Ethnic democracy

Please help improve this article by expanding it. Further information might be found on the talk page. (October 2009)

This article is part of the Politics series
Forms of government
List of government types
Anarchy Aristocracy Communist state Confederation Corporatism Corporatocracy Consociationalism Demarchy Democracy Direct Representative Consensus Despotism Dictatorship Autocracy Military/Military junta Right-wing Authoritarianism Totalitarianism Ethnic democracy Ethnocracy Exilarchy Fascism Federation Feudalism Gerontocracy Kleptocracy Kratocracy Kritocracy/Kritarchy Logocracy Magocracy Meritocracy Geniocracy Minarchism/Night Watchman Monarchy Absolute Constitutional/Limited Diarchy/Co-Kingship Noocracy Ochlocracy/Mobocracy Oligarchy Panarchism Parliamentary Plutocracy Presidential Puppet state Republic Crowned Capitalist Constitutional Federal Parliamentary Dependent head of state Federal Socialist state Sociocracy Supranational union Technocracy Cyberocracy Netocracy Thalassocracy Theocracy Islamic state Theodemocracy Timocracy Tribal Chiefdom Tyranny Union
Politics portal
v • d • e

Ethnic democracy is a political system that combines a structured ethnic dominance with democratic, political and civil rights for all. Both the dominant ethnic group and the minority ethnic groups have citizenship and are able to fully participate in the political process. Ethnic democracy differs from ethnocracy in being more truly democratic. It provides the non-core groups with more political participation, influence and improvement of status than ethnocracy supposedly does. Nor is an ethnic democracy a Herrenvolk democracy which is by definition a democracy officially limited to the core ethnic nation only.^[1]

The term "ethnic democracy" was introduced by University of Haifa sociologist Sammy Smooha in a book published in 1989.^[2]

Contents 1 Model definition 2 Applicability of the model 2.1 Israel 2.2 Latvia and Estonia 2.3 Malaysia 2.4 Slovakia 3 References

[edit] Model definition

Smooha defines eight features that are the core elements of his model of an ethnic democracy^[3]:

1. Ethnic nationalism installs a single core ethnic nation in the state.
2. The state separates membership in the single core ethnic nation from citizenship.
3. The state is owned and ruled by the core ethnic nation.
4. The state mobilises the core ethnic nation.
5. Non-core groups are accorded incomplete individual and collective rights.
6. The state allows non-core groups to conduct parliamentary and extra-parliamentary struggle for change.
7. The state perceives non-core groups as a threat.
8. The state imposes some control on non-core groups.

Smooha also defines ten conditions that can lead to the establishment of an ethnic democracy^[3]:

1. The core ethnic nation constitutes a solid numerical majority.
2. The non-core population constitutes a significant minority.
3. The core ethnic nation has a commitment to democracy.
4. The core ethnic nation is an indigenous group.
5. The non-core groups are immigrant.
6. The non-core group is divided into more than one ethnic group.
7. The core ethnic nation has a sizeable, supportive Diaspora.
8. The homelands of the non-core groups are involved.
9. There is international involvement.
10. Transition from a non-democratic ethnic state has taken place.

[edit] Applicability of the model

The model has been applied by researchers to several countries, with various levels of fit.

[edit] Israel

This section requires expansion.

Sammy Smooha contends that Israel is a model or archetypical ethnic democracy.^[1][4]

[edit] Latvia and Estonia

There is a spectrum of opinion among authors as to the classification of Latvia and Estonia, spanning from liberal or civic democracy ^[5][6] through ethnic democracy^[7] to ethnocracy.^[8] Priit Järve, Senior Analyst at the European Centre for Minority Issues, applied Smooha's model on Estonia and contends that Estonia can be identified as a mixture of ethnic democracy and a system of control.^[3] Two of the eight features of Smooha's model were fully relevant while the remaining features were partially relevant. The first feature, that of ethnic nationalism installing a single core ethnic nation in the state is fully relevant, while the fourth feature of "the state mobilises the core ethnic nation" is not relevant in Järve's view.

The notion that Estonia or Latvia are ethnic democracies has been rejected by some commentators.^[9] On the one hand, the citizenship laws of these countries are not based on ethnic criteria, treating citizens of Russian extract, including a number of people who automatically became citizens because their families have resided there since before 1940, with the same rights as the ethnic majorities^[10][11]. Moreover, non-citizens enjoy social rights on a par with citizens^[12]. On the other hand, given the proportion of minorities without certain political rights (7.5% in the case of Estonia^[13]), Estonia and Latvia may not yet even qualify as ethnic democracies: in Smooha's definition of ethnic democracy, minority groups should enjoy full rights as citizens of the country^[14]. However, given the steady growth of naturalisation and fairly relaxed inter-ethnic relations, Estonia and Latvia may indeed turn into civic democracies in the years to come.

[edit] Malaysia

The neutrality of this section is disputed. Please see the discussion on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until the dispute is resolved. (June 2010)

[edit] Slovakia

Slovak nationalism is grounded in ethnicity and language. "State-building and nation-building in Slovakia are designed to install ethnic Slovaks as the sole nation and to prevent any sign of binationalism. This objective is made clear in the preamble of the Slovak constitution which begins with the following words: “We, the Slovak nation, bearing in mind the political and cultural heritage of our predecessors, the experience gained through centuries of struggle for our national existence and statehood…”^[15]

[edit] References