This page transcludes (or when this is not feasible, links to) all of the deletion debates opened today on the English-language Wikipedia, including articles, categories, templates, and others, as a convenience to XfD-watchers. Please note that because this material is transcluded, watchlisting this page will not provide you with watchlist updates about deletions; WP:DELT works best as a browser bookmark checked regularly.

1 Speedy deletion candidates
2 Articles
3 Files
- 3.1 Files for discussion
  - 3.1.1 April 10
4 Categories
- 4.1 April 10
5 Redirects
- 5.1 April 10
6 Templates
- 6.1 April 10
  - 6.1.1 Template:Year in the Palestinian territories
  - 6.1.2 Template:Year in Mandatory Palestine
7 Miscellany
8 Deletion review
- 8.1 10 April 2017
  - 8.1.1 Gray Routes

Speedy deletion candidates[edit]

The category is at Category:Candidates for speedy deletion.

Articles[edit]

Recent AfDs: Today Yesterday

Media Organisations Biography Society Web Games Science Arts Places Indiscern. Not-Sorted

< 9 April	11 April >

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

Scratch orchestra (type of orchestra)[edit]

(Find sources: "Scratch orchestra (type of orchestra)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Definition of a phrase with little scope for further expansion, WP:NOT#DICTIONARY Verbcatcher (talk) 16:45, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Na Bhuto Na Bhavishyati[edit]

(Find sources: "Na Bhuto Na Bhavishyati" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Non notable film with a non notable cast and crew. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. Searching also does not provide for any better sources. Jupitus Smart 16:42, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Nikkesha[edit]

(Find sources: "Nikkesha" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Non notable actress. Has supposedly acted in some movies and ads, though the references mentioned talk about a play in which she happens to be one of the performers. Searching also does not provide any better sources. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. Jupitus Smart 16:28, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Undisclosed paid editing NeilN ^{talk to me} 16:35, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

RentSeeker.ca[edit]

(Find sources: "RentSeeker.ca" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Recreation on the same day it had already been speedied, by a sock and evident edit-for-hire editor, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/IMZahidIqbal. Andy Dingley (talk) 16:00, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Pocket Maar[edit]

(Find sources: "Pocket Maar" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

The article was made before the movie commenced principal photography. All the sources are dead, and on searching no sources turn up which indicate that the movie went beyond its planning stage. Besides the director has died since then, and the main actress has stopped her acting career. Fails WP:NFILM and is a case of WP:TOOSOON and WP:CRYSTAL. Jupitus Smart 15:52, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Charlie Fink discography[edit]

(Find sources: "Charlie Fink discography" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

WP:TOOSOON. I see no necessity for a discography of someone who has barely released more records than I have. It can clearly be contained in the biog. TheLongTone (talk) 15:49, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:58, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:12, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

MOS:DISCOGRAPHY backs up the nomination, as I read it. Delete per nom. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:14, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Jennifer Banko[edit]

(Find sources: "Jennifer Banko" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Lack of reliable sources in article, and after searching, no evidence of WP:SIGCOV found. Appears to fail WP:NACTORS & WP:GNG as I failed to find any WP:RS independent coverage regarding roles she appeared in, only press releases and non-notable/reliable blogs. Prior AfD in late 2014 closed as no consensus after 2 weeks and zero participation. Does not appear to have had any notable roles or coverage since then (Cheerleader Camp: To the Death does not appear to be notable per WP:NFILM). Roberticus talk 15:40, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Šimon Štefanec[edit]

(Find sources: "Šimon Štefanec" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested by the article's creator on the grounds that he plays for a Serie B club. While accurate, this does not confer notability as he has yet to actually play in Serie B, meaning the article still fails WP:NSPORT. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:23, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:23, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Keep He plays in Serie B team, mostly in Campionato Nazionale Primavera he is also member of Slovakia national under-19 football team^[1]

(User talk:Svk fan) 17:37, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Zinox Technologies[edit]

(Find sources: "Zinox Technologies" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

no visible notibility Mandavi (talk) 15:14, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Dmitri Osipov (ice hockey, born 1996)[edit]

(Find sources: "Dmitri Osipov (ice hockey, born 1996)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Not notable, does not meet WP:NHOCKEY or WP:GNG GiovanniSidwell (talk) 15:11, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note that being selected first in a minor league draft, without any other claim to notability, does not satisfy WP:NHOCKEY. GiovanniSidwell (talk) 15:12, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Ex Mach Tina[edit]

(Find sources: "Ex Mach Tina" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Nothing other than WP:ROUTINE coverage, nothing to show this particular episode passes WP:GNG. Well written, but not every episode of every tv show is notable. As per WP:EPISODE, articles for a show's individual should only, "Create pages for outstanding episodes". Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:09, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

As you can see in the List of Bob's Burgers episodes most of the TV show's episodes have an article here. Why did you pick one article of it and nominate it for deletion? There some articles which aren't well written. --Morten Haan 🏂 talk • skin draft 15:17, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Comment - because it's not notable. The fact that there are articles about other non-notable episodes is an WP:OSE argument. Which in this case, in my opinion, isn't valid. I came across this particular article as part of new page patrolling. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:42, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

I think that episodes of Bob's Burgers have enough independent secondary sources so that they are notable even if article uses just one. --Morten Haan 🏂 talk • skin draft 15:55, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Conair Flight OY 482 from Málaga[edit]

(Find sources: "Conair Flight OY 482 from Málaga" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Unremarkable aviation incident. WP:NOTNEWS, especially stale news of a trivial nature. TheLongTone (talk) 15:06, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:10, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:10, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:10, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete per WP:NOTNEWS. Concur with nom. MB 15:41, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
Delete minor aviation incident, of which there are many. Nothing makes this one notable. WP:NOTNEWS Neiltonks (talk) 16:14, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Amin Surani[edit]

(Find sources: "Amin Surani" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

GNG, passing mentions in English press, notability not really demonstrated. and then some more ATA L3X1 (distant write) 15:04, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:15, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:15, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Soul Kingz Records[edit]

(Find sources: "Soul Kingz Records" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Article has no references outside of Soul Kingz own website and iTunes. The "notable" artists on the label all have articles created by the same person who made this article, FrankKoch, and they all base their notability on one thing: a claim of having a single song chart on the German Urban Charts with the only evidence being a facebook post from one of the artists themselves (MNSSH). This appears to be a slow moving attempt to promote a label and its artists. Justeditingtoday (talk) 14:43, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:26, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:26, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

List of Islam-related terrorist attacks[edit]

(Find sources: "List of Islam-related terrorist attacks" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Highly speculative list that leaves a lot of ambiguity. I do not recall the UK or Russian governments discount "Islamist" backgrounds in recent attacks. For London this is still undecided. Where do you draw the line and who will decide if something is islamist or not? And why do we have a list of muslim terror attacks separate from non-muslim terror attacks? I find that borderline racist. If we are talking about claims that some of those attacks were perpetrated by what the media has called "petty criminals with low life success" who happen to be muslims and pledge allegiance to ISIS (which is often unclear), this may still be Islamist or Islamism-inspired?! This list has too many grey areas to ever be reliable and factual. In likely conflict with WP:OR, WP:VERIFY, WP:!TRUTHFINDERS. Therefore delete. Jake Brockman (talk) 14:18, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

"Nec ad omne clarum facinus audaces Jakis manus Stabuli fugavit turpis Augise labor." English→Seneca, Hercules Furens vv. 247-248, tr. by Frank Miller.84.73.134.206 (talk) 15:17, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

@84.73.134.206: Explain what this has to do with this discussion, or I'll be removing it. Exemplo347 (talk) 15:20, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

I saw on Jake's user page that he's fluent in Latin. I like his argument, but I believe that freeing WP from racist stereotypes is an immense task, like Hercules cleaning the Augean Stables. The quote means: "nor did Jake's hands, bold to attempt all glorious deeds, shirk the foul labour of the Augean stalls.". Feel free to remove it.84.73.134.206 (talk) 15:34, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete as some sort of weird content fork of List of Islamist terrorist attacks. The point here is spectacularly unclear; attacks by Muslims that aren't considered terrorists? Terrorists that do not declare a strictly religious motivation for committing the act? The purpose of a list is to list things that are alike, that can be grouped together and noted for their sameness. This seems to attempt to classify things by what they are not. ValarianB (talk) 14:40, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
Keep The new list includes the attacks perpetrated by Muslims not Islamists to evade the uncertainty of motives ! The article does not mean racism because Islam is not a race, and it only documents incidents ! There is no need to call people racists just for creating a Wikipedia page to list incidents of people being killed and massacred by "petty criminals with low life success who happen to be Muslims and pledge allegiance to ISIS", The notification for deletion is utter nonsense combined with pathetic justifications, users argue not to include the attacks under the "Islamist attacks" so the solution for this political correctness is to categorize the incidents into a new list of "Islam-related attacks" !! LeoHsn (talk) 15:03, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
Delete List based on unclear criteria, entries selected by the author in an indiscriminate way. Exemplo347 (talk) 15:11, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

@ Exemplo347: "unclear criteria, entries selected by the author in an indiscriminate way" hahahahahahaha !!! LeoHsn (talk) 15:23, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

It's funny because it's true. Exemplo347 (talk) 15:25, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

@ Exemplo347: you are a joke ! keep up the shameful justifications ... hahahahahahahaha ! LeoHsn (talk) 15:28, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Maybe you should read WP:NPA sometime. Stick to policy-based discussion like everyone else. Exemplo347 (talk) 15:29, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

We only respect people who deserve to be respected !!! respect is earned from others spontaneously not by POLICIES !! LeoHsn (talk) 15:33, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Well let me know if you have a comment to make that is based on Wikipedia's policies or guidelines. Exemplo347 (talk) 15:40, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete. Actually it is difficult sometimes to pin an exact violation of WP policy to an article. Some just smell bad, like this one. I'd go for the risk of becoming a POV fork & the lack of suitable inclusion criteria.TheLongTone (talk) 15:46, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

(Personal attack removed) (Personal attack removed)

I would create a new page called "Religion of peace strikes again", that would be cool, to list the incidents which are not included under the "ISLAMIST" criteria ! or name it as "List of terror attacks perpetrated by petty criminals with low life success who happen to be muslims and pledge allegiance to ISIS" !! You can choose either one in order to document the attacks on Egyptian churches and other ramming attacks perpetrated by peaceful Muslims ! LeoHsn (talk) 16:24, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

SuperCarlinBrothers[edit]

(Find sources: "SuperCarlinBrothers" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Fails WP:GNG: BEFORE did not produce significant coverage in demonstrably independent and reliable sources. —swpb^T 13:04, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —swpb^T 13:05, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete It may be significant that creating this article was the creator's only edit, and it reads like an advert. This does not have coverage in reliable sources and is not notable. MartinJones (talk) 13:27, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Adrian Petre[edit]

(Find sources: "Adrian Petre" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

This footballer fails WP:NFOOTBALL as a player that has not played in any WP:FPL (fully proffessional league). Fbgpwns5277 (talk) 12:51, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete as above, Liga II is not a fully professional league. No article in Romanian Wikipedia and no evidence that the language issue is the reason for lack of sources meeting GNG. MartinJones (talk) 13:29, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Cal State Fullerton Titans women's basketball[edit]

(Find sources: "Cal State Fullerton Titans women's basketball" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Article was tagged as needing secondary sources after 6 weeks nothing was added I then Prodded it as I could find nothing over and above routine coverage it was unprodded with the comment "Does need independent sources, but really no question to me that the subject meets WP:GNG" but no sources were added to support this statement. Unfortunately all that is left is to propose the article for deletion. Article fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG Domdeparis (talk) 12:19, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Keep Deletion is never an alternative to cleanup, which IMO may not even be necessary as a Division I collegiate team should be considered de facto notable. Hell they were national champions in 1970. A rather poorly-concocted nomination, sorry to say. ValarianB (talk) 13:00, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
Keep: I agree with ValarianB. Just being a Division I basketball team makes them, in my opinion, pretty notable. The article certainly could use some work, but that doesn't make it any less notable. bojo | talk 13:17, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Comment Clean-up is different to proving notability. Notability is not inherent it has to be proved and there are no rules stating that all Div 1 teams are inherently notable or presumed notable. WP:NORG applies to sporting teams and there is no independent coverage in-depth or otherwise. If you can find me any policy rules that support what you are both implying when you say "in my opinion" I will happily retract the nomination. Domdeparis (talk) 13:58, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Comment – I de-prodded the article. Because generally, every game, every roster move and every storyline gets covered for D1 programs, which is a pretty good indicator of GNG. I haven't had time to research yet, but if this case is the exception I will be happy to vote "delete." But in either case, this subject absolutely deserves a discussion rather than just fading away because no one noticed a PROD. Rikster2 (talk) 14:15, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Comment I understand the logic but knowing that a PROD is on for a week IMHO it would have been better to look for the sources before deprodding it is the 4th suggested action in WP:DEPROD. Before PRODDING it I tagged it and edits were made after the tag but 6 weeks later still no external sources to prove notability so I tried to find independent in-depth coverage myself to try and improve the article and nothing came up, as you said there may be stuff out there so I prodded it rather than Afd to give more time to address the problem. As there are no specific guidelines for teams they have to meet WP:NORG and as it is this page doesn't so even if ValarianB thinks it was a poorly concocted nomination I don't agree with him (obviously) and he may want to actually read and address the point about the notability and find the sources necessary. Domdeparis (talk) 15:04, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

OK, well I disagree and it is good that we can ensure we will have an AfD discussion. Mind you, I wasn't even required to give a reason for removing the PROD. That method is for non-controversial nominations - I don't believe this qualifies. Rikster2 (talk) 15:29, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

I didn't think it would be controversial as the article clearly doesn't meet GNG or NORG...my bad and as I mentioned addressing the problem cited is a suggested action but it would have avoided an Afd discussion though.Domdeparis (talk) 15:42, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Keep Article could use expansion and additional references, not deletion per WP:ATD. I've added a few from The Orange County Register to get started. Meets WP:GNG. Hmlarson (talk) 15:40, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Christopher Elliott (actor)[edit]

(Find sources: "Christopher Elliott (actor)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Minor actor with apparently no significant or notable roles. No significant coverage in independent sources. Boneymau (talk) 11:24, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Boneymau (talk) 11:25, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Boneymau (talk) 11:25, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Boneymau (talk) 11:25, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete I looked for sources but couldn't find enough to show that he should have an article. This would need starting again anyway, as so much of it is definitely written by his agents. He has acted in several TV shows, it's true, but significant roles? I don't see it. MartinJones (talk) 12:05, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Comment This is pretty bad puff-piece writing that extends beyond this article, see for example Thunderstone (TV series). The line "Christopher Elliott (who later appeared in Under Jakob's Ladder" gets a mention in the lead of the article, but Elliot is over 30 spots down the full cast list at imdb. Will probably call for deletion as well, I want to do due diligence on sources first, will try to look later. ValarianB (talk) 13:11, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete Recurring (6 appearances in a 52-episode run) small role in Thunderstone tv show, 2nd billing in Under Jakob's Ladder, relatively small film are the subject's high-water marks. Not enough there, not enough coverage in sources to justify a biographical article. ValarianB (talk) 14:29, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Gio Matteo Natoli[edit]

(Find sources: "Gio Matteo Natoli" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

This person does not appear to meet our notability requirements – one brief mention is all I've been able to find in modern sources. The page was created by globally-locked long-term nuisance editor Alec Smithson, who was/is obsessed with people named "Natoli". Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:19, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Comment I haven't come across Alec Smithson's other stuff, but this also has an article in the Portuguese version of Wikipedia. ~~That one seems very well-sourced. I think this is probably notable but~~ most sources will not be in the English language. MartinJones (talk) 12:08, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Good catch, MartinJones, that's Alec Smithson for certain (note the Telecom Italia IP address)! But to be doubly sure, pinging Voceditenore – who is also familiar with this editor – for a second opinion. However well-sourced that page may look at first sight, you'll note that even with all the duplicated references and general bluster and obfuscation, there's exactly one reference there that's less than about 150 years old – the same Domenico Ligresti book that's the only ref in the stub I wrote here. I read Italian without difficulty, by the way, and have searched for sources in that language. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:48, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for your detailed and convincing response, Justlettersandnumbers. MartinJones (talk) 14:11, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Financial philately[edit]

(Find sources: "Financial philately" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Unsourced, no evidence of notability, PROD removed by IP editor likely to be creator of article Melcous (talk) 11:09, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Merge/redirect to Philatelic investment: I started adding references to this article before noticing the existing and more substantial Philatelic investment article. AllyD (talk) 12:10, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Melcous, why do you object to a merge or did these 2 discussions start about the same time? I think a merge and redirect looks best; do you think Philatelic investment is also not worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia? MartinJones (talk) 12:13, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

The Merge To tag was added (by me) after this AfD began. I should add that I'm not sure there is any suitable content for merging, that redirect is the better outcome in my opinion. AllyD (talk) 12:46, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

I have no real objection to a redirect, although there doesn't really seem to be much evidence available that this is a common term. And yes, as AllyD has said, the AfD began before that suggestion was raised. Melcous (talk) 12:51, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Redirect There's no sources that show that this is a notable term. MartinJones (talk) 13:24, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete entirely. This is not an established term in philately or investment as far as I am aware and Philatelic investment already covers the topic well. Philafrenzy (talk) 14:07, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
Delete Original research about a topic that has no coverage by that name, at least as far as Google can tell. There isn't even any specific and intelligible information in the article. Fails WP:N, and there isn't any point in a redirect to anything because, well, again, Google. This isn't a phrase people are like to be searching for. Largoplazo (talk) 16:23, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Synesthesia (Web Series)[edit]

(Find sources: "Synesthesia (Web Series)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Not a clearly notable comedy / drama web-series. I stopped short of deleting per WP:CSD#A7 because there were passing mentions to notable people in one section (albeit unsourced). It won't hurt us to leave this article around for a bit while we have a full discussion. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 10:46, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 10:51, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete - Non-notable web content. Fails to demonstrate notability. reddogsix (talk) 12:00, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
Delete this is just a small and very recent web series which has just finished its kickstarter goal of ~5000$. All the sources in the article are non RS from social media or the webpage of the series/its director. They do some name-dropping, but its based on facebook likes or not sourced at all. I tried to locate some more sources which talk about it, but I couldn't come up with anything; just a lot of promotional social media noise from the producers of the series. It looks like some kind of film student/graduate work, judging from the biography of the director (can be read on IMDB), who seem to be very good in media marketing. Also neither the director nor the other associated people (actors etc.) are or have achieved anything notable to date. This series fails the specific WP:NFO in all points. With the complete lack of reliable sources it also fails WP:GNG. The article should therefore be deleted. I also think its a promotion piece. The creator of the article has the name "Madelberg" -> Madelberg Media is a "distributor" of this series according to imdb (link). Dead Mary (talk) 12:04, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete Good luck to them, but when they need to use Kickstarter and Facebook as sources, you know there's a problem. Maybe it'll become notable (I doubt it) but it fails for now. MartinJones (talk) 12:15, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Undisclosed paid editing NeilN ^{talk to me} 16:36, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Salim Ghauri[edit]

(Find sources: "Salim Ghauri" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Another creation by prolific sock Macrolancer (talk · contribs) / Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/IMZahidIqbal and likely paid editor. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:29, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 10:51, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 10:51, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Comment I'm unsure why you wish to delete this. Do we delete pages just because they are potentially (unproven) paid editing, or from a probable sockpuppet? What are your objections to this person being notable - even with the concerns raised above, we should re-write or improve rather than delete if he is notable, unless there is a policy I haven't read before on this. MartinJones (talk) 12:17, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

DENY and BURDEN are a big part of these AfDs (and this is from an editor advertising themselves on Facebook, after all, with a prolific list of already-blocked socks).

But this person is supposedly notable as CEO of Netsol - we don't have an article on Netsol, and when we had a mere redirect on it, even that got deleted. This biog article is now half the size it was, after some well-overblown claims were removed (Netsol might meet CMMI 5, but they aren't the only people to do so - nor is it even clear why CMMI, a decades old standard, even conveys that much notability for a company these days. It's like describing a new startup as the finest of today's buggy whip makers) So they still have to make the case that this meets BLPN, and under this pile of promotion, I'm not seeing it. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:35, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for expanding on your reasons, Andy. I've looked extensively for sources, and although I may be missing some which are not in English, I cannot find evidence that this man crosses the threshold of notability. Delete. MartinJones (talk) 13:23, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Rémi Grellety[edit]

(Find sources: "Rémi Grellety" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Someone please correct me if I am wrong here, but isn't this a case of notability being inherited? The film for which he was producer was nominated for a national award— that makes the film notable, but the producer? (the associate producer? The editor? The director? The gaffer? etc.?). A google search turns up twitter, facebook, IMDb, LinkedIn, various directory listings, photographs of him, and ample discussion of the film, but I am not finding discussion of him directly. References are mentions as the producer of the film. KDS4444 (talk) 10:28, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 10:52, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 10:52, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete Where are the sources which show he is notable? Google's not showing it and it isn't showing in the article itself either. MartinJones (talk) 12:29, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Philatelic equity[edit]

(Find sources: "Philatelic equity" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Adds no value to stamp collecting and philately. No references and a non-neutral statement of opinion. Robert McClenon (talk) 10:17, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete It is certainly a personal analysis, largely unintelligible, by the author, essentially original research, and absolutely not notable, given that Google returns two hits, both of them gibberish, for this phrase. Largoplazo (talk) 10:28, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Nuremberg moot court[edit]

(Find sources: "Nuremberg moot court" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Non-notable classroom activity. KDS4444 (talk) 10:11, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 10:54, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Zaheer Abbass Gondal[edit]

(Find sources: "Zaheer Abbass Gondal" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

An unsourced Biography of a Living Person (contrary to the Biographies of Living Persons policy) about a person who does not meet the General Notability Guideline. A person's notability is not inherited from the things he has worked on, or the people he has worked with. Exemplo347 (talk) 10:06, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete - appears to be a WP:Coatrack to promote the ideas, and the books, (one of several started by the same author), rather than a biography of a notable person - Arjayay (talk) 10:25, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 10:55, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 10:55, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 10:55, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete - Also note that article was previously tagged with a 'prod blp' tag because it is totally unreferenced. The tag was removed by the article creator clearly editing logged out to avoid scrutiny. The article is still totally unreferenced and can be deleted on this point alone. I also deleted two external links added by the logged out user that linked to sites advertising the very books listed in the article. 86.145.209.181 (talk) 13:59, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

List of Sanitary Wares Companies in India[edit]

(Find sources: "List of Sanitary Wares Companies in India" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Over-specific list category - appears to be "ceramic bathroom companies whose products are available in India". (None of the companies with articles are based in India.) McGeddon (talk) 09:50, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 10:56, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete, if it were a list of Indian companies manufacturing plumbing fixtures it would have some merit, but a list of companies whose wares happen to be available in India is unmaintainable and useless (it already has verifiability issues and originally seems custom-made to include a link to spam promoting a specific company, now removed). Huon (talk) 11:26, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Samuel Robinson (actor)[edit]

(Find sources: "Samuel Robinson (actor)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

fails WP:ENT ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 09:50, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 09:51, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 09:51, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 09:51, 10 April 2017 (UTC)=

Keep @Mahveotm: This article meets all the requirements to be worthy of a Wikipedia Article. There are more than enough valid references and also the user was deemed notable enough to be verified by Twitter; you can verify this by taking another look at the article. I should add that a number of stronger references not included in the article can be found by simply searching Samuel Robinson Actor. This Actor has was the lead in a film that was screened at the last edition of the Toronto Film Festival.This actor has granted numerous unsolicited interviews.Here are some of the references that proves the notability ffor a Wikipedia article of this Actor.

1. http://pulse.ng/movies/samuel-robinson-injustices-faced-by-young-nigerian-actors-id5027939.html

2.http://dailypost.ng/2016/05/12/nollywood-young-actors-suffer-unfair-treatment-producers-samuel-robinson/

3.https://ynaija.com/samuel-robinson/

4.http://naijagists.com/meet-samuel-robinson-ambitious-teenager-nigeria-planning-borrow-n20million-fidelity-bank/

5.http://ebonylifetv.com/programming/ebonylife-homegrown/drama/drama-series/the-governor/

6. https://www.bellanaija.com/2016/08/tiff2016-find-out-the-8-nigerian-movies-selected-for-this-years-toronto-international-film-festival-what-the-city-to-city-spotlight-means-for-nollywood/

7.http://t.guardian.ng/saturday-magazine/youth-magazine/simi-and-tofu-ochello-the-governors-kids/

8.http://socialspy.ng/2016/07/11/exclusive-interview-with-nollywood-actor-samuel-robinson/

9. http://genevieveng.com/5-minutes-with-samuel-robison/

10. http://www.lushradioonline.com/news/5491/

11.http://pulse.ng/movies/green-white-green-watch-ifeanyi-dike-jr-okey-uzoeshi-bimbo-manuel-in-trailer-id5388773.html

12.http://m.screendaily.com/5109088.article

13.http://omojuwa.com/2015/10/the-green-white-green-film-by-abba-makama-watch/

14. http://onobello.com/8-bars-a-clef-actor-samuel-robinson-recounts-his-experience-the-injustices-faced-by-young-nigerian-actors/

15. http://thenet.ng/2016/05/net-films-8-bars-and-a-clef/

16. https://m.thenigerianvoice.com/movie/218337/my-spilled-sweat-and-blood-for-the-movie-8-bars-a-clef.html

17.http://www.newsflash.com.ng/2016/05/16/8-bars-a-clef-watch-linda-ejiofor-ibk-bimbo-akintola-in-behind-the-scenes-video/

18. https://atlanticreporter.com/index.php/2016/05/16/8-bars-a-clef-watch-linda-ejiofor-ibk-bimbo-akintola-in-behind-the-scenes-video/

19. https://entertainment.naij.com/931953-yay-see-8-nigerian-films-chosen-2016-toronto-international-film-festival.html

20.http://thetfs.ca/2016/09/08/tiff-2016-review-green-white-green/

This actor has been featured in both National and international press releases (references above). Please take time to check the independent references to note that the Actor was mentioned in all of them. ... This Actor is verified by Twitter

. Twitter.com/samuelrobinsonx

I am grateful to users like you who go out of their way to keep Wikipedia filtered of Vanity and Self promotional articles, I thank you and Wikipedia thanks you for being an active contributing member helping to keep Wikipedia clean of Junk. However, this article is not part of junk. I believe that the article can be improved but according to Wikipedias guide lines, this Actor is notable enough to have a Wikipedia page. If you have a contrary opinion, please provide your reasons and sufficient evidence of why you believe this article should be deleted. Thank you once again for the time you take out to keep Wikipedia junk free. My vote is Keep.

Piotr Marciniak (architect)[edit]

(Find sources: "Piotr Marciniak (architect)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) requirement. " It was deprodded by User:DGG with the following rationale "might pass WP:PROF or WP:aUTHOR". Sadly, I cannot find any sources to show that this is the case. He is a moderately successful architect, but I don't think he is encyclopedic (he didn't win the Honorary SARP Award yet), for WP:PROF this is not looking promising ([1]), and as for WP:AUTHOR, he has published several books, but I couldn't find any reviews or indication of impact. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:29, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 10:57, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 10:57, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Journal of Fungi[edit]

(Find sources: "Journal of Fungi" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Article deleted after expired PROD in July 2016. PROD reason was "Non-notable new journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Albeit slightly less new now (the journal was established in 2015), the only difference with the previous version of the article is that the journal is now included in DOAJ, which is not a selective database in the sense of NJournals. Therefore, PROD reason still stands, hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 09:15, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:57, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:57, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:57, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Undisclosed paid editing NeilN ^{talk to me} 16:37, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Aseefa Bhutto Zardari[edit]

(Find sources: "Aseefa Bhutto Zardari" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

WP:NOTINHERITED

Another creation by prolific sock Macrolancer (talk · contribs) / Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/IMZahidIqbal and likely paid editor. Andy Dingley (talk) 08:40, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:06, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:07, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:07, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Undisclosed paid editing NeilN ^{talk to me} 16:37, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Alhamra Unplugged[edit]

(Find sources: "Alhamra Unplugged" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Another creation by prolific sock Macrolancer (talk · contribs) / Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/IMZahidIqbal and likely paid editor. Andy Dingley (talk) 08:39, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:08, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:08, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Undisclosed paid editing NeilN ^{talk to me} 16:38, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Idea Croron Ka[edit]

(Find sources: "Idea Croron Ka" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Another creation by prolific sock Macrolancer (talk · contribs) / Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/IMZahidIqbal and likely paid editor.

Also note that the linked BLPs Nabeel A. Qadeer Salim Ghauri, Umar Saif also involve the same editor(s). Andy Dingley (talk) 08:35, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:10, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:10, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Charanjeet Singh Sondhi[edit]

(Find sources: "Charanjeet Singh Sondhi" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Non-notable singer. Winged Blades ^Godric 07:13, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Winged Blades ^Godric 07:14, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Winged Blades ^Godric 07:14, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Seven Wonders Park, Kota[edit]

(Find sources: "Seven Wonders Park, Kota" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

No indication of notability. Maybe move to Wikivoyage? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 06:40, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:11, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:12, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Layla Rivera[edit]

(Find sources: "Layla Rivera" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Fails gng and pornbio. Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:29, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:12, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:13, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:16, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Lela Star[edit]

(Find sources: "Lela Star" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Is adam film award sufficient to pass pornbio. I suspect not and a clear gng fail so should be deleted. Technical sng passes are not free passes if the article clearly fail gng. Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:28, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete - Not notable. Lexlex (talk) 06:34, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Comment - I support the removal of the article. However, I wonder if being nominated for and/or winning awards for the XXX Industry carries the same notability as it does in the music world? So, my delete vote may be overruled by the rules. Kellymoat (talk) 06:42, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

It does carry the same notability, but the award it's self has to have some sort of notable significance, or the pornographic actor/actress has to have an accumulation of awards from their career. Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 07:37, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete per nom. Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 07:37, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:16, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:17, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:18, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Nadia Styles[edit]

(Find sources: "Nadia Styles" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Fails pornbio and gng, there is a single source. Also feel this is unbalanced and if it reflects the source then the article is inherantly unsalvagable. Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:26, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete Fails WP:GNG, and the writing of the article seems too non-neutral. Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 07:08, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Nautica Thorn[edit]

(Find sources: "Nautica Thorn" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

No notable porn performer failing pornbio and gng, there are a bunch of interviews but the publications appear non notable and interviews are a primary source and do not confer notability. Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:24, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete No awards won, no multiple features in notable mainstream media. Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 07:19, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:26, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:28, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hawaii-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:30, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

The Anime Awards[edit]

(Find sources: "The Anime Awards" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Article as a standalone isn't notable and should be deleted and/or merged with the main Crunchyroll article. Most of the sources link directly to the Award website, which raises some promotional concerns too. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 06:06, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

I don't mind merging this article with the Crunchyroll page. As for sources, the problem is that they are few sources for the awards outside of Crunchyroll itself. ISD (talk) 07:53, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Tomas Gorny[edit]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments by suspected single-purpose accounts or canvassed users may be tagged using: {{subst:spa|username}} or {{subst:canvassed|username}}

(Find sources: "Tomas Gorny" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

An unremarkable businessman. Known as a serial entrepreneur and his "immigrant achieves success" human interest story.

The article went through multiple AfDs, the latest closing as "no consensus". (Prior results had been "no consensus" & "delete", then recreated via WP:DR, hence another AfD since). Since then, maintaining neutrality of this article has been a struggle, as evidenced by the discussions on Talk page.

The article recently went through a series of promotional edits, and now contains self-cited trivia such as:

Today, according to SiteLock's website, their software is the only web security solution to offer complete, cloud-based website protection.^[2]

References

^ http://sport.aktuality.sk/c/202931/talentovany-simon-stefanec-bude-pokracovat-v-kariere-v-taliansku/
^ "About/Company Overview". SiteLock. UnitedWeb. Retrieved 24 March 2017.

It seems near impossible to get the article to an NPOV state; hence this nomination. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:13, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:17, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy Keep It’s no surprise that K.e.coffman is the one nominating this article for deletion after SwisterTwister, whom I believe is the former editor’s meatpuppet fails when he tried to do the exact same thing. The Editor Interaction Analyzer shows that both of these individuals edit within one minute of each other on the same article, sometimes just 2 seconds apart! This evidence strongly suggests offsite collaboration between the two. Faithful editors have repeatedly tried to add sources, such as articles by Forbes and Entrepreneur, to the article, but both of these characters magically show up together and collectively oppose such efforts. This WP:GAMING of Wikipedia needs to stop. This is an encyclopaedia, not a personal playground. Eliko007 (talk) 03:34, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Let's not turn this discussion into personal attacks, shall we? To report editor behaviour issues, please use WP:ANI, instead of casting aspersions here. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:56, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Comment - Not only is this not the proper venue for these allegations, they are baseless as the Editor Interaction Analyzer clearly shows. The Editor Interaction Tool only indicates the least amount of time between edits, not the first edit or when they !voted which would be indicator of possible collusion between editors. One actually needs to look at the interactions to determine this such as
(here [2] !votes 4 days apart - 1 minute interaction was after they !voted),

(here [3] !votes 9 days apart - 1 minute interaction was after they !voted) and

(here [4] !votes 6 days apart - 2 minute interaction was after they !voted).

Both SwisterTwister (16,219 AFD's) and K.e.coffman (3,014 AFD's) are tireless and valuable participants at AFD's and it is not unusual, in fact, it is common that they will, from time to time, vote at the same AFD's as I, and several of the other editors at this discussion have. Lastly, in the last week K.e.coffman has participated in over 30 AFD's and this is the only one of those that SwisterTwister has participated in. CBS527^Talk 16:07, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Weak delete. I am not impressed by the Enterpreneur content, which is reprinted in Today.com. I see two decent refs here: BI at [5] and Forbes cited above. The Forbes one is essentially a curated blog. The BI piece is best, and I can't say anything bad about it. I can't see how the article looked when I prodded/AfD it (it got deleted at 2nd AFD). This one, nonetheless, still seems on the wrong side of being notable. I don't think this individual meets GNG. --Hanyangprofessor2 (talk) 04:16, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Comment --- I would note that the above Keep voter has repeatedly removed the notability tag from the article: diff1 & diff2. The latter one was the editor's 6th edit since opening an account. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:28, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Nice of you to point that out. Are you forgetting to point out that you've edit warred to re-instate the tag (round 1, round 2, round 3) despite the fact that multiple editors have pointed out that the article was improved so that it falls within Wikipedia guidelines? Shall I provide an Editor Interaction Analyzer link for the third editor who helped you to do this (Lemongirl942)? I'll hold off on that, for now at least. However, I will point out that you blanked most of the article before nominating it for deletion. And btw, none of those were personal attacks. I simply provided diffs to point out evidence of your behaviour on the article. Nothing wrong with that right? We'll let the rest of the jury decide based on your actions. I'm putting an end to the WP:GAMING that's been going on here. Eliko007 (talk) 01:14, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Shall I provide an Editor Interaction Analyzer link for the third editor who helped you to do this (Lemongirl942)? Yes, please. :-) K.e.coffman (talk) 04:21, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Keep The article is sourced (with a few substantial sources - and additional fluff), and a quick source check shows more sources. I agree the article itself is promotional - stub it down, keeping the noteworthy sources.Icewhiz (talk) 06:14, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Keep The article itself is very poor, although a quick google search to me reveals enough sources to pass WP:GNG, although admittedly not hugely. It's a borderline one, but stub the article down to some information taken from reliable sources and remove the promotional material PenaltyCard (talk) 10:42, 3 April 2017 (UTC) — PenaltyCard (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Keep As a former professional in the hosting technology space, my knowledge of Mr. Gorny's professional accomplishments lead me to believe he is far from simply being "an unremarkable businessman" and a "human interest story". In previous versions of his page, there was a lot of promotional content, and it is my understanding of Wikipedia guidelines that the history of the page likely resulted in the first several rounds of AfD nominations. The article has much of the promotional content that is not useful or cited now removed, and it has been expanded with greater detail and several substantial sources verifying his notability. If more talk needs to be had about how to improve the content on the page, that should be had here (Talk:Tomas Gorny). An AfD, however, is a bit of an extreme response to the page in my view. JonathanBentz (talk) 13:32, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

How is this satisfying any of our set policies such as WP:What Wikipedia is not? Simply claims that he "must be notable" is not the same thing as actually showing the necessary notability. SwisterTwister talk 17:35, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Keep The subject is the founder of four major companies and the article is substantiated with a number of citations, thus establishing its notability. Business Insider and other sources found in the article, such as the Chicago Tribune, are citations that have wide repute in the United States (the purported country of orign where Tomas Gorny does business). Bmbaker88 (talk) 23:13, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Chicago Tribune source is not really about Gorny. Instead, it's about a company called Double Robotics. Sample:

Tomas Gorny, co-founder and CEO of Nextiva, a cloud-based phone-service provider in Scottsdale, Ariz., spends half his time traveling. But even when he’s out of the office, he’s in, in the form of a telepresence robot from Double Robotics. Dubbed Double TG, it’s an endearingly awkward union of iPad, selfie stick, Skype, and Segway. Says Gorny: “One of the most effective ways to feel like I’m in the room is by using my robot.”

That's the extend of coverage on Gorny in the article; his name does not appear again. Such sources are not sufficient for establishing notability. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:29, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

K.e.coffman (talk) 23:29, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Comment - The combined edit count of all 5 keep !voters is just over 1000. Edit count surely isn't proportional to quality/importance, and has limited value, but when it's that extreme something unpleasant is typically afoot. People who have only ever made a couple hundred edits don't typically stumble across AfD, and often appear because of an agenda (one or more of WP:PAID, WP:MEAT, WP:CANVASS, WP:SOCK, etc.). Not all the time, obviously, but it's cause to stop and smell the meat-scented roses when going to close a discussion that appears to lean a certain way. I've only done a cursory evaluation of the sources thus far, so am not yet !voting. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 22:56, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Delete. remains basically promotional after many tries at improvement, including multiple AfDs. I count that as hopeless. If someone without COI wants to start over again, it can be attempted in Draft space. DGG ( talk ) 02:44, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Keep' Tomas Gorny alone gets 8,590 Google hits, not to mention the amount of Google hits that his companies receive. A cursory look at the sources used in the article shows that Tomas Gorny does have notability, at least that sufficient to warrant the existence of an article her. Meatpuppetry issues raised by User:Eliko007 and User:Rhododendrites should be taken into account by the closing admin and reports should be filed at WP:RfCU if necessary.--Jobas (talk) 13:39, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Which of this will actually help? Because what I see there is a clear promotional primary or secondary press releases or notices, not independent coverage needed here. SwisterTwister talk 17:35, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Strong Keep and, in fact, this AfD shouldn't have even been created. The nomination presents 3 points:

The subject is unremarkable (ie does not meet WP:GNG)
There were multiple AfDs
The article does not meet WP:NPOV

2 and 3 are not reasons for deletion. For #1, I can prove that the subject meets WP:GNG. In the Summer of 2016, the article was re-created by me and presented to AfC. The namespace was salted at the time. User:KGirlTrucker81 was the person who reviewed the AfC. She deemed that the subject meet WP:GNG. She then presented it to Deletion_review for un-salting, where it was voted upon by the admins -- User:K.e.coffman was not present at that debate. On 17 September 2016, the admins voted that there were enough reliable sources to meet WP:GNG (visit https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2016_September_17 to read both sides of the argument -- the arguments in that thread overlaps with the arguments in this thread ). Because this debate happened before in the past and because it was deemed that Tomas Gorny meet WP:GNG, we know that Tomas Gorny meets WP:GNG today. Tomas Gorny did not lose any notability between the 18th September 2016 and today. The result must be keep. CerealKillerYum (talk) 15:15, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Yes, multiple AfDs that themselves show either doubts the subject was in fact significant or notable, and because of the repeated promotionalism, it alone violates policy WP:What Wikipedia is not, especially since a handful of these have been clear-label paid users, another policy violation. Together or alone, these are enough to supersede any chances because it violates our necessary considerations. The fact the promotional changes never paid attention to our policies about this is a violation alone, not that "he's still notable". Simply because it was accepted at AfC is not a lifeline at all, since AfD exists for exactly that, article examination. SwisterTwister talk 17:35, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

I contend that the argument for keep by editor CerealKillerYum is faulty, because of another AfD that happened in November 2016, two months after the DR discussion. This latest AfD closed as "No consensus", which means that there's currently no consensus that this topic is notable. Hence it's reasonable to bring the topic back to AfD for further community discussion. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:10, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Keep: per CerealKillerYum's argument, although it can be improved. KGirlTrucker81 ^{huh? what I've been doing} 15:19, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

KGirlTrucker81 It was improved repeatedly before, but as the history shows, the promotionalism has explosively continued. How is this a policy-based Keep in considerations to these promotional contributions? 3 previous AfDs also claimed "Let's fix it" yet with nothing. SwisterTwister talk 17:35, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

@SwisterTwister: The article is not promotinal, but the other creators are not paid by any organization or company (even me) besides we're all volunteers. KGirlTrucker81 ^{huh? what I've been doing} 17:49, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

@KGirlTrucker81: Please see current article copy: "This patented security software, assigned to SiteLock, provides robust website content integrity checking while only lightly loading the website hosting server." Is this passage neutral? K.e.coffman (talk) 18:07, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

@K.e.coffman: Yes, doesn't contain any PEACOCK language. KGirlTrucker81 ^{huh? what I've been doing} 06:03, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete by all means as the main policies here at WP:What Wikipedia is not and WP:Paid, considering the history and also of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nextiva (3rd nomination) and Draft:Nextiva, both with clear promotional changes and users, including some of them now come-and-go accounts so WP:Sockpuppetry likely applies there. These three are main policies of which we use every day here, especially in company or business articles, so this is a no exception. We allow time for improvements when there's confirmed changes, not when WP:THEREMUSTBE SOURCES or WP:ITSNOTABLE. As mentioned, if someone ever wants an article, it's best to restart it with pre-reviewed changes, especially if there's chances of violating our paid-user policy. Although there are claims of "fixing" as shown here, the next page actually then shows there's been nothing but the previous old AfD-material, thus showing any new claims of supposed improvements are stalling, not beneficial to an encyclopedia. In fact, the current article still has the same elements of advertising as shown by his largest section advertised "Business" followed by "PR awards", which is (as shown by WP:GNG), not ever a convincing factor. Simply because a Wikipedian started this article is not an entire defense in our policies, since there's the obvious fact of the company's article not only being deleted, but it was campaigned by several COI people there. SwisterTwister talk 17:35, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

DELETE IT. This article doesn't know if its a personal résumé or a product brochure, which one does wiki allow? Better idea, send it to Monster.com where they actually host this kind of material. Carter2020 — Carter2020 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Comment - User:Carter2020 Wikipedia yearns to be the collection of all human knowledge. In that quest, there is an existing guide on how to do basic things like cast your suggestions here from as simple a task as stating delete or keep and there is no need to shout while at it.
  - Wikipedia absolutely does not yearn to be the collection of ALL human knowledge. I saw a rule against trivia. I saw a rule against promotion. I saw a rule against libel and disparagement of people. I saw a rule against being a dictionary. I saw many other exemptions from the collection of all human knowledge, and this online résumé for Gorny is one of them. Carter2020
Keep - Having profoundly tracked the above discussions let me weigh in. The motivation for deletion is stated as It seems near impossible to get the article to an NPOV state; hence this nomination due to the recent edits made to the article. Last I checked this is not a valid reason for deletion at the AFD policy. Instead of this AFD the policy states that before an AFD, toning down the article to address promo or advertising should be considered which the nom didn’t attempt. Given this I have gone ahead and reset the article to a state where users seemed mollified with the state of the article which is a tenet of just how Wikipedia works. There is also a myriad of additional meatpuppet assertions with no evidence whatsoever and also allegations about WP:paid, sockpuppeting yet all with no tinge of corroboration. This AFD has attracted a few voices that are clearly suspect but that belongs in another forum. I would also suggest that if any changes are desired by anyone to this article they should be posted on the talk page for debate before they are posted into the main article like there was a prosperous confabulation about including certain sources or not which left everyone contented. Wikipedia has tools like locking articles if it is deterring edits from unexperienced users who are out to vandalize articles. Tushi Talk To Me 07:14, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Yes, NPOV issues usually are not a valid reason for deletion at an AFD but notability is a valid reason which the NOM also stated and is being discussed by editors on both sides of this discussion. CBS527^Talk 21:07, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Keep: PassesWP:GNG. In my opinion, SwisterTwister’s approach here is more destructive than constructive, and I know this has been mentioned in the past. Did anybody bother to check online about subject’s notability? The article was published by a confirmed contributor, and has been voted Keep by several senior editors and admins in the previous AfDs. We are now at the 4th nomination, and will go on to subsequent ones until the nominators get what they want. This is simply abuse and not the way AfD was intended. The subject easily meets WP:GNG, and that’s enough reason to keep the article. I’m opting to remain anonymous here to avoid any subsequent drama, just wanted to assist in the discussion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.27.194.58 (talk) 11:41, 6 April 2017 (UTC) — 88.27.194.58 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

88.27.194.58, while your post may be sincere, it doesn't really help that you're commenting anonymously and the individuals who I believe are gaming the system (named above) might use this to fuel their false narrative. Eliko007 (talk) 18:17, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete per WP:NOTSPAM Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ _Talk 21:00, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:12, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete as promotionalism. WP:NOTSPAM is policy. Full stop. We give a lot of leeway to clean up around here when an article has been shown to meet the GNG, but borderline notability cases like this that have been delete before, and then recreated and still have the same promotionalism issues can be deleted per NOTSPAM. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:24, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
Keep: What I see is the same group of editors attempting to prevent the existence of an otherwise WP:COMMONSENSE notable article. A few of the editors commenting here also appeared at the article about Nextiva, one of the companies run by Gorny and tried to prevent its creation, despite it having close to 30 references. It's hard to assume good faith when the same thing happens over and over again with the same people involved. AR E N Z O Y 1 6A•t a l k• 02:54, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Comment -- to report user behaviour issues, please see WP:ANI. That said, editor Renzoy16 should have disclosed that he had been paid to create Nextiva; pls see: User:Renzoy16#Conflict_of_interest. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:10, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Actually, what you've linked is me properly disclosing per WP:PCD. On the other hand, you seem to have a high level of investment in all things related to Tomas Gorny and his companies (such as Nextiva) and you haven't disclosed that you have a COI at stake here (and that's not just me thinking that--other editors here have mentioned their concerns). That's not following Wikipedia's policies at detailed in the link I provided. AR E N Z O Y 1 6A•t a l k• 05:15, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

I have no affiliation with Gorny, Nextiva, or any of their competitors. I frequently vote on company-related AfDs, this is how I came across this article. I've not been paid or solicited to nominate this article (or any other) for deletion. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:21, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Keep: After through research, this article is very well structured and dsiplays acceptable notability. Deletion is ONLY warranted, per Wikipedia policy, in extreme circumstances, such as lack of any content or notability whatsoever, or there is little to no sourcing. This article has decent sourcing and its subject is notable. I see no reason to recommend a deletion. Jkmarold55 (talk) 04:26, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Comment: editor Jkmarold55 has created a small number of articles on businesspeople / companies (link), all of which have been deleted for lack of notability, see for example: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cell Clinic Ltd. and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katrina Cravy. Separately, I do not find the argument to be well reasoned; deletion for lack of notability is quite common and not done only in extreme circumstances. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:02, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
Comment: Please refrain from using past affiliations as ad hominem. In the loosest of senses this applies to you. Those two articles in no way pertain to the subject at hand, and I recommend that you refrain from vehemently background checking every person leaving info on this page in order to win your one man war. Thank you. Jkmarold55 (talk) 05:13, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete as promotional. Lack of in-depth coverage in independent RS. Just doesn't meet GNG. MB 03:40, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Canvassing of some sort has occurred here, relisting to get a clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 05:52, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete per TonyBallioni. Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 07:24, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Russian-Syrian hospital bombing campaign[edit]

(Find sources: "Russian-Syrian hospital bombing campaign" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

I came across this while reviewing the DYK nomination for it, I think this appears to be a case of WP:SYNTH but I'd like to get community input due to the sensitive nature of this topic. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 05:13, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Please look at the article again. It has numerous non-primary reliable resources that have documented a series of attacks on medical facilities in Syria by Syrian government and Russian forces. The subject is not synthesized, hoax, or a fringe theory.

I request that this AfD be withdrawn.--05:28, 10 April 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by RightCowLeftCoast (talk • contribs)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 06:24, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 06:24, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 06:24, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 06:24, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 06:24, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

comment there is an npov problem here. Specigically regarfing the bombed facilities use for additional functions such as a hq bunker. Hospitals contain air shelters, power generation facilities, and other infrastructure coupled with some pesumed immunity from attack. So while it is hard to dispute hospitals were bombed, the actual additional uses of the hospitals are vey much in dispute. Sources in general for the syrian war are poor and tend to be highly biased, from all sides. Npoving would reauire referencing regime, iranian and russian sources.Icewhiz (talk) 10:35, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Referencing regime, Iranian and Russian sources? Yours is a great idea, and I say it without irony. However the basic tenet of WP is that only reliable sources should be relied upon (sounds like a tautology, but wait till the next sentence). This beggars the question "reliable for whom"? The practical answer is "for most WP editors", who share a certain set of beliefs and stereotypes. Now, those shared beliefs are actually what makes consensus on what constitutes a reliable source possible. Iran, according to "reliable" sources, is a rogue state, therefore Iranian sources are unreliable. Same for Russian sources and bad guy Putin. WP could not work otherwise. No consensus → no reliable sources → no WP. 84.73.134.206 (talk) 11:33, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Steve Christian (DJ)[edit]

(Find sources: "Steve Christian (DJ)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG. I can't find any refs. Do not confuse subject with the leader of Anberlin also named Steve Christian. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:39, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:33, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:34, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Tracy Zych[edit]

(Find sources: "Tracy Zych" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Essentially every reference either in the article or listed on the talk page is a mere mention--sometimes just a labelled illustration, sometimes a paragraph, usually more about the celebrity carrying the designer's bag than about the designer. A few are pr-interviews. I'm aware there is less distinction between PR and genuine coverage in fashion than in most fields of life, but this is an example of particularly weak sourcing. The article is furthermore gushy prose. Again, now unusual, but exceptionally so at least in WP: "As popularity and success grew" "a small yet elaborate collection which gained instant recognition, " DGG ( talk ) 03:50, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 03:52, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:41, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:41, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Per WP:G7 by User: RHaworth. (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:49, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Issac Shunsuke Sato[edit]

(Find sources: "Issac Shunsuke Sato" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Searches find absolutely no RS that verify either the content of the article or the notability of this person. I fear some elements may be fabricated. The article contains seven "sources," none of which help verify the main elements of article. #1 and #2 do not even mention the individual. Three does, but it is not an independent RS and only might confirm he is vice principal of some business college in Nepal. Source 4 to 7 are odd in that they are about subjects totally irrelevant to the individual in question and seem tacked on: #4 is about the architecture of the Diet Building; #5 is about changes in government structure in Japan in the 2000s; #6 is a book about recent Japanese documentary; and #7 is actually a fiction film based on Yukio Mishima. None help us understand how he is supposedly "one of the leaders in the field of academia within the Anglican community." Note that on the talk page, the editor who started the page admitted he/she is an employee of this person. There are thus serious WP:COI issues. Clearly fails WP:GNG. Should be speedily deleted, but an editor declined CSD. Michitaro (talk) 03:31, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Melbourne performing art venues[edit]

(Find sources: "Melbourne performing art venues" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Article is pretty much a lower-quality version of List of theatres in the Melbourne City Centre Boneymau (talk) 03:09, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Boneymau (talk) 03:10, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:48, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:48, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:48, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:48, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

List of notable letters[edit]

(Find sources: "List of notable letters" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

List article with no clear criteria for inclusion. Destined to become a collection of trivia content. — foxj 03:07, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete boundless list which appears to be of little practical use outside a "trivia" contest. The Rambling Man (talk) 03:10, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
Delete per nom. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 03:11, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
Keep or redirect and merge with English alphabet - Should be kept because it provides novel information. I do agree, although, that the information needs to be sourced. It should, at the very least although, be merged and redirect to the English alphabet article, maybe to spice up the encyclopedia with interesting information that would be novel, making the readers actually learn something, which is what an encyclopedia is trying to do. RileyBugz^{Yell at me} | _Edits 03:12, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

It's dangerous to start merging trivia with something as EV as English alphabet. Also, this isn't a likely redirect, who would type in "List of notable letters"? The Rambling Man (talk) 03:15, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Join the IRC... RileyBugz^{Yell at me} | _Edits 03:16, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete – This is basically trivia; similar "fun facts" could likely be found about any letter. I don't think there's a need for merging or redirecting, either. ~barakokula31 (talk) 03:20, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
Delete – Foxj and The Rambling Man have it right, unfortunately. Mz7 (talk) 03:22, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Comment - ...or simply "C". How are numbers in List of numbers non-trivial, but "R" for an "R" rated movie, or "i" for "information" not? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 03:26, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

I have no comment on what is honestly a totally unrelated article. Plus, the letters you are naming only stand for these concepts in English (and in some cases, in the US and nowhere else). — foxj 03:28, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:28, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:28, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete I find it silly OR. MB 04:04, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

For the record - I did start it in good faith. I saw List of numbers and figured it would be developed into a useful list. I am sorry to have wasted everyone's time. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 04:22, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

So perhaps to waste even less time now, we can close this as delete? The Rambling Man (talk) 04:44, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Fine by me. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 04:46, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete per The Rambling Man. Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 07:39, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
Delete sorry @Anna Frodesiak: :) but in any case you missed out g and k. 'G'= gram, or, the optimum amount of cocaine to take before posting on an RfA; 'K'= kilo, or, the optimum amount of cocaine to buy, before starting one :D. — O Fortuna ^{velut luna} 09:24, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

List of Knight's Cross recipients 22nd Volunteer cavalry Division Maria Theresia[edit]

(Find sources: "List of Knight's Cross recipients 22nd Volunteer cavalry Division Maria Theresia" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

A list article that contains one entry. For full disclosure, I've edited the article to remove those entries that have been redirected (see prior version. The blue linked articles, except one, have been redirected to a list. Per the recent discussion (Redirect proposal for Knight's Cross winners), it's highly unlikely that the redirected subject would be considered notable in the future and the list is not needed.

The article was created by the same editor who created about 500 articles on the members of the Waffen-SS, and the cross caterigorisation of "Knight's Cross winner by [X] category" strikes me as excessive. The list was created in 2008, at a time when the Knight's Cross recipients were presumed by default to be notable. This has changed recently, so both the individual articles created by the editor in question, along with the lists, are no longer encyclopedically relevant. For a recent AfD on a related list, please see:

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Knight's Cross recipients 16th SS Panzer Grenadier Division Reichsführer SS

K.e.coffman (talk) 02:45, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:47, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:47, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:48, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:48, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

NOVAAGRO LIMITED LLC[edit]

(Find sources: "NOVAAGRO LIMITED LLC" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Non-notable company. All sources I could find appear to be business listings.

The de.wiki and ru.wiki articles have both also been nominated for deletion. ~barakokula31 (talk) 01:54, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 06:41, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete: This appears to be a machine-translated article, parts of which are barely comprehensible. The given sources are primary and routine announcements and my searches are finding nothing better than routine listings which merely verify that it is a company going about its business. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 06:41, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cyprus-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:50, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Sheru Classic[edit]

(Find sources: "Sheru Classic" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Non-notable sports competition. Violates WP:Sports event. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:27, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:51, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:51, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:51, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Lists of UK locations with large ethnic minority populations[edit]

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: "Lists of UK locations with large ethnic minority populations" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

A previous AfD on this article closed as no consensus, with the closing statement noting that the OR issues could be fixed. Almost seven years later, the problems are still there:

The article uses a mix of ethnicity categories where they are available (e.g. Pakistani, Black, Indian), but where groups are subsumed into larger categories (e.g. Other White), it switches to using country of birth, which isn't the same as ethnicity.
Different parts of the article use different sources for their statistics. Some are official statistics, others estimates, and different sources refer to different time periods.
"Large", "location" and "ethnic minority" are not consistently defined. Is "large" to be judged in absolute terms? If so, the answer is "London". If it's defined in percentage terms, then what counts as a location? A parish, a settlement, a county, a region?

The whole article is an OR mess, and given that no one has shown any interest in fixing it in many years, I think it would be better to put the article out of its misery. Cordless Larry (talk) 18:50, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:58, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:58, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:58, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:58, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Keep This is an obviously notable topic. WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP. AusLondonder (talk) 03:41, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Keep The topic is notable enough. The current article is, as others have pointed out, a strange beast and needs work but it's not so bad that we need WP:TNT. Neiltonks (talk) 12:30, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Delete or redirect to Foreign-born population of the United Kingdom. I have thought about this for a while. Initially it appeared to me to be a legitimate list, but on examining the sources it turns out that the list is mainly derived from a user generated list from the Office for National Statistics, which will do user-generated lists on request. You can get "English regions cross-referenced with age, ethnicity, household type (Jan to Dec 2014), employment status, NS-SEC, health conditions and local authorities for Jan to Dec 2015" or whatever else takes your fancy. As the nominator says, there are issues surrounding the structure of the list as it is ill-defined. The notion of what is "large" is not clear, and various from 17% to 2% to "significant" where the percentage seems to fall so low it can't be sensibly given. So there is no precise criteria from which to structure the list. The "ethnic minorities" are exclusively by country, so we don't have race, colour, language, or religion, simply countries of origin; and even then the source data is so unclear, we don't know if it is first or subsequent generation immigration. However, there is a sense that there is a useful idea behind the list, just that this is not the way to go about it. Foreign-born population of the United Kingdom does pretty much the same thing, but in a much more neutral and informative manner. There are links from that article to each ethnicity, such as British Chinese which has sections on where British Chinese live, such as British_Chinese#Community and British_Chinese#Largest_urban_Chinese_communities. Given that we already have the information, but in more more organised, detailed, and authoritative form, where the information is also dealt with in context, I am not seeing the value of keeping this list with its current problems. If the list were newly created I would say give it a chance, but as it was seen as problematic seven years ago, and has not improved in that time, I think deleting it or redirecting the title (and perhaps keeping anything of use) is the best way to go. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 19:40, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Well, I say authoritative, but the source for British_Chinese#Largest_urban_Chinese_communities turns out, again, to be user generated from the Office for National Statistics, albeit from a narrower focus. I think it would be better in these cases for us to be using reliable independent sources. If there is a genuine interest in the "Largest_urban_Chinese_communities" there would be a reliable source publishing the information themselves from the Office for National Statistics. We should not be generating and publishing such statistics ourselves as that runs foul of OR. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 19:48, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete: It's a shame, as it's a valid topic for an article, but the sources don't appear to be available to make one that isn't riddled with OR / synthesis. Jellyman (talk) 10:06, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 01:03, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Diogenis D. Valavanidis[edit]

(Find sources: "Diogenis D. Valavanidis" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

I found no significant coverage and the three organizations that he is a part of have no articles. SL93 (talk) 01:01, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 01:02, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 01:02, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete: GNews actually showed nothing meaningful to add failing GNG and BIO. KGirlTrucker81 ^{huh? what I've been doing} 01:21, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
Borderline keep. He has received decent coverage in Serbian mainstream press for his activities on Serbian and Greek cultural heritage:
- "Diogenis Valavanidis receives Order of the Serbian Orthodox Church". Serbian Orthodox Church. 26 September 2013.
  - "Orden cara Konstantina za čuvara srpskog nasleđa". Politika. 26 September 2013. (concerning that same Order he received)
- "Neobični Beograđani: Grk u potrazi za svetinjama". Večernje Novosti. 23 November 2013.
- "Nasilje je postalo jače od istorije" [Violence became stronger than history]. Svedok. 7 February 2017.
- "Otvoren novi muzej Akropolja" [New Acropolis Museum Opens]. Politika. 20 June 2009. (only brief statement of his)

That being said, there is not much more than that in the mainstream press, other than occasional mention or statement by his. He seems to be currently a secretary of the Serbian embassy in Hungary [6], so he receives some coverage for activities there [7]. No such user (talk) 14:05, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

White Lodging[edit]

(Find sources: "White Lodging" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Fails CORP. No sources to notability on article; a BEFORE search showed only a current article about the demolition of one of their properties, a few older articles about staff changes; nothing that rises above ROUTINE. This is not unexpected as hotel ownership and hotel management organizations are by nature low profile. John from Idegon (talk) 01:34, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Keep Did you really do Before? I easily found plenty of sources to satisfy both Corp Depth and the GNG. Philafrenzy (talk) 12:10, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
- So are they a state secret, Philafrenzy? If you easily found sources to satisfy Corp depth and gng, how does it help improve the encyclopedia to keep that info to yourself? John from Idegon (talk) 14:37, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

I added them to the article before I voted, as you could have done before nominating the article for deletion. Philafrenzy (talk) 16:12, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Those sources are all ROUTINE. Staff changes, more sourcing on the ONEEVENT security incident. Further, none are what one would call reliable and independent. Nothing from PRnewswire can ever be considered for notability (the name is the givaway) and trade publications are very seldom usable to show notability, as they are constructed from press releases with no journalism at all. John from Idegon (talk) 16:57, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete, none of the sources pass WP:CORPDEPTH. John from Idegon is correct in saying that they are routine reports of staffing updates and are neither independent nor reliable. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:11, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:57, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:57, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:59, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete Does not meet WP:NCORP. Insufficient in-depth coverage in RS. Sources given are routine or minor. MB 13:43, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Dewrance & Co. Ltd[edit]

(Find sources: "Dewrance & Co. Ltd" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

This article fails to demonstrate the notability of Dewrance & Co. Ltd. Neither its text nor its sources show that it "has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources." Eddie Blick (talk) 02:04, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete: Fails GNG and NCORP after Google showed nothing to add secondary sources. KGirlTrucker81 ^{huh? what I've been doing} 14:12, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

It is hardly surprising that a company which folded so long ago does not have much internet presence. The three sources quoted are however reliable and independent, and I expect to find more printed sources. Besides the company had a steam engine named after it. that is pretty good evidence of notability. Rathfelder (talk) 19:15, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:00, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:00, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:58, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete The sources show this company existed which is not in dispute. However, nothing indicates it is notable. WP is not a comprehensive business directory. Fails WP:NCORP. MB 15:40, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Archery at the 2017 Island Games[edit]

(Find sources: "Archery at the 2017 Island Games" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Not a notable sports event to warrant an article, the event is a few months away and referenced by a primary source only. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:35, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

The sport is one of fourteen games being undertaken by twenty four teams from many countries in the Island Games. I do not see that archery is more, or less, important than any of the other games in the competition. Wikipedia articles exist for all the games since 1985 with many sub articles for the various sports in the bi-annual games. The games attract 3,000 competitors. It is not a minor event. This page is set up pending the public announcements of the teams and events and the competition itself in June. Until then, the sources are limited, once the games are in progress, there will be many sources in different countries and in many languages to link to these games. Ânes-pur-sàng (talk) 00:05, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:28, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:28, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 02:15, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Move to draft space until the event actually happens.--Jahaza (talk) 02:17, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

If you move it so it is not visible, it cannot be updated as more information of participants, times and places are released over the next 6-8 weeks. Ânes-pur-sàng (talk) 15:54, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:23, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:55, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Ellorum Vazhavendum[edit]

(Find sources: "Ellorum Vazhavendum" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

This article fails to demonstrate the notability of the subject. With its only source a song book from the film, there is no evidence that the film has "received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Eddie Blick (talk) 19:03, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Keep: There is a book by Film News Anandan that can help expand this. I'll try using it tomorrow. --Kailash29792 (talk) 19:16, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Kailash, Only the page showing the list of films released in 1962 is available. The page containing details of this film is not available - even in the printed book. The author has said/lamented in his another book titled "Sidharadikkappatta en saemippu karuvoolam" that many of his database pages were lost by the printer.--UKSharma3 05:42, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

. --Kailash29792 (talk) 05:48, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:15, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:15, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

I have expanded the Soundtrack section, added external links and added a citation of a book published recently.--UKSharma3 05:15, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Now I added a Bibliography quoting an authentic book in which the name of this film and year are recorded.--UKSharma3 08:42, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 02:15, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:54, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Midtown Walmart[edit]

(Find sources: "Midtown Walmart" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Fails WP:NOT#NEWS. Individual Wal-Mart. Prevan (talk) 02:16, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Keep: It's more of an article on a development controversy in a gentrifying neighborhood than a store. It has a multitude of reliable sources across many publications. B137 (talk) 02:22, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
Delete or Merge to Miami. This does have sourcing but it does not seem to be notable enough in itself for it's own article. It's a single event in one area, therefore suggest merging it to that city's page if the content is to be kept. -- Dane ^talk 01:26, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
- The city is way too big for a merge. Prevan (talk) 02:02, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
- It would be merged with Midtown Miami or Wynwood, the "prominent" neighborhoods it is a part of. B137 (talk) 05:59, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:26, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:26, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:26, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:26, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:54, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Scandinavia's Next Top Model[edit]

(Find sources: "Scandinavia's Next Top Model" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

This article looks a bit like a disambiguation page, but its format does not fit that style. Eddie Blick (talk) 18:18, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Merge and redirect to Top_Model, which has its own section about International Top Model shows. Sheepythemouse (talk)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:02, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 02:16, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete - No need for merge (what would you merge?) or redirect - just stick a hatnote in both of the two target articles. Exemplo347 (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:53, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Le Karlof Orchestra[edit]

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: "Le Karlof Orchestra" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Delete. WP:BLP of a musician, who has a potentially valid claim of notability per WP:NMUSIC (award nomination) but is completely failing to reliably source it. The only "source" here is a WP:ROUTINE concert listing which fails to verify the notability claim, and I can't find any evidence of real media coverage about him on either Google or ProQuest. As always, NMUSIC does not grant an article topic a free pass just because passage of a criterion has been claimed; it is passed only when the claim to passage is reliably sourced to media coverage about the subject. Note that first discussion was conducted in 2006, a time when just the claim itself was enough and we were a lot looser about how well it actually had to be sourced than we are now, so the fact that it was kept at that time is not permanently binding if the article fails to meet our current standards. Bearcat (talk) 16:32, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 16:34, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 16:34, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 02:16, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:29, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:53, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

“Cousin Vinny” Agnello[edit]

(Find sources: "“Cousin Vinny” Agnello" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Sources are YouTube videos and Amazon. Fails WP:NAUTHOR, and can't find any other notability criteria that automatically makes them notable. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 15:26, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:22, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:22, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Merge to Louis Anthony Agnello and get rid of the "Cousin Vinny" part in the title. If we're going to pick one of his many monikers, I'm personally leaning towards "The Stripper King of New York" (lol!). Seems more famous with the press as an oddball and public figure, and in that regard passes WP:GNG. [8] [9] [10] [11]. Yvarta (talk) 01:43, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 02:16, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Agnello is a published author with a major agency whatever his background may be. His bookcover carries "Cousin Vinnie" as the authors name and anyone searching for him from the book would be looking for that, not 'the Stripper King' no matter how appealing that might be to some. Cited 'copyright' infringements have been removed, links have been added and we'd like this project to move forward. Any reasonable changes needed will be made but Let us see a list of said violations please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Panamamac (talk • contribs) 14:37, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:53, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for continuing the discussion about this man's journey from lurid stripper to published author. This truly American tale is far from over, and his fans have been asking him, on his recent book tour much of which was picked up by the faith oriented media and well received, why he had no Wiki page.
As we said before if it is matter of content or formatting, adjustments can be made. His 2nd book 'the Vengeance of the Manager is currently available on Amazon with another in work. Interest in the movie rights for Devil's Glove has been shown as well.

Nomad Capitalist[edit]

(Find sources: "Nomad Capitalist" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Fails the WP:CORPDEPTH test. This company is not listed on the NYSE and not listed on NASDAQ.

Looking at the references in this article:

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/most-desirable-passports-earth-don-080006049.html includes a mention of "view of "Nomad Capitalist", a firm that recently ranked 199 countries corresponding to their value of citizenship". So a website described another website?
https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/nomad-capitalist#/entity TechCrunch is arguably a reliable reference. Shirt58 (talk) 11:49, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:20, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

PompeyTheGreat (talk) 06:06, 29 March 2017 (UTC)Personally of the opinion that Nomad Capitalist is fairly notable. Has been in multiple online news reports and seems to be pretty major in terms of offshoring, although the article as is has a promotional tone.PompeyTheGreat (talk) 06:06, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 02:17, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy delete -- A7 material. I requested such. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:26, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:34, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:52, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

St. James Foundation[edit]

(Find sources: "St. James Foundation" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

This article fails to demonstrate the notability of the St. James Foundation. In particular, it does not show "has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources." One source is not available. One is from an entity operated by the foundation. Eddie Blick (talk) 02:21, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:38, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:38, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:51, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Mudrick Capital Management[edit]

(Find sources: "Mudrick Capital Management" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Fails WP:ORG, relies on self-published sources & sources failing to meet WP:ORGDEPTH. Cabayi (talk) 10:30, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 10:31, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 10:31, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Keep - Subject is covered in reliable sources. This article alone, published by Bloomberg, in and of itself establishes notability by detailing the company. Please let me know if you'd like to see a list of additional news sources. Meatsgains (talk) 16:23, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Side note - as the creator of this page, the original draft I uploaded contained unencyclopedic language but I did go through and trim it out. Meatsgains (talk) 16:31, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:53, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete GNG not met. Wikipedia is not a directory to be filled up with PR-style business listings of this nature. Exemplo347 (talk) 16:30, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Could you be more specific in regards to the page's "PR-style business listing"? Meatsgains (talk) 00:28, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

I really don't need to be more specific - it's only a stub article, and the entire thing reads like a PR-based entry in a business directory. It's nothing more than routine coverage, when Wikipedia is meant to be an encyclopaedia. This is the problem with creating business articles from the Requested Articles process - people tend to focus on PR-type sources like Bloomberg's business listing section instead and it shows. Exemplo347 (talk) 00:41, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

While I agree the Bloomberg business listing is essentially a PR source, the company is detailed in reliable sources for notable investments and ranked on Forbes' Top Hedge Funds of 2016. Meatsgains (talk) 17:49, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:51, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Fiera Capital Corporation[edit]

(Find sources: "Fiera Capital Corporation" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Fails WP:ORG, relies on self-published sources & sources failing to meet WP:ORGDEPTH. Cabayi (talk) 10:29, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 10:30, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 10:31, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Keep - As the creator of this page, I came across Fiera Capital at WP:RA. Upon some digging, I found these two articles by Financial Post and Dasher Business Review, which detail the company, thus meeting general notability requirements. Meatsgains (talk) 16:28, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:54, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete GNG not met. Wikipedia is not a business directory. Exemplo347 (talk) 16:31, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:50, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete fails WP:NCORP. Insufficient in-depth coverage in RS. MB 03:57, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

InterTrader[edit]

(Find sources: "InterTrader" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

No evidence that this has any notability. The refs provided show that it exists and promotes itself. Nothing here suggests notability . Fails WP:GNG Velella ^{Velella Talk} 23:20, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:00, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Weak Delete : Found some news on Google News. But not sure about the reliability of these reference. Someone please check. --Elton-Rodrigues (talk) 20:59, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:12, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:26, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:48, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Economic Freedom of the World[edit]

(Find sources: "Economic Freedom of the World" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

The superficial referenciness of this article obscures the fact that there are no cited sources independent of the publishers which establish its significance. Guy (Help!) 14:54, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Selective merge/redirect to Fraser Institute. Neutrality^talk 14:55, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Selective merge/redirect to Fraser Institute. I agree with Neutrality. The article is not notable on its own, but some of the content in it should be on Fraser Institute article. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 14:58, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
~~Ditto~~. Actually, Keep – Article has several independent sources. (I'll work to provide more.) – S. Rich (talk) 02:18, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:19, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Keep - Index is widely referenced. I see no advantage in merging as article is quite long.Jonpatterns (talk) 13:31, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Conservatism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:11, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:11, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:47, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Meat Light[edit]

(Find sources: "Meat Light" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

This article provides no "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" with regard to the subject. Its only source is the artist's web site. Eddie Blick (talk) 18:56, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Keep: Article is of certain interest in a series of similar articles, as can be followed in the chronology timeline in the inforbox. Removing this article will cause interruption of that chronology. - DVdm (talk) 19:40, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

@DVdm: You will need to develop a stronger argument to keep this article, preferably by either listing articles supporting that it has received significant coverage from reliable, third-party sources in this AfD or incorporating them into the article itself. Aoba47 (talk) 18:04, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

@Aoba47: There's some comments in prnewswire.com, allmusic.com and thatericalper.com. Google gets about 64,800 hits, many of which commercial. Would any of this be helpful? - DVdm (talk) 18:54, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

@DVdm: The sources appear to be helpful (particularly the AllMusic and Prnewswire sources). Just remember that the amount of hits something gets on Google does not automatically equate to notability. Aoba47 (talk) 19:09, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ZAPPAtite. - DVdm (talk) 19:06, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:00, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 03:26, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete No individual notability that meets GNG. I'd like to point out that Pr NewsWire will never meet the independent sources part of the GNG, because the subjects of their articles pay to have their press releases published there. Exemplo347 (talk) 16:40, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Makes sense to me; thank you for the clarification. Not sure what I was thinking there lol. Aoba47 (talk) 17:32, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

*Delete per above comment. Aoba47 (talk) 17:53, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:01, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Keep I have added three references to the article, which I believe are sufficient to establish that the album in question meets the notability criteria at WP:GNG and WP:NALBUM. I would request other editors to review this and reassess what they have posted here. Thanks. @Aoba47 and Exemplo347: — Mudwater ^(Talk) 22:22, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

I think (and this is just my opinion so I look forward to hearing from other contributors) that the main question is whether or not there is enough coverage to warrant a separate article outside of the main article on the artist. Looking through the sources that you have provided, there are very good. The "Rolling Stone" and "AllMusic" articles provide a good start for a "Reception" section and some information on the songs to put some information on the song's composition. The Relix source is not as good; it has some good information, but overall the album only has a brief mention in that source. I am assuming the Zappa source would be used to supply the production and recording information about the album (akin to liner notes). I am definitely seeing your side of the argument as these sources do point to something, but I am still not 100% convinced about the subject's notability from three additional sources. If possible, it would be appreciated if you track more down. With the additions of these sources, I am not 100% either way so I will just strike my comment until I hear from other more experienced users about this issue. Aoba47 (talk) 23:46, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

I think that having an AllMusic review as well as a write-up in Rolling Stone should be good enough for establishing that an album is notable. The Relix article is more for giving some context for the production. But for whatever it's worth, here are two pretty nice essays that I haven't added to the article as references. They probably "don't count", because they're published on blogging sites. Plain and Fancy; The Resentment Listener — Mudwater ^(Talk) 00:18, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘Actually, here's another good reference, and I just added it to the article. It's by Eric Alper. — Mudwater ^(Talk) 00:36, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:45, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Keep - sufficient coverage in the sources identified above (Allmusic, Rolling Stone, Eric Alper) to support a standalone article; meet WP:NALBUM. Gongshow talk 01:33, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
Keep: Changing my vote as sufficient coverage has been proven through sources. Aoba47 (talk) 15:08, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Workflow (app)[edit]

(Find sources: "Workflow (app)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Does not appear to meet WP:NSOFTWARE, as all the non-routine coverage seems to center about the single event of the parent company being acquired by Apple. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 15:36, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Keep if rewritten: The mere fact that Apple thinks its valuable enough to acquire must mean that this app has signifigance (notability is not temporary), and may play a part in future versions of iOS. Right now, however, the article is just a statement and a list of sources. ViperSnake151 Talk 15:43, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Please do not delete this article. I have added more references.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.136.38.134 (talk • contribs) 15:47, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Please read WP:109PAPERS. Quantity of sources is not nessecarily a means of measuring notability. It is the quality of the coverage. ViperSnake151 Talk 15:59, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

The earliest reference is in 2014. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.136.38.134 (talk) 16:10, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

I actually did re-write the article just now; apparently this app won an award from Apple for its support of iOS accesibility features. Surely that is an example of pre-acquisition notability. ViperSnake151 Talk 16:21, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:27, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 03:26, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:43, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Post-tech[edit]

(Find sources: "Post-tech" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

WP:NEO. Term does not appear to be in common use. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 15:24, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:03, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:03, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Weak delete. I agree this is a non-notable neologism, not clearly defined in any sources I can see. Change to weak delete, see below. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:49, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Keep. I'm new here, so I don't know the exact rules about the deletion of articles. However, I do see a definition in this ON/OFF book which is as a PHD thesis a scientific piece of work and a good summary of the current debate.^[1] Further, it's mentioned in the DIE ZEIT article^[2] (it's the German NYT) which did apparently run as the main article of the issue. Even it's not mentioned widely over the web, it's mentioned by very reliable sources. Can concepts become part of Wikipedia only once they are regularly used? Mljakubowski (talk) 09:47, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Mljakubowski: I cannot speak for the German newspaper usage, but the book you found does indeed define it (in the future rather than commercial bookseller please link to page view on Google Books if possible, like this: Sarah Genner (3 January 2017). ON/OFF: Risks and Rewards of the Anytime-Anywhere Internet. vdf Hochschulverlag AG. pp. 163–. ISBN 978-3-7281-3799-9. ). The source of their definition seems to be [12], a German language document on whose reliability again I cannot comment. That's a good start, but please read WP:NEO and WP:GNG. For new terms we need more than 1-2 sources, a more widespread use would help. If you can show this term used in let's say 5 or so more reliable sources, preferably English (so I can read them), I'd be ready to change my vote to keep. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:43, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

References[edit]

^ Genner, Sarah (3 January 2017). ON/OFF: Risks and Rewards of the Anytime-Anywhere Internet. vdf Hochschulvlg. ISBN 3728137995.
^ Jürgen von Rutenberg. "ZEITmagazin International, No 2, Fall-Winter 2015 (printed), German version online available". ZEITmagazin International. Retrieved 24 March 2017.

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 03:26, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:43, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Matías Leonicio[edit]

(Find sources: "Matías Leonicio" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Redirect to band was reverted without rationale or improvement. Searches turn up very little, and all of it in connection with his band. Should be a redirect, but as I said, it was reverted. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:46, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:08, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Chile-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:08, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Redirect to band since subject lacks indepdent notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:50, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 03:27, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:43, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Christopher Brett Bailey[edit]

(Find sources: "Christopher Brett Bailey" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Fails WP:BASIC. There are some secondary sources which are quite detailed, but appear to be more a review of his performance than a biography. See [13][14][15][16][17]. Also appears to fail WP:ENT. Magnolia677 (talk) 12:37, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Delete - the sources added to justify removed of the speedy deletion tag do not establish notability. Most refs appear to be advertising or peripheral mentions. Fails WP:GNG Velella ^{Velella Talk} 13:55, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Do not delete - New sources evidencing cult status in the UK theatre community have been added. References chosen demonstrate industry profile and acclaim. 17:13, 25 March 2017 (GMT) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Churlishmeg (talk • contribs)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 03:27, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:36, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:36, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:36, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:37, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:42, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Black Diamond Capital Management[edit]

(Find sources: "Black Diamond Capital Management" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Not a notable company. It generates a little bit of commentary in trade press, but nothing more. The article rehashes the company's BS in a very close paraphrase, "employs investments that synthesize bottom-up credit analysis". Cabayi (talk) 10:23, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 10:24, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 10:24, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Keep - As creator of this page, I came across Black Diamond at WP:RA. With the combination of trade/merger press and involvement in a significant lawsuit [18], I saw this company as certainly meeting general notability requirements. Meatsgains (talk) 16:40, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Would it help if I cut some of the "company's BS"? Meatsgains (talk) 16:45, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

It would make the article more neutral, but it wouldn't fix the notability issue. I've always been wary of companies at WP:RA - there's a real risk of becoming a spammer's cat's paw or worse yet, their meat-puppet. Cabayi (talk) 07:26, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 03:29, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete GNG not met. What's with the sudden creation of all these non-notable business listing-style "articles"? Exemplo347 (talk) 16:44, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:42, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Amanda Glassman[edit]

(Find sources: "Amanda Glassman" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Part of an apparent promotional campaign. The claim of 52 publications sounded impressive, until I actually looked. She has written one book, co-chaired one conference, and written a dozen of so technical reports mostly for the Center for Global Development , (itself the subject of an exceptionally spammy and congratulatory article which will need to be looked at. )These reports are typically found in only two or three libraries, and are usually under 100 pages. I listed a few of them. The other publication are magazine articles.

The other references are either her own works, her own organization's work, or her own blurbs for various conferences and organization, DGG ( talk ) 08:47, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Delete the level of publications is not enough to satisfy the notability guidelines for academics.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:08, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:22, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:22, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:22, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:22, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Weak keep. GS h-index of around 17 in average-cited field of public health may pass WP:Prof#C1. Other positions held may contribute to WP:GNG. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:15, 27 March 2017 (UTC).

But she is not an academic. Her notability, such as it is , is as an organizer. Public health is not a low cited field. Anyway, it's not h index that matters but the distribution of citation h=17 can mean 17 items with 17 citations each, or 1item with 500 and 16 items with 16 each. Here, she has no item with over 100 citations, and in biomedical sciences, that's the effective minimum standard. DGG ( talk ) 00:38, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 03:32, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:40, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Alis Rowe[edit]

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: "Alis Rowe" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Just-prior AfD was just "procedurally closed" due to disruptive SOCKing by Sdc3000/SThompson/Imalawyer. Am re-listing so that people who !voted in good faith are not too far from the work and thinking they did last time. My rationale for !voting to delete was: this is marginal. I was heading toward keep because she has published a lot of books but then I saw that they all appear to be self-published, on Amazon's CreateSpace or through her self-publishing imprint, Lonely Mind books. If you take those away, as we should, you are not left with much. I am going to have to say delete for now. This may be a WP:TOOSOON thing. Jytdog (talk) 05:55, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Jytdog (talk) 06:02, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: Sock !vote removed by Bbb23; thank you for policing this Jytdog (talk) 17:37, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Keep. I understand why this re-nomination needed to take place, but the prior discussion seemed headed toward a "no consensus" close (especially if you ignore the 'delete' votes from the now-blocked users) and perhaps we'll end up in the same place again. Here, I'll just re-post the relevant portion of my previous recommendation.

Although this case is more "borderline" than many, I can see some notability coming from the niche publications. There's nothing suspect about that -- people who operate in specialised areas can be expected to derive their coverage from specialty publications. That's true for many of the academics who have articles here. And it is certainly true for the hundreds upon hundreds of sports figures whose articles are sourced solely to an on-line sports database (and it is difficult to imagine anything more "niche" than that). I also see some notability coming from the BBC interview. Although we tend to downplay the significance of interviews in our notability discussions, the fact remains that the BBC does not have an unlimited amount of air time and that some editorial discretion went into the decision to devote some of that time to the subject.

NewYorkActuary (talk) 07:41, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Keep as has coverage in a number of genre related reliable sources, this article was created at WP:AFC and I agree with that decision as there is just about enough coverage for WP:BASIC although more sources would be helpful Atlantic306 (talk) 17:30, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Delete "just about enough coverage" is not enough coverage, and so we should delete.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:07, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Keep - references meet WP:GNG criteria. WP:TOOSOON is an essay. Hmlarson (talk) 20:40, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:35, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:35, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 03:33, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:17, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:40, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Happy Computers[edit]

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: "Happy Computers" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. First AfD 10 years ago closed as keep because geek editors who commented were fan of Atari, through one noted that sources are about the products, not company, but the consensus was that WP:THEREMUSTBESOURCES. Second AfD closed as no consensus since no-one except the nominator, User:Alpha Quadrant, voted. Since nobody can find sources for notability for the company, and few articles mentioning it name in passsing and reviewing its products don't establish it, here we go again. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:28, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Keep Products reviewed in various Atari magazines, some of these reviews are even referenced in the article. It is obvious there are enough reliable sources to make stand-alone articles for each product, but it is more convenient for our readers to keep them all under one company article. Pavlor (talk) 05:23, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:40, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete Reviews about their products may make those products notable, but notability is never inherited. Exemplo347 (talk) 16:48, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
keep enough reception in paper magazines Shaddim (talk) 20:31, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Keep The Happy Drive was well-known and received significant coverage at the time of release. Dgpop (talk) 21:01, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:19, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:19, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:19, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Note Nobody who has !voted keep has provided any evidence of significant coverage in reliable, independent sources for the company - not the products, the company. I'd say that people are getting themselves confused. 22:15, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Should we make new articles for each of their products? From my point of view a useless waste of community time... Pavlor (talk) 05:06, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Well, if the products are notable then there's no reason why articles about them shouldn't be made. This article isn't about the products, and people who are !voting keep based on the notability of the products rather than the company are out of step with Wikipedia's policies and the community consensus on inherited notability. Exemplo347 (talk) 14:45, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Further comments should be grounded in Wikipedia policies and guidelines.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:40, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

SMP Kristen 7 BPK Penabur[edit]

(Find sources: "SMP Kristen 7 BPK Penabur" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Non-notable non-secondary school, with only primary references. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:54, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:06, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:06, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Redirect to List of schools in Indonesia and add it to that. Don't see how a redirect to Jakarta would be that useful since the city is massive. The list article makes more sense for this one. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:22, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:15, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:36, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

World Sufi Forum[edit]

(Find sources: "World Sufi Forum" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Fails WP:EVENT - no evidence of "significant national or international coverage". Mere 200 participants, just few of them notable. Contrary to the infobox type, no indication also that it is a recurring event. — kashmiri ^TALK 13:28, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:20, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:20, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:20, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:20, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:20, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

comment there was some coverage, I would look forward to merge or redirect. Rzvas (talk) 09:20, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Weak keep - Is there a reason to discount the 700+ google news results I see when searching the term there? Most of those are articles about Modi's participation in the event, but I don't see why they aren't good indicators of the article's suitability for inclusion in wikipedia. Smmurphy^(Talk) 19:15, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- Redirect If it is a one-off event, I don't expect coverage to continue to grow. There does seem to be enough coverage that it might still be a search term, and a redirect seems useful. Smmurphy^(Talk) 20:08, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Delete It's a single event with no evidence of consistent, sustained coverage or real notability aside from Modi's participation. Information about this forum could possibly be included in the article for the All India Ulema and Mashaikh Board, but I wouldn't recommend a straight merge because some of the material here consists of peacock terms pulled from the forum's official website. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:25, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

I just triple-checled the AIUMB article, and apparently at the bottom there's already information about this forum; I just didn't scroll down enough previously. In that case, I simply reaffirm my delete vote since the information is already included in the encyclopedia. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:26, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Merge and redirect to All India Ulema and Mashaikh Board per above. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 19:37, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:36, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Masters of Cinema[edit]

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: "Masters of Cinema" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

No indication of notability. A single refernce to a low-profile online-only "trade magazine". The content is spammy. My searches have found numerous blogs but little of any value for Wikipedia's purposes. If the page is deleted, List of Masters of Cinema releases should be deleted along with it. Huon (talk) 00:34, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

I just noticed that the article had previously been nominated for deletion in 2015. Tokyogirl79 cleaned it up at that time, but even after that cleanup the only source for the prose of the article was the company's own website. By now the article is in no better shape, arguably worse. I would take that as an indication that significant coverage of the series itself simply does not exist and still think the article should be deleted. Huon (talk) 00:46, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

PIVX[edit]

(Find sources: "PIVX" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

This article should be deleted as it does not meet the WP:GNG. A WP:BEFORE search did not find any reliable sources. -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 22:16, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 April 1. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:31, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Keep - I think this does meet WP:GNG criteria. It covers a subject that I know nothing about, but I found this Bitcoin Buzz source which mentions that it is a fork of DASH, and it is a quoted company with a market capitalisation of $47 million. It is mentioned here as one of four cryptocurrencies which operate a masternode system, and here, here, here. These may not be ideal sources, but they show it is in the news, people are interested in it, and therefore it is a good topic for an encyclopedia. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:08, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
Don't delete - This is a brief but accurate description of this cryptocurrency. I think that this article - PIVX fork of DASH - meets WP:GNG requirements.— Randomaccess (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. The preceding unsigned comment was added at 19:10, 6 April 2017 (UTC) (UTC).

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The log of April 1 is overfilled
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 14:18, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete as the subject appears to fail to meet our notability requirements. The sources found by Cwmhiraeth are all either not independent from the subject or not considered reliable for our purposes here, I'm afraid. Cordless Larry (talk) 09:05, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
I feel confident that this huffington post article is a reliable source. Dude6935 (talk) 21:21, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
- It's based on a press release though, Dude6935, so is not independent of the subject and therefore doesn't contribute to establishing notability. See WP:GNG on this. Cordless Larry (talk) 20:12, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  - Oh, I missed that it was a press release. Dude6935 (talk) 21:39, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:27, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:27, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:27, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: This is the first official relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:33, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Office des professions du Québec[edit]

(Find sources: "Office des professions du Québec" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Article about a government agency, which basically just paraphrases its own mission statement in bullet points and fails to include any real substance (or even much actual prose beyond the base statement that it exists), and which cites no reliable source coverage about the agency to get it over WP:ORGDEPTH. The only "reference" present here at all, in fact, is the external link to its own website. As always, an organization does not get an automatic notability freebie just because it exists; it must be the subject of reliable source coverage for an article to become earned. Bearcat (talk) 21:13, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 21:13, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Comment This appears to have been a translation from the French Wikipedia. Veillg1 (talk · contribs) even used a {{homonymy see}} template that is on French Wikipedia as {{voir homonymes}} (this is their disambiguation hatnote template) So it is badly attributed -- 70.51.200.162 (talk) 03:48, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The log of April 1 is overfiled
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 14:21, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

- NOTE this appears to be a continuing problem with user:Veillg1, with new articles lacking attribution, being translated from French Wikipedia with this user. There's no edit summary describing it came from fr.wiki; nor is there a talk page attribution template. -- 70.51.200.162 (talk) 04:49, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:32, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: This is the first official relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:32, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Psych (rapper)[edit]

(Find sources: "Psych (rapper)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

WP:BLP of a rapper, with no strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC and no evidence of reliable source coverage in media. Pretty much right across the board, the referencing here is to unacceptable primary sources, like his own Facebook and Instagram and Soundcloud accounts, or WP:BLOGS that cannot carry notability -- and the one thing here that's even marginally closer to an acceptable source than anything else is, Buzzfeed, is to the user-generated "community" section of Buzzfeed and not to content written by any actual employee of Buzzfeed. (Which is, obviously, not to say that Buzzfeed could actually carry a GNG claim all by itself at the best of times, but Buzzfeed Community counts for even less than Buzzfeed proper.) As always, Wikipedia is not a free publicity platform on which any musician is entitled to have an article just because he exists -- he must be the subject of reliable source coverage in media, which verifies passage of a specific notability criterion, for an article to become earned. Bearcat (talk) 20:52, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 21:04, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 21:04, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The log of April 1 is overfilled
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 14:22, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:34, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:34, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: This is the first official relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:31, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete per nom. Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 07:28, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Mahobiya[edit]

(Find sources: "Mahobiya" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

The similar main article namely Banaphar is already existing along with the specific articles like Alha and udal. Is this article really needed, contents of which are not supported by Releable Source. MahenSingha (Talk) 20:50, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete This is only a one sentence entry lacking any source material. I feel it could be deleted.TH1980 (talk) 00:04, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The log of April 1 is overfilled
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 14:24, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:23, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:23, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Comment - @Mahensingha: Why is this submitted to AfD and not merged straight away, as was discussed and more or less agreed to on the article's talk page? Smmurphy^(Talk) 00:44, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any responses to Smmurphy (talk · contribs)'s comment?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:31, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Travis Collinson[edit]

(Find sources: "Travis Collinson" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

B GetSomeUtah (talk) 20:12, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Keep as no valid reason for deletion has been presented. -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 14:26, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The log of April 1 is overfilled
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 14:26, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete. Sorry. Newbie at listing these. Please don't bite. Reason is non-notability and created by account that seems purely commercial in nature. The article is an advertisement. GetSomeUtah (talk) 15:30, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:35, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

The article doesn't read like an advertisement, whether you're right or not about the article creator's intent. He's clearly a notable painter, loosely speaking: whether he is by our definition of the term...? His work is certainly known and exhibited and written about. The weeklies SF Gate and OC Weekly that are on the article aren't bad -- they're not solely devoted to him but they're much more than passing mentions. And I wonder if some of those exhibitions -- we have solo, group, curated, public -- don't combine to meet WP:NARTIST: "has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition." Combining the coverage that we do have with all his exhibitions, I'd say weak keep. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:48, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:48, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: This is the first official relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:30, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Jeff Colson[edit]

AfDs for this article:

Articles for deletion/Jeff Colson

(Find sources: "Jeff Colson" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Not notable. Commercial in nature. Created by user who has created several of these pages. GetSomeUtah (talk) 20:04, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:15, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Keep Meets WP:ARTIST4d at a minimum: is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums. Probably meets every single other criterion as well, but this should suffice. The promotional nature of the article has no bearing on the notability of the subject. Mduvekot (talk) 01:13, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Preventing the log of April 1 from overfilling
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 14:27, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:35, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: This is the first official relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:29, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Haji Idrees Palh[edit]

(Find sources: "Haji Idrees Palh" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Fails WP:GNG No independent sources to be found, nor in Western script, nor in Sindhi script. The Banner talk 14:29, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:22, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:23, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:40, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:28, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Jayanta Roy[edit]

(Find sources: "Jayanta Roy" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Non-notable music composer. I found no sources that provide significant coverage of Roy himself, nor does he seem to meet any of the criteria in WP:COMPOSER. GSS (talk|c|em) 15:42, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 15:45, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 15:45, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 15:45, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: The below comment was posted by the author on the talk page of this AfD, so I have moved it here. GSS (talk|c|em) 13:38, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

This page is significant and should be in wikipedia. Roy has worked with National Award Winning Singer Rupankar Bagchi who is very much famous public figure in West Bengal. He worked with Gopika Goswami who has done playback in many highly popular bengali films such as Jamai 420, Shororipu, Not a Dirty Film, Sathiya. Sundeep Gosswami (who has sung Dil Kyun on Roy's compostion) has worked singer and music director as Sundeep-Surya (previously was known as Sandeep-Surya) duo in Bollywood movies such as Bhindi Baazaar Inc., Blue Mountains (2017 film) and Suraj Jagan, Roop Kumar Rathod, Sadhana Sargam, Tochi Raina have sung on his composition. Roy also worked as painter in Tui Bolle Project ( an Indo- Bangladeshi relationship project) with one of the top artist of Bangladesh Shayan Chowdhury Arnob.Jiami (talk) 18:07, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

@Jiami: Notability is not inherited. A person who is the subject of an article has to be notable in their own, and I can see no evidence that Jayanta Roy is. GSS (talk|c|em) 13:45, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

@GSS-1987: Sir, Roy has been referred several times in Bangladeshi newspapers for Tui Bolle project in many renowned Bangladeshi newspapapers as it can derived from online sources. Tui Bolle project is very much significant in the sense that it has been done to enhance Indo-Bangladesh cultural relations in that atmosphere where Indian music is banned in Bangladesh. Its also a fact of significance/notability for Roy being mentioned in a lot of Bangladeshi National newspapers for that project where other persons in that project (like musicians who played for that and others involved in song production) except composer and lyricist were mentioned nowhere (so far links I have had from internet search).Roy has been covered multiple times in West Bengal state level newspapers and regional ones and also televison channels whose onlie links expire in few days and a number of them don't have online links, so it will remain as a fact of ambiguity from the view of wiki until any user as well as me can't give further online sources and I or any other user can give reference of online links of news coverage in recent future when any online link of his next coverage will generate on net or will be covered in English newspapers whose links don't expire. I have come on wiki to be an wikipidean editor and so I made the article short rather than using any info from the offline newspapers where from I read many about Roy Sir. So, its my request to you is to keep the page making it recommended for improvement following rule of not deleting in case of doubt. Please go for inclusionism. Jiami (talk) 14:28, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

As I said above Notability is not inherited. To have a Wikipedia article, the subject must receive significant coverage in reliable, independent sources to demonstrate it's notability and the available sources are either unreliable or trivial passing mentions. Nothing I've seen suggests that this person meets GNG and I don't see any indication of passing WP:COMPOSER. GSS (talk|c|em) 05:49, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

@GSS-1987: What I can say about this, the sources are reliable enough. An article can be made for a single event too if the event is significant and there are multiple coverages of event along with the person's role WP:BIO1E. Anyways, I shall agree with any decision you would take. Regards. Jiami (talk) 07:38, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:27, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Lack's principle[edit]

(Find sources: "Lack's principle" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Info could easily be merged in section David Lack Llightex (talk) 00:25, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:29, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:29, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Redirect to David Lack. This is an exact duplication of the one-sentence paragraph in the main article (including refs). If and when someone feels moved in the future to expand this with lots of examples and discussion, a standalone article might become feasible.--Elmidae (talk · contribs) 04:23, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Keep - I've extended the article to explain the evolutionary reasoning behind the principle (without going into the maths), and have added some more citations. The principle applies to all reproducing organisms, not only to birds, and is already sufficiently sourced to show that it is notable. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:12, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Eclectic Northeast[edit]

(Find sources: "Eclectic Northeast" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Delete or Redirect to Tanushree Hazarika: This article appears to have been created by a representative of the magazine, and does not make it clear whether the magazine meets the notability criteria. No independent coverage in reliable sources to support WP:GNG and no indication of passing WP:NMEDIA. Article recreated using different title after the speedy-deletion of a version (Eclectic Northeast Magazine) which was blatant advertising. GSS (talk|c|em) 08:10, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 08:11, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 08:11, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

This magazine is quite notable and is similar in circulatin and content to The Northeast Today, in fact the page of Eclectic Northeast Magazine was not so much advertising as The Northeast Today. It is suspected that people against the magazine are asking for its deletion. This page should be up and more links. Kangla Online, the leading newspaper of a state in Assam : Manipur, has a source on Eclectic - <ref>http://kanglaonline.com/2015/11/eclectic-northeast-celebrates-its-9th-anniversary/ . Even Chief minister of Assam, Mary Kom released the magazine http://www.manipur.org/news/2012/11/19/chief-minister-of-assam-shri-tarun-gogoi-and-olympic-champion-m-c-mary-kom-releases-eclectic-northeast-magazine/ Northeast India has a huge but neglected population. Mainstream media doesn't cover this are so much and deletion of an important magazine entry from wikipedia from the region should not be allowed. There is no reference of blatant advertising like as in The Northeast today. Notability: The above picture shows that a 15 year reigning Chief Minister of a state, his son and also an Olympic Silver Medalist is launching the magazine and still it is being considered Non-Notable? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gauravjaina (talk • contribs) 08:07, 27 March 2017 (UTC) — Note to closing admin: Gauravjaina (talk • contribs) appears to have a close connection with the subject of the article being discussed.

kanglaonline.com is a press release about subject celebrating its 9th anniversary and press release are not considered independent. I don't see if manipur.org is a reliable source. Your comment at SPI ManaliJain88 confirmed that you know the author (ManaliJain88) personally and as per the selection of your articles it looks like you and ManaliJain88 have conflict of interest in this and other articles. As per our policies at what Wikipedia is not you should not use Wikipedia for promotional purposes. Thank you – GSS (talk|c|em) 14:31, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

KEEP THE ARTICLE

The article "Eclectic Northeast" has been edited to give it more referenced links rather than random ones.The article should not be deleted because the magazine is a well deserved magazine of the region. There is a need for such magazine to keep people aware of the issues of their own region. So, people should know about the magazine to know about the region. There might not be many notable references to the article but there are a few of them which are notable enough to support the article. ManaliJain88 (talk) 07:39, 28 March 2017 (UTC)Manali JainManaliJain88 (talk) 07:39, 28 March 2017 (UTC) — Note to closing admin: ManaliJain88 (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this XfD.

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 16:55, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:24, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Uncle Seth[edit]

(Find sources: "Uncle Seth" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

This band does not meet the criteria for WP:BAND. There is one write-up about an upcoming event in "Media in Canada". A public relations expert used them as an example of good marketing in his book. I found three press releases, [19], [20] and [21]. The claim about "official band of Canadian podcasters' has been copied from the third of these into the Jesse Kohl article and then into the Wikipedia article, so there's no independent reference. I was unable to find any independent published reviews of the contents their recordings, their blog, their podcast or their Second Life "simulcast", or reports of any performances. —Anne Delong (talk) 04:37, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:02, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 16:57, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Keep Hi, I am a founding member of the band Uncle Seth, and wanted to respond.

While much of our original press coverage is no longer available online, our Second Life simulcast was covered in this Toronto Star article which still lives at archive.org. Parts of one of our Second Life concerts were shown on Global National News in Canada but unfortunately the original video is no longer availible.

National coverage of our podcasting and Second Life did appear on CBC Radio as mentioned here and here (the second of which includes the 'offical band of Canadian podcasting' reference from broadcaster Tod Maffin) but again unfortunately the original audio is no longer availible.

Evidence of radio airplay and additional media coverage throughout Canada have also vanished, but I do believe Uncle Seth was at least in some small ways a pioneering band in terms of our efforts to connect with fans online, and I would appreciate your consideration in keeping this article alive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmoonah (talk • contribs) 00:12, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Jmoonah, thanks for finding that Toronto Star item; I have added it to the article. The link to the band's blog can't be used, but it does give a timeframe for the "Bandwidth" report; the promotional blurb for the two previous shows say that one was to be about unusual promotion and the other was to be about feuds between bands. Recordings of these broadcasts likely still exist somewhere, but can't be cited unless we know what was in them. The other link appears to be to a personal blog; I'm not sure that comments there are of encyclopedic importance. The "evidence of additional media coverage" you mention may not be on line, but if you still have, for example, newspaper clippings for which you can identify the name of the paper, and the date the item appeared, text written by the journalist (not quotes or promotion from the band members) can be used to support the article.—Anne Delong (talk) 14:16, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:09, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:45, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:24, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Mark Eshleman[edit]

(Find sources: "Mark Eshleman" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Non-notable individual. Fails any form of WP:N. Article fails to make a credible claim of notability. Should be a Speedy candidate. reddogsix (talk) 03:29, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 16:58, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:08, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:46, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:46, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:46, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:23, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete He is some kind of director for the band Twenty One Pilots. Its not quite sure what is his role is, but he made some of their videos. The gist is, apart from his connection to the band there is nothing noteworthy about him. Coverage of him as person is completely sparse, he only gets a couple of passing mentions in third-tier media when they talk about the band. There is an interview in the Sun-Sentinel (already in the article) but thats basically everything which can be found about him. Per our notability requirements we need significant coverage in multiple independent sources in-depth about the subject. This is not fulfilled with some passing mentions and a single interview. His only notability claim is his association with the band, but thats not enough for anything according to our criteria and guidelines. He fails WP:DIRECTOR in all points and with the lack of reliable source which do in-depth coverage he also fails WP:GNG and/or WP:NBIO very clearly. The article should therefore be deleted. Dead Mary (talk) 12:19, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
Delete Seems to stake claim of notability by association. No significant references outside of his role in working with Twenty One Pilots. If he merits any presence at all on wikipedia it should be on that page, not as a stand alone article. ShelbyMarion (talk) 14:35, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Semra Eren-Nijhar[edit]

(Find sources: "Semra Eren-Nijhar" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Not clear that this article meets our notability requirements. The sources cited here only mention Eren-Nijhar in passing. She doesn't appear to meet any of the criteria at WP:ACADEMIC either. Cordless Larry (talk) 17:36, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:36, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:36, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:36, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:36, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:18, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Murtaza Khojami[edit]

(Find sources: "Murtaza Khojami" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

WP:BLP of a singer and record producer, with no strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC and no quality reliable sourcing to support it. The only "references" here are his music's buy-it pages on online music stores, not media coverage about him -- and going back further in the history, the only other references that have ever been here at all are a Spotify stream and a Vevo videoclip. As always, a musician is not automatically entitled to a Wikipedia article just because the presence of his music on iTunes or Spotify proves that he exists; he must be the subject of media coverage, verifying passage of at least one specific NMUSIC criterion, for a Wikipedia article to become earned. Bearcat (talk) 17:47, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Musicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 15:38, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Afghanistan-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 15:38, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:18, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Prashant Girkar[edit]

(Find sources: "Prashant Girkar" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Applied a prod with the reason: Does not meet WP:DIRECTOR. The tag was removed, but the article was not improved in terms of adding content to show notability. This may be a case of WP:TOOSOON. –CaroleHenson (talk) 18:44, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Production Manager is totally different category, prashant girkar is main director of film he is not a production manager, i provided some references please go through it. wikibot 18:48, 2 April 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shrinivaskulkarni1388 (talk • contribs)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:17, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:29, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:29, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Red Sky Mary[edit]

(Find sources: "Red Sky Mary" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Local band with no charted hits, no national tour, no national media attention. Articles I see are PR. Fails WP:BAND Rogermx (talk) 19:15, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: As the nomination was formatted improperly, please consider this the initial listing rather than a relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:17, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:33, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Hampshire-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:33, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy Delete / A7 - Seems pretty clear. No meaningful content. No assertion of significance. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 01:16, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Princes Mead Shopping Centre[edit]

(Find sources: "Princes Mead Shopping Centre" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

No claim or indication of notability for this shopping mall. WP:CSD#A7 nomination declined by administrator, so bringing here. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 19:45, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Redirect to Farnborough, Hampshire#Town centre as that is where it is already mentioned. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 19:57, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:10, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:10, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:15, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete WP:MILL shopping mall with 37 stores. No indication it's notable. MB 04:00, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Is it an invalid or implausible redirect term, though? Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 10:58, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

No objection to a redirect, but the relevant section isn't even sourced. I wouldn't say the proposed target article has a "subtopic" on this subject per WP:POFR; it is barely useful. I wouldn't create this one myself. MB 14:34, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Courtney Rood[edit]

(Find sources: "Courtney Rood" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Rood has no coverage in reliable sources.[22] — JJMC89 (T·C) 20:29, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 20:29, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:30, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Americas-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:00, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:14, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Michael Kaminski (computer scientist)[edit]

(Find sources: "Michael Kaminski (computer scientist)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Does not qualify under WP:ACADEMIC sources consist largely of articles written by the subject, no evidence of bona fide notability per WP:GNG. KDS4444 (talk) 13:33, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07 (T) 20:31, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:14, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. — Stringy Acid (talk) 15:36, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. — Stringy Acid (talk) 15:36, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. — Stringy Acid (talk) 15:36, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete as the article doesn't pass WP:PROF (unfortunately). H-index < 20 (by manual counting from Google Scholar listings) in a high-citation field. ACM page records 255 citations over 35 years, which is again not high enough for WP:PROF#C1. Other criteria of WP:PROF don't seem to be applicable. — Stringy Acid (talk) 16:04, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Otolorin Olabode[edit]

(Find sources: "Otolorin Olabode" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Doesn't pass WP:GNG. No coverage in reliable secondary sources of him as a person. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 00:13, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete - Fails to demonstrate notability. Reference is an example of subject's work. reddogsix (talk) 00:16, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:28, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:28, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:28, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete fails WP:GNG — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mahveotm (talk • contribs)

Michael Wohl[edit]

(Find sources: "Michael Wohl" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

This article appears to be about two different people. One is a producer of yoga videos, the founder of Bodywisdom and inventor of an endless candle, the other is the Director of Social Entrepreneurship at Simon Business School at the University of Rochester.

Additionally, if Wohl is most known for founding Bodywisdom Media Inc. and for being the executive director of the The Art of Peace Foundation, and neither of those two organizations have received significant coverage in reliable sources, how can he meet WP:GNG? Mduvekot (talk) 21:54, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

I wrote this page, I'm going to try to defend it.

They are not different people. Unfortunately it is the linkedin source which demonstrates this, which I realize is typically unacceptable, and the only reason I know for sure that this is the case is because I was at a lecture IRL where he spoke, which is obviously also unacceptable. I will look deeper into the sources and find the connection.

I concede that Bodywisdom alone does not meet the general notability guideline, but The Art of Peace Foundation does. The Art of Peace Foundation did at one point receive significant coverage (around 2008 when the songs for tibet album was produced), in fact, the album itself does have a wikipedia page Songs for Tibet: The Art of Peace. I will do some more research and make a page for The Art of Peace organization, make a page for it, and demonstrate this.

King Jason96 (talk) 23:15, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete - a passing mention in a BBC article about itunes in China, and several social media type of citations are not enough to support notability. ValarianB (talk) 16:45, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:13, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Eventful Forum[edit]

(Find sources: "Eventful Forum" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Fails WP:EVENT, non-notable JMHamo (talk) 22:06, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:58, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:59, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:13, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:13, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Fun Ki baat[edit]

(Find sources: "Fun Ki baat" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

No significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. A google search for "Fun Ki baat" yielded one result from the times of india, but the subject appears to be a different programme. Mduvekot (talk) 22:27, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:12, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Khaplam wai[edit]

(Find sources: "Khaplam wai" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

The one source is dead. Online results are mirrors. I honestly can't confirm that the subject even exists. Mr. Guye (talk) 23:12, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Laos-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 23:14, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Dance-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 23:15, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete. I see a single book mention in passing; this is either incorrectly transliterated or, well, non-notable. --Hanyangprofessor2 (talk) 05:32, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Redirect to Mor lam. It does exist, book source, but does not look like enough to justify a separate article. ValarianB (talk) 16:38, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:11, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Files[edit]

Files for discussion[edit]

April 10[edit]

File:1994 Penrith City Chiefs team photo.jpg[edit]

Permission reason is that the photo was given to every member of the team. That is simply not how copyright works. Copyright is a legal matter that is only transferred via legal action or contract (such as work for hire). Without that the copyright still belongs to the photographer and this photo is not in the public domain. Majora (talk) 00:43, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Delete - for the same reason given at the associated article AFD. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 03:47, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

I may have been a little obscure with my explanation. The photo was taken by the team's photographer and a copy was given to all members of the team by team management as a gift. Permission was given expressly or implicitly to use the photo to promote the game in schools and in the local community. AUSSportsHistory (talk) 12:51, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Logo of The Sims 4.svg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Is being used as a second image to display The Sims 4 logo within the article despite the fact File:The Sims 4 Box Art.png has already been used for well over 2 years. Therefore and as such, its usage does not consitute fair use since its usage doesn't do anything more to illustrate the logo than the other. However, if the consensus of this discussion turns out that the boxart image ends up getting deleted and not this one, that should achieve the same result. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 03:43, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SWsdvoNp.png[edit]

unused logo no encyclopedic use FASTILY 06:10, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

File:DREAM 72dpi RGB.jpg[edit]

unused logo no encyclopedic use FASTILY 06:10, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Backconnectinclogo.png[edit]

unused logo no encyclopedic use FASTILY 06:11, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Explica Logotype 2016.png[edit]

unused logo no encyclopedic use FASTILY 06:11, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

File:YG logo tagline.jpg[edit]

unused logo no encyclopedic use FASTILY 06:11, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

File:QM logo word.jpg[edit]

unused logo no encyclopedic use FASTILY 06:11, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

File:ReSec LOGO-01.png[edit]

unused logo no encyclopedic use FASTILY 06:11, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

File:San Roberto International School logo.png[edit]

unused logo no encyclopedic use FASTILY 06:11, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

File:"KingIsaacWorld"Oct 1,2016.jpg[edit]

orphaned image of non-notable subject Jon Kolbert (talk) 08:16, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

File:5 March 2017 selfie.jpg[edit]

Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 11:34, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

File:A.Sifar C.Selfie2.jpg[edit]

Unused personal photo - out of project scope.

Also File:A.Sifar C.Selfie.jpg. XXN, 11:43, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Afaan Bilal.jpg[edit]

Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 16:08, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

File:AJG6AxA.jpg[edit]

Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 16:31, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

File:P5RAept.jpg[edit]

Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 16:32, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

File:AjayRajasekaran.jpg[edit]

Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 16:32, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Ajay rajasekaran.jpg[edit]

Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 16:33, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Alberto Frigo, 01 Images of the artifacts used by the main hand 2004-2040.jpg[edit]

Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 16:36, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Alvaro Dal Canton.jpg[edit]

Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 16:41, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Ameykakdephoto.jpg[edit]

Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 16:45, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Categories[edit]

April 10[edit]

NEW NOMINATIONS[edit]

Category:Argutinsky-Dolgorukov[edit]

Propose merging Category:Argutinsky-Dolgorukov to Category:All parents

Nominator's rationale: Only contains one page. The linked Russian Wikipedia category has 4 articles, but for the time being this one is not justified. – Fayenatic London 16:13, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Category:Association football people by country[edit]

Propose renaming Category:Association football people by country to Category:Association football people by nationality

Nominator's rationale: Opposed speedy. The category should either follow the convention of Category:Sportspeople by sport and nationality or it should be removed from it. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:43, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Copy of speedy nom

Category:Association football people by country to Category:Association football people by nationality – C2C: per the convention in Category:Sportspeople by sport and nationality. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:25, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Oppose. @Armbrust this is a container for categories of footballers in a country, who may not be of that nationality. See the similar distinction between Category:Association football players by country and Category:Association football players by nationality. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 15:35, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

@BrownHairedGirl: In that case, however, it shouldn't be in Category:Sportspeople by sport and nationality at all. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 15:51, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

@Armbrust: you may be right about that, and if so, then some juggling of parent categories may be required.
However, the underlying question is that since this all arises from a desire not to put expatriate footballers in Fooland under a "Fooish people" category, hoe far up the tree do we pursue the distinction? I am far from sure that it is a good idea to retain this distinction in the category system, because I don't think that our general intermixing of people-by-nationality with people-by-place supports it. For example, an American expatriate artist in Paris may be there for all their notable career, possibly many decades, so it would be folly not to categorise them under Category:People from Paris .... but that places them under Category:French people. I see no problem with that, but the sports categories are based on the assumption that such fuzziness doesn't exist. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:01, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

@Armbrust: This is a can of worms that is way too complex for a speedy. @BrownHairedGirl: I think the sports categories don't assume that kind of fuzziness doesn't exist, it's more that it's very common for footballers in particular to move around the globe, often on an annual basis - but for a very short time, maybe 6-8 years at the peak of their careers. So they don't get entrenched in the way that your artist would, so they don't identify as "French" - but at the same time, their two most defining characteristics at any one time are the team they are playing for and their international team (which is defined more strictly than citizenship - you can have two passports but only one football nationality). And for many footballers from smaller countries like say Ryan Giggs, they are defined more by the club than their country as they win many more trophies with their club than country. So personally I'd let sleeping dogs lie.... Le Deluge (talk) 18:23, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Category:Apostolic nuncios[edit]

Propose renaming Category:Apostolic nuncios to Category:Apostolic Nuncios

Nominator's rationale: Opposed speedy. Every subcategory uses a capital "N", so this one should too. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:39, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Copy of speedy nom

Category:Apostolic nuncios to Category:Apostolic Nuncios – C2C: every subcategory uses upper-case for "Nuncios". Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 15:42, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Oppose, probably I don't know the niceties of papal procedure, but I would guess that this is one of those cases where titles are capitalised but the collective noun is not. Qv The Queen of England being one of a number of queens, or Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother being categorised in Category:Queen mothers‎. Le Deluge (talk) 19:13, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Category:Austrian people of Silesian German descent[edit]

Propose merging Category:Austrian people of Silesian German descent to Category:German emigrants to Austria

Nominator's rationale: purge and merge, the category consists of four Austrian people whose parents were born in Austrian Silesia so they don't belong in the category (not of German descent) and should be purged. And as a fifth one there is Georg Wahl who was a German Silesian working in Austria for about 15 years. So he wasn't descending, he was just a German and should be moved to Category:German emigrants to Austria. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:25, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Category:Drohobych Oblast[edit]

Propose deleting Category:Drohobych Oblast - (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:People from Drohobych Oblast

Nominator's rationale: delete per WP:SMALLCAT, not enough content for a small short-lived (20 years) country subdivision. No need to merge anything, the articles are already in the right categories. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:57, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Oppose. Consistency with other country's subdivisions. Give a some time. Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 06:11, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Category:Ukrainian football forward, 2000s births stubs[edit]

Propose deleting Category:Ukrainian football forward, 2000s births stubs - (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: I propose that this category is a few years too early. Those born in the 2000s would be 17 or younger. Very few would have encyclopedia-worthy careers at this time. Recommend deleting the category and upmerging the template to Category:Ukrainian football forward stubs. Nothing against recreating the category in a few years, once a reasonable number of stubs (> 60) exist for this category. Dawynn (talk) 03:05, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Category:Soltaniyeh County geography stubs[edit]

Propose deleting Category:Soltaniyeh County geography stubs - (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: Inconsistent definition. Wikipedia can't even agree as to whether this is a county of its own or a district in Abhar County. Categories relating to the independent county definition are extremely small. Propose deleting and moving template to Category:Abhar County geography stubs. Dawynn (talk) 02:42, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Category:Universal identifiers[edit]

Propose renaming Category:Universal identifiers to Category:Unique identifiers

Nominator's rationale: This is in the spirit of CFDS #C2D, but it doesn't precisely fit that situation. Universal identifier is a redlink, and Universal identifiers is a redirect to International identifier, a kind of identifier that's used to identify multinational corporations. The basic concept is covered by an article with a different name, Unique identifier (this is the standard term in the field, not merely a Wikipedia-created descriptive title), which covers all sorts of identifiers from international identifiers to national identity numbers, from Bates numbering to Smithsonian trinomials. The article and category for this basic concept ought to share a title, and when the article has the standard term as its current title, the discrepancy ought to be resolved by renaming the category. Nyttend (talk) 02:06, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Redirects[edit]

April 10[edit]

No Teasing[edit]

No Teasing → The Simpsons (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

The Pacifier (Simpsons TV ad) → The Simpsons (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

The Dog Biscuit → The Simpsons (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

The Last Butterfinger → The Simpsons (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

The Raid (Simpsons TV ad) → The Simpsons (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Bart's Homework → The Simpsons (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

The Bully (The Simpsons TV ad) → The Simpsons (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Bart's Karate Lesson → The Simpsons (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Good vs. Evil (Simpsons TV ad) → The Simpsons (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

The Beach (Simpsons TV ad) → The Simpsons (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

The Simpsons Baseball → The Simpsons (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Smell Your Breath → The Simpsons (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

A to Z (Simpsons TV ad) → The Simpsons (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Itchy & Scratchy's "500 Easy Pieces" → The Simpsons (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Plastic Underwear → The Simpsons (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Bart's Nightmare (Simpsons TV ad) → The Simpsons (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

The Butterfinger Group → Butterfinger (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

These are all redirects from Simpsons Butterfinger commercials to articles that don't mention them. Maggie's Party, a similar Butterfinger ad redirect, was deleted after a discussion in December, and the same basic arguments apply to all of these.

The Butterfinger Group might plausibly be worth noting somewhere as the first appearance of Milhouse; but while the Milhouse article notes he was designed for a Butterfinger ad, that ad isn't mentioned by name. Butterfinger (where The Butterfinger Group currently redirects) has some content about these ads in general, but not about any specific ad. Sideways713 (talk) 11:58, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Mark (singer)[edit]

Mark (singer) → Mark Lee (singer) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Redirect is ambiguous as to what it should be targeting as there are several Marks in the world who are singers other than Mark Lee. Marky Mark comes to mind, for instance.

Note that I declined a speedy deletion proposal that didn't specify a valid criteria and fixed the redirect that, after a series of page moves, had somehow ended up targeting itself. –Grondemar 04:46, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi, I moved the page from Mark (singer) to Mark Lee (singer) (obviously because the surname had to be included), but the intended target redirected back to Mark (singer). Hence, I performed a page swap. I didn't think the left over redirect at Mark (singer) was a plausible/nessecary redirect so I marked it for speedy deletion with words to this effect. Sorry for any confusion. —Frosty ☃ 05:00, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Keep. He appears to be sufficiently well-known by his (albeit ambiguous) first name as a South Korean boy-band member, but his article should include his other name (as it currently does per user:Frosty). See WP:NICKNAME and WP:MONONYM. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 06:05, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Agie[edit]

Agie → Agha (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

"Agie" and "Agha" are not the same word. Agha is a disambiguation page, so the current setup could be considered misleading/confusing. Steel1943 (talk) 21:54, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Comment. The redirect originally targeted Agha (Ottoman Empire), whose version at the time did mention agie. – Uanfala (talk) 22:05, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Redirect to 'Aggie', itself a disambiguation page, since a great number of individuals are known as "Aggie _____" and this is easily misheard to be "Agie _____". The connection to 'Agha' seems tenuous at best to me. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 03:30, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Retarget to Aggie per Coffee and as a plausible typo. Tazerdadog (talk) 02:01, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Probably unrelated, but I just created Popo Agie.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:59, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

'Comment. I!m wondering, without any evidence at all, whether this is a likely typo or OCR error for "agile" (a DAB). Si Trew (talk) 20:16, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
retarget to Aggie] per CoffeeWithMarkets. Thryduulf (talk) 08:31, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguate. A draft dab page (admittedly thin) with two red-linked entries and a prominent "see also" link to Aggie is available below the redirect. – Uanfala (talk) 14:51, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
- Why isn't Agha also on there? Hyperbolick (talk) 21:13, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
  - It doesn't seem to be covered in any article. But if you think there should be an entry, you're welcome to add it. – Uanfala (talk) 21:15, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: to allow time to discuss the drafted disambiguation page. Is that enough to disambiguate or should it be retargeted to Aggie?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ^(talk) 00:16, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Dab per Uanfala. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 05:50, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Confederate States Air Force[edit]

Confederate States Air Force → Commemorative Air Force (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

No evidence that "states" was ever in the name. Unlikely search term, apparently stems from a hoax. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:58, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

I have a feeling that Bill Bryson states somewhere, in Made in America (book) I would guess, that Colonel Sanders started to become the archetypal Southern Colonel after being granted honorary membership of the Confederate States Air Force at the rank of Colonel. (That rank does not exist in the regular USAF or RAF, I am aware; the article states he was awarded the title of Kentucky colonel, which I believe is indeed the case.) Will check; if he does in fact say Confederate then User:TenPoundHammer's statement of "no evidence" is weakened, but not beyond repair; could have just been a mistake on Bryson's part. Si Trew (talk) 20:24, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Not in Made in America (book). Perhaps I am thinking of Notes from a Big Country, but so far I am on User:TenPoundHammer's side. Can't find that one on my bookshelf right now. Si Trew (talk) 20:31, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

..because I have the American (original) version called I'm a Stranger Here Myself. D'Oh. But I appear to have mislaid that or lent it to someone. Si Trew (talk) 20:33, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Comment. The redirect exists because "delete then redirect" was the consensus of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Confederate States Air Force in 2014. Thryduulf (talk) 07:22, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Weak keep. This title gets a lot of google hits, but almost all of them are for various different alternate histories. We have an article American Civil War alternate histories but that doesn't mention an air force, and retargetting to any single one would not be appropriate unless it is a central plot point in one more than others (doesn't appear to be the case based on a quick google). Military of the Confederate States of America doesn't mention this for obvious reasons. It's a not implausible misremembering of the (now former) name of the present target, and so in the absence of anything better it will do, but ideally it should should be a hatnote atop a better target. I'll leave a note a the Alternate History wikiproject to see if they have any thoughts. Thryduulf (talk) 07:22, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ^(talk) 00:15, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Keep. User:Thryduulf tends to do a lot more checking than I do; I do basic checks as requried, but Thryduulf tends to look into these things. In case of any doubt of WP:COI, which I'm expecting, no more has Thryduulf asked me to say this than Champion has asked me to list Eubot nominations. Facts are still facts, though a hundred times you tell them so. Si Trew (talk) 13:14, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Templates[edit]

April 10[edit]

Template:Year in the Palestinian territories[edit]

Template:Year in the Palestinian territories (edit · talk · history · links · logs · subpages · delete)

deprecated term-template dates through 2020, nation article is at State of Palestine. Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 07:22, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

weak delete as redundant to Template:Years in the Palestinian territories. Frietjes (talk) 16:07, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Template:Year in Mandatory Palestine[edit]

Template:Year in Mandatory Palestine (edit · talk · history · links · logs · subpages · delete)

anachronism-template dates through 2020, nation article is at State of Palestine. Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 07:11, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

weak delete as redundant to Template:Mandatory Palestine year nav. Frietjes (talk) 16:08, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Miscellany[edit]

Deletion review[edit]

10 April 2017[edit]

Gray Routes[edit]

After talking to the administrator who deleted Gray Routes page, I'm keeping it for deletion review upon her suggestion.

This is Vamshi and I am a student. I am new to wiki and this is the first article that I tried to publish. My user name is vamshidhar.18 . Link for the wiki article that you deleted: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gray_Routes&action=edit&redlink=1

I follow news about upcoming startups in the media as a hobby and I recently came across this company called "Gray Routes" which I found noteworthy. However, when I searched on Wikipedia, I realized that the company didnt have a page so I thought of creating one myself. I was not aware that there was already a page created earlier which got deleted due to not having sufficient references.

I wish to highlight the fact that in the last one year, the company gained very good coverage in the media with respect to its growth and expansion. I have mentioned notable references such as Bloomberg, The Silicon Review & TechCircle as well which posit this fact.

I request you to reconsider your decision of speedy deletion. However, if you feel that the information published is some kind of advertisement, do let me know so that I can re-edit the page.

I have gone through all the guidelines of Wikipedia and I am certain that the references which I have mentioned satisfy the criteria of Wikipedia's policies.

Below are references I found on Gray Routes

http://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapid=243554798 http://thesiliconreview.com/magazines/gray-routes-technology-enabling-location-analytics-to-resolve-the-age-old-problem-of-locations-for-enterprises/ http://techcircle.vccircle.com/2016/02/08/exclusive-gray-routes-raises-second-round-of-angel-funding/ http://thesiliconreview.com/magazines/10-fastest-growing-data-analytics-companies-2016-2/ Vamshidhar.18 (talk) 08:12, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

[1] ttp://sport.aktuality.sk/c/202931/talentovany-simon-stefanec-bude-pokracovat-v-kariere-v-taliansku/

[2] "About/Company Overview". SiteLock. UnitedWeb. Retrieved 24 March 2017.

[3] Genner, Sarah (3 January 2017). ON/OFF: Risks and Rewards of the Anytime-Anywhere Internet. vdf Hochschulvlg. ISBN 3728137995.

[4] Jürgen von Rutenberg. "ZEITmagazin International, No 2, Fall-Winter 2015 (printed), German version online available". ZEITmagazin International. Retrieved 24 March 2017.

[1]

[2]

[1]

[2]

Centralized discussion

Proposals: policy	other	Discussions	Ideas
A request for adminship is open for discussion. RfC: Recent policy changes about verifiability as a reason for inclusion RfC: Adopting a gender neutral default for policy, guidelines and help pages RfC: Linking to details regarding the offline Medical Wikipedia app RFC on the proposed policy update on cosmetic edits done by bots Wikimedia Movement 15 year strategy discussion Merging "Infobox single" and "Infobox song" Combining AfC reviewers and new page reviewers For a listing of ongoing discussions, see the dashboard.
archive talk edit history watch purge

v t e Wikipedia community

For a listing of current collaborations, tasks, and news, see the Community portal. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the Dashboard.

About Wikipedia	Welcome! Administration News The Signpost Goings-on In the media Meetups Mailing lists Awards Reward board Contests Wikipedians Statistics Milestones The Wikipedia Library Centralized discussion Village pump Idea lab Policy Proposals Technical Miscellaneous

Contents and grading	Requested articles Most-wanted articles Images needing articles Articles needing images Articles for creation Creation Help Vital articles Today's articles for improvement Peer review Good article nominations Featured article candidates Lists Pictures Portals Topics Article translation Pages Main Page Errors

WikiProjects and groups	Directory Culture and the arts Geographical History and society Science, technology and engineering Wikipedia assistance and tasks Patrols Recent changes Counter-Vandalism Unit Version 1.0 Editorial Team Accessibility

Maintenance tasks	Task Center Open tasks Backlog Database reports Category tracker Dusty articles Special pages New pages Recent changes Controversial issues

Administrators and noticeboards	Admin dashboard Admin requests Administrators' Incidents Edit warring Vandalism Requests for closure Revision deletion Oversight Request Page protection Regional notice boards Sockpuppets User permissions Open proxies Usernames Changing Title blacklist OTRS Bureaucrats' Requests for adminship & bureaucratship Arbitration Committee Requests Enforcement

Content dispute resolution	Editor assistance Requests for comment Third opinion Dispute resolution noticeboard Biographies of living persons Conflict of interest External links Fringe theories Neutral point of view No original research Reliable sources Mediation

Other noticeboards and assistance	Requests for help Asking questions Teahouse Help desk Reference desk Adopt-a-user Online Ambassadors Copyright assistance Copyright investigations Text problems Media questions Paid editors Resource requests Mergers History mergers Moves Page importation Spam Blacklist Whitelist Bot owners' Education Incidents New pages patrol General sanctions Editor sanctions Long-term abuse

Deletion discussions	Guide Admin Today Articles Templates Files Categories Redirects Miscellany Speedy Proposed BLP Books Review Undeletion Arguments to avoid Arguments to make Article Rescue

Elections and votings	Requests for comment (meta) Wikimedia Foundation elections WP Democracy Voting is not evil Milestones

Directories and summaries	Departments Edit summary legend Editor's index Essays FAQs Glossary Abbreviations Help Manual of Style Simplified Rules Five pillars Policies Guidelines Shortcuts Template messages Citation templates Tips Today Tools Wikis Wiki markup

Wikipedia:XfD today

Contents

Speedy deletion candidates[edit]

Articles[edit]

Scratch orchestra (type of orchestra)[edit]

Na Bhuto Na Bhavishyati[edit]

Nikkesha[edit]

RentSeeker.ca[edit]

Pocket Maar[edit]

Charlie Fink discography[edit]

Jennifer Banko[edit]

Šimon Štefanec[edit]

Zinox Technologies[edit]

Dmitri Osipov (ice hockey, born 1996)[edit]

Ex Mach Tina[edit]

Conair Flight OY 482 from Málaga[edit]

Amin Surani[edit]

Soul Kingz Records[edit]

List of Islam-related terrorist attacks[edit]

SuperCarlinBrothers[edit]

Adrian Petre[edit]

Cal State Fullerton Titans women's basketball[edit]

Christopher Elliott (actor)[edit]

Gio Matteo Natoli[edit]

Financial philately[edit]

Synesthesia (Web Series)[edit]

Salim Ghauri[edit]

Rémi Grellety[edit]

Philatelic equity[edit]

Nuremberg moot court[edit]

Zaheer Abbass Gondal[edit]

List of Sanitary Wares Companies in India[edit]

Samuel Robinson (actor)[edit]

Piotr Marciniak (architect)[edit]

Journal of Fungi[edit]

Aseefa Bhutto Zardari[edit]

Alhamra Unplugged[edit]

Idea Croron Ka[edit]

Charanjeet Singh Sondhi[edit]

Seven Wonders Park, Kota[edit]

Layla Rivera[edit]

Lela Star[edit]

Nadia Styles[edit]

Nautica Thorn[edit]

The Anime Awards[edit]

Tomas Gorny[edit]

Russian-Syrian hospital bombing campaign[edit]

Steve Christian (DJ)[edit]

Tracy Zych[edit]

Issac Shunsuke Sato[edit]

Melbourne performing art venues[edit]

List of notable letters[edit]

List of Knight's Cross recipients 22nd Volunteer cavalry Division Maria Theresia[edit]

NOVAAGRO LIMITED LLC[edit]

Sheru Classic[edit]

Lists of UK locations with large ethnic minority populations[edit]

Diogenis D. Valavanidis[edit]

White Lodging[edit]

Dewrance & Co. Ltd[edit]

Archery at the 2017 Island Games[edit]

Ellorum Vazhavendum[edit]

Midtown Walmart[edit]

Scandinavia's Next Top Model[edit]

Le Karlof Orchestra[edit]

“Cousin Vinny” Agnello[edit]

Nomad Capitalist[edit]

St. James Foundation[edit]

Mudrick Capital Management[edit]

Fiera Capital Corporation[edit]

InterTrader[edit]

Economic Freedom of the World[edit]

Meat Light[edit]

Workflow (app)[edit]

Post-tech[edit]

References[edit]

Matías Leonicio[edit]

Christopher Brett Bailey[edit]

Black Diamond Capital Management[edit]

Amanda Glassman[edit]

Alis Rowe[edit]