Portal talk:Contents
↓ | Skip to table of contents | ↓ |
Editing of this talk page by new or unregistered users is currently disabled. See the protection policy and protection log for more details. If you cannot edit this talk page and you wish to make a change, you can request unprotection, log in, or create an account. |
|
Archives |
---|
The first four pages of archives for this page, were moved to become archive-subpages of Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Contents. |
|
Threads older than 60 days may be archived by MiszaBot II. |
Contents |
To-do list for Portal:Contents: | |
---|---|
To-do list is empty: remove {{todo}} tag or click on edit to add an item. |
|
Main topics classification systems – Update as changes are made | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Topics | Portal:Contents | Megaportals | Wikipedia:Core topics, inner levels | Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Core topics | Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Core topics/Supplement | Wikipedia:Core topics - 1,000 |
Arts and culture | Arts and culture | Arts, Culture | Humanities, 15 | Culture; Humanities, 24 | Cultural topics (120) | Culture; Humanities, 162 |
Geography and places | Geography and places | Geography | Geography, 65; Countries | |||
Health and fitness | Health and fitness | Health | Medicine | |||
History and events | History and events | History, Current events | ||||
Mathematics and logic | Mathematics and logic | Mathematics, Logic | Mathematics | Mathematics, 5 | Math | |
Natural and physical sciences | Natural and physical sciences | Science | Natural Science | Earth, 16; Life science; Physical science, 29 | Science; Chemical elements, 118 | |
People and self | People and self | Biography, Personal life | Everyday life, 9 | Biographies, 201 | ||
Philosophy and thinking | Philosophy and thinking | Philosophy, Thinking | Philosophy | |||
Religion and belief systems | Religion | Religion | ||||
Reference | Reference | Library and information science | ||||
Social sciences and society | Social sciences and society | Science, Society | Social Sciences, 10 | Social science, 22; society, 15 | Social sciences, 173 | |
Technology and applied sciences | Technology and applied sciences | Technology and applied sciences | Applied Arts and Sciences, 14 | Technology, 18 | Technical topics (135) | Technology |
Topics | Wikipedia:Version 0.5 | Wikipedia:Vital articles | Wikipedia:Vital articles/Expanded | Wikipedia:Featured articles | ||
Arts and culture | Arts, Language and literature | Arts | Arts | Art; Awards, decorations and vexillology; Culture; Food and drink; Language and linguistics; Literature and theatre; Music | ||
Geography and places | Geography | Geography | Geography | Geography and places | ||
Health and fitness | Health, Medicine | Health, Medicine | Medicine | |||
History and events | History | History | History | Archaeology, History, Heraldry | ||
Mathematics and logic | Mathematics | Mathematics, Measurement | Mathematics, Measurement | Mathematics | ||
Natural and physical sciences | Natural sciences | Science | Science | Biology; Chemistry and mineralogy; Geology, geophysics and meteorology; Physics and astronomy | ||
People and self | Everyday life | People, Everyday life | People, Everyday life | Royalty and nobility; Sport and recreation, Video games | ||
Philosophy and thinking | Philosophy | Philosophy | Philosophy | Philosophy | ||
Religion and belief systems | Religion | Religion | Religion | Religion, mysticism and mythology | ||
Reference | ||||||
Social sciences and society | Society and social sciences | Society and social sciences | Society and social sciences | Business and finance, Economics, Education, Law, Media, Politics and government, Psychology, Society, Warfare | ||
Technology and applied sciences | Applied sciences and technology | Technology | Technology | Architecture, Computing, Engineering and technology, Transport | ||
Category:Fundamental categories | Topics | Category:Main topic classifications | Category:Wikipedia core topics | Category:Top-importance articles | ||
Information | ||||||
Nature | Mathematics and logic | Mathematics | Math | |||
Natural and physical sciences | Astronomy, Biology, Chemistry, Earth sciences, Environment, Geology, Nature, Physics, Science | Ecology, Science | ||||
Reference | ||||||
Technology and applied sciences | Agriculture, Applied sciences, Architecture, Computing, Technology | Construction, Technology | ||||
Society | Arts and culture | Arts, Crafts, Culture, Film, Language, Literature, Music, Visual arts | Culture, Film | |||
Geography and places | Geography | |||||
Health and fitness | Health, Medicine | Health sciences, Nutrition | ||||
History and events | Archaeology, Events, History | |||||
People and self | Entertainment, People, Radio | Biography | ||||
Social sciences and society | Business, Economics, Education, Law, Military, Politics, Psychology, Society | Society | ||||
Structure | ||||||
Thought | Philosophy and thinking | Philosophy, Thought | ||||
Religion and belief systems | Religion |
Names in TOCs – Update as changes are made | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Topics | Overviews | Topics | Basic topics | Glossaries | Portals | Categories |
Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
Arts and culture | Arts and culture | Arts and culture | Arts and culture | Arts and culture | Arts and culture | Arts and culture |
Geography and places | Geography and places | Geography and places | Geography and places | Geography and places | Geography and places | Geography and places |
Health and fitness | Health and fitness | Health and health science | Health and fitness | Health | Health | Health and fitness |
History and events | History and events | History and events | History and events | History and events | History and Current events | History and events |
Mathematics and logic | Mathematics and logic | Mathematics and logic | Mathematics and logic | Mathematics and logic | Mathematics and Logic | Mathematics and logic |
Natural and physical sciences | Natural sciences and nature | Natural and physical sciences | Natural sciences and nature | Natural sciences and nature | Natural and physical sciences | Natural sciences and nature |
People and self | People and self | People and self | People and self | People and self | ||
Philosophy and thinking | Philosophy and thinking | Philosophy | Philosophy and thinking | Philosophy, religion, and spirituality | Philosophy, religion, and spirituality | Philosophy and thinking |
Religion and belief systems | Religion and belief systems | Religion and spirituality | Religion and spirituality | Religion and belief systems | ||
Social sciences and society | Social sciences and society | Social sciences and society | Social sciences and society | Social sciences and society | Social sciences and Society | Social sciences and society |
Technology and applied sciences | Technology and applied sciences | Technology and applied sciences | Technology and applied sciences | Technology and applied sciences | Technology and Engineering | Technology and applied sciences |
Topic Names & Labels – Update as changes are made | |
---|---|
Subpages, TOCs, Sections | Main Page, Browse bars |
Reference | Reference |
Culture and the arts | Culture, arts |
Geography and places | Geography |
Health and fitness | Health |
History and events | History |
Mathematics and logic | Mathematics |
Natural and physical sciences | Nature |
People and self | People |
Philosophy and thinking | Philosophy |
Religion and belief systems | Religion |
Social sciences and society | Society |
Technology and applied sciences | Technology |
Portal talk:Contents/Navigation
Proposal: Use the same naming convention for all of this portal's subpages
Add sq:Portal:Përmbajtja
ADD sq:Portal:Përmbajtja.--Tufche 19:14, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Missing
In this page are missing,Categoria:Fundamental. KnuxD (talk) 14:58, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
About three years ago, I started working on a Topics-based contents pages project. My basic objective was to design and implement a set of complementary contents pages that can use the same underlying sections. One group would include individual pages with all of the sections related to a type of page, like Overviews, while the other group would have pages with all of the sections about a topic, like Culture and the arts. The underlying structure of this project has been in place almost from the start. Complementary page layout templates for each group - Portal:Contents/Types layout and Portal:Contents/Topics layout - plus the contents of each section moved to subpages allow for transclusion to and editing from either template group. Here's an example of the same underlying section showing on the two corresponding pages: Overviews - Culture and the Arts and Culture and the Arts - Overviews. While both groups of contents pages are fully functional, only the pages by type are included in the contents navigational headers and footers.
I recently updated the topical contents page group to reflect the changes since I last worked on this project. Here's a summary of what I found. The type-oriented group includes six pages with topical sections: Overviews · Portals · Lists · Outlines · Glossaries · Categories. The topical group includes 12 pages with type-oriented sections: Reference · Culture · Geography · Health · History · Mathematics · Nature · People · Philosophy · Religion · Society · Technology. This means that up to 72 contents sections could be included in either of these contents page groups. As it turns out, 71 of these 72 possible sections actually do contain links to content. The only empty section to date is Glossaries about People and self.
My recommendation is to do the following:
- Add topical links to the contents pages navigational header and footer templates - Template:Contents pages (header bar) and Template:Contents pages (footer box).
- Those links would be as follows: Reference · Culture · Geography · Health · History · Mathematics · Nature · People · Philosophy · Religion · Society · Technology.
As a demonstration of the concept and to facilitate discussion, I will be bold and do the following:
- Add the proposed links to Template:Contents pages (footer box).
- Replace Template:Contents pages (header bar) on all pages listed in it (except on Featured content) with Portal:Contents/TOC navbar, including: Contents · Overviews · Portals · Lists · Outlines · Glossaries · A–Z index · Categories. This will keep the proposed header bar change off the high-profile featured content page, while still allowing testing of the proposed change in context.
- Update Portal:Contents to better reflect the inclusion of topical contents pages and the organization of the contents pages navigational templates.
- Activate the links to to the applicable topical contents pages from the corresponding type-oriented contents page section headings.
I look forward to the discussion on how we best can reach consensus on this proposal. Regards, RichardF (talk) 13:41, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
- It's confusing. The topics-based pages contain too much redundancy. The redundancy on the geography page is especially strong. I believe the topics pages will fuel the battle between lists and categories, between lists and outlines, between lists and indexes once the index list is added, and between outlines and portals. Each subsystem needs to be allowed to develop independently of the others, for leap-frogging to occur. Outlines especially have the potential to develop into a very robust system, including software enhancements. Presenting such close comparison will only invite the all-or-nothing axe upon one or more of these subsystems. But more than anything, it is just confusing - which is the same reason it didn't go live 3 years ago. I'm reverting. The Transhumanist 23:12, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
Because the page was reverted, here is a link to Portal:Contents with the aded topical contents page navigation links and corresponding revised narrative -- RichardF (talk) 13:31, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
Page view stats
2011 Views | FEB 1-14 | FEB 1 | FEB 7 | FEB 14 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Contents | 424,700 | 31,700 | 31,900 | 41,300 |
Featured content | 277,567 | 19,900 | 20,100 | 30,600 |
Glossaries | 5,216 | 381 | 390 | 433 |
Lists | 4,576 | 364 | 372 | 343 |
Outlines | 2,778 | 187 | 224 | 186 |
Overview | 2,848 | 197 | 228 | 249 |
Portals | 92,510 | 7,000 | 7,200 | 6,800 |
A-Z index | 11,714 | 887 | 971 | 891 |
Categories | 5,340 | 517 | 427 | 357 |
Lower use types | 32,472 | 2,533 | 2,612 | 2,459 |
All types | 402,549 | 29,433 | 29,912 | 39,859 |
Reference | 13,762 | 1,100 | 1,100 | 1,000 |
Culture | 7,258 | 557 | 577 | 568 |
Geography | 7,127 | 520 | 494 | 562 |
Health | 8,127 | 605 | 602 | 617 |
History | 8,632 | 614 | 694 | 637 |
Mathematics | 5,013 | 383 | 430 | 372 |
Nature | 4,405 | 346 | 352 | 317 |
People | 9,606 | 675 | 728 | 657 |
Philosophy | 3,819 | 287 | 316 | 310 |
Religion | 4,033 | 330 | 323 | 283 |
Society | 2,934 | 188 | 221 | 211 |
Technology | 6,210 | 474 | 489 | 435 |
All topics | 80,926 | 6,079 | 6,326 | 5,969 |
Types & Topics | 483,475 | 35,512 | 36,238 | 45,828 |
Total | 908,175 | 67,212 | 68,138 | 87,128 |
Here's a set of Wikipedia article traffic statistics for the proposed header bar contents pages. In about half a day since posting the topical contents page links on the navigation bar, they already are over 2,500 page views today. These individual page views range from over 100 to over 400. I'll track these views at least through February. -- RichardF (talk) 04:23, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
- These stats show the effects of link placement. "Contents" and "Featured content" are on the sidebar which is displayed on every page of Wikipedia. The portals link is on the Main Page, and is featured multiple times in a nav-bar at the top of most portal pages. When subjects are displayed across a navbar, readers tend to blast across the navbar, increasing the page count for the pages linked to - thus the topics pages feed each other with cursory page views. When "Overview" was moved further up the page toward the top of Portal:Contents, it's traffic went up. Since Portal:Contents is in the top 100 pages for traffic on Wikipedia, anything listed at the top of it will get more hits by placing it there. I do believe the topics-based pages that congregate all the contents page types should not be placed there, because they are just too confusing. See the discussion thread above. Thank you. The Transhumanist 23:38, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
The topical contents page links were removed from the contents pages header bar before the completion of the second day of testing, January 29, 2011. Nevertheless, as indicated in the updated table and corresponding chart, the number of views on these pages increased substantially. Clearly, when given the opportunity, Wikipedia users choose to view contents pages organized by topic. In addition, when give a side-by-side choice, they often viewed topical contents pages at a rate higher than they viewed the non-high profile type-oriented contents pages. RichardF (talk) 02:25, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
The table and chart now cover the Wikipedia contents page views February 2011 trial period. -- RichardF (talk) 01:28, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
- It doesn't show what you've claimed. What it shows is that readers tend to click more on links that are placed at the top of a page. Any links you place up there will get more traffic. The question is, what links should be placed up there? That question cannot be answered by page view counts - especially in a nav bar where readers may simply be blasting across the nav bar for a quick look-see. The Transhumanist 23:34, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
Discussion of trial period
- Comment: I agree with the proposal by RichardF (talk · contribs), I think it is a great idea. However, we should gain a greater consensus from more individuals than simply the two quibbling above. :P Perhaps blast a notice out to relevant talk pages of WikiProjects, and parties can in the meanwhile agree to a two week trial period? Surely the world will not end if we implement a two week trial period? Thank you for your time and consideration, -- Cirt (talk) 15:19, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
- I've posted invitations at several community talk pages, but so far, not much interest in joining the discussion has been shown. Perhaps Cirt (talk · contribs) can be more persuasive. :-) At this point, I believe a third party should reinstate the reversions to Portal:Contents, Portal:Contents/Types layout and Template:Contents pages (footer box). -- RichardF (talk) 18:44, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
- Yay
- Support 2 week trial period as proposed by Cirt. -- Ϫ 00:07, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
- Support trial period through February 14 - Wikipedia time. With three supports, I'm going to reinstate the links. -- RichardF (talk) 00:44, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
- Support - lets try it out see what we get .Moxy (talk) 03:04, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
- Support - Seems reasonable to me I don't see any reason to oppose. --Kumioko (talk) 20:07, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
- Huh? Comments
- Oops - I was expecting that selecting a top row (say, Categories), then the type of the selection displayed on the second row (say, Nature) would be of type Category:Nature. Likewise, if Outlines were selected on the top row, then the analog would be Outline of Nature on the second row, etc. --Ancheta Wis (talk) 07:36, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
- When I go to a "contents" page, I expect it to be about the subject matter - the topics covered. Wikipedia's contents pages traditionally have been about organizing the material with similar characteristics and formats. This setup, IMHO, has been the fundamental disconnect from traditional subject matter classification systems. I hope the two week trial period offers an objective measure of how Wikipedia users actually prefer to browse summaries of its contents. In any event, giving Wikipedia users meaningful choices about how they access the encyclopedia's content is a good thing. I also think the expanded labels and links on the top navigation bar help address any initial confusion about each line. -- RichardF (talk) 16:02, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
-
- Well, it doesn't show preference or meaningful choices. Any links you place at the top of high-traffic pages such as Portal:Contents will get a lot of hits just out of curiosity. If people used these pages over and over, then we could expect that the number of hits would continually rise rather than remain constant. They aren't rising, which indicates they are probably getting looky-loo traffic and not repeat users. Note that the hits for the other links up there haven't changed appreciably over time either. Yet, the pages displayed on these nav pages in total get far more traffic than these nav pages do, which means the vast majority of traffic to the pages listed (outlines, etc.) is coming to them via other routes.
- These nav pages aren't attracting users back to them, which strongly suggests that they need a redesign. How can we make them more useful so that users actually return to use them? I think Ancheta is right to make suggestions on a new approach. Because we are obviously missing something. The traffic just keeps passing by. I think we should stop some passers-by and ask them what their impression of these pages are and what they think they are for. We might be surprised. The Transhumanist 03:50, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
- For some reason, we now have Portal:Contents/Overviews and Portal:Contents/Overview, both of which are linked to on various pages and templates. I assume some merging and/or cleanup is in order. -- RichardF (talk) 02:53, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
- Once again, The Transhumanist (talk · contribs) is interfering with the Contents test.
- The test had nothing to do with the Overview/Overviews links, which is what I was working on. I was unaware that all work on the entire contents system was supposed to stop because of the test. Please point out where the proposal specified that. And quit falsely accusing people. The Transhumanist 03:50, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:RichardF#Please_be_on_the_lookout
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Contents_pages_(header_bar)&oldid=413200560
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Portal:Contents/TOC_navbar&oldid=413200380
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Portal:Contents&oldid=413199887
I reverted these edits to allow the test to continue as is. RichardF (talk) 03:24, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
- Nay
Discussion of main proposal
Now that the trail period is completed, the discussion can return to the merits of the main proposal, which is repeated below:
- Add topical links to the contents pages navigational header and footer templates - Template:Contents pages (header bar) and Template:Contents pages (footer box).
- Those links would be as follows: Reference · Culture · Geography · Health · History · Mathematics · Nature · People · Philosophy · Religion · Society · Technology.
- Yay
- Support - Clearly, Wikipedia users are interested in browsing the encyclopedia's contents by topic. During the two week trial period, the pages proposed for additions to the templates were viewed over 80,000 times. The overall encyclopedia contents navigation system should support this interest by including the proposed pages in the high-level contents navigation templates. -- RichardF (talk) 13:54, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
- Support - Seems like a great idea that already has a good deal of support for continued implementation. Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 14:09, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
- Support - Sounds like a good idea to me. --Kumioko (talk) 15:49, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
- Support. Sure, I don't see why not. I'm not really understanding TT's original opposition though.. -- Ϫ 14:38, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
- Huh? Comments
- I have blocked the account which added a gratuitous word on the 1st line of the Contents navbar, and have removed the noise word. Please let me know if you need additional help. --Ancheta Wis (talk) 17:48, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
- Nay
- Oppose - The bloated nav bar is cumbersome and confusing. It is an example of link cruft. I think we should keep it simple. The Transhumanist 03:57, 19 February 2011 (UTC)