Wikipedia:Centralized discussion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Centralized discussion
Proposals Discussions Recurring proposals
  • RfC: should the secret ballot method via SecurePoll continue to be used for the upcoming 2010 Arbitration Committee election in December?
  • Straw poll: should lifespans be expressed in years alone at the top of a bio article, where the days/months appear in the body of the article and are not significant per se.
  • RfC: Follow-up to various Sept+Oct RFCs on handling of 'meatpuppetry' in policy. Includes proposal to cover external canvassing with internal canvassing on one page and promote latter to policy.
  • RfC: Proposal to change the icons used for user talk deletion notices.
  • Talk page proposal to refine the WP:V policy section describing best practices in using scholarly and media sources.
  • RfC: How long can an abandoned userspace draft stay before being deleted as a fake article?
  • RfC: Are association football players an exemption to the general notability guideline?
  • Discussion: Should WP:NFCC expressly require that all verbatim uses of non-free text be specifically denoted as quotations?
  • Request for input on the reader ratings extension ("Article Feedback Tool") being tested on some articles.
  • RfC: Should the word "football" be preceded with the disambiguation "code" (association, American, etc.) for all types of football on the first use of the word?
  • RfC: Should users be prohibited from removing a block notice while the block is in effect?

Note: inactive discussions, closed or not, should be archived.
archive • talk • edit • history • watch
Shortcuts:
WP:CD
WP:CENT
WP:CENTRAL

Contents


[edit] Background

Wikipedians frequently discuss proposed changes to Wikipedia policy; these may take the form of new proposals, amendments to existing policies or guidelines, or straw polls. These discussions generally take place on relevant talk pages. They may also occur at Meta-Wiki, on IRC, and on our mailing lists.

Village pump (policy) and Village pump (proposals) provide central areas both for giving notice of discussions elsewhere and for debate itself. Despite regular archiving, these pages tend to grow rather lengthy. It's not always easy to know what issues are active.

[edit] Guidance

Cent is generally used to draw attention to discussions regarding policies, guidelines or other matters that have a wide impact and on which a broad consensus is needed. Announcements, such as for ArbCom elections, etc, are generally done via the Watchlist notice or the Sitenotice. Discussions related to content, including use of infoboxes and templates within a specific topic area, are usually best advertised within the appropriate WikiProjects.

[edit] Listing examples

Shortcut:
WP:CENTNOT

Discussions listed on Cent are about matters that are significant enough to require a broad consensus. See Wikipedia:Canvassing for guidance on the appropriate way to gain attention.

Some discussions may also be listed on Wikipedia:Requests for comment.

Appropriate
Inappropriate

[edit] How to list

[edit] When to archive

[edit] Cautions

Like any tool, this may be misused. Kindly exercise restraint, assume good faith, and allow process to take its course. Please don't add new policy ideas indiscriminately; trial balloons are better floated at Village pump (proposals). This template should be reserved for ongoing discussions. Remember, its usefulness is in inverse proportion to its size.

Before joining a debate, it might be wise to gather some background, especially on complex or long-standing issues. Please be courteous to your fellow editors and read existing discussion before adding your own comment. It's hoped that {{cent}} will contribute to the opening of policy debate and the broadening of consensus; but of course no good purpose is served by uninformed comment. Stay cool.

[edit] Documentation

[edit] See also

Personal tools
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox
Print/export