SUBSCRIBE TO NEW SCIENTIST

Tech

Feeds

Home |Tech |Environment | News

Electric cars jostle for position on the power grid

Continue reading page |1 |2

IT MIGHT have hogged the limelight at last week's Geneva Motor Show in Switzerland, but the most arresting detail on Porsche's latest concept car (pictured) was actually somewhat mundane: a wall plug. But over the next 12 months plugs will be increasingly appearing on production models from the world's biggest car makers. And as they do, electricity providers and governments will be scrambling to prepare for the as-yet-unknown effects of shackling our transport power needs to the electricity grid.

Plug-in cars come in two forms: electric vehicles fully reliant on a battery and the electricity grid, and plug-in hybrids that combine a smaller battery with a conventional engine.

When they start to appear in significant numbers, electric cars have the potential to drastically alter the demand patterns that our electricity infrastructure has been built around (see graph). The Nissan Leaf, a fully electric family car, will start to roll off production lines in October with a 24-kilowatt-hour battery pack. That sort of capacity is not far short of the average American household's daily consumption of electricity - 30 kWh, according to 2008 figures from the US Department of Energy.

Plug-in hybrids' batteries have lower capacities: 5 kWh in the case of the Toyota Prius and 16 kWh for the Chevrolet Volt, due out in November. These batteries can also draw charge from their gasoline-driven engines, but they will nevertheless consume additional mains power.

"The concern is that this new demand is potentially invisible to us," says David Densley, head of sustainability at UK energy supplier Scottish & Southern Energy, which is working with car-maker BMW on a trial of about 50 electric versions of its Mini, the Mini E, in southern England. "People could go and buy cars, plug them into their existing socket and the first thing we'll know is that the lights go out on the whole street."

Densley says a clustering effect is expected, where the appearance of one electric vehicle in a neighbourhood leads to a concentration of several on the same section of grid. "That could have a significant impact."

Results from the Mini E trial and others taking place around the world are being used by suppliers to try to predict how many cars can be supported without upgrading local networks.

Given that the specification of vehicles set to ship and the plug-point power are both known, basic forecasting of demand is possible. For example, charging a Nissan Leaf takes 16 hours on a standard US 110-volt supply, or 8 hours using the 240-volt supply which is standard in Europe and also installed in US homes for high-demand appliances like tumble-dryers.

Predicting the all-important behaviour of the drivers of these cars is more tricky, however. Extensive user testing has taken place in advance of the Leaf's launch, says Olivier Paturet, head of Nissan's European Zero-Emissions Mobility Program. "But we still don't quite know how they will be used."

A variety of studies, including the Mini E research, has found that "two-centre charging" is popular with drivers, combining an overnight charge at home using cheap power during the low-demand hours with a top-up at work during the day. The public charging networks being rolled out in cities such as London, Amsterdam in the Netherlands and Houston, Texas, will allow more options.

However they choose to charge, drivers will have to become used to power suppliers taking a strong interest in what they do with their vehicles, whether by needing to know when a new vehicle is bought, the pricing of peak power use, or through direct control of their car's connection.

"The electricity industry has to keep the lights on," says Joe DiNucci, a director of Coulomb Technologies in San Jose, California, which makes electric vehicle charging points. "They need to know what charging points are doing, and to have some control."

Electricity companies need to know what car charging-points are doing, and to have some control

Coulomb's charging points are linked to the internet and can be monitored and even remotely controlled by a power utility, allowing them to slow down the rate cars are drawing power at times of high demand, for example. The firm is already operating chargers on the sites of Silicon Valley companies such as Apple, Pixar and Google, and in public for city authorities such as San Francisco and Houston.

The chargers being used in the UK's Mini E trial are less subtle. They deliver power only after 11 pm, when electricity is cheap, unless a "boost" button is pressed to trigger an hour of more costly charge at any given time. In future, the kind of nuanced monitoring offered by networked points like Coulomb's is likely to become standard for home chargers, says Denseley. As these "smart meters" are rolled out by the US, the UK and other western governments and start to appear in homes, electricity grids will become more efficient.

Continue reading page |1 |2
Issue 2751 of New Scientist magazine
  • New Scientist
  • Not just a website!
  • Subscribe to New Scientist and get:
  • New Scientist magazine delivered to your door
  • Unlimited online access to articles from over 500 back issues
  • Subscribe Now and Save

If you would like to reuse any content from New Scientist, either in print or online, please contact the syndication department first for permission. New Scientist does not own rights to photos, but there are a variety of licensing options available for use of articles and graphics we own the copyright to.

Have your say
Comments 1 | 2 | 3

Demand Smoothing

Fri Mar 12 11:33:44 GMT 2010 by Brokk

At present power demand is smoothed by pumped-storage overnight. Water is pumped uphill (well, up-mountain) at night, and allowed to run down again generating hydro-electricity during peak demand in the day. Millions of batteries typically plugged in at night might offer a useful smoothing effect.

Why So Negative?

Fri Mar 12 11:50:59 GMT 2010 by Michael Day

I'm amazed at the slant on this article, or maybe it's just my reading of it. It seems to me to come across as. "Oh noes electric cars might steal all the power and it'll do dark." whereas the reality is more like "Hooray, with smart grids and lots of extra batteries plugged into the grid we finally have a chance to smooth our demand curve out."

Also "Ireland, Portugal and Denmark are all blessed with reliably strong winds that make wind-power attractive." What about Britain? surely we have one of the best wind resources in the world?

Great article, great news, could be reported more positively.

M

Why So Negative?

Fri Mar 12 12:48:06 GMT 2010 by Nico

The point is it requires changes in how the electric grid is designed, and how we should plan for it in the future. Changes are required, and i think the public and goverments needs to be aware of it. Its not only a game of those who own this market currently as they will likely not like to change a running bussines (like shell wouldnt like if all cars could drive 100km on one gallon)..

Maybe even the days of of the huge electric companies are numbered.

Allthough they hold the market.

New alternatives might be possible, like small grid solution, a village with a few windmills not depending on the main grid.

Or how about people renting out their batery power to people with windmill, or the main grid.

Or how about leasing a car from your maingrid?

Or how about getting a free car if you becomme a member of your maingrid provider, like mobile phones and telecom providers.

Whatever is going to happen big changes are in the air, not only because coal is an ending monopoly, but also new solar cells, new wind and new aqua-mills (under water), and besides we are on the doorstep of fusion power.

This all together should start a big debate, between companies, so we could start to work on standardization. Lets say your a carr manufactor, lets define batery sizes together.

Your a solar panel provider, lets reshape the AC/DC grid lines maybe rent the grid out, or like in germany you as an energy company can rent a roof for its square meters and place solar cells on it. In fact this caused a market for roofs!

Why So Negative?

Fri Mar 12 13:08:52 GMT 2010 by Jean
http://jean.posterous.com

"... and besides we are on the doorstep of fusion power"

Fusion won't happen this century at least not cost-effectively.

Why So Negative?

Sat Mar 13 21:37:57 GMT 2010 by Peter

No it won't, however we are rapidly closing the gap on Hybrid Fission/Fusion which is a better alternative than any of the current power sources economically and ecologically.

Why So Negative?

Sat Mar 13 21:44:02 GMT 2010 by Peter

Just saw that New Scientist has a current article on Hybrid Fission/Fusion:

(long URL - click here)

Within the next few decades hopefully plants will start coming online, which is more viable than building Solar or Wind farms. Do the calculations, how many Solar/Wind Farms need to be constructed to equal the output of a single Fission reactor?

Why So Negative?

Fri Mar 12 14:33:15 GMT 2010 by Mike

The concern isn't that electric cars might steal all the power. The concern is that, as this new type of electrical appliance rolls out, there will be sudden changes in demand.

Utilities are paid to avoid blackouts. They're professionally paranoid. Of course, when they aren't paranoid enough, really bad things happen.

As to wind energy, well, it's not really reliable enough for current grids. It's *especially* hopeless at peak loads.

"Smart grids" and "innovative storage mechanisms" are either non-existent, and likely to remain so (smart grids) or horribly inefficient (pumped storage, basically).

An all electric car fleet is going to put *substantial* pressure on existing grids. Ideally, there wouldn't need to be a huge revamp of those grids... hence this article. I thought it was pretty positive, in that light.

Why So Negative?

Sun Mar 14 01:40:32 GMT 2010 by nick

I think its mainly a shout for change in energy politics (grid designs). I mean if you drive on oil or electric, energy has to come from somewhere.

just imagine the oil infrastructure to get it from the middle east (where it funds war / terrorism ) you need to build oil platforms mammoth tanker ship, you need to build gas stations and cars that run on it. Lots of pipes and drill deep. etc etc.

In fact if we had to start from scratch now, choosing directly for electric cars would make much more sense, everywhere where people are there is an electric grid. We need to give it a chance also inside the current grid. (think of how much already has been invested in oil..) .. investments, you do for profit, although this time, we all know that oil is an ending market. People start to loose their interest for it.

And so there is a much larger investment in alternatives..

We can close our eyes for this but also these new investors are going to get return value for their money

So i think, yes these cars put pressure on the grid.

However oil puts pressure on our life environment global warming, in the end its calculating which amount of money (or Change) will give the cheapest way to live, in the cheapest live-able environment. ( i wont see the healthiest cause i don't think we will go for that)

Also Wind power is ideal, for this.

Lets say you use your car on average 3 or 4 hours a day. This means ~20 hours it can be a buffer.

It requires smart-grids sure, and they can be efficient, its no rocket science, in fact we've been already to the moon.

So this article although not that clear in my opinion is an alarm bell for decision makers.

Well lets hope NS is also read by politicians.

Electric Cars

Fri Mar 12 13:56:43 GMT 2010 by Michael

No problem - discrete banks of diesel generators ought to do the trick.

Comments 1 | 2 | 3

All comments should respect the New Scientist House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please use the "Report" link in that comment to report it to us.

If you are having a technical problem posting a comment, please contact technical support.

Plug-in power (Image: Roger Bentley/Rex Features)

Plug-in power (Image: Roger Bentley/Rex Features)

1 more image

ADVERTISEMENT

Shape-shifting polymer pulls off amazing memory tricks

10:00 13 March 2010

The polymer, called Nafion, can "remember" three distinct shapes when heated – the best yet for a shape-memory polymer

Metal mist clears for fusion power

15:30 12 March 2010

A fine mist of toxic metal will not choke off the fusion reactions inside the planned ITER reactor, as physicists had feared

Shoddy construction beats precision in quantum world

19:00 11 March 2010

Instead of striving to eliminate imperfection physicists would do better to inject a bit of randomness into their quantum devices

Robot toddler gets an upgradeMovie Camera

14:40 11 March 2010

See the springier legs and more sensitive hands developed for a toddler-sized robot that will test theories about how flesh-and-blood children learn

Latest news

Shape-shifting polymer pulls off amazing memory tricks

10:00 13 March 2010

The polymer, called Nafion, can "remember" three distinct shapes when heated – the best yet for a shape-memory polymer

Better living through green chemistry

17:51 12 March 2010

For many people, "chemical" is still a dirty word – but wooden trousers, dream creams and mussel muscles are coming to the rescue

Pi day: Five tasty facts about the famous ratio

17:31 12 March 2010

To celebrate Pi day this weekend, New Scientist serves up some lesser-known facts about the famous ratio, from appearances in nature to unusual poetry

Metal mist clears for fusion power

15:30 12 March 2010

A fine mist of toxic metal will not choke off the fusion reactions inside the planned ITER reactor, as physicists had feared

TWITTER

New Scientist is on Twitter

Get the latest from New Scientist: sign up to our Twitter feed

ADVERTISEMENT

Partners

We are partnered with Approved Index. Visit the site to get free quotes from website designers and a range of web, IT and marketing services in the UK.