Subscribe to New Scientist

Opinion

Feeds
Report an inappropriate comment

It Is Simpler To Start A New World, That To Fix This One

Sat Nov 21 23:09:02 GMT 2009 by stoffer

Why should we not call space stations worlds? I think that space stations are in many aspects superior to planets - production can take place in zero-g which means lower energy cost for moving things, lower cost of transportations, higher quality metal alloys etc. There are some disadvantages of course.

But my main point is that the main reason we stay in this piece of rock is that it is huge gravity well and it's very expensive to get out of it. What is the point of getting out of gravity well and sinking our duds into other gravity well, if we can use the available energy MUCH more efficiently in space-station manner.

Fields marked * are required.

Nature of problem *

ADVERTISEMENT

Latest news articles

Competition! Sampling Darwin

11:00 24 November 2009

Enter our competition to incorporate Darwin's famous concluding sentence into a new work of art, and win a special edition Origin of Species featuring a cover by artist Damien Hirst.

Robot arm opens doors for wheelchair usersMovie Camera

10:31 24 November 2009

The arm can grip all sorts of handles and knobs while pushing or pulling to open a door

Odd couples of the animal world

10:00 24 November 2009

With Marty Crump's precise yet jolly prose, Sexy Orchids Make Lousy Lovers puts soap operas to shame

LHC smashes protons together for first time

22:39 23 November 2009

The particle accelerator is now officially a collider – it will attempt to break the world record for collision energies before the end of the year

ADVERTISEMENT

Partners

We are partnered with Approved Index. Visit the site to get free quotes from website designers and a range of web, IT and marketing services in the UK.

Login for full access