Tactical High Energy Laser

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

  (Redirected from THEL)
Jump to: navigation, search
THEL/ACTD

The Tactical High-Energy Laser, or THEL, is a laser developed for military use, also known as the Nautilus laser system. The mobile version is the Mobile Tactical High-Energy Laser, or MTHEL.

Contents

[edit] Demonstrator

On July 18, 1996, the United States and Israel entered an agreement to produce a cooperative THEL called the Demonstrator, which would utilize deuterium fluoride laser chemical laser technologies. Primary among the four contractors awarded the project on September 30, 1996 are Northrop Grumman (formerly TRW.) THEL conducted test firing in FY1998, and Initial Operating Capability (IOC) was planned in FY1999. However this was significantly delayed due to reorienting the project as a mobile, not fixed design, called Mobile Tactical High Energy Laser (MTHEL). The original fixed location design eliminates most weight, size and power restrictions, but is not compatible with the fluid, mobile nature of modern combat. The initial MTHEL goal was a mobile version the size of three large semi trailers. Ideally it would be further downsized to a single semi trailer size. However, doing this while maintaining the original performance characteristics is difficult. Furthermore, the Israeli government, which had been providing significant funding, decreased their financial support in 2004, postponing the IOC date to at least 2010.

In 2000 and 2001 THEL shot down 28 Katyusha artillery rockets and 5 artillery shells.

On November 4, 2002, THEL shot down an incoming artillery shell. A mobile version completed successful testing. During a test conducted on August 24, 2004 the system successfully shot down multiple mortar rounds. The test represented actual mortar threat scenarios. Targets were intercepted by the THEL testbed and destroyed. Both single mortar rounds and salvo were tested.

Even though military experts such as the former head of the Administration for the Development of Weapons and the Technological Industry, Aluf Yitzhak Ben Yisrael, were calling for the implementation of the THEL, the project was discontinued.[1] During the 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict, Ben Yisrael, currently the chairman of the Israeli Space Agency, renewed his calls to implement the THEL against high-trajectory fire.

[edit] Countermeasures

In theory certain countermeasures could reduce the effectiveness of THEL. These could include heat hardening and reflective coating of the projectiles, which would increase the necessary laser exposure time. However, THEL has primarily been developed to intercept relatively primitive threats such as homemade Qassam rockets and World War II-era Katyusha rockets, which thus far have not incorporated sophisticated countermeasures.

A review of the types of technologically feasible countermeasures would include (though not be limited to) the following :

  1. Reflective coatings which attempt to reflect a large proportion of the incident radiation which is incident upon the aimed projectiles. This would not necessarily reduce the absorbed incident radiation to such an extent that the projectile is not destroyed - but in combination with other types of countermeasure, reflective coatings would feasibly ensure that target kill is achieved despite the use of THEL.
  2. Modification of projectile geometries to take into account the possibility that laser light radiation might be used to neutralize the projectiles. Such geometries might also be concomitant with the purpose of improving the aerodynamic properties of the projectile - thus ensuring that it can travel faster (and, conceivably, would thus be able to rely upon the increased convective dissipation which is associated with heat transfer between the air and the projectile). Note: This includes the possibility of using projectile shapes which are NOT cylindrical. A different missile form would help to ensure that a minimum cross-section surface area is exposed to laser light.
  3. As is the case in "hyper-cavitating torpedoes", which envelope the torpedo in a gaseous envelope so that they may travel at supersonic speeds underwater, it is also found that the use of similar (supersonic) gaseous envelopes around a missile would ensure that a sufficiently cool gas will carry away proportion of the incident radiation energy which is incident upon the missile by both convective and diffusive effects (ie: partial reflection, partial expansion upon being heated by the laser radiation and partial convection due to the temperature increase, though the latter two could arguably be considered as being of similar effect). This would thus also have the effect of a countermeasure to the THEL system. The enveloping gas/substance can be modified so as to consist of fine droplets which carry away a significant proportion of incident radiation and heat on the projectile as they are vaporised (provided, of course, they are chosen so as to absorb the heat radiation corresponding to the frequency of the incident radiation). Note, the larger the gaseous diameter around a cylindrical projectile (measured in terms of its cross section), the disproportionately larger the amount of incident radiation required by the THEL laser to destroy the projectile (consider the volume of the envelope and the highest level of heat dissipation which this corresponds to).
  4. An oscillating or chaotic trajectory (one which is difficult to predict, but which will still ensure that the target is killed) will increase the difficulties in the use of the THEL system due to guidance. If guided into windy or turbulent environments, such a chaotic trajectory would also ensure that there is more of a turbulent gaseous flow around the missile (though this would be due to the natural movement of air due to the fast moving missile, rather than any specifically designed effect, as in case 3).
  5. Heat Resistant Coating Layers (HRCLs). These are similar to the use of a reflective coating in the sense that coating layers attempt to avoid too much heat causing guidance system malfunction or propellant autoignition within the THEL countermeasure projectile. However, in the case of HRCLs, internal capillaries/coolant mechanisms can be built quite simply into a projective design (consider wrapping the exterior of the projectile in a series of hollow air-pipes which allow air to flow parallel to the fast-moving projectile, but in a manner which does not impede air flow around the projectile - perhaps even aided via the use of a simple internal refrigeration system). Of course the notion of using an internal refrigeration mechanism within a small projectile system is, a priori, not something which seems sensible (though it might very well be economically feasible in the realms of missile design). However, the use of a 'disposable' interior to a THEL type system would ensure that excessively large amounts of heat which are generated due to incident radiation on the missile could be dissipated via the use of 'fall away' layers – such as occurs with the NASA space shuttle as it re-enters the earth's atmosphere (within this type of a design, what occurs is that ceramic heat blocks at the base of the shuttle become red to white hot and are designed to fall off the shuttle, carrying away excess heat with them as they fall – this is clearly a heat dissipation strategy which could be applied as a countermeasure to the THEL type system, and, due to the way in which the heat blocks dissipate large quantities of heat, this method could be applied to artillery as only a thin heat dissipation based ceramic layer would be required for the purposes of carrying away incident heat energy).

Advanced warheads can be protected against almost any atmospheric laser system, but such measures prove increasingly difficult to integrate. As stated above, the intended targets of this missile system will be small, low cost, and low tech devices like shells and improvised rockets.

As a final note, it is seen that knowledge of the use of radiation intensive THEL like lasers within a combat situation at the design stage of a missile ensures that it is possible to make simple (and, perhaps, more ubiquitous) design modifications to missile systems which ensures that it will take orders of magnitude more power (in Watts) of incident laser directed missile radiation in order to destroy a missile than would otherwise be the case. Redesigning propellant exteriors within a projectile, as well as the type of propellant used within a projectile can also increase the amount of energy required to eliminate a projectile using the THEL type system.

No mention is made of the fate of multi-stage projectile systems within this countermeasure system – though it might be imagined that designing a warhead which “dummies” a THEL kill, and then reignites to carry on its previous trajectory after a certain fall time period would be worth consideration for certain types of multi-stage projectile system.

[edit] Further Countermeasures

Other counter measures which can be employed include the use of a vibrating aerospike which increases turbulence in the sheathing surrounding the missile, disrupting the targeting abilities of laser tracking systems upon which the THEL and other anti-missile systems are likely based.

Explosive Reactive Armour (see ceramic sheathing countermeasure above), and cellularised fuel compartments together with "surface sensors" which intelligently modify missile trajectory after detection of targeting radiation which is a component of missile targeting systems could also be used.

The use of dimples and porous coolant sheathing materials to increase disruptive turbulence and provide an active coolant mechanism is also possible, providing that the wicking times of such coolants are sufficiently small.

[edit] See also

[edit] Lasers

[edit] Laser weapons

[edit] References

[edit] External links