User talk:Feinoha

This username is an alternate account of Vivio Testarossa. Hello, I am a sockpuppet of User:Vivio Testarossa (formerly known as User:VivioFateFan), for use on public computers and other insecure locations. Feinoha Talk, My master 02:34, 8 July 2009 (UTC) Note all talk page discussions are archived here

Fair Use Statement: Before complaining read this I scan hundreds of related articles at time, and do not have time to add rationales to images that lack them. If it's fair use, and doesn't have a rationale, it gets tagged {{Di-no fair use rationale}}. No exceptions. If I don't know whether it has a rationale or not it goes here. As I am not an administrator, I do not actually delete images. If I make a mistake and tag something as not having a rationale, even though it does, feel free to hit me with a trout.

Contents 1 I am currently scanning for presence of Fair use rationales 2 I have scanned 3 Afc UK Harcore producers 4 20bite: Merge article 5 Userpage protection? 6 Cretan Owl 7 Re: Alien stubs 8 RE:your message 9 Sorry 10 Invitation 11 Copy-pastes of legitimate articles 12 Non-heterosexuals article rewritten 13 SASSCO 14 Quentin Elias 15 Articles for Creation 16 Thank you... 17 AfC news 18 Vandalism 19 I appreciate it... 20 Cut-and-paste moves 21 dont waste my time with pretty pictures 22 Privacy of personal information 23 User:KrAtul 24 Menudo (band) 25 RE: File copyright problem with File:(Az)Xeus.jpg 26 Thank you from (Az)Xeus 27 Rationales 28 OTRS 29 Ease up on the rampant image tagging 30 Your edit to The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past 31 deletable image-caption 32 AfD 33 Re:Coaching 34 Maniac Mansion Article 35 Images 36 New image project 37 Troja (bendi kosovar) 38 Outline collaboration! 39 Elaborate 40 William Miller (criminal) 41 AfD 42 Re: Cataclysm 43 Open proxy reports 44 Talkback 45 Category:Past Proposed Deletion Candidates 46 Future deprecation 47 Who to notify 48 Ping 49 Removal of PROD from Devin Ross 50 Hi 51 Help 52 HELP WITH SOME PROBLEMS ON PUTTING PICTURES ON PROFILE! 53 Confirmation Edit 54 IIHF Page 55 Co-motherhood 56 Douglas Eivind Hall 57 Help Cleaning Up Page Move 58 Page move 59 Yama nashi ochi nashi imi nashi listed at Redirects for discussion 60 Sono Hanabira ni Kuchizuke wo 61 New Article Request. 62 Response at WP:FEED 63 "Clean up" 64 Links you removed

[edit] I am currently scanning for presence of Fair use rationales

[edit] I have scanned

• Category:Bishōjo games
• Category:Super NES games
• Category:Game Boy Advance games
• Category:Nintendo Entertainment System games

wd-3 WikiDefcon Level is Elevated. Back up to ~14 RPM.	9.5 This user page has been vandalized 9.5 times.

.

User:Vivio Testarossa/ToDo /TemplateTest

Archives

Vivio Testarossa- Talk (Main) 1 2 3 4 5 6 P NanohaA'sYuri- talk (Alt) 1 Regarding Felidae Conservation Fund's rejection: some of the material is taken off the Felidae website, but it is also supplemented with other information. Furthermore, as I am the author of this and a lot of the website itself, it is really a copyright violation? If Felidae is writing the article, is it still a violation?, That is my question. Allycatfelidae (talk) 05:06, 4 February 2009 (UTC)Ally Nauer

[edit] Afc UK Harcore producers

Hi, I don't really know much about adding stuff to wikipedia, I tried to add the article http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Submissions/List_of_UK_Hardcore_producers&action=history

The source is discogs which is a fairly reputable site —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.104.227.11 (talk) 20:33, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

[edit] 20bite: Merge article

hi, its me ,20bite. i just want to say hi. hehe.kk contact me please! --20bite (talk) 04:38, 23 July 2008 (UTC)20bite hi, if your reading this, this is 20bite here i want to know how to merge articles, please contact me. ty —Preceding unsigned comment added by 20bite (talk • contribs) 17:37, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Userpage protection?

Hey, I just went ahead and reverted this. I was wondering if you wanted your userpage semi-protected to prevent that happening in the future? Tiptoety ^talk 23:17, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

No problemo, let me know if you change your mind. Cheers, Tiptoety ^talk 23:26, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Cretan Owl

As I said, the policies state that species should be included only in the genus articles. It did say "genus", but it actually is a species; Athene cretensis. The ''Gorgeous Girl''!!! (talk) 00:38, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Alien stubs

Hi - in an attempt to get some form of resolution on the Alien stubs SFD, I've made a new proposal at Wikipedia:Stub_types_for_deletion/Log/2008/February/25#.7B.7BAlien-stub.7D.7D_.2F_Cat:Alien_stubs which you might be interested in looking at. Grutness...wha? 09:11, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] RE:your message

I forgot to log in, and I did not get prompted to add an edit summary. It should properly be removed for WP:NOT compliance, which I;ve already done. 129.108.25.4 (talk) 19:29, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Sorry

Thats okay, I din;t have any particular queries at the moment - what sort of general advice would you have? --Stuartjmanton (talk) 17:34, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Invitation

Hi! maxsch created an RFC for myself User:Florentino floro - Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Florentino floro[1] I would appreciate it if you would take a look. Max created this upon message to my adopting parent User:Diligent Terrier here[2] vis-a-vis the pending User:Diligent Terrier/Florentino floro and Maxschmelling (created on 18:38, 18 May 2008 by Diligent Terrier) Thanks.--Florentino floro (talk) 05:56, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Copy-pastes of legitimate articles

You prodded an article, Alex Sallons, on the grounds that it was a copy and paste of Martin Luther King with few modifications. Articles like that are eligible for speedy deletion under criterion G3 (vandalism) as blatant misinformation, therefore a prod is not required. --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 00:08, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Non-heterosexuals article rewritten

Hi, I've rewritten Non-heterosexuals and would appreciate you revisiting Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Non-heterosexuals to see if your concerns have been addressed. Thank you! Banjeboi 13:32, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

I second Benjiboi's request, and believe your concerns have been addressed. In all fairness, the article clearly didn't assert notability as it was when nominated. However, due to the improvements during the AfD, please consider withdrawing the nomination, per WP:HEY, as well as per WP:AFD which says: If the reasons given in the deletion nomination are later addressed by editing, the nomination should be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an admin. Thank you. — Becksguy (talk) 06:24, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

[edit] SASSCO

[3] is a website and team that has actual sponsors including iKobo, Manpower and Milltech and have a deal with Adidas a team who has their own footballs, with a well known six-a-side football league on Tuesday's and Thursday's with Cups and leagues, a website with 27,000 hits! A u18 team. They play teams like Shildon A.F.C Rutherford A.F.C. They have money to spend, and have many links with well-known companies, they wil be touring Malta in November with details on the site about it. They are a FA Charter afficiated club. A club hosted by a well known hosting service, Red Fox Hosting. A club that could be playing in the Football League in less then 10 years! Also a team that had played in the Tyne & Wear Football League, until the fall of the league. A Archive section going back to 1999! Rivalries as well! Hopefully this piece of text is not regarded as vandalism but regarded as good point to create the article 'Sassco'. Feel free to post on the message board on the Sassco website or on my user talk page, Thanks!!!--FederationKOSOVO (talk) 19:14, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Quentin Elias

Please help me keep an eye out [4]. I am away from Wikipedia about 21 hours a day. Drop me a message if I need to look into anything, or go to WP:AN. Thanks for bringing the COI to our attention. Keegan^talk 05:19, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Articles for Creation

Take a look at the instructions. Let me know if there are other reasons and perhaps they can be included. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:34, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Thank you...

[edit] AfC news

Dear AfC participant,

1. Msgj and Tnxman307 are organising the AfC challenge! It's a little competition to help improve some of the articles created through AfC and we are hoping that everyone will get involved. For level 1, you just need to bring a stub up to Start-class. Level 2 is improving a Start-class article to C-class. And so on. To get involved or for more information please see the competition page.
2. Those of you who haven't reviewed an article recently might not have noticed the new process that was implemented this year. Reviewing articles is now more enjoyable than ever :) You might like to give it a try. All articles waiting for review are in Category:Pending Afc requests. (Please read the updated instructions.)
3. Please consider adding {{AFC status}} to your userpage to keep track of the number of articles waiting for review. At the time of writing we are officially backlogged, so help is needed!
4. There is currently a proposal to bring the Images for upload process under the umbrella of WikiProject Articles for creation. The rationale is that both processes are designed to allow unregistered users to take part more fully in Wikipedia, and partipants in each process can probably help each other.

If you no longer wish to receive messages from WikiProject Articles for creation, please remove your name from this list. Thank you.

[edit] Vandalism

I wanted to vandalize your user boxes to make one of them say "this user is a sex offender" but don't know how. User name one (talk) 05:38, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

[edit] I appreciate it...

Thank you for reverting the edit to my user page. Please be advised that I have received death threats from this user in the past and the most recent edit summary accuses me of murder, so calling it vandalism is misleading/inappropriate/not enough. If you notice any other such "contributions", please revert ASAP, notify oversight immediately and report such abuse to WP:ANI so the user can be blocked as soon as possible to prevent other such problems. — BQZip01 — ^talk 05:00, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Cut-and-paste moves

Hi! Just wanted to clarify something for you when reviewing suspected copyright violations. Your edit here said the two pages were unrelated - what happened is one article was "cut-and-pasted" to another location instead of moved using the "Move" tab. That is usually what has happened when Corenbot says that one Wikipedia article is a copy of another. You can check this in the articles' histories and fix it by either:

• Replacing the content of the new article with a redirect to the old article, and reverting the history of the old article back to before it was cut-and-pasted - this is appropriate if you can't see why it was moved or it was no longer necessary (e.g. to create a disambiguation page for an article that has since been deleted), or
• Tagging the new article with {{db-histmerge|NAME OF PAGE THE ARTICLE WAS CUT FROM}} if the cut-and-paste move makes sense (e.g. fixing a typo) and the page should be moved to the new location properly. An admin will move the existing article to the new location and merge article histories if necessary.

If you come across a real cut-and-paste mess (e.g. a user has cut-and-pasted several articles on top of one another and they've since been edited), you can explain what's happened at the cut and paste move repair holding pen and an admin will fix it. Hope that helps. :) Somno (talk) 05:27, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Thought I would include an example of the first way of fixing cut-and-paste moves, since it was difficult to explain and may have been confusing - a user cut-and-pasted Bigger Than Life into Bigger Than Life (film) and Corenbot posted at suspected copyright violations that "Bigger Than Life (film)" was a copy of "Bigger Than Life". I made Bigger Than Life (film) into a redirect to the original article and reverted the original article back. Somno (talk) 05:35, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] dont waste my time with pretty pictures

Please don't waste my time.... let others who are involved in my arguments deal with this... find some other occupation... peace! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.249.224.61 (talk) 00:28, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Privacy of personal information

I have posted to User talk:Iiidddeeefffeeerrr. You should not have given a warning, let alone a final warning, for [5]. I know you cannot see the user page now that it has been deleted, but you could when you gave the warning. PrimeHunter (talk) 14:13, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] User:KrAtul

Yes, I9 applies to such images (though it might be a good idea to request fair use rationales over deletion in some cases). Have you considered informing the uploader that making a screenshot does not transfer the copyright and that PD-self can only be applied to material they have created from scratch themselves or for material that is a derivative of PD material? Most people are just plainly oblivious to copyright rules. Unless we inform them, it won't improve. - Mgm|^(talk) 12:34, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Menudo (band)

I know this will be a pain but can you review the Menudo (band) page edits that have been done by me over the past months. I sourced the information from NY post and linked one story from a actual news story the clip was on a blog but I was not using the blog info just the news clip. There have been several obvious fans vandal the page, I also think the user from today that started the drama is a Menudo fan.

Just review for nuetral review and revert sourced info if you feel I am correct and/or re-write it in wiki standards.

Thanks so much for your help.--66.229.250.178 (talk) 19:16, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] RE: File copyright problem with File:(Az)Xeus.jpg

I have created this Image myself and have said so in the comments; therefore it doesn't have a license I don't wish to argue with you or the rules of this site its just I looked at the license options when I uploaded the file and I am not sure which of these options I should have chosen, I would appreciate it if you could help me out with this matter by pointing me in the right direction with this issue.--^AzXeus 18:57, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Thank you from (Az)Xeus

I appreciate that I have now resolved the issue Thanks to your help I have added a license to the image and I now know what to do if I want to upload similar images in the future, thank you one last time and I hope wont need you help again ;) --^AzXeus 19:38, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Rationales

I already added in all images used in Microsoft Office 2000 wanted rationales. I too made them all as your first one.㍐ (talk) 17:43, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] OTRS

This is getting annoying. How am I supposed to contact the OTRS to get a copyright-exclusion, exactly? ResMar 22:52, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Ease up on the rampant image tagging

Yo, I'm looking at all these tags you're placing on images and a majority of them are basic stuff like screenshots and game covers. Instead of slapping them with a CSD tag you could take the five minutes, look at their respective articles and add a rationale yourself if the image is warranted. Tbh what you're doing isn't really constructive at all. - 66.19.201.152 (talk) 02:46, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past

I noticed you tagged The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past as having an excessive amount of copyrighted material. As of this typing, the page has box art(required), a screenshot illustrating gameplay(required), a sreenshot illustrating the prologue(probably excessive), the album cover(likely helpful), a page from the graphic novel(could be too much, could be helpful), and a screenshot illustrating the gameplay of Four Swords(helpful). I am unaware of anything else that could be construed as copyrighted material. If the screenshot of the prologue were removed, would that satisfy the tag, or would another image need to go? Larrythefunkyferret (talk) 04:56, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] deletable image-caption

Hi, and thanks for looking after some of the fair use images around Wikipedia. I've improved several fair use rationales on images included on List of characters in Fire Emblem: The Sacred Stones according to your suggestions.

I wanted to point out a minor technicality, though. Your use of {{dfu}} on image pages with disputed rationales is correct, but {{deletable image-caption}} on article pages implies that a disputed fair use rationale is a criterion for speedy deletion (in contradiction of WP:CSD#F6). Instead, you might try a caption like "<small>This image's fair use rationale is disputed. It may be deleted after seven days from the date of the dispute, if uncontested.</small>". Matt Fitzpatrick (talk) 01:42, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Hi. I came over to mention an AfD here, but wanted to point out that "dfu" is a speedy criterion under WP:CSD#F7: "Invalid fair-use claims tagged with {{subst:dfu}} may be deleted seven days after they are tagged, if a full and valid fair-use use rationale is not added." This is likely why {{Di-disputed fair use rationale}} suggests that contributors "Add following to the image captions: {{deletable image-caption}}". Concerns with that should probably be addressed to WT:CSD, since many contributors are likely to follow the directions on the template. :) --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 11:54, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Ah, good catch. Vague templates are vague. Maybe I can suggest an improvement there. Matt Fitzpatrick (talk) 00:15, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] AfD

In case you didn't return to my talk page, I wanted to let you know about the AfD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Same-sex unions in flux, since you expressed an interest in the article. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 11:54, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Re:Coaching

Well, I've been far too busy recently to provide any significant amount of coaching, but the comments I've made in the past (particularly the one when I started the coaching off the top of my head) still stand. Take a set of articles on topics you enjoy and start improving them. If you don't know how, look at GA or FA examples of similar articles. If you still need help, go to the relevant WikiProject and ask for aid. Participation in the normal editing process provides you with knowledge of most of our policies and guidelines and a fairly natural manner as you edit. It's gradual and will take time but is ultimately satisfying (and is the reason we're all here). — sephiroth bcr ^(converse) 08:38, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Maniac Mansion Article

I noticed that you tagged the Maniac Mansion article with the non-free tag. Please let me know what media warrants the tag so I can fix the problem. Thank you. Rzrscm (talk) 01:01, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Images

You know, it would be nice if you added quick rationales to those fair-use game screenshots that are obviously valid, but just lack the rationale. --Apoc2400 (talk) 23:20, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] New image project

Hi. This little form letter is just a courtesy notice to let you know that a proposal to merge the projects Wikipedia:WikiProject Free images, Wikipedia:WikiProject Fair use, Wikipedia:WikiProject Moving free images to Wikimedia Commons and Wikipedia:WikiProject Illustration into the newly formed Wikipedia:WikiProject Images and Media has met with general support at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Files. Since you're on the rosters of membership in at least one of those projects, I thought you might be interested. Conversation about redirecting those projects is located here. Please participate in that discussion if you have any interest, and if you still have interest in achieving the goals of the original project, we'd love to have you join in. If you aren't interested in either the conversation or the project, please pardon the interruption. :) Thanks. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:32, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

P.S. Hi. :) --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:32, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Will you be interested in giving an Editor assistance in Ice Hockey World Championships article. Thank you Andreyx109 (talk) 02:48, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

I'll take a look at it, I can't guarantee I'll be able to solve the problem, but I don't try we'll never know. Thanks for informing me about this. NanohaA'sYuri^{Talk, My master} 22:12, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Troja (bendi kosovar)

Here is a list with all articles about the albanian Metal band Troja:

• [6]
• [7]
• [8]
• [9]
• [10]
• [11]
• [12]

I hope that this articles are good references for my article. More pages are at [13] Goroth 22:28, 11 May 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Goroth (talk • contribs)

It is a beginning I think, but more good references isn't easy to find about Troja, because it is an very unknown band.... But we can use the references from GAZETAEXPRESS and BALKANINSIGHT....I'm very sorry but I don't if SPIRIT OF METAL and the other SITE is useful, too. I don't know that FACEBOOK and the GERMAN WIKIPEDIA ARTICLE about Troja were not good references but it is good to know...THANK YOU =) Goroth 21:44, 13 May 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.233.183.19 (talk)

[edit] Outline collaboration!

As you know, Penubag is working on a banner to advertise the Outline WikiProject. And he's almost done.

The banner prominently presents the "Outline of chocolate", which of course will become the most widely advertised outline as soon as the banner goes live. The first thing many editors will do after seeing the banner is look for that outline.

The problem is, we don't have one.

So that's our first outline collaboration!

I started a draft this morning.

It needs to be finished and moved to the article namespace before we can start using Penubag's banner ad!

Come join in on the fun. It's chocolate!

The Transhumanist    22:07, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Elaborate

I elaborated, but I might have not have explained good enough. It was explained well in this AFD, but it feels odd to link to an AFD to a different article in a nomination. Joe Chill (talk) 16:23, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

[edit] William Miller (criminal)

Pardon me, but is there a reason why you accepted that submission? We are currently in the process of reviewing a large number of AfC submissions in a batch, and although you are free to improve and give comments on the article, I'm curious as to why you accepted it when I was in the middle of modifying it. Thanks! The Earwig (Talk | Contribs) 19:23, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Ah, I didn't see your comment on the batch discussion page. My apologies. The Earwig (Talk | Contribs) 19:27, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

[edit] AfD

Proposing a 7 minute old article for deletion is ridiculous. - Denimadept (talk) 19:25, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Cataclysm

Nah, we're cool. <3 --Yuefairchild (talk) 05:32, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Open proxy reports

Hello. I noticed your report at AIV[14], which is quite lucky because most reports of this type are simply removed without blocking. Open proxies are better reported to WP:OP if there's no particular hurry. It might also be an idea to have a fresh read of Wikipedia:Open proxies. Thanks. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 19:45, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Talkback

TNXMan 11:52, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Category:Past Proposed Deletion Candidates

Hello, Feinoha … I'm not sure how useful this Category will be, but let's see how long it lasts before Some Other Editor takes it to WP:CFD. :-) Happy Editing! — 138.88.43.201 (talk · contribs) _{22:24, 17 September 2009 (UTC)}

Wow … 3,465 pages are in this category (as of today) … I guess a lot of editors are using this template! :-) — 138.88.125.101 (talk) 22:26, 30 October 2009 (UTC) Note that my IP has changed.

[edit] Future deprecation

Could I ask you to clarify your reasoning for these edits: [15][16]? Equazcion (talk) 18:35, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Hello, please see this lengthy RfC and in particular the final conclusion which has instructions for contesting the deletion of specific "future templates" --ThaddeusB (talk) 00:39, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Sorry but I won't undelete the template. Per the RFC it was a valid deletion. Garion96 (talk) 07:36, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Who to notify

Re Wikipedia:Featured article review/Voting system/archive1: please at least notify the nominator mentioned in Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Voting system, along with the top few editors mentioned in the edit count. Eubulides (talk) 20:20, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Ping

I have sent you an e-mail. --Tenmei (talk) 07:01, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Removal of PROD from Devin Ross

Hello Feinoha, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to Devin Ross has been removed. It was removed by Eagles247 with the following edit summary '(signed by Eagles, expand, add infobox, rmv deletion tag)'. Please consider discussing your concerns with Eagles247 before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 08:34, 28 April 2010 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages) 08:34, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Hi

hi! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Force101 (talk • contribs)

how do you add user boxes to your talk pages?--Force101 (talk) 23:12, 28 April 2010 (UTC)Force101

This is a sockpuppet that continues to return to harass people. Personally, I don't believe he should be given any help. Goodvac (talk) 23:21, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Help

Yes, I had noticed and was about to come and thank you. So, thank you! :) KingOfTheMedia (talk) 20:45, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

[edit] HELP WITH SOME PROBLEMS ON PUTTING PICTURES ON PROFILE!

CAN YOU PLEASE HELP ME AND TELL ME HOW TO PUT PICTURES ON YOUR PROFILE!--Iron-Maiden4335 01:29, 13 May 2010 (UTC) Oh but does it have to be from wikipedia?--Iron-Maiden4335 01:36, 13 May 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iron-Maiden4335 (talk • contribs) 01:33, 13 May 2010 (UTC) ok thx for that i will try and if i need help on anything i know i can contact you!--Iron-Maiden4335 01:42, 13 May 2010 (UTC) Well i did but it wont work can you put a picture of this pokemon on my profile please, it is called chikorita ok? thx--Iron-Maiden4335 02:02, 13 May 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iron-Maiden4335 (talk • contribs)

[edit] Confirmation Edit

I confirm that I have requested Account Creation access. Feinoha ^{Talk, My master} 20:55, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for applying to access the account creation tool. I have approved your request. You may now access the tool here. Before you do so, please read the tool's guide to familiarize yourself with the process. You may also want to join #wikipedia-en-accounts on irc and the mailing list. Keep in mind that the ACC tool is a powerful program, and misuse may result in your access being suspended by a tool administrator. Don't hesitate to get in touch with me if you have any questions. Thank you for participating in the account creation process. FunPika 21:02, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Ok sorry i will try my best at putting a picture on my profil--Iron-Maiden4335 21:47, 13 May 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iron-Maiden4335 (talk • contribs)

[edit] IIHF Page

Hey, can you block this moron from editing the IIHF Page? Or what can i do in such cases? Kante4 (talk) 20:38, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. Since you were here longer and i saw you undid his version, i thought i may just ask since i´m pretty new. ;) Kante4 (talk) 20:47, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Co-motherhood

Hello, I am new as a contributor and added a short article on co-motherhood which was immediately suggested for deletion after the same person suggested I change my username, which I did. Here is the discussion on the deletion:

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Co-motherhood From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia < Wikipedia:Articles for deletion Jump to:navigation, search [edit] Co-motherhood Co-motherhood (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log • AfD statistics) (Find sources: "Co-motherhood" – news • books • scholar • images) position paper by WP:COI author UtherSRG (talk) 05:42, 13 May 2010 (UTC) • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. -- JOHN VANDENBERG (CHAT) 07:46, 13 May 2010 (UTC) • Delete It would be better if this was covered in the LGBT parenting article, no reason to fork a specific term. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 07:47, 13 May 2010 (UTC) • Redirect I think by this you actually meen we need redirecting? Deletion meens that there will be no mention of this term at all in Wikipedia. I added the term because it was lacking. If it is searchable after redirection I see that as a good alternative.OKjustchange (talk) 03:48, 14 May 2010 (UTC)— OKjustchange (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. • Redirect to LGBT parenting per Pax Vobiscum. (I don't think deletion is appropriate because this is a plausible search term, and because I don't think Co-motherhood should be a redlink that encourages inexperienced users to write an article there.)—S Marshall Talk/Cont 09:56, 13 May 2010 (UTC) • Delete without redirect. For essay-type papers like this, there is a discussion about adding CSD criteria. — Timneu22 • talk 13:12, 13 May 2010 (UTC) • AfD isn't a vote, so please explain your rationale for the "delete without redirect". I'm aware of the discussion about adding a new CSD criterion, but I haven't felt the need to comment on it because I don't think it'll go anywhere.—S Marshall Talk/Cont 13:24, 13 May 2010 (UTC) • Redirect to LGBT parenting; perfectly valid and useful search-term.--BelovedFreak 13:50, 13 May 2010 (UTC) • Delete and no redirect. Unsourced POV soapbox essay from the very first sentence, with statements like "the spouse of the new mother will legally and morally be considered the father of the child, although he may not be the biological father." Leave the legal and moral judgments to someone else please. While it appears that "co-mother" is a term used in situations where two women have a sexual relationship and both participate in the raising of children in the household, and would be a logical search term, this rant doesn't need to be preserved in a history. Mandsford 14:19, 13 May 2010 (UTC) • If you think this term should be described in a simpler or clearer way, I suggest you edit it. I think this is concise and refers only to facts.OKjustchange (talk) 03:57, 14 May 2010 (UTC)— OKjustchange (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. • Delete as content fork. Uncle Dick (talk) 05:32, 14 May 2010 (UTC) • The reason for this article is that this term is not found or mentioned in any other article as far as I can see. "Content fork" does not apply. OKjustchange (talk)06:06, 14 May 2010 (UTC) — OKjustchange (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. • Delete and redirect per above. Useight (talk) 14:52, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

As you can see, the article was deleted and re-directed to LGBT parenting as some users suggested, but still there is no mention of the term co-motherhood in the article it was re-directed to. As a new contributor I would not wish to edit other peoples articles but I understand you are participating in a group to improve the LGBT parenting article. Please feel free to use my article in editing your article, if you wish:

Co-motherhood From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

When a married heterosexual couple have a child by the use of assisted reproductive technology, the spouse of the new mother will legally and morally be considered the father of the child, although he may not be the biological father. In the same way, homosexual lesbian couples can have children. The role and status of the non-biological mother or co-mother, is called co-motherhood. In some countries, such as the Netherlands and Australia, there is an approximation towards equal legal rights for all parents, regardless of sexual orientation. This includes the right to co-maternity leave and many other rights, responsibilities and obligations assumed by fathers.

[edit] See also LGBT parenting

[edit] External Links http://www.starobserver.com.au/news/2009/11/10/lesbian-parents-win-recognition/18148 [1] http://www.ru.nl/vox/archief/zoek_op_nummer/nummers_%28index/jaargang_4/inhoudsopgave_5/scriptie_piekerende/ [2] http://www.samesexmarriage.ca/legal/qc_civil_unions.htm [3] "The papers and TV here are full of "civil union" and stories of lesbian co-motherhood. The people who appeared at the Commission hearings in Québec said..."

[edit] References [1] [2] [3]

[4] 1. ^ Karla Mason Bergen, Elizabeth A. Suter, Karen L. Daas (July 2006). "About as Solid as a Fish Net": Symbolic Construction of a Legitimate Parental Identity for Nonbiological Lesbian Mothers". 'Journal of Family Communication, Volume 6, Issue 3. pp. 201 - 220. http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~content=a785035755&db=all. "Nonbiological lesbian mothers lack not only biological ties to their children, but have no legal ties..." 2. ^ Machteld Vonk, Molengraaff Institute for Private Law, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands (2004). "One, Two or Three Parents? Lesbian Co-Mothers and a Known Donor with ‘Family Life’ under Dutch Law". 'Oxford Journals, Int. Jnl. of Law, Policy and the Family,Volume 18, Number 1. pp. 103-117. http://lawfam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/18/1/103. "In recent years much attention has been paid to the equal treatment of same-sex couples in the Netherlands." 3. ^ Erin Hadley, M.A. and Jennifer Stuart, Ph.D. (2010). "The Expression of Parental Identifications in Lesbian Mothers' Work and Family Arrangements". 'Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing.. http://pep.gvpi.net/document.php?id=ppsy.026.0042a. "We also find a range of experience in reactions to biological motherhood and co-motherhood." 4. ^ Queensland Government (17 August 2009). "Same-Sex Model Review". Department of Justice and Attorney. http://www.justice.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0015/21633/same-sex-model-review-17-aug-2009.pdf. ""...there is no justification for excluding co-mothers from the Status of Children Act 1996"" Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Co-motherhood"

I think this is important as there are new regulations, official application forms and standardized procedures to apply for co-motherhood in different European countries, so it is not a term which should be left totally unmentioned in an encyclopedia. Please, could you forward this to the LGBT group project? OKjustchange (talk) 10:17, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Douglas Eivind Hall

Why are you playing around with the entry "Douglas Eivind Hall" I am his son and he died shortly before I was born. My mother told me all about him. She was Scottish. She put me up for adoption after I was born in the Gaza Strip, Gaza City. Refael Vardi. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lowellmassachusetts (talk • contribs) 22:16, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

As mentioned on your talk page all article must indicate why someone is notable in order to be included. Also, while I'm sorry to hear that this person died, Wikipedia is not the place for memorials. I hope this helps. Feinoha ^{Talk, My master} 22:25, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Could you please a prayer for my deceased Dad. Tom Cruise looks like him. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lowellmassachusetts (talk • contribs) 22:47, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Help Cleaning Up Page Move

{{Adminhelp}}

Could someone help with the page moves I made when creating the article for WP:AFC, Entanglement (graph measure). I originally moved it to Entanglement (graph mesasure), noticed that the word "measure" was misspelled, so I moved it to Entanglement (graph meassure). After which I noticed that the new page was still misspelled, and finally moved it to the correct title at: Entanglement (graph measure). Feinoha ^{Talk, My master} 00:28, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Give me a minute and I'll clean it up for you. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:29, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Right, I've deleted both typo redirects. You should be able to fix any broken links without admin help, but let me know if anyhting else needs deleting. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:33, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Page move

Did I do it correctly? Joe Chill (talk) 03:34, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Yama nashi ochi nashi imi nashi listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Yama nashi ochi nashi imi nashi. Since you had some involvement with the Yama nashi ochi nashi imi nashi redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). —Farix (t | c) 22:47, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Sono Hanabira ni Kuchizuke wo

Wow, this looks obscure. Although you can't use these as sources, [17] and [18] might give you some better context, or images if you need them. And here is the games' website. Sorry I can't help more, but try the Anime project. Tezero (talk) 16:32, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

[edit] New Article Request.

The link section has a code, what you would type, and what it looks like. i think that it shouldn't look like a redlink, which it does. Maybe we could create a Redirect to another Example Page??? A Word Of Advice From Beastly20: Don't Be Silly, Wrap Your Willy! 00:19, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Right now Name of page is protected against created per WP:SALT. I guess if you really think it would be better to change it from a red link to a blue one, maybe changing the link from Name of page to something like Article. Feinoha ^{Talk, My master} 00:31, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Response at WP:FEED

Whether you came to feed as a result of my plea, or for some other reason, I appreciate the attempt to help. However, I was puzzled by this response:

"Do you have a specific question about the topic? We're not mind readers here."

At the help desk, I expect editors to ask a specific question. However, at the Feedback desk, it is generally understood that the editor is asking for general feedback; in the case of a user draft, such as this, is it ready for main space? Some explicitly ask, but some just post (or attempt to post) the article they have worked on. In this case, User:Liwumi/Ecco2_Corp. (Many new editors don't yet know how to properly link to thee article they've started.) In this case, the editor needs a lot of help.--SPhilbrickT 12:33, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

On a more positive note, thanks for reviewing The National Scout Reserve article. We really could use more reviewers at Feedback, hope you will poke your head in once in a while.--SPhilbrickT 12:44, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

[edit] "Clean up"

I have cleaned up, because the article looked sililar to a list, who exits already. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.73.191.28 (talk) 04:08, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

I took a look at the article after you posted your explanation here. I don't agree with you that the article "looks like a list". I do however, think that the article is getting way too long, and perhaps could be split per the guidelines at WP:SPLIT. Feinoha ^{Talk, My master} 04:21, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

I splitted the article to other: List of the national championships of the SV Dynamo and List of international winning SV Dynamo sports club athletes. Do you agree?--88.73.191.28 (talk) 04:28, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Links you removed

Hello, thanks for leaving a message outlining your concerns about the www.contemporaryartdaily.com links I added to a number of artists' websites. While I understand Wikipedia's need to guard against spam and promotion, I think those links pass the Wikipedia guidelines in that they 1. feature relevant copyrighted media content with permission of the exhibition spaces, 2. display many installation views not easily found elsewhere on the net, including at the galleries' pages themselves (compare, e.g., the images of the Jonathan Monk show at the gallery page and at Contemporary Art Daily) and 3. the links direct to index pages which can automatically update with additional material in the future. If you could elaborate on what you think is inappropriate about the presence of the links, that would be very helpful. 24.15.199.147 (talk) 17:45, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

I removed your links to the Contemporary Art Daily site, based on the the fact that at the time (before you explained it to me), you appeared to be adding them to many articles. I do not have anything against you nor Contemporary Art Daily. I suggest you read Wikipedia:Spam#How not to be a spammer before readding them. If, after reviewing that, you still have more questions please feel free to ask them on my talk page. I hope that made sense. Feinoha ^{Talk, My master} 18:02, 28 October 2010 (UTC)