User talk:Kndimov

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Subpages

Archives
Replacement filing cabinet.svg
1) 4 June 2011 – 31 December 2013
2) 1 January 2014 –

Wikipedia Signpost

Why Your Edit Was Undone and Meaning Clarification[edit]

Hello there Kndimov! I am just letting you know that I placed the section referencing tag back into the Accession of Crimea to the Russian Federation. I was not implying that the Article itself lacked sources; I was saying that the information in the 2nd paragraph of the article (before the first section) lacks sourcing. Please see the article's talk page here for full details. Thank you for taking the time to check this out and have a good day! მაLiphradicusEpicusთე 21:00, 22 March 2014 (UTC) -- LiphradicusEpicus (talkcontribs)

No problem, I believe the problem is fixed now. -- Kndimov (talk) 16:37, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for Sourcing[edit]

Hey! Thanks for adding that source to the 2nd paragraph! Just wanted to let you know that it did not go un-noticed! :) მაLiphradicusEpicusთე 20:49, 23 March 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by LiphradicusEpicus (talkcontribs)

That wasn't me, but thanks anyways! I added the "citation needed" tag at the end of the second paragraph though. -- Kndimov (talk) 21:52, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Help talk:Reverting[edit]

Thanks for helping out, but note that posts are dated and you are replying to posts which are years old. Don't excpect answers. PrimeHunter (talk) 02:49, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

I'm aware of that, and I appreciate your concern. I was simply replying so that if someone new was looking at the page with similar questions they might find the answer. -- Kndimov (talk) 02:54, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Archiving pages[edit]

Rollback[edit]

Wikipedia Rollback.svg

Hello, this is just to let you know that I've granted you Rollback rights. Just remember:

If you have any questions, please do let me know.

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:03, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Your deletions of cited work[edit]

Hi there Kndimov! I wanted to let you know that I have reverted your deletion on this article Evelin Banev "Brendo". You must know that your edits give an unrealistic view about a serious matter (Kidnapping), specifically Kidnapping_of_10-year-old_Daughter. If you are not familiar with the details, read up, but do not write history wrong. Thanks for taking the time. Cheers! --23:28, 15 April 2014 (UTC)27.122.12.73 (talk)

All I did was delete material that was like a conspiracy theory. The sources given (at the time) represented people's [the author's] opinion only. I don't think it is fair to accuse people of being involved in kidnapping without having actual evidence to support your claim. Anyone can make up a story/accusation, that doesn't mean it should be included in the article. -- Kndimov (talk) 22:21, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Idea Khonkaen VC[edit]

Hello Kndimov, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Idea Khonkaen VC, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 22:41, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Just let you know that I found the right tag this time, and that the article was deleted under section A7: "Article about a group or club, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject". -- Kndimov (talk) 14:00, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
The author just re-created the exact same article. It still does not explain the club's significance, nor does it have any sources. I have tagged it for deletion a second time. -- Kndimov (talk) 16:14, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Re: Removal of Opinion polls in Ontario general election, 2014[edit]

Feel free to re-add them. I was trying to fix something I broke, and the removal of the polls was accidental. Me-123567-Me (talk) 23:16, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

I was removing the libertarians someone had added from the riding/candidate section. I didn't see any consensus for it on the talk page, but I'm open to discuss it. :-) Me-123567-Me (talk) 23:19, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Libertarians? - Ontario election[edit]

I have started a discussion about the Libertarians in the candidate section of the Ontario election article, I thought you might want to join in. Me-123567-Me (talk) 04:41, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

I suspected that last night. It's why I warned him about sock puppetry. Me-123567-Me (talk) 14:57, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Kndimov. You have new messages at Me-123567-Me's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Edits concerning Edward Guiliano[edit]

If you edit Edward Guiliano again, I'll report you vandal.--Paeancrime (talk) 01:54, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Remove you edits vandal--Paeancrime (talk) 02:01, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
I can't clean your shit--Paeancrime (talk) 02:01, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Who are you calling a vandal?? All I ever did on that page was make minor edits that any caring editor would have done. For example here I changed the first word in the article from a pronoun ("He") to the name of the person in question ("Edward Guiliano"). Is that vandalism to you? The other edits I made were this and this. They were nothing but completing the citations given. I am not a vandal, I have done nothing but minor edits that a caring editor would do. The edit war you have going on between you and "GB fan" is only between you two. DO. NOT. DRAG. ME. INTO. THIS. -- Kndimov (talk) 02:02, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
It gets worse!!! In the edit history for the page, you said: "kndimov agreed to take back his edits, see his talk page". Where do you see this? I didn't even reply to your post and now you talk for me? I am not the vandal here. -- Kndimov (talk) 02:04, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Best for you would be to agree with me. I 'll take care of GB Fan--Paeancrime (talk) 02:06, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Just shut up and stay shut. Don't edit anymore on that article--Paeancrime (talk) 02:06, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Don't you tell me to shut up. I DON'T CARE ABOUT YOUR EDIT WAR. I only did minor constructive edits. This is not vandalism. Whether you delete the article or not, I don't care. But listen here, Paeancrime, you call me a vandal one more time, or tell me to "shut up and stay shut" and I will report you and you will be blocked. You hear me? Last warning. -- Kndimov (talk) 02:13, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
And don't go accusing me of sock puppetry, Paeancrime, like you did on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. I have been around since 2011 and am not a puppet. You on the other hand have but 27 edits (most on the user talk space). I think you are the sock puppet here, not me. -- Kndimov (talk) 02:21, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Notice[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Personal attack by User:Paeancrime. Thank you. GB fan 02:11, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Thank you! -- Kndimov (talk) 02:14, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure![edit]

TWA guide left bottom.png
Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 07:38, Saturday May 24, 2014 (UTC)

Get Help
About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge


Nakhchivan Autonomous Republic[edit]

I think the user made changes to the link and that is why it wasn't working, after removing the addition the link worked. Ninetoyadome (talk) 21:44, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Reviewer granted[edit]

Wikipedia Reviewer.svg

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also: