User talk:Doncram

Check out 0 articles in Category:NRHP dab needing cleanup out of 3,303 articles in Category:Disambig-Class National Register of Historic Places articles overall. Check out 64 articles in Category:NRHP architects, 7 articles in Category:NRHP builders,0 articles in Category:NRHP engineers, Check Grand Forks ND /drafts Check Middlesex CT /drafts Check Williamson TN /drafts Check ThreeBot other /drafts Jonesboro Historic District (Jonesborough, Tennessee) nrhp docs Knights of Pythias Pavilion nrhp docs Talk:Old Town (Franklin, Tennessee) article organization List of Lustron houses devt as table and indiv articles List of S. H. Kress and Co. buildings devt as table and indiv articles Wikipedia:WikiProject Disambiguation/NRHPdabcleanup2010 Talk:Thomas Metcalfe (Kentucky) and related NRHPs of stonemason-governator Fred F. Willson and List of RHPs in Gallatin per User talk:Doncram#Fred Willson (e) Dec2010 vers

Monterey County Jail

Hi Doncram. I just came across the dab page Monterey County Jail which has me scratching my head. Are these really different locations? I can only see one. France3470 (talk) 22:18, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

I'll look into it. The dab page reflects my working from a database. There may have been 2 notable locations, or it may reflect 2 NRHP data entries about the same location (in which case just one article should be created and the dab page should go. --doncram 22:29, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Okay, let me know what you discover. Thanks, France3470 (talk) 22:37, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Resolved, I think, by my starting stub article for one NRHP-listed building. Noted by France3470's edit at the talk page. Further discussion, if needed, at Talk:Monterey County Jail. Thanks. --doncram 16:08, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

Welcome back

Good to see you back! You might consider contributing at Wikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places/Fall 2011 Photo Contest.

I'd love to see you back at WP:NRHP working efficiently and effectively at full speed once again. Smallbones (talk) 01:42, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

Thanks! --doncram 16:08, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

A cupcake for you!

Welcome back! :) ‖ Ebyabe talk - General Health ‖ 03:40, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

Thanks! --doncram 16:08, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

Good to see you're back

It was a nice surprise today to see that you're back. It's been a while. Welcome back! Cbl62 (talk) 05:47, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

Yes, welcome back Doncram! I hope you're well and wish you (an early) Happy Thanksgiving. Best, Markvs88 (talk) 15:27, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

Thanks! --doncram 16:08, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

Welcome back--Pubdog (talk) 01:01, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Sauganash Historic District Talk

Hello,

Over a year ago you "talked" to me and requested some pictures of houses in the Sauganash Historic District. I am so sorry I didn't get back to you earlier, but this is the first time I've logged into Wikipedia for over a year. Yes, I am a member of the Sauganash Community Association Board of Directors. As an association, we did not post any pictures on Flickr. That must have been someone else. I will talk to the rest of the Board to see if I can get any pictures to include on our Wikipedia page. I don't see it being an issue.

Regards. Fleepkay (talk) 01:04, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Residencia Armstrong-Poventud

Thanks for noticing. I actually wanted to take a second look at that and a couple of other articles to ensure everything had been synced right, but you beat me to it. take care, Mercy11 (talk) 02:56, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Dr. Franklin E. Kameny House

Hello! Your submission of Dr. Franklin E. Kameny House at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! SarekOfVulcan (talk) 03:09, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

You're quite right about the length -- my apologies. Review struck. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:04, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Wickham Road Historic District

Actually, the edit comment on Wickham Road Historic District clearly explains that the district is from a single year. Districts are collections that can and do span multiple years. This district contains at least 5 major buildings and an unknown number of smaller buildings. So listing it in one year is simply not correct. Yes, the circa dates are provided. If those really are deemed important enough to categorize, they should be included on redirects for the actual buildings. That allows the buildings to correctly appear in the appropriate year based categories. Listing a district in 5 years, solely to show the completion dates of a few buildings is not correct. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:31, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

First Baptist Church (Phoenix)

Well, that's pretty horrid... Check out this link and scroll all the way in on the GMap. :-( http://www.panoramio.com/photo/2023709— Preceding unsigned comment added by SarekOfVulcan (talk • contribs)

Copyright problems

I've raised the question at Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2011 November 25, per your request.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:01, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

Move warring at Girls' Domestic Science and Arts Building

Please see the result of WP:AN3#User:SarekOfVulcan reported by User:SarekOfVulcan (Result: Move protected). I haven't checked to see if you are under any current restriction, but it does not look good for either you or Sarek to be involved in another edit war. If you have concerns about the correct title for this article, I'm sure you can explain the case for your views on the article talk page. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 02:20, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

So I was looking over your recent edit history

and (1) was pleased to spot a couple of "my" articles there, but (2) also bumping along through some of the others discovered this one Masonic Temple of Des Moines. It is classified at Beaux-Arts and I'm thinking, "No, not really." More like some Georgian or some sort of Renaissance Revival. Something, but not Beaux-Arts. A quick look by you, a thumbs up and down on Beaux-Arts and I'll change it or be on my way. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 02:42, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Hi. I dunno, looks like could be Beaux-Arts to me. :) I justed looked for info in the MPS document for the architectural firm, but find nothing about this building in that, unfortunately. --doncram 03:00, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Shopbell & Company

Hello, Doncram, and thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that some editors are discussing at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shopbell & Company whether the article Shopbell & Company should be in Wikipedia. I encourage you to comment there if you think the article should be kept in the encyclopedia.

The deletion discussion doesn't mean you did something wrong. In fact, other editors may have useful suggestions on how you can continue editing and improving Shopbell & Company, which I encourage you to do. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Help Desk.

Thanks again for your contributions! SarekOfVulcan (talk) 06:55, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXVIII, October 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D analyzes three books from Osprey Publishing Review essay: Nick-D reviews the new Bundeswehr Military History Museum

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 08:04, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Repost of Category:Late 19th and 20th Century Revivals architecture

A tag has been placed on Category:Late 19th and 20th Century Revivals architecture requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead recreating the page. Thank you.

I will remove the speedy deletion tags for reposting material that was deleted in previous discussions. You obviously have additional information that wasn't available or brought up by anyone else, and your objection should be taken to a new CFD for a discussion with a broader audience. Thanks. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 22:24, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Shen Yin Shu

Thanks for your review and recommendation on the DYK nomination. I've made changes to the hook to better match the source. Please check it out. --Zanhe (talk) 00:51, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for your suggestions. I've revised the hook again based on one of them. --Zanhe (talk) 20:19, 29 November 2011 (UTC)