Breaking News
Get 4 extra free issues and unlimited free access to NewScientist.com

The World's No.1 Science & Technology News Service

 

Cutting doctors' hours has limited benefit for patients

  • 11 September 2007
  • NewScientist.com news service
Printable versionEmail to a friendRSS FeedSyndicate
 
Tools
digg thisAdd My YahooAdd Google Reader reddit submitNewsvineciteulike submit

IT SEEMS like a no-brainer. Junior doctors work very long hours and fatigue is known to impair judgement, so forcing hospitals to give doctors time off should cut down on medical errors.

The truth is more complex. In 2003, US resident doctors were ordered to work no more than 80 hours per week, and no more than 24 hours at a stretch. Since these restrictions came in, patient mortality rates have remained unchanged, say Kevin Volpp of the Philadelphia VA Medical Center in Pennsylvania and colleagues (Journal of the American Medical Association, vol 298, p 975). A related study by the same team found a small benefit, but only for certain hospitals and medical conditions (JAMA, vol 298, p 984). The concern is that the benefits of additional doctors are offset by doctors passing patients to each other more frequently, which can lead to misunderstandings about a patient's condition, says Volpp. Some doctors argue that trainee medics may not be getting enough experience of medical procedures.

Restrictions on hours of work came in, but mortality rates in patients remain unchanged
From issue 2620 of New Scientist magazine, 11 September 2007, page 7
Printable versionEmail to a friendRSS FeedSyndicate
 
Cover of latest issue of New Scientist magazine
  • For exclusive news and expert analysis every week subscribe to New Scientist Print Edition
  • For what's in New Scientist magazine this week see contents
  • Search all stories
  • Contact us about this story
  • Sign up for our free newsletter
 
SUBSCRIBER LOGIN
Subscribe to New Scientist magazine