Phytotherapy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Running total of the number of research papers listed on PubMed from 1990-2007 containing the word "phytotherapy."[original research?]

Phytotherapy is the study of the use of extracts from natural origin as medicines or health-promoting agents.

Traditional phytotherapy is a synonym for herbalism and regarded as alternative medicine by much of Western medicine. Although the medicinal and biological effects of many plant constituents such as alkaloids ( morphine, atropine etc. ) have been proven through clinical studies there is debate about the efficacy and the place of phytotherapy in medical therapies.


Modern phytotherapy, following the scientific method, can be considered the study on the effects and clinical use of herbal medicines.

Contents

[edit] Points to consider in phytotherapy

[edit] Standardization

In herbal medicine, plant material that has been processed in a repeatable operation so that a discrete marker constituent is at a verified concentration is then considered standardized. Active constituent concentrations may be misleading measures of potency if cofactors are not present. A further problem is that the important constituent is often unknown. For instance St John's wort is often standardized to the antiviral constituent hypericin which is now known to be the active ingredient for antidepressant use. Other companies standardize to hyperforin or both, although there may be some 24 known possible constituents. Only a minority of chemicals used as standardization markers are known to be active constituents. Standardization has not been standardized yet: different companies use different markers, or different levels of the same markers, or different methods of testing for marker compounds. Herbalist and manufacturer David Winston points out that whenever different compounds are chosen as 'active ingredients' for different herbs, there is a chance that suppliers will get a substandard batch (low on the chemical markers) and mix it with a batch higher in the desired marker to compensate for the difference.[1]

[edit] Quality

The quality of crude drugs or plant medicines depends upon a variety of factors, including the variability in the specie (or species) of plant being used; the plant's growing conditions (i.e. soil, sun, climate); and the timing of harvest, post-harvest processing, and storage conditions. The quality of some plant drugs can judged by Organoleptic factors (i.e. sensory properties such as the taste, color, odor or feel of the drug), or by administering a small dose of the drug and observing the effects.

These conditions have been noted in historical herbals such as Culpepper's Complete Herbal[2] or The Shen Nong or Divine Farmer's Materia Medica.[3] This was standard pharmacognosy curriculum for many years.[citation needed]

Storage after collection is a factor worthy of study; researchers in Nara, Japan have stored samples of ginseng root (Panax ginseng), licorice root (Glycyrrhiza glabra) and rhubarb root (Rheum emodi) that have been shown to retain their active properties for over 1,200 years.[4]

In modern times the foregoing aspects are no less important, but have been neglected with the advent of laboratory testing, although it generally is true that only certain constituents are identified and measured.[citation needed] Processes like HPLC (High performance liquid chromatography), GC (gas chromatography), UV/VIS (Ultraviolet/Visible spectrophotometry) or AA (atomic absorption spectroscopy)are used to identify species, measure bacteriological contamination, assess potency and eventually creating Certificates of Analysis for the material.

Quality should be overseen by either authorities ensuring Good Manufacturing Practices or regulatory agencies by the US FDA. In the United States one frequently sees comments that herbal medicine is unregulated, but this is not correct since the FDA and GMP regulations are in place. In Germany, the Commission E has produced a book of German legal-medical regulations which includes quality standards.[5]

[edit] Investigations by the scientific community

Common sense, as advocated above, is essential when working with, and consuming, plant-based medicinal products. Research by the scientific community attempts to explore, validate -- and above all -- understand the physiological aspects of traditional herbal and vegetative treatments.

[edit] Safety

A number of herbs are thought to be likely to cause adverse effects.[6] Such herbs, like most herbs for example in Traditional Chinese Medicine, are used in small doses within the herbal formula.

Furthermore, "adulteration, inappropriate formulation, or lack of understanding of plant and drug interactions have led to adverse reactions that are sometimes life threatening or lethal."[7] Proper double-blind clinical trials are needed to determine the safety and efficacy of each plant before they can be recommended for medical use.[8] Although many consumers believe that herbal medicines are safe because they are "natural", herbal medicines may interact with synthetic drugs causing toxicity to the patient, may have contamination that is a safety consideration, and herbal medicines, without proven efficacy, may be used to replace medicines that have a proven efficacy.[9]

The political issues around the safety of crude drugs vary from considering natural remedies "safe" regardless of potential dangers to considering them a dangerous unknown.[10]

Ephedra has been known to have numerous side effects, including severe skin reactions, irritability, nervousness, dizziness, trembling, headache, insomnia, profuse perspiration, dehydration, itchy scalp and skin, vomiting, hyperthermia, irregular heartbeat, seizures, heart attack, stroke, or death.[11] Ephedra has been an object of difficulty; having legitimate western medicine uses, illegal uses and powerful side effects. Known and used as Mormon Tea or Indian Tea, the plant contains the potent chemical drugs ephedrine and pseudoephedrine. Aside from being chemicals used to create methamphetamine they have direct CNS stimulant effects including high blood pressure and high heart rate. These effects have led to strokes and other CNS or cardiac issues in certain people at certain dosages. In recent years, the safety of ephedra-containing dietary supplements has been questioned by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, and the medical community as a result of reports of serious side effects and ephedra-related deaths. [12][13][14][15][16] However, when used appropriately by the correct people it is an effective decongestant, a bronchodilator for use in asthma and an adjuvant for the common cold.

There is no evidence to conclude that herbs have more side effects and adverse actions than western (chemically synthesized) medications, which routinely have the same adverse side effects declared on their packages.

Poisonous plants which have limited medicinal effects are often not sold in material doses in the United States or are available only to trained practitioners,[citation needed] these include:

Other plants contain potent alkaloids which may cause physical harm when used incorrectly, but are not treated as possibly dangerous, leaving an uninformed public at risk for side effects or herb to chemical drug interactions. Gingko biloba arguably has positive effects for many people but it is a blood thinner which may increase or cause spontaneous bleeding. White Willow, the source of salicin which through salicylic acid is the base for acetylsalicylic acid or Asprin. Salicylate drugs such as A.S.A. are effective in reducing pain and fever but are also blood thinners. If, for example, one were to take Gingko Biloba and White Willow reduced blood clotting may lead to increased length of wound bleeding or to situations such as hematuria.


Plants such as Comfrey[17][18] and Petasites have specific toxicity due to hepatotoxic pyrrolizidine alkaloid content.[19][20] There are other plant medicines which require caution or can interact with other medications, including St. John's wort and grapefruit.[21]

[edit] "Paraherbalism"

Phytochemical researcher Varro Eugene Tyler described paraherbalism as "faulty or inferior herbalism based on pseudoscience", using scientific terminology but lacking scientific evidence for safety and efficacy. Tyler listed ten fallacies that distinguished herbalism from paraherbalism, including claims that there is a conspiracy to suppress safe and effective herbs, herbs can not cause harm, that whole herbs are more effective than molecules isolated from the plants, herbs are superior to drugs, the doctrine of signatures (the belief that the shape of the plant indicates its function) is valid, dilution of substances increases their potency (a doctrine of the pseudoscience of homeopathy), astrological alignments are significant, animal testing is not appropriate to indicate human effects, anecdotal evidence is an effective means of proving a substance works and herbs were created by God to cure disease. None of these beliefs have any basis in fact.[22][23]

[edit] See also

[edit] References

  1. ^ Alan Tillotson Growth, Maturity, Quality
  2. ^ Culpeper's Complete Herbal by Nicholas Culpeper reprinted in 2003 by Kensington Arts Press
  3. ^ The Divine Farmer's Materia Medica: A Translation of the Shen Nong Ben Cao (Blue Poppy's Great Masters Series) by Yang Shou-Zhong and Bob Flaws (translator) Blue Poppy 1998
  4. ^ Tillotson Institute of Natural Health - Growth, Manufacture, Quality
  5. ^ Making Sense of Commission E, review by Jonathan Treasure, 1999-2000.
  6. ^ Talalay P. and Talalay P., "The Importance of Using Scientific Principles in the Development of Medicinal Agents from Plants", Academic Medicine, 2001, 76, 3, p238.
  7. ^ Elvin-Lewis M. (2001). "Should we be concerned about herbal remedies". Journal of Ethnopharmacology 75 (2-3): 141–164. DOI:10.1016/S0378-8741(00)00394-9. PMID 11297844. 
  8. ^ Vickers AJ (2007). "Which botanicals or other unconventional anticancer agents should we take to clinical trial?". J Soc Integr Oncol 5 (3): 125–9. DOI:10.2310/7200.2007.011. PMC 2590766. PMID 17761132. //www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=2590766. 
  9. ^ Ernst E (2007). "Herbal medicines: balancing benefits and risks". Novartis Found. Symp. 282: 154–67; discussion 167–72, 212–8. DOI:10.1002/9780470319444.ch11. PMID 17913230. 
  10. ^ [Jane Brody. Taking Stock of Mysteries of Medicine]http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9A05EEDC1F3EF936A35756C0A96E958260&sec=health&spon=&pagewanted=2
  11. ^ Ephedra information from Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Accessed April 11, 2007.
  12. ^ Haller C, Benowitz N (2000). "Adverse cardiovascular and central nervous system events associated with dietary supplements containing ephedra alkaloids". N Engl J Med 343 (25): 1833–8. DOI:10.1056/NEJM200012213432502. PMID 11117974. 
  13. ^ Bent S, Tiedt T, Odden M, Shlipak M (2003). "The relative safety of ephedra compared with other herbal products". Ann Intern Med 138 (6): 468–71. PMID 12639079. 
  14. ^ "National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine Consumer Advisory on ephedra". 2004-10-01. http://nccam.nih.gov/health/alerts/ephedra/consumeradvisory.htm. Retrieved 2007-02-13.  ]
  15. ^ "Food and Drug Administration summary of actions regarding sale of ephedra supplements". http://www.fda.gov/oc/initiatives/ephedra/february2004/. Retrieved 2007-02-13. 
  16. ^ WebMD page on ephedra supplements. Accessed 7 Feb 2007.
  17. ^ Hiller K, Loew D. 2009. Symphyti radix. In Teedrogen und Phytopharmaka, WichtlM (ed). Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft mbH Stuttgart: Stuttgart; 644–646.
  18. ^ Benedek, B., Ziegler, A. and Ottersbach, P. (2010), Absence of mutagenic effects of a particular Symphytum officinale L. liquid extract in the bacterial reverse mutation assay. Phytotherapy Research, 24: 466–468. doi:10.1002/ptr.3000 - http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ptr.3000/abstract
  19. ^ Mattocks AR 1986. Chemistry and Toxicology of Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids, Academic Press: London; 391.
  20. ^ Cordell, G. A., Quinn-Beattie, M. L. and Farnsworth, N. R. (2001), The potential of alkaloids in drug discovery. Phytotherapy Research, 15: 183–205. doi:10.1002/ptr.890 - http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ptr.890/abstract
  21. ^ [1] Winston, David. Herbal Medicine Introduction
  22. ^ Tyler, VE; Robbers JE (1999). Tyler's Herbs of Choice: The Therapeutic Use of Phytomedicinals. Routledge. pp. 6-8. ISBN 0789001594. 
  23. ^ Tyler, VE (1999-08-31). "False Tenets of Paraherbalism". Quackwatch. http://www.quackwatch.com/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/paraherbalism.html. Retrieved 2012-04-28. 
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox
Print/export
Languages