyle

Whether that is true or not is irrelevant.

Rising sea levels + 9 billion urbanised people = disaster.

You are aware of course that previous climate change events have caused mass extinctions? right?

It's been shown by economists that mitigating these effects now is far far cheaper than trying to cope with them when they occur.

You might be some anarchist who doesn't care about feeding the world, but I would probably be correct in saying you are a very small minority.

So What

Wed Dec 02 04:08:48 GMT 2009 by Vendicar Decarian

Seas have risen 400 ft since last ice age 10,000 years ago." - Billsnotfree

14,000 years ago... But you can't get anything right so why start now?

How many port cities existed 14,000 years ago Little Billy?

So What

Wed Dec 02 07:37:18 GMT 2009 by billisfree

Thank you, Vendicar

I'm happy you accepted this fact.

I'm sure there are LOTS of villages (including ports) far below sea level by now. Wave action would most likely destroy most evidence of these old villages. If we look hard enough, we should find a few of them.

The seas most likely rose slowly, giving peole plenty of time to build new dwellings higher up.

Agree?

This comment breached our terms of use and has been removed.

This comment breached our terms of use and has been removed.

This comment breached our terms of use and has been removed.

This comment breached our terms of use and has been removed.

Comments 1 | 2 | 3

All comments should respect the New Scientist House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please use the "Report" link in that comment to report it to us.

If you are having a technical problem posting a comment, please contact technical support.

ADVERTISEMENT

US and China emissions pledges won't stop 2 °C warming

12:16 02 December 2009

Modelling suggests these cuts will not be enough to head off dangerous climate change – Europe may have to take up the slack

Five eco-crimes we commit every day

11:32 01 December 2009

If you really want to save the planet, you should rethink how you clean your clothes – and your bottom

Great and good share hopes and fears for Copenhagen

07:00 30 November 2009

New Scientist asked leading scientists, politicians and business people to tell us if the imminent climate change talks can deliver

Early Snowball Earth may have melted to a mudball

11:00 28 November 2009

If the icy tropics of 700 million years ago were covered in dust, this could have helped melt the ice

Latest news

WHO changes advice on HIV therapy

13:13 02 December 2009

The World Health Organization now advises giving antiretroviral therapy to people with HIV earlier on in the infection cycle

Watch it live: dissection of famous brain

12:45 02 December 2009

In what must certainly be the world's first live, webcast brain dissection, scientists today will cut thin sections from a human brain

US and China emissions pledges won't stop 2 °C warming

12:16 02 December 2009

Modelling suggests these cuts will not be enough to head off dangerous climate change – Europe may have to take up the slack

Autism and schizophrenia could be genetic opposites

11:33 02 December 2009

The conditions may be two sides of the same coin, suggests a review of genetic data – the finding could help design complementary treatments

TWITTER

New Scientist is on Twitter

Get the latest from New Scientist: sign up to our Twitter feed

ADVERTISEMENT

Partners

We are partnered with Approved Index. Visit the site to get free quotes from website designers and a range of web, IT and marketing services in the UK.

Login for full access