User talk:Widr
| This is Widr's talk page, where you can send messages and comments to Widr. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|||
| Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 | |||
|
|
|||
Contents
chesh103[edit]
Hi Widr - good spot. I'm a journalist running a piece on how Wikipedia self-corrects, hence the alteration. Sorry for the trouble. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chesh103 (talk • contribs) 10:41, 22 April 2015
EDIT[edit]
My edit was accurate and constructive — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.192.25.200 (talk) 03:49, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Please be careful with BLPs[edit]
Hi there. Your recent edit at John Nicolson (journalist) re-added controversial and uncited information about a living person which had been correctly removed. Please be careful when editing that you avoid doing this in the future. Stifle (talk) 16:23, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
- @Stifle: Actually I had intended to remove the good-faith commentary left by the IP. Sometimes you miss something and/or add something back by mistake when using anti-vandalism tools such as STiki. That's human, unfortunately. I did a quick Google search, and it seems that the person in question has at least at some point lived in Spitalfields, so it's not all made up. Unsourced—like several other parts of the article—and possibly incorrect, yes, but hardly "defamatory" (hence the warning you have left to the IP that had originally added that piece as their one and only edit). Widr (talk) 17:17, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Joshua Hoffman for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joshua Hoffman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joshua Hoffman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Edcolins (talk)
