Paul the Apostle

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Paul of Tarsus)
Jump to: navigation, search
Paul the Apostle

Ananias restores the sight of Saint Paul.
A 1631 painting by Pietro Cortona.
Apostle to the Gentiles
Born c. 5 [1]
 in Tarsus[Acts 22:3]
Died c 67[2]
 in Rome[2]
Venerated in All Christianity
Major shrine Basilica of Saint Paul Outside the Walls
Feast January 25 (The Conversion of Paul)
February 10 (Feast of Saint Paul's Shipwreck in Malta)
June 29 (Feast of Saints Peter and Paul)
November 18 (Feast of the dedication of the basilicas of Saints Peter and Paul)
Attributes sword
Patronage Missions; Theologians; Gentile Christians;
St.Paul preaching in Beroia, a contemporary mosaic in Veria

Paul the Apostle, also called the Apostle Paul, Paul of Tarsus, and Saint Paul, (Ancient Greek: Σαούλ (Saul), Σαῦλος (Saulos), and Παῦλος (Paulos); Latin: Paulus or Paullus; Hebrew: שאול התרסיŠaʾul HaTarsi (Saul of Tarsus)[3] (c. 5 - c. 67 ),[2] was a Jew[4] who referred to himself as the "Apostle to the Gentiles".[Rom 11:13]

According to the Acts of the Apostles, his conversion to faith in Jesus  took place in a profound life-changing experience on the road to Damascus. Together with Simon Peter and James the Just, he is considered among the most notable of early Christian leaders.[5] He was also a Roman citizen—a fact that afforded him a privileged legal status with respect to laws, property, and governance.[4][6]

Thirteen epistles, or letters, in the New Testament are attributed to Paul. Within these epistles other letters are referenced that do not appear in the Bible, such as a Laodicean epistle.[Col. 4:1]

His authorship of six of the thirteen is questioned by some scholars,[7] three of which are widely thought not to be his work.[8] Paul's influence on Christian thinking arguably has been more significant than any other New Testament author.[7] Augustine of Hippo developed Paul's idea that salvation is based on faith and not works.[7] Martin Luther's interpretation of Paul's writings heavily influenced Luther's doctrine of sola fide.

Paul's conversion dramatically changed the course of his life. Through his activity and writings, his beliefs eventually changed religious belief and philosophy throughout the Mediterranean basin. His leadership, influence and legacy led to the formation of communities dominated by gentile groups that adhered to the Judaic "moral code" but relaxed or abandoned the "ritual" obligations of the Mosaic law on the basis of the life and works of Jesus Christ and the New Covenant. These communities eventually formed Christianity, in the split of early Christianity and Judaism.

Contents

[edit] Sources of information

Conversion of Saint Paul, a fresco by Michelangelo

The Book of Acts contains an account of Paul's travels and deeds, his conflicts with Pagans and Jews, and his interactions with apostles. It was written from a perspective of reconciliation between Pauline Christians and their opponents, and portrays Paul as a law-abiding Jewish Christian and omits his dispute with Peter. A primary source for historical information about Paul's life is the material found in his seven letters. However, these letters contain comparatively little information about Paul's past. Acts leaves several parts of Paul's life out of its narrative, such as his (alleged) execution in Rome.[9]

Scholars such as Hans Conzelmann and 20th century theologian John Knox (not the 16th century John Knox) dispute the historical reliability of the Acts of the Apostles.[10][11] Paul's own account of his background is found particularly in Galatians. According to some scholars, the account in Acts of Paul visiting Jerusalem[Acts 11:27-30]

contradicts the account in Paul's letters.[9] (Please see the full discussion in the Acts of the Apostles article). Some scholars consider Paul's accounts to be more reliable than those found in Acts.[12]

[edit] Names

Paul shares his original Hebrew name Saul, meaning "asked for", with the Biblical King Saul, a fellow Benjaminite and the first king of Israel, who was replaced by King David, of the tribe of Judah. Usage of "Paul" is first recorded in Acts when he begins his first missionary journey into a new territory. In Acts 13:6-13 , we are told of Paul speaking to Sergius Paulus, a Roman official. Paulus was a Roman surname, and apparently Paul adopted it as his first name. Although it is a common belief that Paul changed his name when he adopted Christianity, there is no evidence to support it.

[edit] Personality

Another common belief is that Paul wrote his letters by hand, but scholars think Paul likely dictated epistles through a secretary or amanuensis,[13][14] for example Romans 16:22 cites a scribe named Tertius. The practice among 1st-century scribes would usually be to paraphrase the gist of the author's message.[13] The Pauline epistles often claim that he was not an eloquent public speaker.[15] Paul was also bothered by a "thorn" (2 Cor 12:7) which scholars debate as to its possible meaning.

[edit] Prior to conversion

Paul, whose Hebrew name was Saul,[16] was "of the people of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, a Hebrew of Hebrews; in regard to the law, a Pharisee.”[Phil. 3:5]

Acts identifies Paul as from the Mediterranean city of Tarsus (in present-day south-central Turkey), well-known for its intellectual environment. Acts also quotes Paul as saying he was "a Pharisee, the son of a Pharisee".[Acts 23:6]


Paul confesses to having “violently persecuted” the “church of God” prior to his conversion.[17] He was well respected by everyone and advancing in stature within Judaism's Jerusalem Temple leadership before he came to the decision that Jesus, by his resurrection from the dead, was actually The Lord and The Messiah.[Rom. 1:3-4]


[edit] Conversion and mission

Geography relevant to Paul's life, stretching from Jerusalem to Rome.
Statue of Saint Paul in Damascus

Paul's conversion can be dated to 33 - 36[18][19][20] by his reference to it in one of his letters.[9] According to the Acts of the Apostles, his conversion (or metanoia) took place on the road to Damascus where he experienced a vision of the resurrected Jesus after which he was temporarily blinded.[Acts 9:1-31]

[22:1-22]
[26:9-24]
This event is the source of the phrase Pauline conversion.

[edit] Post-conversion testimony

In the opening verses of Romans 1 , Paul provides a litany of his own apostolic claim and his post-conversion convictions about the risen Christ:

Paul's writings give some insight into his thinking regarding his former place in Judaism. He is strongly critical both theologically and empirically of claims of moral or lineal superiority [2:16-26]

of Jews while conversely strongly sustaining the notion of a special place for the Children of Israel.[9-11]
His aggressive and authoritative writing style, even when addressing the supposed "super-apostles",[11]
some of whom would have had far more persuasive claims to apostleship, having known Jesus during his lifetime, suggests that Paul's stature in Judaism and the Temple leadership must have been quite high.

Paul asserted that he received the Gospel not from any person, but by a personal revelation of Jesus Christ.[Gal 1:11–16]

 Paul claimed independence from the "mother church" in Jerusalem[12]  (possibly in the Cenacle), but was just as quick to claim agreement with it on the nature and content of the gospel.[Gal 1:22-24]


[edit] Early ministry

After his conversion, Paul went to Damascus, where Acts states he was healed of his blindness and baptized by Ananias of Damascus.[22] Paul says that it was in Damascus that he barely escaped death [2Cor. 11:32] . Paul also says that he then went first to Arabia, and then came back to Damascus.[Gal. 1:17]

He describes in Galatians how three years after his conversion he went to Jerusalem. There he met James and stayed with Simon Peter for 15 days.[Gal. 1:13–24]


The house believed to be of Ananias of Damascus in Damascus
Bab Kisan, believed to be where Paul escaped from persecution in Damascus

There is no explicit written record that Paul had known Jesus personally prior to the Crucifixion yet it is unlikely that he was not acutely aware of Jesus' ministry or his trial before the Chief Priest. Paul asserted that he received the Gospel not from any person, but by the revelation of Jesus Christ.[Gal. 1:11–12] . Paul claimed almost total independence from the "mother church" in Jerusalem.[12] and yet was eager and diligent to bring material support from the various budding Gentile churches that he planted to the less affluent mother church at Jerusalem. In his writings Paul persistently relied on the persecutions he endured both physical beatings and viscous slanders, from Jews and Gentiles to claim proximity and union with Jesus and as an irrefutable validation of his preaching and teaching.

Paul's narrative in Galatians states that 14 years after his conversion he went again to Jerusalem.[Gal. 2:1–10]

It is not completely known what happened during these so-called "unknown years," but both Acts and Galatians provide some partial details.[23] At the end of this time, Barnabas went to find Paul and brought him back to Antioch. [Acts 11:26]


When a famine occurred in Judea, around 45–46,[24] Paul and Barnabas journeyed to Jerusalem to deliver financial support from the Antioch community.[25] According to Acts, Antioch had become an alternative center for Christians following the dispersion of the believers after the death of Stephen. It was in Antioch that the followers of Jesus were first called "Christians."[Ac. 11:26]


[edit] First missionary journey

Luke, the writer of the Acts,[26] arranges Paul's travels into three separate journeys. The first journey,[Ac 13-14]

led initially by Barnabas, takes Paul from Antioch to Cyprus then southern Asia Minor (Anatolia), and back to Antioch. In Cyprus, Paul rebukes and blinds Elymas the magician[Ac 13:8-12]
who was criticizing their teachings. From this point on, Paul is described as the leader of the group.[27] Antioch served as a major Christian center for Paul's evangelizing.[28]

[edit] Council of Jerusalem

Icon of James the Just, whose judgment was adopted in the Apostolic Decree of Acts 15:19-29 , c. 50.

Most scholars agree that a vital meeting between Paul and the Jerusalem church took place some time in the years 48 to 50,[9] described in Acts 15:2

and usually seen as the same event mentioned by Paul in Galatians 2:1

.[9] The key question raised was whether Gentile converts needed to be circumcised.[29] At this meeting, Peter, James, and John accepted Paul's mission to the Gentiles. See also Circumcision controversy in early Christianity.

Jerusalem meetings are mentioned in Acts, in Paul's letters, and some appear in both.[30] For example, the Jerusalem visit for famine relief[Acts 11:27–30]

apparently corresponds to the "first visit" (to Cephas and James only).[Gal. 1:18–20]

[30] F. F. Bruce suggested that the "fourteen years" could be from Paul's conversion rather than the first visit to Jerusalem.[31]

[edit] Incident at Antioch

Despite the agreement achieved at the Council of Jerusalem as understood by Paul, Paul recounts how he later publicly confronted Peter, also called the "Incident at Antioch" over Peter's reluctance to share a meal with Gentile Christians in Antioch.[32]

Writing later of the incident, Paul recounts: "I opposed [Peter] to his face, because he was clearly in the wrong". Paul reports that he told Peter: "You are a Jew, yet you live like a Gentile and not like a Jew. How is it, then, that you force Gentiles to follow Jewish customs?"[Gal. 2:11–14]

Paul also mentions that even Barnabas (his traveling companion and fellow apostle until that time) sided with Peter.[33]

The final outcome of the incident remains uncertain. The Catholic Encyclopedia states: "Paul's account of the incident leaves no doubt that Peter saw the justice of the rebuke." In contrast, L. Michael White's From Jesus to Christianity claims: "The blowup with Peter was a total failure of political bravado, and Paul soon left Antioch as persona non grata, never again to return."[34]

The primary source for the Incident at Antioch is Paul's letter to the Galatians.

[edit] Visits to Jerusalem in Acts and the epistles

This table is adapted from White, From Jesus to Christianity.[30] Note that the matching of Paul's travels in the Acts and the travels in his Epistles is done for the reader's convenience and is not approved of by all scholars.

Acts Epistles
    • "after many days" of Damascus conversion
    • preaches openly in Jerusalem with Barnabas
    • meets apostles
    • sees only Cephas (Peter) and James

,[Acts 12:25]

    • for famine relief
  • There is debate over whether Paul's visit in Galatians 2 refers to the visit for famine relief (Acts 11:30, 12:25) or the Jerusalem Council (Acts 15). If it refers to the former, then this was the trip made "after an interval of fourteen years" (Gal. 2:1).
    • 14 years later (after Damascus conversion?)
    • with Barnabas and Titus
    • possibly the "Council of Jerusalem"
    • Paul agrees to "remember the poor"
    • followed by confrontation with Peter and Barnabas in Antioch[Gal. 2:11–14]
    • to "greet the church"
  • Apparently unmentioned.
    • to bring gifts for the poor and to present offerings
    • Paul arrested
  • Another[36] visit to Jerusalem[37]
    • to deliver the collection for the poor

[edit] Resumed mission

Around 50-52, Paul spent 18 months in Corinth.[9] The reference in Acts to proconsul Gallio helps ascertain this date.[9] Here he worked with Silas and Timothy.[9]

After Corinth, the next major center for Paul's activities was Ephesus.[9] Ephesus was an important center for early Christianity from the year 50, see also Early centers of Christianity#Western Anatolia. From 52 to 54, Paul lived here, working with the congregation and apparently organizing missionary activity into the hinterlands.[38] Paul's time here was marked by disturbances and possibly imprisonment. Finally, he was forced to leave.[9]

Next, he traveled to Macedonia[39] before going probably to Corinth for three months (56-57) before his final visit to Jerusalem.[9] Though Paul wrote that he visited Illyricum, he meant what would now be called Illyria Graeca[40] that was part of the Roman province of Macedonia, which is now modern day Albania.[41]

[edit] Arrest and death

Saint Paul arrested, early 1900s Bible illustration

Paul arrived in Jerusalem in 57 with a collection of money for the congregation there.[9] Acts reports that the church welcomed Paul gladly, but it was apparently a proposal of James that led to his arrest.[9] Paul caused a stir when he appeared at the Temple, and he escaped being killed by the crowd by being taken into custody.[9] He was held as a prisoner for two years in Caesarea until a new governor reopened his case in 59.[9] When accused of treason, he appealed to Caesar, claiming his right as a citizen of Rome to appear there before a proper court and to defend himself of the charges.[9]

The Acts recounts that on the way to Rome he was shipwrecked on "Melite" (Malta),[9] [Acts 28:1]

where he was met by Publius[Acts 28:7]
and the islanders, who showed him "unusual kindness".[Acts 28:2]
He arrived in Rome c 60 and spent two years under house arrest.[9][Acts 28:16]
All told, during his ministry the Apostle Paul spent roughly 5½ to 6 years as a prisoner or in prison.

Irenaeus of Lyons in the 2nd century believed that Peter and Paul had been the founders of the Church in Rome and had appointed Linus as succeeding bishop.[42] Though not a bishop of Rome, Paul is highly responsible for bringing Christianity to Rome.

Saint Paul's beheading. Painting by Enrique Simonet in 1887

Neither the Bible nor other history says how or when Paul died. According to Christian tradition, Paul was beheaded in Rome during the reign of Nero around the mid-60s at Tre Fontane Abbey (English: Three Fountains Abbey).[citation needed] By comparison, tradition has Peter being crucified upside-down. Paul's Roman citizenship accorded him the more merciful death by beheading.[43]

In June 2009, Pope Benedict announced excavation results concerning the tomb of Paul at the Basilica of Saint Paul Outside the Walls. The sarcophagus itself was not opened but was examined by means of a probe. It revealed pieces of incense and purple and blue linen as well as small bone fragments. The bone was radiocarbon dated to the 1st to 2nd century. According to the Vatican, this seems to confirm the tradition of the tomb being Paul's.[44]

[edit] Roman citizenship

The basis of Paul's Roman citizenship is reported in various and many chapters of the Book of Acts:

. But Paul said to the officers: "They beat us publicly without a trial, even though we are Roman citizens, and threw us into prison. And now do they want to get rid of us quietly? No! Let them come themselves and escort us out." The officers reported this to the magistrates, and when they heard that Paul and Silas were Roman citizens, they were alarmed. They came to appease them and escorted them from the prison, requesting them to leave the city.

- As they stretched him out to flog him, Paul said to the centurion standing there, "Is it legal for you to flog a Roman citizen who hasn't even been found guilty?" When the centurion heard this, he went to the commander and reported it. "What are you going to do?" he asked. "This man is a Roman citizen." The commander went to Paul and asked, "Tell me, are you a Roman citizen?" "Yes, I am," he answered. Then the commander said, "I had to pay a big price for my citizenship." "But I was born a citizen," Paul replied. Those who were about to question him withdrew immediately. The commander himself was alarmed when he realized that he had put Paul, a Roman citizen, in chains.
 - Then he called two of his centurions and ordered them, "Get ready a detachment of two hundred soldiers, seventy horsemen and two hundred spearmen[b] to go to Caesarea at nine tonight. Provide mounts for Paul so that he may be taken safely to Governor Felix." He wrote a letter as follows: Claudius Lysias, To His Excellency, Governor Felix: Greetings. This man was seized by the Jews and they were about to kill him, but I came with my troops and rescued him, for I had learned that he is a Roman citizen.

- If, however, I am guilty of doing anything deserving death, I do not refuse to die. But if the charges brought against me by these Jews are not true, no one has the right to hand me over to them. I appeal to Caesar!" After Festus had conferred with his council, he declared: "You have appealed to Caesar. To Caesar you will go!" Only Roman citizens could appeal directly to Caesar.

- Festus said: "King Agrippa, and all who are present with us, you see this man! The whole Jewish community has petitioned me about him in Jerusalem and here in Caesarea, shouting that he ought not to live any longer. I found he had done nothing deserving of death, but because he made his appeal to the Emperor I decided to send him to Rome. Again, only Roman citizens could appeal directly to Caesar.

- Agrippa said to Festus, "This man could have been set free if he had not appealed to Caesar." Again, only Roman citizens could appeal directly to Caesar.

[edit] Writings

Thirteen epistles in the New Testament are traditionally attributed to Paul, of which seven are almost universally accepted, three are considered in some academic circles as other than Pauline for textual and grammatical reasons, and the other three are in dispute in those same circles.[45] Paul apparently dictated all his epistles through a secretary (or amanuensis), who would usually paraphrase the gist of his message, as was the practice among 1st-century scribes.[13][14] These epistles were circulated within the Christian community, where they were read aloud by members of the church along with other works. Paul's epistles were accepted early as scripture and later established as Canon of Scripture. Critical scholars regard Paul's epistles (written 50-62)[28] to be the earliest-written books of the New Testament. They are referenced as early as c. 96 by Clement of Rome.[46]

[edit] Authorship

Paul Writing His Epistles, 16th century (Blaffer Foundation Collection, Houston, Texas).

Paul's letters are largely written to churches which he had visited; he was a great traveler, visiting Cyprus, Asia Minor (modern Turkey), mainland Greece, Crete, and Rome. His letters are full of expositions of what Christians should believe and how they should live. He does not tell his correspondents (or the modern reader) much about the life of Jesus; his most explicit references are to the Last Supper[1 Cor. 11:17-34]

and the crucifixion and resurrection.[1 Cor. 15]
His specific references to Jesus' teaching are likewise sparse,[1 Cor. 7:10-11]
[9:14]
raising the question, still disputed, as to how consistent his account of the faith is with that of the four canonical Gospels, Acts, and the Epistle of James. The view that Paul's Christ is very different from the historical Jesus has been expounded by Adolf Harnack among many others. Nevertheless, he provides the first written account of what it is to be a Christian and thus of Christian spirituality.

Of the thirteen letters traditionally attributed to Paul and included in the Western New Testament canon, there is little or no dispute that Paul actually wrote at least seven, those being Romans, First Corinthians, Second Corinthians, Galatians, Philippians, First Thessalonians, and Philemon. Hebrews,( No relation to the Gospel according to the Hebrews) which was ascribed to him in antiquity, was questioned even then, never having an ancient attribution, and in modern times is considered by most experts as not by Paul (see also Antilegomena). The authorship of the remaining six Pauline epistles is disputed to varying degrees.

The authenticity of Colossians has been questioned[47] on the grounds that it contains an otherwise unparalleled description (among his writings) of Jesus as 'the image of the invisible God,' a Christology found elsewhere only in John's gospel. On the other hand, the personal notes in the letter connect it to Philemon, unquestionably the work of Paul. Internal evidence shows close connection with Philippians.[48] Ephesians is a very similar letter to Colossians, but is almost entirely lacking in personal reminiscences. Its style is unique. It lacks the emphasis on the cross to be found in other Pauline writings, reference to the Second Coming is missing, and Christian marriage is exalted in a way which contrasts with the reference in 1 Cor. 7:8-9 . Finally, according to R.E. Brown, it exalts the Church in a way suggestive of a second generation of Christians, 'built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets' now past.[49] The defenders of its Pauline authorship argue that it was intended to be read by a number of different churches and that it marks the final stage of the development of Paul of Tarsus's thinking. It has to be noted, too, that the moral portion of the Epistle, consisting of the last two chapters has the closest affinity with similar portions of other Epistles, while the whole admirably fits in with the known details of St. Paul's life, and throws considerable light upon them.[48]

Russian Orthodox icon of the Apostle Paul, 18th century (Iconostasis of Transfiguration Church, Kizhi Monastery, Karelia, Russia).
Saint Paul, Byzantine ivory relief, 6th - early 7th century (Musée de Cluny)

The Pastoral Epistles, 1 and 2 Timothy, and Titus have likewise been put in question as Pauline works. Three main reasons are advanced: first, their difference in vocabulary, style and theology from Paul's acknowledged writings; Defenders of the authenticity note, that they were then probably written in the name and with the authority of the Apostle by one of his companions, to whom he distinctly explained what had to be written, or to whom he gave a written summary of the points to be developed, and that when the letters were finished, St. Paul read them through, approved them, and signed them.[48] Secondly, the difficulty in fitting them into Paul's biography as we have it.[50] They, like Colossians and Ephesians, were written from prison but suppose Paul's release and travel thereafter. However, Christianity was not yet declared a religio illicita at the time they were written, and according to Roman law there was nothing deserving of death against him.[48] Finally, the concerns expressed are very much the practical ones as to how a church should function. They are more about maintenance than about mission[citation needed].

2 Thessalonians, like Colossians, is questioned on stylistic grounds, with some[citation needed] noting, among other peculiarities, a dependence on 1 Thessalonians yet a distinctiveness in language from the Pauline corpus. This, again, is explainable by the possibility of St. Paul requesting one of his companions to write the letter for him under his instructions.[48]

[edit] Atonement

Paul wrote down much of the theology of atonement.[51] Paul taught that Christians are redeemed from the Law (see Supersessionism) and from sin by Jesus' death and resurrection.[51] His death was an expiation; as well as a propitiation, and by Christ's blood, peace is made between God and man.[51] By baptism, a Christian shares in Jesus' death and in his victory over death, gaining, as a free gift, a new, justified status of sonship.[51]

[edit] Relationship with Judaism

Some scholars see Paul (or Saul) as completely in line with 1st-century Judaism (a "Pharisee" and student of Gamaliel), others see him as opposed to 1st-century Judaism (see Marcionism), while still others see him as somewhere in between these two extremes, opposed to "Ritual Laws" (see for example Circumcision controversy in early Christianity) but in full agreement on "Divine Law". These views of Paul are paralleled by the views of Biblical law in Christianity.

Paul's theology of the gospel accelerated the separation of the messianic sect of Christians from Judaism, a development contrary to Paul's own intent.[9] He wrote that the faith of Christ was alone decisive in salvation for Jews and Gentiles alike, making the schism between the followers of Christ and mainstream Jews inevitable and permanent.[9] He successfully argued that Gentile converts did not need to become Jews, get circumcised, follow Jewish dietary restrictions, or otherwise observe Mosaic laws.[9] Nevertheless, in Romans he insisted on the positive value of the Law, as a moral guide.

E. P. Sanders' publications[52] have since been taken up by Professor James Dunn who coined the phrase "The New Perspective on Paul"[53] and N.T. Wright,[54] the Anglican Bishop of Durham. Wright, noting a difference between Romans and Galatians, the latter being much more positive about the continuing covenant between God and his ancient people than the former, contends that works are not insignificant but rather proof of attaining the redemption of Jesus Christ by grace (free gift received by faith)[Rom. 2:13ff]

and that Paul distinguishes between works which are signs of ethnic identity and those which are a sign of obedience to Christ.

[edit] World to come

Paul believed that Jesus would return within his lifetime.[16] He expected that Christians who had died in the mean time would be resurrected to share in God's kingdom, and he believed that the saved would be transformed, assuming supernatural bodies.[16]

Paul's teaching about the end of the world is expressed most clearly in his letters to the Christians at Thessalonica. Heavily persecuted, it appears that they had written asking him first about those who had died already, and, secondly, when they should expect the end. He assures them that the dead will rise first and be followed by those left alive.[1 Thes. 4:16ff]

This suggests an imminence of the end but he is unspecific about times and seasons, and encourages his hearers to expect a delay.[55] The form of the end will be a battle between Jesus and the man of lawlessness[2 Thess. 2:3]
whose conclusion is the triumph of Christ.

[edit] Role of women

A verse in the first letter to Timothy,[1 Tim 2:12 KJV]

traditionally attributed to Paul, is often used as the main biblical authority for prohibiting women from becoming ordained clergy and or holding certain other positions of ministry and leadership in Christianity, though Paul's authorship of this letter is debated. The Letter to Timothy is also often used by many churches to deny women a vote in church affairs, reject women from serving as teachers of adult Bible classes, prevent them from serving as missionaries, and generally disenfranchise women from the duties and privileges of church leadership.[56] The apparent message of this verse may seem anachronistic to 21st century Western societies with their emphasis on gender egalitarianism and non-discrimination.

11Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection.
12But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.
13For Adam was first formed, then Eve.
14And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression.

1 Timothy 2:11-14, KJV

The KJV translation of this passage seems to be saying that women in the churches are to have no leadership roles vis a vis men.[57] Whether it also forbids women from teaching children and women is dubious as even those Catholic churches that prohibit female priests, permit female abbesses to teach and exercise authority over other females. Any interpretation of this portion of Scripture must wrestle with the theological, contextual, syntactical, and lexical difficulties embedded within these few words.[58] Fuller Seminary theologian J. R. Daniel Kirk finds evidence in Paul’s letters of a much more inclusive view of women. He writes that Romans 16

is a tremendously important witness to the important role of women in the early church. Paul praises Phoebe for her work as a deacon and Junia who was (according to some scholars) an Apostle. Kirk points to recent studies that have led "many scholars" to conclude that the passage in 1 Corinthians 14
ordering women to "be silent" during worship was a later addition, apparently by a different author, and not part of Paul’s original letter to Corinth. His third example is Galatians 3:28
"There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus (italics added). In pronouncing an end within the church to the divisions which are common in the world around it, he concludes by highlighting the fact that "...there were New Testament women who taught and had authority in the early churches, that this teaching and authority was sanctioned by Paul, and that Paul himself offers a theological paradigm within which overcoming the subjugation of women is an anticipated outcome."[59]
The conversion on the way to Damascus, by Caravaggio.

[edit] Influence on Christianity

Paul's influence on Christian thinking arguably has been more significant than any other New Testament author.[7] Paul declared that faith in Christ made the Torah unnecessary for salvation, exalted the Christian church as the body of Christ, and depicted the world outside the Church as under judgment.[9]

[edit] Lord's Supper

Paul's writings include the earliest reference to the supper of the Lord, a rite traditionally identified as the Christian Eucharist, as instituted by Christ at the Last Supper.

[edit] Eastern tradition

In the East, church fathers reduced the element of election in Romans 9 to divine foreknowledge.[9] The themes of predestination found in Western Christianity do not appear in Eastern theology.

[edit] Western tradition

Augustine's foundational work on the gospel as a gift (grace), on morality as life in the Spirit, on predestination, and on original sin all derives from Paul, especially Romans.[9]

In the Reformation, Martin Luther expressed Paul's doctrine of faith most strongly as justification by faith alone.[9] John Calvin developed Augustine's predestination into double predestination.[9]

[edit] Modern theology

In his commentary The Epistle to the Romans (Ger. Der Römerbrief; particularly in the thoroughly re-written second edition of 1922) Karl Barth argued that the God who is revealed in the cross of Jesus challenges and overthrows any attempt to ally God with human cultures, achievements, or possessions. Some theologians believe this work to be the most important theological treatise since Friedrich Schleiermacher's On Religion: Speeches to its Cultured Despisers.

As in the Eastern tradition in general, Western humanists interpret the reference to election in Romans 9 as reflecting divine foreknowledge.[9]

[edit] Church tradition

The image of Saint Paul in a parish dedicated to him in the Roman Catholic Diocese of Cubao.

Various Christian writers have suggested more details about Paul's life.

1 Clement, a letter written by the Roman bishop Clement of Rome, around the year 90 reports this about Paul:[60]

"By reason of jealousy and strife Paul by his example pointed out the prize of patient endurance. After that he had been seven times in bonds, had been driven into exile, had been stoned, had preached in the East and in the West, he won the noble renown which was the reward of his faith, having taught righteousness unto the whole world and having reached the farthest bounds of the West; and when he had borne his testimony before the rulers, so he departed from the world and went unto the holy place, having been found a notable pattern of patient endurance."

Commenting on this passage, Raymond Brown writes that while it "does not explicitly say" that Paul was martyred in Rome, "such a martyrdom is the most reasonable interpretation."[61]

Eusebius of Caesarea, who wrote in the 4th century, states that Paul was beheaded in the reign of the Roman Emperor Nero. This event has been dated either to the year 64, when Rome was devastated by a fire, or a few years later, to 67. The San Paolo alle Tre Fontane church was built on the location where the execution was believed to have taken place. A Roman Catholic liturgical solemnity of Peter and Paul, celebrated on June 29, may reflect the day of his martyrdom, other sources have articulated the tradition that Peter and Paul died on the same day (and possibly the same year).[62] The apocryphal Acts of Paul, the apocryphal Acts of Peter suggest that Paul survived Rome and traveled further west. Some hold the view that he could have revisited Greece and Asia Minor after his trip to Spain, and might then have been arrested in Troas, and taken to Rome and executed.[2 Tim. 4:13]

A tradition holds that Paul was interred with Saint Peter ad Catacumbas by the via Appia until moved to what is now the Basilica of Saint Paul Outside the Walls in Rome. Bede, in his Ecclesiastical History, writes that Pope Vitalian in 665 gave Paul's relics (including a cross made from his prison chains) from the crypts of Lucina to King Oswy of Northumbria, northern Britain. However, Bede's use of the word "relic" was not limited to corporal remains.

Paul, who was quite possibly martyred in Rome, has long been associated with that city and its church. Paul is the patron saint of London.

[edit] Speculative views

Facial composite of Paul by experts of the LKA NRW, Germany

Elaine Pagels, professor of religion at Princeton University and an authority on Gnosticism, argues that Paul was a Gnostic [63] and that the anti-Gnostic Pastoral Epistles were "pseudo-Pauline" forgeries written to rebut this.

British Jewish scholar Hyam Maccoby contends that the Paul as described in the Book of Acts and the view of Paul gleaned from his own writings are very different people. Some difficulties have been noted in the account of his life. Paul as described in the Book of Acts is much more interested in factual history, less in theology; ideas such as justification by faith are absent as are references to the Spirit, according to Maccoby. He also points out that there are no references to John the Baptist in the Pauline Epistles, although Paul mentions him several times in the Book of Acts.

Others have objected that the language of the speeches is too Lukan in style to reflect anyone else's words. Moreover, some have argued that the speeches of Peter and Paul are too much alike, and that especially Paul's are too distinct from his letters to reflect a true Pauline source.[64] Despite these suspicions, historian-attorney Christopher Price concludes that Luke's style in Acts is representative of those ancient historians known for accurately recording speeches in their works. Examination of several of the major speeches in Acts reveals that while the author smoothed out the Greek in some cases, he clearly relied on preexisting material to reconstruct his speeches. He did not believe himself at liberty to invent material, but attempted to accurately record the reality of the speeches in Acts.[64]

F. C. Baur (1792–1860), professor of theology at Tübingen in Germany, the first scholar to critique Acts and the Pauline Epistles, and founder of the Tübingen School of theology, argued that Paul, as the "Apostle to the Gentiles", was in violent opposition to the original 12 Apostles. Baur considers the Acts of the Apostles were late and unreliable. This debate has continued ever since, with Adolf Deissmann (1866–1937) and Richard Reitzenstein (1861–1931) emphasising Paul's Greek inheritance and Albert Schweitzer stressing his dependence on Judaism.

A statue of Paul holding a scroll (symbolising the Scriptures) and the sword (symbolising his martyrdom)

Maccoby theorizes that Paul synthesized Judaism, Gnosticism, and mysticism to create Christianity as a cosmic savior religion. According to Maccoby, Paul's Pharisaism was his own invention, though actually he was probably associated with the Sadducees. Maccoby attributes the origins of Christian anti-Semitism to Paul and claims that Paul's view of women, though inconsistent, reflects his Gnosticism in its misogynist aspects.[65]

Professor Robert Eisenman of California State University, Long Beach argues that Paul was a member of the family of Herod the Great.[66] Professor Eisenman makes a connection between Paul and an individual identified by Josephus as "Saulus," a "kinsman of Agrippa."[67] Another oft-cited element of the case for Paul as a member of Herod's family is found in Romans 16:11

where Paul writes, "Greet Herodion, my kinsman." This is a minority view in the academic community.

Among the critics of Paul the Apostle was Thomas Jefferson who wrote that Paul was the "first corrupter of the doctrines of Jesus."[68] Howard Brenton's 2005 play Paul takes a skeptical view of his conversion.

F.F. Powell argues that Paul, in his epistles, made use of many of the ideas of the Greek philosopher Plato, sometimes even using the same metaphors and language.[69] For example, in Phaedrus, Plato has Socrates saying that the heavenly ideals are perceived as though "through a glass dimly."[70] These words are echoed by Paul in 1 Corinthians 13:12 .

[edit] See also

[edit] References

[edit] Notes

  1. ^ http://www.pbs.org/empires/peterandpaul/footsteps/footsteps_1_1.html
  2. ^ a b c Harris, p. 411
  3. ^ Bauer lexicon; Acts 13:9 , from "The New Testament of Our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ: According to the Received Greek Text" (University Press, Cambridge 1876)
  4. ^ a b Encyclopedia Britannica, although he was Roman by birth [Acts 22:24-29] , Paul the Apostle, 2008, O.Ed.
  5. ^ "The Canon Debate," McDonald & Sanders editors, 2002, chapter 32, page 577, by James D. G. Dunn: "James the brother of Jesus and Paul, the two other most prominent leading figures [beside Peter] in first-century Christianity"
  6. ^ [Acts 22:24-29]
  7. ^ a b c d Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church ed. F.L. Lucas (Oxford) entry on Paul
  8. ^ Ehrman 2004:385
  9. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa "Paul, St" Cross, F. L., ed. The Oxford dictionary of the Christian church. New York: Oxford University Press. 2005
  10. ^ Walton, Steve (2000). Leadership and Lifestyle: The Portrait of Paul in the Miletus Speech and 1 Thessalonians. Cambridge University Press. pp. 3. ISBN 0521780063. http://books.google.com/books?id=P9NznB__-E0C&pg=PA3&vq=%22these+scholars+see+the+paul%22&dq=conzelmann+paul+acts&as_brr=3&sig=QanFBxTbjopfPhsPqcWm1PG3lLw. 
  11. ^ Hare, Douglas R. A. (1987), "Introduction", in Knox, John, Chapters in a Life of Paul (Revised ed.), Mercer University Press, pp. xxii, 135 p., ISBN 086554266X, http://books.google.com/books?id=g_42mQjLOVsC&pg=PR10&vq=%22proper+historical+method+requires+us%22&dq=paul+primary+sources+acts+epistles&as_brr=3&sig=RvCwlMrXfqLVQ91D-2OTOOwRWm8 
  12. ^ a b c Harris, p. 316-320
  13. ^ a b c Harris, p. 316-320. Harris cites Galatians 6:11 , Romans 16:22 , Colossians 4:18 , 2 Thessalonians 3:17 , Philemon 19
  14. ^ a b Joseph Barber Lightfoot in his Commentary on the Epistle to the Galatians writes: "At this point[Gal. 6:11] the apostle takes the pen from his amanuensis, and the concluding paragraph is written with his own hand. From the time when letters began to be forged in his name([2 Thes. 2:2]
    2 Thes. 3:17
    ) it seems to have been his practice to close with a few words in his own handwriting, as a precaution against such forgeries... In the present case he writes a whole paragraph, summing up the main lessons of the epistle in terse, eager, disjointed sentences. He writes it, too, in large, bold characters (Gr. pelikois grammasin), that his handwriting may reflect the energy and determination of his soul."
  15. ^ [1Cor 2:1-5] [2Cor 10:10] [2Cor 11:6]
  16. ^ a b c Ehrman, Bart. Peter, Paul, and Mary Magdalene: The Followers of Jesus in History and Legend. Oxford University Press, USA. 2006. ISBN 0-19-530013-0
  17. ^ Galatians 1:13-14 , Philippians 3:6 , and Acts 8:1-3
  18. ^ Bromiley, Geoffrey William (1979). International Standard Bible Encyclopedia: A-D (International Standard Bible Encyclopedia (Wbeerdmans)). Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. pp. 689. ISBN 0-8028-3781-6. 
  19. ^ Barnett, Paul (2002). Jesus, the Rise of Early Christianity: A History of New Testament Times. InterVarsity Press. pp. 21. ISBN 0-8308-2699-8. 
  20. ^ L. Niswonger, Richard (1993). New Testament History. Zondervan Publishing Company. pp. 200. ISBN 0-310-31201-9. 
  21. ^ through his mother Mary
  22. ^ Hengel, Martin and Anna Maria Schwemer, trans. John Bowden. Paul Between Damascus and Antioch: The Unknown Years Westminster John Knox Press, 1997. ISBN 0-664-25736-4
  23. ^ Barnett, Paul The Birth Of Christianity: The First Twenty Years (Eerdmans Publishing Co. 2005) ISBN 0-8028-2781-0 p. 200
  24. ^ Ogg, George, Chronology of the New Testament in Peake's Commentary on the Bible (Nelson) 1963)
  25. ^ Barnett p. 83
  26. ^ Luke 1:3
    Acts 1:1
  27. ^ Map of first missionary journey
  28. ^ a b Harris
  29. ^ Acts 15:2 ff; Galatians 2:1 ff
  30. ^ a b c White, L. Michael (2004). From Jesus to Christianity. HarperCollins. pp. 148–149. ISBN 0060526556. http://books.google.com/books?id=w4ehxXoIxCUC&pg=PA149&vq=%22Two+more+of+Paul%27s+visits+to+Jerusalem%22&dq=paul+%22visits+to+jerusalem%22+acts+letters&as_brr=3&sig=Lir18QcyIN5vGQhjG0W8m8KwIqI. 
  31. ^ Paul: Apostle of the Free Spirit, F. F. Bruce, Paternoster 1980, p.151
  32. ^ Catholic Encyclopedia: Judaizers see section titled: "The Incident At Antioch"
  33. ^ Catholic Encyclopedia: Judaizers: "On their arrival Peter, who up to this had eaten with the Gentiles, "withdrew and separated himself, fearing them who were of the circumcision," and by his example drew with him not only the other Jews, but even Barnabas, Paul's fellow-labourer."
  34. ^ White, L. Michael (2004). From Jesus to Christianity. HarperSanFrancisco. pp. 170. ISBN 0060526556. http://books.google.com/books?id=w4ehxXoIxCUC&pg=PA170&vq=%22total+failure+of+political+bravado%22&dq=paul+%22visits+to+jerusalem%22+acts+letters&as_brr=3&sig=EZ2xNofTh3Rw11WHiHXs-iVqhR8. 
  35. ^ Paul does not exactly say that this was his second visit. In Galatians, he lists three important meetings with Peter, and this was the second on his list. The third meeting took place in Antioch. He does not explicitly claim that he did not visit Jerusalem in between this and his first visit.
  36. ^ Note that Paul only writes that he is on his way to Jerusalem, or just planning the visit. There might or might not have been additional visits before or after this visit, if he ever got to Jerusalem.
  37. ^ Romans 15:25 ,8-9; 2Corinthians 8–9 , 1 Corinthians 16:1–3
  38. ^ "Paul, St." Cross, F. L., ed. The Oxford dictionary of the Christian church. New York: Oxford University Press. 2005
  39. ^ Paul: His Story by Jerome Murphy-O'Connor,page 247
  40. ^ A critical and exegetical commentary on the Epistle to the Galatians
  41. ^ http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/05209a.htm
  42. ^ Ireneaus Against Heresies 3.3.2: the "...Church founded and organized at Rome by the two most glorious apostles, Peter and Paul; as also [by pointing out] the faith preached to men, which comes down to our time by means of the successions of the bishops. ...The blessed apostles, then, having founded and built up the Church, committed into the hands of Linus the office of the episcopate."
  43. ^ Lashway, Calvin. "HOW and WHERE did the Apostle Paul die?" Web: HOW and WHERE did the Apostle Paul die?
  44. ^ St Paul's tomb unearthed in Rome from BBC News (2006–12–08); http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,,4442169,00.html?maca=en-rss-en-all-1573-rdf
  45. ^ p. 316-320
  46. ^ Clement 47:1
  47. ^ MacDonald, Margaret Y. Sacra Pagina: Colossians and Ephesians. Liturgical Press, 2000. ISBN 978-0-8146-5819-2
  48. ^ a b c d e Epistle to the Colossians - Catholic Encyclopedia
  49. ^ Brown, R.E., The Churches the Apostles left behind p.48.
  50. ^ Barrett, C.K. the Pastoral Epistles p.4ff.
  51. ^ a b c d "Atonement." Cross, F. L., ed. The Oxford dictionary of the Christian church. New York: Oxford University Press. 2005
  52. ^ Paul and Palestinian Judaism in 1977; Paul, the Law, and the Jewish People in 1983
  53. ^ J.D.G. Dunn's Manson Memorial Lecture (4.11.1982): 'The New Perspective on Paul' BJRL 65(1983), 95–122.
  54. ^ New Perspectives on Paul
  55. ^ Rowlands, Christopher. Christian Origins (SPCK 1985) p.113
  56. ^ Kroeger, Richard C. and Catherine C. I Suffer Not a Woman. Baker Book House, 1992. ISBN 0-8010-5250-5
  57. ^ Wright, N.T. "The Biblical Basis for Women’s Service in the Church." Web: <www2.cbeinternational.org/CBE_InfoPack/pdf/wright_biblical_basis.pdf Biblical Basis for Women’s Service> 16 Dec. 2009
  58. ^ Moore, Terri D. "Chapter Six: Conclusions on 1 Timothy 2:15." bible.org Aug. 30, 2009:
  59. ^ Kirk, J.R. Daniel. "Was Paul a Misogynist?" Web:
  60. ^ The First Epistle of Clement to the Corinthians, 5:5–6, translated by J.B. Lightfoot in Lightfoot, Joseph Barber (1890). The Apostolic Fathers: A Revised Text with Introductions, Notes, Dissertations, and Translations. Macmillan. pp. 274. OCLC 54248207. http://earlychristianwritings.com/text/1clement-lightfoot.html. 
  61. ^ Brown, Raymond Edward; John Paul Meier (1983). Antioch and Rome: New Testament Cradles of Catholic Christianity. Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press. pp. 124. ISBN 0809125323. http://books.google.com/books?id=_6H3XKLXGvYC&pg=PA124&vq=%22such+a+martyrdom+is+the+most+reasonable+interpretation%22&dq=paul+clement+death&as_brr=3&sig=CcsRPhc3hLHN-RKGuHtE1mVQsyk. 
  62. ^ Lactanius, John Chrysostom, Sulpicius Severus all agree with Eusebius' claim that Peter and Paul died under Nero. Lactantius, Of the Manner in Which the Persecutors Died II; John Chrysostom, Concerning Lowliness of Mind 4; Sulpicius Severus, Chronica II.28–29
  63. ^ Pagels, Elaine. The Gnostic Gospels. Vintage Publishers, 1989, p.62
  64. ^ a b Price, Christopher. "The Speeches in Acts." Christian Colligation of Apologetics Debate Research & Evangelism, 2003. Web: The Speeches in Acts
  65. ^ Maccoby,Ch. 1
  66. ^ See Paul as Herodian, JHC 3/1 (Spring, 1996), 110-122. http://depts.drew.edu/jhc/eisenman.html
  67. ^ Antiquities, Book XX, Chapter 9:4. http://www.ccel.org/j/josephus/works/ant-20.htm
  68. ^ The Writings of Thomas Jefferson: Being his Autobiography, Correspondence, Reports, Messages, Addresses, and Other Writings, Official and Private. Published by the Order of the Joint Committee of Congress on the Library, from the Original Manuscripts, Deposited in the Department of State, With Explanatory Nites, Tables of Contents, and a Copious Index to Each Volume, as well as a General Index to the Whole, by the Editor H. A. Washington. Vol. VII. Published by Taylor Maury, Washington, D.C., 1854.
  69. ^ Powell, F. F.Saint Paul's Homage to Plato, worldandi.com retrieved on Nov. 16, 2008.
  70. ^ Plato Phaedrus translated by Benjamin Jowett

[edit] Bibliography

[edit] External links



Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox
Print/export
Languages