Stone tool

The Stone Age This box: view · talk · edit
↑ before Homo (Pliocene)
Venus of Brassempouy, an Upper Paleolithic representation of a woman Stone tool Paleolithic Lower Paleolithic Homo Control of fire by early humans Middle Paleolithic, Middle Stone Age Homo neanderthalensis Homo sapiens Recent African origin of modern humans Upper Paleolithic, Late Stone Age Behavioral modernity, Atlatl, Origin of the domestic dog Mesolithic Microliths, Bow, Canoe Natufian Khiamian Neolithic Pre-Pottery Neolithic Neolithic Revolution, Domestication Pottery Neolithic Pottery Chalcolithic Metallurgy, Wheel, Domestication of the horse,
↓ Bronze Age

A stone tool is, in the most general sense, any tool made either partially or entirely out of stone. Although stone tool-dependent societies and cultures still exist today, most stone tools are associated with prehistoric, particularly Stone Age cultures that have become extinct. Archaeologists often study such prehistoric societies, and refer to the study of stone tools as lithic analysis. Stone has been used to make a wide variety of different tools throughout history, including arrow heads, spearpoints and querns. Stone tools may be made of either ground stone or chipped stone, and a person who creates tools out of the latter is known as a flintknapper.

Chipped stone tools are made from cryptocrystalline materials such as chert or flint, radiolarite, chalcedony, basalt, quartzite and obsidian via a process known as lithic reduction. One simple form of reduction is to strike stone flakes from a nucleus (core) of material using a hammerstone or similar hard hammer fabricator. If the goal of the reduction strategy is to produce flakes, the remnant lithic core may be discarded once it has become too small to use. In some strategies, however, a flintknapper reduces the core to a rough unifacial or bifacial preform, which is further reduced using soft hammer flaking techniques or by pressure flaking the edges. More complex forms of reduction include the production of highly standardized blades, which can then be fashioned into a variety of tools such as scrapers, knives, sickles and microliths. In general terms, chipped stone tools are nearly ubiquitous in all pre-metal-using societies because they are easily manufactured, the tool stone is usually plentiful, and they are easy to transport and sharpen.

Contents 1 Evolutionary development of technocomplexes 1.1 Mode I: The Oldowan Industry 1.2 Mode II: The Acheulean Industry 1.3 Mode III: The Mousterian Industry 1.4 Mode IV: The Aurignacian Industry 1.5 Mode V: The Microlithic Industries 1.6 Neolithic industries 2 Tool stone 3 See also 4 References 5 External links

[edit] Evolutionary development of technocomplexes

From the 19th century archaeologists had been turning up prehistoric worked stone tools that appeared to be typologically classifiable into taxa. They referred to these homotaxial groups of stone tools as industries and named them after the type site; for example, Acheulean after St. Acheul, France, and later Oldowan from Olduvai Gorge in Africa. In the earlier 20th century they became complexes and technologies; in the later, technocomplexes.

In 1969 in the 2nd edition of World Prehistory, Grahame Clarke envisioned an evolutionary progression of flint-knapping in which the "dominant lithic technologies" occurred in a fixed sequence from Mode 1 through Mode 5.^[1] He assigned to them relative dates: Modes 1 and 2 to the Lower Palaeolithic, 3 to the Middle, 4 to the Advanced and 5 to the Mesolithic. They were not to be conceived, however, as either universal – they did not account for all lithic technology – or synchronous – in effect simultaneously in different regions. Mode 1, for example, was in use in Europe long after it had been replaced by Mode 2 in Africa.

Clarke's scheme was adopted enthusiastically by the archaeological community. One of its advantages was the simplicity of terminology; for example, the Mode 1/Mode 2 Transition. The transitions are currently of greatest interest. Consequently in the literature the stone tools used in the period of the Palaeolithic are divided into four "modes", each of which designate a different form of complexity, and which in most cases followed a rough chronological order.

[edit] Mode I: The Oldowan Industry

Wikimedia Commons has media related to: Oldowan

The earliest stone tools in the life span of the genus Homo are Mode 1 tools,^[2] and come from what has been termed the Oldowan Industry, named after the type site (many sites, actually) of Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania where they have been found in very large quantities. Oldowan tools were characterised by their simple construction, predominantly comprised of core forms. These cores were river pebbles, or rocks similar to them, that had been struck by a spherical hammerstone to cause conchoidal fractures removing flakes from one surface, creating an edge and often a sharp tip. The blunt end is the proximal surface; the sharp, the distal. Oldowan is a percussion technology. Grasping the proximal surface, the hominan brought the distal surface down hard on an object he wished to detach or shatter, such as a bone or tuber.

The earliest known Oldowan tools yet found date from 2.6 million years ago, during the Lower Palaeolithic period, and have been uncovered at Gona in Ethiopia.^[3] After this date, the Oldowan Industry subsequently spread throughout much of Africa, although archaeologists are currently unsure which Hominan species first developed them, with some speculating that it was Australopithecus garhi, and others believing that it was in fact the more highly evolved Homo habilis.^[4] Homo habilis was the hominan who used the tools for most of the Oldowan in Africa, but at about 1.9-1.8 million years ago Homo erectus inherited them. The Industry flourished in southern and eastern Africa between 2.6 and 1.7 million years ago, but was also spread out of Africa and into Eurasia by travelling bands of H. erectus, who took it as far east as Java by 1.8 million years ago and Northern China by 1.6 million years ago.

[edit] Mode II: The Acheulean Industry

Wikimedia Commons has media related to: Acheulean

Eventually, more complex, Mode 2 tools began to be developed through the Acheulean Industry, named after the site of Saint Acheul in France. The Acheulean was characterised not by the core, but by the biface, the most notable form of which was the hand axe.^[5] The Acheulean first appears in the archaeological record as early as 1.7 million years ago in the West Turkana area of Kenya and contemporaneously in southern Africa.

The Leakeys, excavators at Olduvai, defined a "Developed Oldowan" Period in which they believed they saw evidence of an overlap in Oldowan and Acheulean. In their species-specific view of the two industries, Oldowan equated to H. habilis and Acheulean to H. erectus. Developed Oldowan was assigned to habilis and Acheulean to erectus. Subsequent dates on H. erectus pushed the fossils back to well before Acheulean tools; that is, H. erectus must have initially used Mode 1. There was no reason to think, therefore, that Developed Oldowan had to be habilis'; it could have been erectus'. Opponents of the view divide Developed Oldowan between Oldowan and Acheulean. There is no question, however, that habilis and erectus coexisted, as habilis fossils are found as late as 1.4 million years ago. Meanwhile, African H. erectus developed Mode 2. In any case a wave of Mode 2 then spread across Eurasia, resulting in use of both there. H. erectus may not have been the only Hominan to leave Africa; European fossils are sometimes associated with Homo ergaster, a contemporary of H. erectus in Africa.

In contrast to an Oldowan tool, which is the result of a fortuitous and probably ex tempore operation to obtain one sharp edge on a stone, an Acheulean tool is a planned result of a manufacturing process. The manufacturer begins with a blank, either a larger stone or a slab knocked off a larger rock. From this blank he removes large flakes, to be used as cores. Standing a core on edge on an anvil stone, he hits the exposed edge with centripetal blows of a hard hammer to roughly shape the implement. Then he works it over again, or retouches it, with a soft hammer of wood or bone to produce a tool finely chipped all over consisting of two concave surfaces intersecting in a sharp edge. Such a tool is used for slicing; concussion would destroy the edge and cut the hand.

Some Mode 2 tools are disk-shaped, others ovoid, others leaf-shaped and pointed, and others elongated and pointed at the distal end, with a blunt surface at the proximal end, obviously used for drilling. Mode 2 tools are used for butchering; not being composite (having no haft) they are not very appropriate killing instruments. The killing must have been done some other way. Mode 2 tools are larger than Oldowan. The blank was ported to serve as an ongoing source of flakes until it was finally retouched as a finished tool itself. Edges were often sharpened by further retouching.

[edit] Mode III: The Mousterian Industry

Wikimedia Commons has media related to: Mousterian

Eventually, the Acheulean in Europe was replaced by a lithic technology known as the Mousterian Industry, which was named after the site of Le Moustier in France, where examples were first uncovered in the 1860s. Evolving from the Acheulean, it adopted the Levallois technique to produce smaller and sharper knife-like tools as well as scrapers.^[6] The Mousterian Industry was developed and used primarily by the Neanderthals, a native European and Middle Eastern hominin species.^[7]

[edit] Mode IV: The Aurignacian Industry

The long blades (rather than flakes) of the Upper Palaeolithic Mode 4 industries appeared during the Upper Palaeolithic^[8]. The Aurignacian culture is a good example of mode 4 tool production.^[9]

[edit] Mode V: The Microlithic Industries

Mode 5 stone tools involve the production of Microliths, which were used in composite tools, mainly fastened to a haft.^[10] Examples include the Magdalenian culture.

[edit] Neolithic industries

Ground stone tools became important during the Neolithic period. These ground or polished implements are manufactured from larger-grained materials such as basalt, greenstone and some forms of rhyolite which are not suitable for flaking. The greenstone industry was important in the English Lake District, and is known as the Langdale axe industry. Ground stone implements included adzes, celts, and axes, which were manufactured using a labour-intensive, time-consuming method of repeated grinding against an abrasive stone, often using water as a lubricant. Because of their coarse surfaces, some ground stone tools were used for grinding plant foods and were polished not just by intentional shaping, but also by use. Manos are hand stones used in conjunction with metates for grinding corn or grain. Polishing increased the intrinsic mechanical strength of the axe. Polished stone axes were important for the widespread clearance of woods and forest during the Neolithic period, when crop and livestock farming developed on a large scale.

[edit] Tool stone

In archaeology, a tool stone is a type of stone that is used to manufacture stone tools. Alternately, the term can be used to refer to stones used as the raw material for tools.

[edit] See also

[edit] References

[edit] External links