User talk:Kndimov
Subpages
|
Contents
- 1 Why Your Edit Was Undone and Meaning Clarification
- 2 Thanks for Sourcing
- 3 Help talk:Reverting
- 4 Archiving pages
- 5 Rollback
- 6 Your deletions of cited work
- 7 Speedy deletion declined: Idea Khonkaen VC
- 8 Re: Removal of Opinion polls in Ontario general election, 2014
- 9 Libertarians? - Ontario election
- 10 Edits concerning Edward Guiliano
- 11 Notice
- 12 Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
- 13 Nakhchivan Autonomous Republic
- 14 Reviewer granted
Why Your Edit Was Undone and Meaning Clarification[edit]
Hello there Kndimov! I am just letting you know that I placed the section referencing tag back into the Accession of Crimea to the Russian Federation. I was not implying that the Article itself lacked sources; I was saying that the information in the 2nd paragraph of the article (before the first section) lacks sourcing. Please see the article's talk page here for full details. Thank you for taking the time to check this out and have a good day! მაLiphradicusEpicusთე 21:00, 22 March 2014 (UTC) -- LiphradicusEpicus (talk • contribs)
Thanks for Sourcing[edit]
Hey! Thanks for adding that source to the 2nd paragraph! Just wanted to let you know that it did not go un-noticed! :) მაLiphradicusEpicusთე 20:49, 23 March 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by LiphradicusEpicus (talk • contribs)
- That wasn't me, but thanks anyways! I added the "citation needed" tag at the end of the second paragraph though. -- Kndimov (talk) 21:52, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
Help talk:Reverting[edit]
Thanks for helping out, but note that posts are dated and you are replying to posts which are years old. Don't excpect answers. PrimeHunter (talk) 02:49, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- I'm aware of that, and I appreciate your concern. I was simply replying so that if someone new was looking at the page with similar questions they might find the answer. -- Kndimov (talk) 02:54, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Archiving pages[edit]
Archiving pages (Content collapsed because of length) |
---|
I happened to notice that you recently archived a few talk pages. I also do this when I run across pages with significant quantities of very old sections. However, I find it easier to let either User:lowercase sigmabot III (lcSB3) or User:ClueBot III (CB3) perform the actual archiving. For a few reasons, I prefer using lcSB3. I have a couple of standard direct paste in blocks of text which make it very easy to set up archiving and just leave it to be archived by the lcSB3 within the next 24 hours. It is necessary to come back and verify the archiving after the first bot run due to various date issues (missing signatures, etc.) and some instances of malformed text in some situations. However, that can almost completely be handled with a few clicks using User:Equazcion/OneClickArchiver. I generally choose to set the archiving at 2 years, 1 year, or 90 days depending on the activity level on the page. Sometimes I choose some different amount of time due to how the discussions on the page happen to be grouped. The paste-in blocks of text I use are: <!--lcΣB3 90 days:--> {{Archives |auto=yes |search=yes |title=[[Help:Archiving a talk page|Archives]] ([[{{#titleparts:{{TALKPAGENAME}}|1}}/Archive index|index]]) |bot=lowercase sigmabot III |age=90 |style=margin-top:2px; }}<!-- The length of time in age= and units= parameters in the "Archives" template (above) should match the length of time in the "algo=" parameter within the MiszaBot config (below). Note that the "algo=" parameter is in days and the "age=" and "units=" parameters are in whatever units are in "units=". The "algo=" parameter is what specifies the length of time for which the bot actually looks. The "Archives" template specifies only what is displayed in the archive box.--> {{User:MiszaBot/config |algo=old(90d) |archive={{subst:FULLPAGENAME}}/Archive %(counter)d |counter=1 |maxarchivesize=100K |archiveheader={{Automatic archive navigator}} |minthreadsleft=4 |minthreadstoarchive=1 }} {{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn |target={{subst:FULLPAGENAME}}/Archive index |mask={{subst:FULLPAGENAME}}/Archive <#> |leading_zeros=0 |indexhere=yes }}__TOC__{{clear}} or <!--lcΣB3 2 years:--> {{Archives |auto=yes |search=yes |title=[[Help:Archiving a talk page|Archives]] ([[{{#titleparts:{{TALKPAGENAME}}|1}}/Archive index|index]]) |bot=lowercase sigmabot III |age=2|units=years |style=margin-top:2px; }}<!-- The length of time in age= and units= parameters in the "Archives" template (above) should match the length of time in the "algo=" parameter within the MiszaBot config (below). Note that the "algo=" parameter is in days and the "age=" and "units=" parameters are in whatever units are in "units=". The "algo=" parameter is what specifies the length of time for which the bot actually looks. The "Archives" template specifies only what is displayed in the archive box.--> {{User:MiszaBot/config |algo=old(730d) |archive={{subst:FULLPAGENAME}}/Archive %(counter)d |counter=1 |maxarchivesize=100K |archiveheader={{Automatic archive navigator}} |minthreadsleft=4 |minthreadstoarchive=1 }} {{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn |target={{subst:FULLPAGENAME}}/Archive index |mask={{subst:FULLPAGENAME}}/Archive <#> |leading_zeros=0 |indexhere=yes }}__TOC__{{clear}} These are included here because you might find it easier in the future to use something similar rather than manually archiving pages. In order to complete the setup of the archive indexing I then preview the page and open the red "index" link in the archive box in a new tab. The Archive index page then needs the text
It looks good. One minor issue, however. The length of time (3 years) in the {{Archives}} template (specified by I have added a HTML comment to both of the drop in text sections above. I have also added the same text to what I will normally use (minus the carriage returns used above to prevent the Note: The added comment starts on the same line as the end of the {{Archives}} template because the position of the table of contents (TOC) on the page is sensitive to extra lines between the templates. There are already a couple of things included in the drop-in text to make the TOC line up exactly with the archive box. Without previewing the page (in each instance) resulting from what is dropped in, I did not want to possibly introduce something that might cause the TOC to move down the page by some extra white-space. — Makyen (talk) 03:46, 31 March 2014 (UTC) |
Rollback[edit]
Hello, this is just to let you know that I've granted you Rollback rights. Just remember:
- Rollback gives you access to certain scripts, including Huggle and Igloo, some of which can be very powerful, so exercise caution
- Rollback is only for blatant vandalism
- Having Rollback rights does not give you any special status or authority
- Misuse of Rollback can lead to its removal by any administrator
- Please read Help:Reverting and Wikipedia:Rollback feature to get to know the workings of the feature
- You can test Rollback at Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback
- You may wish to display the {{User wikipedia/rollback}} userbox and/or the {{Rollback}} top icon on your user page
- If you have any questions, please do let me know.
HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:03, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Your deletions of cited work[edit]
Hi there Kndimov! I wanted to let you know that I have reverted your deletion on this article Evelin Banev "Brendo". You must know that your edits give an unrealistic view about a serious matter (Kidnapping), specifically Kidnapping_of_10-year-old_Daughter. If you are not familiar with the details, read up, but do not write history wrong. Thanks for taking the time. Cheers! --23:28, 15 April 2014 (UTC)27.122.12.73 (talk)
- All I did was delete material that was like a conspiracy theory. The sources given (at the time) represented
people's[the author's] opinion only. I don't think it is fair to accuse people of being involved in kidnapping without having actual evidence to support your claim. Anyone can make up a story/accusation, that doesn't mean it should be included in the article. -- Kndimov (talk) 22:21, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Idea Khonkaen VC[edit]
Hello Kndimov, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Idea Khonkaen VC, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 22:41, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
- Just let you know that I found the right tag this time, and that the article was deleted under section A7: "Article about a group or club, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject". -- Kndimov (talk) 14:00, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
Re: Removal of Opinion polls in Ontario general election, 2014[edit]
Feel free to re-add them. I was trying to fix something I broke, and the removal of the polls was accidental. Me-123567-Me (talk) 23:16, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- I was removing the libertarians someone had added from the riding/candidate section. I didn't see any consensus for it on the talk page, but I'm open to discuss it. :-) Me-123567-Me (talk) 23:19, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Libertarians? - Ontario election[edit]
I have started a discussion about the Libertarians in the candidate section of the Ontario election article, I thought you might want to join in. Me-123567-Me (talk) 04:41, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
- I suspected that last night. It's why I warned him about sock puppetry. Me-123567-Me (talk) 14:57, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Edits concerning Edward Guiliano[edit]
If you edit Edward Guiliano again, I'll report you vandal.--Paeancrime (talk) 01:54, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
- Remove you edits vandal--Paeancrime (talk) 02:01, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
-
- I can't clean your shit--Paeancrime (talk) 02:01, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
-
-
- Who are you calling a vandal?? All I ever did on that page was make minor edits that any caring editor would have done. For example here I changed the first word in the article from a pronoun ("He") to the name of the person in question ("Edward Guiliano"). Is that vandalism to you? The other edits I made were this and this. They were nothing but completing the citations given. I am not a vandal, I have done nothing but minor edits that a caring editor would do. The edit war you have going on between you and "GB fan" is only between you two. DO. NOT. DRAG. ME. INTO. THIS. -- Kndimov (talk) 02:02, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
- Best for you would be to agree with me. I 'll take care of GB Fan--Paeancrime (talk) 02:06, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Just shut up and stay shut. Don't edit anymore on that article--Paeancrime (talk) 02:06, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Don't you tell me to shut up. I DON'T CARE ABOUT YOUR EDIT WAR. I only did minor constructive edits. This is not vandalism. Whether you delete the article or not, I don't care. But listen here, Paeancrime, you call me a vandal one more time, or tell me to "shut up and stay shut" and I will report you and you will be blocked. You hear me? Last warning. -- Kndimov (talk) 02:13, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- And don't go accusing me of sock puppetry, Paeancrime, like you did on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. I have been around since 2011 and am not a puppet. You on the other hand have but 27 edits (most on the user talk space). I think you are the sock puppet here, not me. -- Kndimov (talk) 02:21, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
Notice[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Personal attack by User:Paeancrime. Thank you. GB fan 02:11, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure![edit]
-
-
-
-
- Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-
-
-
-- 07:38, Saturday May 24, 2014 (UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Nakhchivan Autonomous Republic[edit]
I think the user made changes to the link and that is why it wasn't working, after removing the addition the link worked. Ninetoyadome (talk) 21:44, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
Reviewer granted[edit]
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
- Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. — MusikAnimal talk 22:57, 20 May 2014 (UTC)