United States presidential election, 1900
|
|
||||
| November 6, 1900 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
 |
 |
|||
| Nominee | William McKinley | William Jennings Bryan | ||
| Party | Republican | Democratic | ||
| Home state | Ohio | Nebraska | ||
| Running mate | Theodore Roosevelt | Adlai E. Stevenson I | ||
| Electoral vote | 292 | 155 | ||
| States carried | 28 | 17 | ||
| Popular vote | 7,228,864 | 6,370,932 | ||
| Percentage | 51.6% | 45.5% | ||
|
|
||||
| Presidential election results map. Blue denotes states won by Bryan/Stevenson, Red denotes those won by McKinley/Roosevelt. Numbers indicate the number of electoral votes allotted to each state. | ||||
|
Previous President President-elect |
||||
The United States presidential election of 1900 was held on November 6, 1900. It was a rematch of the 1896 race between Republican President William McKinley and his Democratic challenger, William Jennings Bryan. The return of economic prosperity and recent victory in the Spanish-American War helped McKinley to score a decisive victory. President McKinley chose New York Governor Theodore Roosevelt as his running mate as Vice President Garret Hobart had died from heart failure in 1899.
Contents |
[edit] Nominations
[edit] Republican Party nomination
Republican candidate:
[edit] Candidates gallery
The 926 Republican delegates to the Republican convention in Philadelphia renominated William McKinley by acclamation. Thomas Platt, the "boss" of the New York State Republican Party, did not like Theodore Roosevelt, New York's popular governor, even though he was a fellow Republican. Roosevelt's efforts to reform New York politics - including Republican politics - led Platt and other state GOP leaders to pressure President McKinley to accept Roosevelt as his new Vice-Presidential candidate, thus filling the spot left open when Vice President Garret A. Hobart died in 1899. By electing Roosevelt to the Vice-Presidency, Platt would remove Roosevelt from New York state politics. Although Roosevelt was reluctant to accept the vice-presidency, which he regarded as a relatively trivial and powerless office, his great popularity among most Republican delegates led McKinley to pick him as his new running mate. Ironically, Roosevelt would be elevated to the Presidency in September 1901 when McKinley was assassinated in Buffalo, New York.
| Presidential Ballot | Vice Presidential Ballot | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| William McKinley | 926 | Theodore Roosevelt | 925 |
| Not voting | 1 |
[edit] Democratic Party nomination
Democratic candidates:
- George Dewey of Vermont, Admiral of the Navy
- William Jennings Bryan of Nebraska, Democratic presidential nominee in 1896
[edit] Candidates gallery
After Admiral George Dewey's return from the Spanish-American War, many suggested he run for President of the United States on the Democratic ticket. However, his candidacy was plagued by public relations missteps. Newspapers started attacking him as naïve after he was quoted as saying the job of president would be easy since the chief executive was merely following orders in executing the laws enacted by Congress and that he would "execute the laws of Congress as faithfully as I have always executed the orders of my superiors." Shortly thereafter he admitted to never having voted in a presidential election. He drew yet more criticism when he offhandedly told a newspaper reporter that "Our next war will be with Germany."[1]
Dewey also angered some Protestants by marrying Catholic Mildred McLean Hazen (the widow of General William Babcock Hazen and daughter of Washington McLean, the owner of The Washington Post) in November 1899 and giving her the house that the nation had given him following the war.[2]
Dewey withdrew from the race in mid-May and endorsed William McKinley.
William Jennings Bryan was easily nominated after Dewey withdrew from the race. Bryan won at the 1900 Democratic National Convention in Kansas City, garnering 936 delegate votes. Former Vice President Adlai Stevenson was nominated for the office again, beating out David B. Hill and Charles A. Towne for the nomination.
| Presidential Ballot | |
| William Jennings Bryan | 936 |
|---|---|
| Vice Presidential Ballot | ||
| Ballot | 1st Before Shifts | 1st After Shifts |
|---|---|---|
| Adlai E. Stevenson | 559.5 | 936 |
| David B. Hill | 200 | 0 |
| Charles A. Towne | 89.5 | 0 |
| Abraham W. Patrick | 46 | 0 |
| Julian S. Carr | 23 | 0 |
| John W. Smith | 16 | 0 |
| Elliott M. Danforth | 1 | 0 |
| James S. Hogg | 1 | 0 |
[edit] Other nominations
The Populist Party, which four years earlier had supported Bryan, split into two factions. One group, the "Fusion" faction, wanted to merge with the Democrats. The Fusion faction held its convention in Sioux Falls, South Dakota and nominated Bryan for President and Charles A. Towne for Vice President (Towne, the national chairman of the Silver Republican Party, later withdrew from the race). The "Middle of the Road" Populists wanted to maintain their identity as a separate political party; they met in Cincinnati and nominated Wharton Barker and Ignatius L. Donnelly. The "Fusion" group was absorbed into the Democratic Party with this election; and though the "Middle of the Road" faction contested two future presidential elections, the Populists were no longer considered a serious political force after 1900. The Socialist Labor Party also divided; the larger faction formed the Social Democratic Party and nominated Eugene Debs for president. This party was renamed the Socialist Party following the election. Both factions of the Prohibition Party fielded candidates, though it was the last campaign of the National Prohibitionists. Other third party candidates included Seth H. Ellis of the Union Reform Party and Jonah F.R. Leonard of the United Christian Party.
[edit] General election
[edit] Campaign
The economy was booming in 1900, so the Republican slogan of “Four More Years of the Full Dinner Pail”, combined with victory in the brief Spanish-American War in 1898, had a powerful electoral appeal. Teddy Roosevelt had become a national hero fighting in Cuba during the war, and as such he was a popular spokesman for the Republican ticket. In his speeches he repeatedly argued that the war had been just and had liberated the Cubans and Filipinos from Spanish tyranny:[3]
Four years ago the nation was uneasy because at our very doors an American island was writhing in hideous agony under a worse than medieval despotism. We had our Armenia at our threshold. The situation in Cuba had become such that we could no longer stand quiet and retain one shred of self-respect…. We drew the sword and waged the most righteous and brilliantly successful foreign war that this generation has seen.
Bryan's campaign was a reprise of his major issue from the 1896 campaign, free silver. It was not as successful in 1900 because of the improved economy, and because gold was being inflated by new production from Alaska and South Africa, thus allowing more paper dollars to enter the national economy. Bryan's second major campaign theme attacked McKinley's imperialism; Bryan argued that instead of liberating Cuba and the Philippines, the McKinley administration had simply replaced a cruel Spanish tyranny with a cruel American one. Bryan was especially harsh in his criticisms of the American military effort to suppress a bloody rebellion by Filipino guerillas. This theme won over some previous opponents, especially "hard money" Germans, former Gold Democrats, and anti-imperialists such as Andrew Carnegie.
Both candidates repeated their 1896 campaign techniques, with McKinley again campaigning from the front porch of his home in Canton, Ohio; at its peak, he greeted sixteen delegations and 30,000 cheering supporters in one day. Meanwhile Bryan took to the rails again, traveling 18,000 miles to hundreds of rallies across the Midwest and East. This time, he was matched by Theodore Roosevelt, McKinley's running mate and the Governor of New York, who campaigned just as energetically in 24 states, covering 21,000 miles by train.
[edit] Philippine–American War claims
The triumph of the American army and navy in the war against Spain was a decisive factor in building Republican support. Democrats tried to argue that the war was not over because of the insurgency in the Philippines, which became their major issue. A perception that the Philippine War was coming to an end would be an electoral asset for the Republicans, and the McKinley administration stated that there were reductions of troops there. Republicans pledged that the fighting in the Philippines would die down of its own accord within sixty days of McKinley's reelection.[4] However, as one lieutenant explained in a letter to his wife, “It looks good on paper, but there really has been no reduction of the force here. These battalions [being sent home] are made up on men…about to be discharged.”[5]
In addition, Secretary of War Elihu Root had MacArthur's September 1900 report which he did not release until after the election.[6] General Arthur MacArthur had been in command of the Philippines for four months, warning Washington that the war was not lessening and that the end was not even in sight. MacArthur believed that the guerrilla stage of the war was just beginning and that Filipinos were refining their techniques through experience. Furthermore, Philippine leader Emilio Aguinaldo’s strategy had popular support. MacArthur wrote:
The success of this unique system of war depends upon almost complete unity of action of the entire native population. That such unity is a fact is too obvious to admit of discussion; how it is brought about and maintained is not so plain. Intimidation has undoubtedly accomplished much to this end, but fear as the only motive is hardly sufficient to account for the united and apparently spontaneous action of several millions of people. One traitor in each town would eventually destroy such a complex organization. It is more probable that the adhesive principle comes from ethological homogeneity, which induces men to respond for a time to the appeals of consanguineous leadership even when such action is opposed to their interests and convictions of expediency.[7]
[edit] Soldier vote
Nonetheless, the majority of soldiers in the Philippines did not support Bryan. Any mention of the election of 1900 in the soldiers' letters and diaries indicated overwhelming support for the Republican ticket of McKinley and Roosevelt. According to Sergeant Beverly Daley, even the “howling Democrats” favored McKinley. Private Hambleton wrote, “Of course, there are some boys who think Bryan is the whole cheese, but they don't say too much.”[8]
[edit] The Election
Despite Bryan's energetic efforts, the renewed prosperity under McKinley, combined with the public's approval of the Spanish-American War, allowed McKinley to gain a comfortable victory. His popular and electoral-vote margins were both larger than in 1896; he even carried Bryan's home state of Nebraska. As in 1896, Bryan did best in the traditionally Democratic "Solid South" and among farmers in the West. Bryan won New York City (Manhattan), but President McKinley won the state of New York, winning all the state's electoral votes.
[edit] Results
| Presidential candidate | Party | Home state | Popular vote | Electoral vote |
Running mate | Running mate's home state |
Running mate's electoral vote |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Count | Pct | |||||||
| William McKinley | Republican | Ohio | 7,228,864 | 51.6% | 292 | Theodore Roosevelt | New York | 292 |
| William Jennings Bryan | Democratic | Nebraska | 6,370,932 | 45.5% | 155 | Adlai Ewing Stevenson | Illinois | 155 |
| John Granville Woolley | Prohibition | Illinois | 210,864 | 1.5% | 0 | Henry Brewer Metcalf | Ohio | 0 |
| Eugene V. Debs | Social-Democratic | Indiana | 87,945 | 0.6% | 0 | Job Harriman | California | 0 |
| Wharton Barker | Populist | Pennsylvania | 50,989 | 0.4% | 0 | Ignatius L. Donnelly | Minnesota | 0 |
| Joseph Francis Maloney | Socialist Labor | Massachusetts | 40,943 | 0.3% | 0 | Valentine Remmel | Pennsylvania | 0 |
| Other | 6,889 | 0.0% | — | Other | — | |||
| Total | 13,997,426 | 100% | 447 | 447 | ||||
| Needed to win | 224 | 224 | ||||||
Source (Popular Vote): Leip, David. 1900 Presidential Election Results. Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections (July 28, 2005).
Source (Electoral Vote): Electoral College Box Scores 1789–1996. Official website of the National Archives. (July 31, 2005).
[edit] See also
[edit] References
- Bailey, John W., Jr. (1973). "The Presidential Election of 1900 in Nebraska: McKinley over Bryan". Nebraska History 54 (4): 561–584. ISSN 0028-1859.
- Bailey, Thomas A. (1937). "Was the Presidential Election of 1900 a Mandate on Imperialism?". Mississippi Valley Historical Review (Organization of American Historians) 24 (1): 43–52. doi:10.2307/1891336. http://jstor.org/stable/1891336.
- Coletta, Paolo E. (1964). William Jennings Bryan. 1. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. ISBN 0803240503.
- Gould, Lewis L. (1980). The Presidency of William McKinley. Lawrence: Regents Press of Kansas. ISBN 0700602062.
- Harrington, Fred H. (1935). "The Anti-Imperialist Movement in the United States, 1898-1900". Mississippi Valley Historical Review (Organization of American Historians) 22 (2): 211–230. doi:10.2307/1898467. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1898467.
- Kent, Noel Jacob (2000). America in 1900. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe. ISBN 0765605953.
- Miller, Stuart Creighton (1982). Benevolent Assimilation: The American Conquest of the Philippines, 1899–1903. New Haven: Yale University Press. ISBN 0300030819.
- Morgan, H. Wayne (1963). William McKinley and His America. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press. ISBN 0873387651.
- Morgan, H. Wayne (1966). "William McKinley as a Political Leader". Review of Politics 28 (4): 417–432. doi:10.1017/S0034670500013188. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1405280.
- Schlup, Leonard (1986). "In the Shadow of Bryan: Adlai E. Stevenson and the Resurgence of Conservatism at the 1900 Convention". Nebraska History 67 (3): 224–238. ISSN 0028-1859.
- Schlup, Leonard (1991). "The American Chameleon: Adlai E. Stevenson and the Quest for the Vice Presidency in Gilded Age Politics". Presidential Studies Quarterly 21 (3): 511–529. ISSN 0360-4918.
- Tompkins, E. Berkeley (1967). "Scilla and Charybdis: the Anti-imperialist Dilemma in the Election of 1900". Pacific Historical Review 36 (2): 143–161. ISSN 0030-8684.
[edit] Notes
- ^ Convention Diary: NRO Total Convention at www.nationalreview.com
- ^ HarpWeek | Elections | 1900 Medium Cartoons at elections.harpweek.com
- ^ [Brands 1997: 400]
- ^ [Miller 1982: 143]; Detroit Evening News, September 7, 1900; San Francisco Call, September 8, 21, 1900; Boston Evening Transcript, September 20, 1900
- ^ [Miller 1982: 148]; Lt. Samuel Powell Lyon to his wife, April 12, 1900, Carlisle Collection
- ^ [Miller 1982: 143, 148]
- ^ [Miller 1982: 150–151]; Literary Digest 21 (1900): 605–606
- ^ [Miller 1982: 187]; Letters of Sergeant Beverly Daley, November 16, 1900, Private Hambleton, March 4, 1900.
[edit] External links
 |
Wikimedia Commons has media related to: United States presidential election, 1900 |
- Opper cartoons for 1900 election ridiculing TR and McKinley as pawns of Trusts and Sen. Hanna
- 1900 popular vote by counties
- 1900 State-by-state Popular vote
- How close was the 1900 election? — Michael Sheppard, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
||||||||
