User talk:Raeky

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end.
 Start a new talk topic.


Contents

[edit] re: Nadya Suleman

Your claims of vandalism on my part are are absolutely ridiculous. Please stop leaving unnecessary warnings on my talk page and please stop threatening me with a block of my editing privileges. No policy has been violated on my part, so best of luck if you choose to attempt to go that route. 24.137.71.242 (talk) 12:18, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

admins take blp violations very seriously, and the warn templates I used was appropriate... I'm quite familiar with policy in this reguard. — raekyt 17:29, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
There is no BLP violation. The info was properly sourced.Freshfighter9talk 01:25, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Not in the previous edits... the article has recently been taken off page protection from an assult of similar edits, and the talk page of the article discusses them already. It's still mostly rumor and even though these sources are a little better than previous TMZ type articles, they're not without their problems for BLP. — raekyt 11:40, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Re: the BLP violation, the big policies here we need to abide by are WP:BLPGOSSIP and the reason why we don't need to include something that is just now happening before the movie is even really announced officially or any kind of official information WP:NOTNEWSPAPER. — raekyt 11:52, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Regarding your most recent reversion on this subject, there was no longer an issue that I can see regarding the credibility of the sources. It seems you even concede that point. It seems you now have an issue with the wording, though I can see nothing wrong with that either. Why not just reword it? Reverting everything you don't agree with isn't productive. From where I sit, you are being rather stubborn on this subject. I'm not going to involve myself any further in this because it's likely pointless, so do what you feel is right.Freshfighter9talk 20:51, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Per WP:BRD the whole R, revert, part, means it's ok to revert changes THEN discuss them, and per WP:BLP it's best to err on the side of discussion BEFORE inclusion for controversial or objectionably content. This isn't a trivial addition, this is adding material she herself is cautious about calling porn, so wording needs to be thought out, and again per WP:BLP and WP:NOTNEWSPAPER we don't have to add this material right now, we can wait until things are certain, movie is released and not just rumor... Your welcome to contribute to the discussion I made on the talk page after last revert, if you even saw it, or invite others to comment on my behavior but to just throw out accusations of WP:OWN and other malicious behavior accusations isn't helpful to the discussion. There are routes if you think just adding information for future events about a person on their article, things that hasn't happened, things that news reporters are relying on people named "Bubbles" as their source, and for rumors from tweets of porn stars about future films, is in-line with BLP policies, then please, goahead. Otherwise I recommend caution, patience and prudence when dealing with adding PORNOGRAPHIC information to a BLP. — raekyt 20:59, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
What "future events" are you referring to? The information is question, which you are trying very hard to keep excluded, has clearly already happened. The video was filmed. It's not a rumor. The "malicious behavior accusations" as you refer to them are valid concerns. In fact, a bias in your editing may be present as well. Not an accusation, just an observation.Freshfighter9talk 16:00, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Wheres the official anointment from the studio that it was filmed or release date or title or cover art? The articles say it was filmed, but that's all based on rumor most likely stemming from the original TMZ article. — raekyt 22:14, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Information.svg Ouch! You've used a template to send a message to an experienced editor. Please review Wikipedia:Don't template the regulars or maybe listen to a little advice. Doesn't this feel cold, impersonal, and canned? It's meant in good humor. Best wishes. Geraldshields11 (talk) 01:50, 30 June 2012 (UTC)


[edit] Talkback

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Raeky. You have new messages at Solarra's talk page.
Message added 04:51, 19 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ Talk ♪ ߷ ♀ Contribs ♀ 04:51, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

[edit] WPVA

FYI, I replied to your half-month-old comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Visual arts. You were looking for specific requests however and I was not too specific. Riggr Mortis (talk) 02:16, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

[edit] The Signpost: 18 June 2012

[edit] AE

You have been mentioned at WP:AE, Arbitration Enforcement, in relation to sanctions. Fifelfoo (talk) 03:43, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

@Raeky, please remain calm and don't unnecessarily create bad blood with an editor who is acting in good faith and does have something valuable to add. I strongly advise plenty of mutual respect and patient listening. Like I told Fifelfoo, you guys agree more than you disagree, and have a great deal to learn from each other. Good luck! Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 05:56, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

[edit] The Signpost: 25 June 2012

[edit] Please comment on Talk:Filipa Moniz Perestrelo

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Filipa Moniz Perestrelo. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 10:15, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Opinion

Thanks for offering your time. I had posted two potential FPCs at PPR. You can see my cases for them at Wikipedia:Picture peer review/20120623 Sqwiki the Squirrel at Wiknic.JPG and Wikipedia:Picture peer review/Atmospheric thermocline. Does either of those have a chance?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 01:02, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Responded, thanks! — raekyt 15:14, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
One thing I note is that when your listing the articles the image is in, you NEED to sort them by EV, articles you think the image has the most EV for (and is contributing the most too) should be listed first, articles that have almost no EV should either be omitted (just say "and __ more articles). For FP criteria it just needs to have HIGH EV contribution to at least one article, using it in A LOT of articles that it has minimal or very low EV for can actually hurt the FP nomination since it looks bad to many of the reviewers to just cram images into articles that isn't helping them much. I know you advocate over-use of images in articles (something I oppose) but for the FP nominations sake, if your putting forth YOUR OWN images, best not look like your cramming it into as many articles as possible. Find just one or two GREAT articles for the image, and only put them in that during the nomination period, after the FP process is done, you can add them to others as you see fit but too many articles for your own pictures at the start seems like self-promotion and is HIGHLY looked down upon at the FP process. — raekyt 15:31, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
I have replied.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 17:30, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Pages nominated for deletion

Hi there,

Can you help me understand better as to why these pages would be deleted?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ben_Nemtin http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Dave_Lingwood http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jonnie_Penn http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Duncan_Penn

I am trying to meet the basic requirements wikipedia requires, however this has been a very, very difficult process. Any insight and helpful tips would be greatly appreciated, as I have not received any help when asked previously.

Thanks PeterJensen007 (talk) 06:29, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

I responded to you at Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#The_Buried_Life_COI that gives you the basics. All articles need to meet Wikipedia's basic guidelines for inclusion, these are setforth at WP:N, specifically for an actor they're WP:ENTERTAINER and as far as I can tell they don't meet these requirements. They're known for one TV show, has had no significant roles in any other tv show or movie, has not received major awards, has not had major news coverage about them as a person, etc. The show probably meets notability requirements but I don't see it for these individuals. If you feel I'm incorrect in this assessment then by all means state so in the deletion discussions, but keep in mind of the COI, you'll have to have clear evidence that they meet these requirements. — raekyt 11:05, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
The bar for inclusion is usually set pretty low by Inclusionists so it may not be that difficult to keep them, but generally for WP:BLP articles theres a higher level of requirements for inclusion than a non-blp article, simply because of promotion or privacy concerns. — raekyt 11:10, 2 July 2012 (UTC)


[edit] "Disruptive Creationist Slanted Edits"

making such edits will not get you any where. Further warnings or actions may be taken as well. --Cormag100 (talk) 10:00, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Good luck with that. — raekyt 10:25, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

[edit] The Signpost: 02 July 2012

[edit] Please comment on Talk:Pinta Island tortoise

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Pinta Island tortoise. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 22:15, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

[edit] First colored senator and reps.jpg

Hi Raeky, thanks for your input at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/First colored senator and reps.jpg. It's been very illuminating. I was wondering if you would be giving your Support for the nomination? – Lionel (talk) 21:22, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

[edit] A bowl of strawberries for you!

Erdbeerteller01.jpg I hadn't seen you around on WP for a while, until very recently. I don't know if you've been editing other areas, or just preoccupied with real life, but it's good to see you back! :)   — Jess· Δ♥ 03:43, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noach (parsha)

I've started an SPI. Dougweller (talk) 14:43, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

[edit] The Signpost: 09 July 2012

[edit] Please comment on Talk:Jared Lee Loughner

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Jared Lee Loughner. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 11:15, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

[edit] The Signpost: 16 July 2012

[edit] Please comment on Talk:Photosynthesis

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Photosynthesis. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 23:15, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Raeky&oldid=503195441"
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox
Print/export