Wikipedia:Files for discussion

Skip to table of contents · Skip to current discussions · Purge this page

WP:FFD

Files for discussion (FfD) is for listing images and other media files which are unneeded or have either free content or non-free content usage concerns. Files that have been listed here for more than 7 days are eligible for either deletion or removal from pages if either a consensus to do so has been reached or no objections to deletion or removal have been raised. To quote the non-free content criteria, "it is the duty of users seeking to include or retain content to provide a valid rationale; those seeking to remove or delete it are not required to show that one cannot be created." For undeletion requests, first contact the administrator who deleted the file. If you are unable to resolve the issue with that administrator, the matter should be brought to deletion review.

Examples of what files you may request for deletion or change here:

Obsolete – The file has been replaced by a better version.
Orphan – The file is not used on any pages in Wikipedia.
Unencyclopedic – The file doesn't seem likely to be useful in any Wikimedia project.
Low quality – The file is of an extremely low resolution, distorted, or has other physical image quality concerns.
Copyright violation – The file might be used in violation of copyright.
Possibly unfree – The file is tagged with a freeness claim, but may actually be eligible for copyright in the United States.
NFCC violation – The file is used under a claim of fair use but does not meet the requirements.
NFCC applied to free image – The file is used under a claim of fair use, but the file is either too simple, or is an image which has been wrongly labeled given evidence presented on the file description page.

If you have questions if something should be deleted, consider asking at Media Copyright Questions.

What not to list here[edit]

For speedy deletion candidates, do not use this page; instead use one of the speedy deletion templates. See the criteria for speedy deletion. These are: duplicates (where both files are on Wikipedia), thumbnails, broken files, non-existent files, non-commercial, "by permission" files and files which are not an image, sound file or video clip and have no encyclopedic use.
Files that have no source, have an unknown copyright, are unused or replaceable non-free, or are non-free without rationale can be marked so that they will be deleted after a week, and should not be listed on this page. Add one of the following to the file page:
1. {{subst:nsd}} if a file has no source indicated
2. {{subst:nld}} if a file has a source but no licensing information
3. {{subst:orfud}} if a file has a non-free copyright tag but isn't used in any articles
4. {{subst:rfu}} if a file has a non-free copyright tag but could be replaced by a free file
5. {{subst:dfu|reason}} if a file has a non-free copyright tag but the rationale isn't sufficient or is disputed
6. {{subst:frn}} if a file has no non-free use rationale
Redundant or duplicate files do not have to be listed here. Please use
1. {{isd|Full name of file excluding the "File:" prefix}} for speedy deletion if the other file is on Wikipedia, not on Commons
2. {{now commons|File:NEW FILENAME}} if the file now exists on Commons, or {{now commons}} for files with the same name on Commons. (Don't nominate protected images, they are usually locally uploaded and protected since they are used in an interface message or in a highly used template, thus they are high-risk.)
For blatant copyright infringements, use speedy deletion by tagging the file {{db-f9}}
If a file is listed as public domain or under a free license, but lacks verification of this (either by an OTRS ticket number or a notice on the source website), tag it as {{subst:npd}}.
Files that are hosted on Wikimedia Commons cannot be deleted via this process. Please use the Commons deletion page instead.
Description pages with no local file, even though they are in the file namespace, should not be listed here.
1. Redirects should be treated as in any other namespace: if no speedy deletion criteria apply, they should be listed at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion.
2. Local description pages for files hosted on Commons are usually speedy-deletable under criterion F2; use {{db-nofile}}.
3. Local description pages with no associated file are speedy-deletable under criterion G8; use {{db-imagepage}}.
4. Any other deletion of a description page with no local file should be listed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion.
If a file is appropriately licensed and could be usable elsewhere, consider copying it to the Wikimedia Commons instead of listing it for deletion. Once copied to the Commons, it is eligible for speedy deletion per criterion 8 for files.
If you are the uploader of the image, tag it with {{db-author}}.

Instructions for listing files for discussion

To list a file:

1	Edit the file page. Add `{{ffd\|log=2017 February 26}}` to the file page.
2	Create its FfD subsection. Follow this edit link and list the file using `{{subst:ffd2\|File_name.ext\|Uploader= \|Reason= }} ~~~~` Leave the subject heading blank. If the file has been replaced by another file, name the file that replaced it in your reason for deletion. Refer below for a list of other common reasons. For listing additional files with the same reason, edit the first file section and use `{{subst:ffd2a\|File_name.ext \|Uploader= }}` for each additional file. Also, add `{{ffd\|log=2017 February 26}}` to the top of the file page of each file other than the first one nominated.
3	Give due notice. Inform the uploader by adding a message to their talk page using `{{subst:fdw\|File_name.ext}}` Remember to replace "File_name.ext" with the name of the image or media For multiple images by the same user, use `{{subst:fdw-multi\|First_file.ext \|Second_file.ext \|Third_file.ext}} ~~~~` (can handle up to 26) If the image is in use, also consider adding `{{ffdc\|File_name.ext\|log=2017 February 26}}` to the caption(s), or adding a notice to the article talk pages. Consider also notifying relevant WikiProjects of the discussion.

State the reasons why the file should be deleted, removed, or altered. Also, state what specific action should be taken, preferably in bold text; this allows discussion participants and closers to better understand the purpose of the nomination. Some examples of nomination statements include:

Delete. Orphaned with no foreseeable encyclopedic usage.
Delete. Replaced by File:FILE2.
Free (public domain) file may actually be eligible for copyright in the United States. This photograph was actually first published in 1920, not 1926.
Remove from ARTICLE1 and ARTICLE2. The file only meets WP:NFCC#8 with its use in ARTICLE3.
Non-free file may actually be free. This logo does not seem to meet the threshold of originality to be eligible for copyright in the United States and should actually be tagged free using {{PD-logo}}.

Some common reasons for deletion or removal from pages are:

Obsolete - The file has been replaced by a better version. Indicate the new file name
Orphan - The file is not used on any pages in Wikipedia. (If the file is only available under "fair use", please use {{subst:orfud}} instead). Please consider moving "good" free licensed files to Commons rather than outright deleting them, other projects may find a use for them even if we have none; you can also apply {{Copy to Wikimedia Commons}}.
Unencyclopedic - The file doesn't seem likely to be useful in this encyclopedia (or for any Wikimedia project). Images used on userpages should generally not be nominated on this basis alone unless the user is violating the Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not policy by using Wikipedia to host excessive amounts unencyclopedic material (most commonly private photos).
Low quality - The image is of an extremely low resolution, distorted, or has other physical image quality concerns.
Copyright violation - The file might be used in violation of copyright.
Possibly unfree file - The file marked as free may actually be non-free. If the file is determined to be non-free, then it will be subject to the non-free content criteria in order to remain on Wikipedia.
Non-free file issues - The non-free file may not meet all requirements outlined in the non-free file use policy, or may not be necessary to retain on Wikipedia or specific articles due to either free alternatives or better non-free alternative(s) existing.
File marked as non-free may actually be free - The file is marked non-free, but may actually be free content. (Example: A logo may not eligible for copyright alone because it is not original enough, and thus the logo is considered to be in the public domain.)

These are not the only "valid" reasons to discuss a file. Any properly explained reason can be used. The above list comprises the most common and uncontroversial ones.

Since abbreviated deletion reasons will not be familiar to most Wikipedians, especially newbies, please consider using full words. A few extra keystrokes now can save paragraphs of explanation to a panicked uploader wondering what's wrong with their image.

If you remove a file from an article, list the article from which you removed it so there can be community review of whether the file should be deleted. This is necessary because file pages do not remember the articles on which the file were previously used.

Administrator instructions

Instructions for discussion participation[edit]

In responding to the deletion nomination, consider adding your post in the format
* '''View''' - Reasoning ... -- ~~~~
where "Delete", "Keep", "Comment", or something else may replace "View". In posting their reasoning, many editors use abbreviations and cite to the following:

Wikipedia:NFCC#1 – Free equivalent is/is not available
Wikipedia:NFCC#8 – Significance
Wikipedia:Non-free content#Images 2 – Unacceptable image use

Remember that polling is not a substitute for discussion. Wikipedia's primary method of determining consensus is through editing and discussion, not voting. Although editors occasionally use straw polls in an attempt to test for consensus, polls or surveys sometimes impede rather than assist discussion. They should be used with caution, and are no more binding than any other consensus decision.

Also remember that if you believe that an image is potentially useful for other projects and should be moved to Wikimedia Commons, in lieu of responding '''Move to Commons''', you can move it there yourself. See Wikipedia:Moving files to the Commons for instructions.

Instructions for closing discussions[edit]

Nominations should be processed for closing after being listed for 7 days following the steps here.

Old discussions[edit]

The following discussions are more than 7 days old and are pending processing by an administrator:

This page has a backlog that requires the attention of one or more administrators.
This notice is automatically updated by AnomieBOT (talk) and will no longer be displayed when the backlog is cleared.

Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 January 19 - 3 remaining
Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 January 20 - 3 remaining
Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 January 22 - 21 remaining
Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 January 24 - 1 remaining
Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 January 25 - 4 remaining
Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 January 26 - 2 remaining
Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 January 27 - 17 remaining
Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 January 31 - 1 remaining
Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 February 3 - 4 remaining
Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 February 10 - 7 remaining
Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 February 14 - 1 remaining
Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 February 17 - 3 remaining
Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 February 18 - 3 remaining

For older nominations, see the archives.

Discussions approaching conclusion

Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 February 19 - Discussions with at least 6 full days since nomination. After 7 days, they may be closed.

Recent nominations[edit]

February 20[edit]

File:In The Dust of This Planet.jpg[edit]

This is a book cover which is claimed to be used as the primary means of identification for Eugene Thacker, the author of the book. This is not really an appropriate image to use as the primary means of identification, and in any case, it isn't actually being used as the primary means in the article itself. Whpq (talk) 03:31, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Sudheep.jpeg[edit]

portrait of uploader, unlikely that uploader owns copyright and has permission to publish the file under a free license FASTILY 07:08, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

February 21[edit]

File:Skylar moore.jpg[edit]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. Exifdata implies a selfie but this file still fails to meet WP:WEBHOST criteria for inclusion. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 00:36, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Jillian Sipkins in Peanut Butter Jelly by Galantis.png[edit]

Quite obviously does not meet the Non-free content criteria. The only rationale given is that it's to illustrate a character in a video, but there is no reason given why it's important to illustrate this character (and it's not important, so no such reason can ever be given). 118.141.120.94 (talk) 05:56, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

She is the main character of the story. Kellymoat (talk) 12:36, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Delete - Lacks the context needed to establish this image as essential for the understanding of the article. There is no sourced commentary about the image or its importance to the video. -- Whpq (talk) 14:46, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Honestly, I was invited to discuss. I wasn't aware that this was a voting page. But I don't actually have a vote one way or the other.

In the video, she is the main character. She is the one that says "spread it like peanut butter" which sets everyone into a frenzy. The "band" is the not the center focus, they only make a cameo.

The image, as described on the file page, is a screen shot from the video. Kellymoat (talk) 12:29, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

This is a discussion on what action should be taken with respect to this non-free file. The !vote format is part of the guidelines for posting in this discussion. See Wikipedia:Files for discussion#Instructions for discussion participation. All non-free content must meet all of the non-free content criteria in order to be used. In particular, for this image, the issue is whether WP:NFCC#8 has been met. Neither the nominator nor I believe that point 8 has been met. -- Whpq (talk) 13:33, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Juliet Simms.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Speedy deleted as a copyright violation RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:01, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Dubious claim of own work. Originally stated that license is PD because "idk": [1] but then tried to claim it was an own work and license it under CC-BY-SA-4.0. Note the EXIF data. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 06:45, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Speedy Delete - C;lear copyright violation. See http://archive.jsonline.com/Services/image.ashx?domain=www.jsonline.com&file=33214315-mjs_warpedtour_julietsimms_01.jpg&resize=210*139 which is unsurprising given that that the EXIF shows the image to be copyrighted by a Journal-Sentinel photographer. -- Whpq (talk) 14:49, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- @Whpq: It can't be a rip of that off the web, since the resolution of this image is much higher than that image. That's why I didn't nominate it for speedy. It's a copyright violation, but not obviously so, at least in my opinion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 15:05, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  - The archives at the Journal Sentinel have gone 404 for some reason. The link is to the image gallery, but clinking on the image (which one would expect to bring up the full-res image) leads to a 404 page missing notice. I tagged it as a speedy since the EXIF data along with the image gallery make it (to me) quite obvious that this is a copyright violation. -- Whpq (talk) 15:10, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sokun Nisa1.jpg[edit]

Image is claimed as own work but is not credible. Uploader has previously uploaded copyrighted images. This appears to be a posed product placement photo, quite possibly from the subject's Facebook page. Whpq (talk) 14:43, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Charles Edison (draft registration card, 1918).gif[edit]

Un-verifiable source information, unable to verify copyright status of file. FASTILY 06:03, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar 16:03, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Keep, obviously It is a US federal government form so not eligible for copyright. It was distributed in 1918 so copyright would have expired, even if eligible for copyright. The part filled in is ineligible for copyright since it contains only facts, the way a phone book is ineligible for copyright. The source is clearly marked as "Selective Service", the government agency responsible for the form. Why is there any doubt about this? --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 02:12, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Foreigner - Agent Provocateur.JPG[edit]

File:Foreigner-I-Want-To-Know-Wh-297484.jpg is currently "PD-ineligible-USonly". The copyright status of album cover of Agent Provocateur (album) shall be evaluated. I asked the same question at WP:MCQ, but no one there responded. I want to be bold and change the info to reflect the licensing accuracy, but I'd rather put this up for FFD first. This album cover has unique colored shapes forming an "F", in contrast to the UK picture sleeve of "I Want to Know What Love Is" using the very basic 3D "F". Speaking of that song, if the album cover is not copyrightable in the US, same should go for the US release of the worldwide hit single, which I plan to upload if the album cover (similar to the front cover of the US single) is considered free only in the US. George Ho (talk) 06:56, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:13, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Collins Kids in Israel.jpg[edit]

portrait of notable individual. dubious own work claim FASTILY 04:36, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:15, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

February 22[edit]

File:The Real Housewives of Potomac (Official Season 2 Cast).png[edit]

Non-free cast photo for The Real Housewives of Potomac. All of the cast members are living people, and their role in the show is to play themselves so it is possible to replace them with a free image, or images of the cast members. Whpq (talk) 03:07, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

File:The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills (Official Season 7 Cast).png[edit]

This is a non-free cast photo that is claimed to be used as the primary means of identification in The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills, but that role is taken by the infobox image File:TheRealHousewivesOfBeverlyHillsLogo.png. The cast photo is simply being used to illustrate the cast of some of the seasons. As all of the cast members are living people, and play themselves in the shows, these images are replaceable with free images. In fact, 4 of the 6 cast members listed in this photo have free images available which can be seen on their individual articles. Whpq (talk) 03:26, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Scihub raven.png[edit]

This logo is shown in File:Scihub screenshot.png hence in violation of WP:NFCCP#3a. Wcam (talk) 03:30, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Logo is being used as the primary image, in that case I would say keep, unless the screenshot was relocated to the infobox in which case the logo would be redundant and could be deleted. Salavat (talk) 11:36, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Pike County Lake.jpg[edit]

This file has three images in its history. The most recent image appears at http://www.troyal.gov/content/6205/16376/16442/default.aspx which states the web site i copyrighted. If the uploader is in fact the copyright holder, we would need OTRS confirmation. If this is a copyright violation, then this should be reverted to an earlier version as those images appear to be okay. Whpq (talk) 03:30, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Bhadane.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:06, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

The Google maps elements which dominate this image are copyrighted. Whpq (talk) 03:34, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Filuren Rouge 2005.jpg[edit]

According to Signature#Copyright, a visual signature (not the name) may be protected by copyright. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 03:45, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

In my opinion this is an artistic work and most likely copyrighted. --Wcam (talk) 04:27, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Yeah, it said it was his "tag" so I'm assuming signature, and possibly his own unique work, so double copyrighted. -- Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 05:01, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Kibrit Creative Solutions, Logo.jpg[edit]

unused logo, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 07:13, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Temple guard Bali.jpg[edit]

Derivative of non-free content; there is no FOP in Indonesia FASTILY 07:20, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

"Derivative of non-free content"? I bought that statue and took the photo myself. What are you on about? Yintan 08:33, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Ownership of the statue does not transfer its copyright to you. While you hold the copyright to the photo, copyright for the statue resides with the person who created it. There is no freedom of panorama in Indonesia for this type of work, so we can't host this photo. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:41, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

But then how is this acceptable, FOP wise? Also, 'my' statue is a traditional religious design, they've been making identical ones for centuries (See, for example, this one). It's not an original design by the stone carver. Yintan 22:14, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

(ec) The copyright law of Indonesia is available at Wikisource: s:Copyright Act of Republic of Indonesia. Section 10 (if I am understanding it correctly) says that the Government of Indonesia is the copyright holder of ancient artistic works, and that approval of the relevant government agency needs to be sought before reproducing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:46, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

I see, and I think you understand it correctly. With that article and no FOP, there's a lot to be deleted on Commons then. Yintan 23:02, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Does such a copyright apply to the US? From what I know, the US constitution does not permit an unending copyright and that is an unending copyright. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:51, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

That article is slightly bizarre and obviously ignored by virtually every publisher. But rules are rules, I guess. Yintan 23:02, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

@Jo-Jo Eumerus: each country has its own set of copyright rules. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 04:28, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Yes. The reason I am asking is to know whether the copyright would apply in the US. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:27, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

The ancient statue would be out of copyright in the United States. Copyright law of the United States. So if the statue is PD in the US and copyright in the source country, we could host the image here on Wikipedia but not on the Commons. Template with {{Do not move to Commons|reason=USonly}}. We also need two license tags: one for the photo and one for the statue. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 16:41, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

@Diannaa: With that article the Indonesian government basically claims copyright on everything for ever, unless somebody else has already copyrighted it. It's quite Draconian. They could make a lot of money if they start sueing all those companies that publish holiday brochures, for a start. But anyway, if my pic has to go, it has to go. Yintan 08:28, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

@Yintan: How old is the statue? Is it a recent creation, a piece of work taken from some ancient temple, a perfect copy of a statue on an ancient temple or something else? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:57, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

@Jo-Jo Eumerus: The statue in the photograph is about 25 years old, but the actual design has been used for centuries. It's not an original design by the stone carver, it's the classic 'demon guard' you'll find on numerous Balinese temples. Some of these guard statues are replaced after a century or so because the soft sandstone doesn't last very long, and of course the replacement has to be as good as identical to the previous statue. So in that respect you could say it's a copy of a statue on an ancient temple, yes. I bought mine of a stone carver who had made about 10 of them in advance, knowing that sooner or later a temple would contact him for a replacement. If you do a picture search for Balinese demon guards you'll find many very similar, if not identical, statues. Yintan 21:26, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

File:The Real Housewives of Orange County season 11.png[edit]

This is a non-free cast photo used in The Real Housewives of Orange County with no explanation as to why it is not replaceable. The cast of the shows are living people who are playing themselves in the show so free images of the cast could be had. In fact, that very same article has File:RealHousewivesOCVALaunchApr09.jpg, a free cast photo. Fails WP:NFCC#1. Whpq (talk) 13:48, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Bhadane, Murbad.jpeg[edit]

The map appears to be a screen shot from a (presumably copyright) website, as it has part of a watermark. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:03, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

File:IMac G5.svg[edit]

This image should be deleted, as it has been replaced by the rasterized version found here. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:18, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

File:H2AZchromcompjpg.jpg[edit]

replaced by new and improved version on WC https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:H2AZchromcomp4TC.jpg DennisPietras (talk) 18:46, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

This is my first time asking for deletion this way, so I'm not sure if I am supposed to comment further or not, but, to be sure, here goes - when I used this file in my sandbox, I found that the text was too small to be read in the thumb, so I revised the image to have the 2 models in a vertical lineup and posted that version to WC. That one works fine as a thumb, so there is no use for this version. Thanks, DennisPietras (talk) 02:28, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Yes, this was a test upload by new editor DennisPietras, so I think comes under both speedy (not currently used on WP) & Wikipedia:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#G2._Test_pages. With the newly arranged image-montage uploaded to WC, for later use in his article, I don't see any problem for an Admin deleting the WP version as a speedy.--Aspro (talk) 19:32, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Walley Barnes.jpg[edit]

Image is taken from flickr which asserts a CC-BY-SA 2.0 license, but the comments on the image indicate it is an image form a book "Big Book of Football Champions 1955", in which case the copyright does not belong to the scanner and they cannot release it under a free license. Whpq (talk) 18:48, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Colonel Christodoulou interrogates Bulgarian POWs.jpg[edit]

Seeing as Commons has deemed the USOnly restriction incorrect, this file can prolly be deleted - after reuploading it over the smaller Commons file, of course. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:51, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

February 23[edit]

File:Thomas A. Zlaket.png[edit]

Invalid license; C-SPAN is not PD-USGov. — Train2104 (t • c) 04:39, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

After looking into it I agree. Is it possible to change the license to fair use? ErieSwiftByrd (talk) 05:03, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Amman in 1930.jpg[edit]

unused, possible copyvio (see watermark in bottom left corner) FASTILY 08:12, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Astana Ministerium nach Brand.jpg[edit]

unused locally, Wikipedia is not a file webhost FASTILY 08:31, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Fashion-net-mainpage-squircles-2016.png[edit]

No evidence of permission for dual (or any) licence. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:27, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Delete No evidence of permission to release under any license. The page from which it was taken is clearly labelled "Copyright © 1995–2017 Fashion Net Inc". Furthermore, there is no evidence of the uploader being the author of the work(s) displayed. There are multiple images in that screen shot by multiple photographers. It also violates the criteria for non-free fair use of the images, both in terms of its size and in the lack of critical commentary on the image itself. At most, the lettering of the top logo only could be used in the infobox, i.e.

FASHION NET

THE WORLD'S HUB FOR FASHION SINCE 1995

Voceditenore (talk) 10:17, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Professor Amanda Fisher in 2016.jpg[edit]

Uploader asserts they are the copyright holder but the EXIF states "Copyright owned by Layton Thomposon." OTRS confirmation would be needed Whpq (talk) 12:20, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Uploader has swapped image - metadata now correctly assigns license/copyright

File:White-rock larkspur.jpg[edit]

Flickr Public Domain Mark with no other evidence of public domain, see c:Template:Flickr-public_domain_mark — Train2104 (t • c) 14:45, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Screenshot from p.332 of MIT SP303 SoMA filing.png[edit]

Local government files are not necessarily public domain, especially not something submitted by a citizen for review. — Train2104 (t • c) 14:48, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Perhaps you could be a bit more clear. I don't know what you mean by "something submitted by a citizen for review," and I'm not sure those words apply here (it as submitted by a large educational institution to a local government for review). Your use of the word "especially" confuses me too: you're suggesting the public domain status of a government document might change depending on who the submitter is, and whether they are a citizen (as opposed to a non-citizen)? ^{[citation needed]}. I'm still under the impression that such submissions are in the public domain in Massachusetts, although I don't have a rigorous citation for you. In any event, it's hard to be too concerned, because it's clearly fair use to snip an image from a large public (whether public domain or not, clearly it is public) document for purposes of discussion on a talk page. jhawkinson (talk) 14:56, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Javad Bahonar.jpg[edit]

PD-Iran with no date stated — Train2104 (t • c) 15:10, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

File:University as Family, sculpted by Oliver LaGrone 1975.jpg[edit]

Invalid PD tag — Train2104 (t • c) 15:11, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Marla Malcolm Beck.jpg[edit]

Dubious own work claim. Picture looks professional. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 21:17, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

February 24[edit]

File:Example of heavily software-censored news report.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: speedy delete. User requested deletion (G7) Primefac (talk) 00:30, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Commons admin here. Copyrighted text which can be read if really concentrating, and parts of a copyrighted image. Screenshots can not (in most cases) claim de minimis, due to it intentionally including things. That AP image, even if just in parts, is still copyrighted. (t) Josve05a (c) 00:21, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

@Josve05a: The text is not copyrighted. Its a caption added by the BBC. Wiki-Coffee ^Talk 00:26, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
@Josve05a: The conversation is not worth having for a file I am only using to put on a userpage so I have self csd. Wiki-Coffee ^Talk 00:30, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

(edit conflict) Even text by the BBC can be copyrighted. Imagine if you copied the tet in to an article, it would be a {{G12}}. Same thing for a screenshot of it. Een if blurred, you can still make out the words, making it a derivative work. (t) Josve05a (c) 00:33, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Webrex Trade Marks Search Result ipindiaonline.gov.in.pdf[edit]

Unused, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 00:40, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Space Fighter Gameplay.jpg[edit]

Screenshot of software, unknown if free. — Train2104 (t • c) 01:28, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Army of the Men of the Naqshbandi Order Officer.jpg[edit]

Invalid license tag — Train2104 (t • c) 01:39, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:TimothyBarrGACongress.png[edit]

Georgia does not release their images into the public domain. "For public use" does not equate to "public domain". Public domain is a much much higher legal standard and is in no way met with this image. Majora (talk) 03:58, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Clay Cox Official GA Congress photo.png[edit]

Georgia does not release their images into the public domain. "For public use" does not equate to "public domain". Public domain is a much much higher legal standard and is in no way met with this image. Majora (talk) 03:58, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:David Casas Official GA Congress photo.png[edit]

Georgia does not release their images into the public domain. "For public use" does not equate to "public domain". Public domain is a much much higher legal standard and is in no way met with this image. Majora (talk) 03:58, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Manny Pacquiao in 1996 (screenshot).jpg[edit]

Non-free image of Manny Pacquiao. We have lots of free images of him. There is no soured commentary of this image nor is the stated purpose of "To illustrate what the character looks like in his earlier boxing career." required to understand this article. Whpq (talk) 03:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

@Whpq: Please tag these delayed F7 (I've done so already for this one). That way it will be deleted in two days and not have to sit through this slog of a process. --Majora (talk) 04:01, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

The purpose of the file is to illustrate the visual identification of Manny Pacquiao in his earlier career and there is no found free licensed equivalent of young photo of him. Prettyboy361 (talk) 05:02, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Sorry Prettyboy361 but our fair use policy is quite clear on this matter. It doesn't matter what you are trying to use it for. There are free alternatives that are already in use that show him. For that reason, and that reason only, we can't keep this image. Sorry but that is just the way our policy is written. --Majora (talk) 05:09, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Wallis, Hold House Port Mear Square Island.jpg[edit]

Technically unsourced, but not CSD grade. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:31, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Keep - Source added. --Cactus.man ✍ 20:31, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

To the nominator: This file should not be listed here. From the WP:FFD page (What Not to List Here): "Files that have no source .... can be marked so that they will be deleted after a week, and should not be listed on this page. Add one of the following to the file page:

{{tl:nsd}} if a file has no source indicated:

--Cactus.man ✍ 20:45, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Paoli boxeador.jpg[edit]

Dead source, and no author given. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:04, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Paoli6anos.jpg[edit]

Dead souce, No author listed Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:04, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Naval Brigade of Rambler and Doris.jpg[edit]

Dead link, No listed author Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:06, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Regarding the Pain of Others.jpg[edit]

Refferal as I updated this to PD-old, the textual incusion being simple. I'd like a second view though. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:28, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Texaco Eaglet.jpg[edit]

~~Unusued,~~ No listed author lifetime. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:54, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Now back on Frank Hawks article. See note: GNU Free Documentation License referring to San Diego Air and Space Museum Archives Commons project Public Domain (No copyright restrictions): San Diego Air and Space Museum Archives. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 17:35, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Please indicate the author lifetime, or at the very least the date of first publication.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 23:18, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Howard Hughes 1938 flight.jpg[edit]

Unusued, No author lifetime listed. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:55, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Keep standard Flickr Commons license. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 19:21, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

A 'standard Flickr Commons' license is not necessarily sufficient for an image which may have been previous published. When was the image first published? 23:22, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Laura Ingalls aviator 2a.jpg[edit]

No author lifetime listed. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:55, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Keep standard Flickr Commons license. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 19:21, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

A 'standard Flickr Commons' license is not necessarily sufficient for an image which may have been previous published. When was the image first published? 23:23, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Boston Bruins 1939 Stanley Cup champions.jpg[edit]

No original author/lifetime provided. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:04, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:PanchoVilla.jpg[edit]

Dead source , No author lifetime stated Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:07, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Gary Martin Vikingur.jpg[edit]

Crop of photo found here: http://fotbolti.net/news/15-02-2016/gary-martin-ekki-anaegdur-ad-vera-bodinn-til-vikings Ytoyoda (talk) 16:55, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:ICARDA research farm.jpg[edit]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. No Exif data, nothing establishes authorship. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 19:42, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Patnala Lingamurthy.jpg[edit]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. Authorship is unclear as the file looks professional and commercial in nature. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 19:45, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:TRADGF.jpeg[edit]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. Authorship is unclear as the file looks professional and commercial in nature. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 19:46, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Five By Nine.jpg[edit]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. No EXIF data, nothing establishes authorship. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 20:07, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Arbolitos repetidos.jpg[edit]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. File also looks to be derivative of a copyrighted work. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 20:07, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:ELMER disciples.jpeg[edit]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. No EXIF data, nothing establishes authorship. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 20:08, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Louder Now Cover.jpg[edit]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. No EXIF data, nothing establishes authorship. File looks professional and commercial in nature. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 20:09, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Textfile 001.jpg.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Nick (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:08, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. No EXIF data, nothing establishes authorship. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 20:09, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Matt McGinn around 1954.jpg[edit]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. No EXIF data, nothing establishes authorship. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 20:12, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Pastor Jenkins (5).jpg[edit]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. Authorship is unclear as the file looks professional and commercial in nature. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 20:13, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:SueStroman 4-12-76 21small.jpg[edit]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. Authorship is unclear as the file looks professional and commercial in nature. No EXIF data, nothing establishes authorship. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 20:13, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Mike Gonsolin.jpg[edit]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. Authorship is unclear as the file looks professional and commercial in nature. EXIF data suggests google. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 20:14, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Sheppard Mullin Logo 2011.jpg[edit]

File looks promotional in nature using Wikipedia as if it were a WP:WEBHOST. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 20:15, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:TTjan.jpg[edit]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. Authorship is unclear as the file looks professional and commercial in nature. EXIF data suggests Glen Cooper Photography is the copyright holder. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 20:16, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Queen of Free Thought Writing.jpg[edit]

File looks promotional in nature using Wikipedia as if it were a WP:WEBHOST. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 20:17, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:PILI NUTS.JPG[edit]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. Authorship is unclear as the file looks professional and commercial in nature. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 20:18, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Alpaca fibre information.GIF[edit]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. Authorship is unclear as the file looks professional and commercial in nature. File looks promotional in nature using Wikipedia as if it were a WP:WEBHOST. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 20:19, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Robert Thomas Ward, microscopist.jpg[edit]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. No EXIF data, nothing establishes authorship. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 20:29, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:ElizabethMeza.jpg[edit]

File appears to be personal in nature with no encyclopedic value. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 20:30, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Kellyphoto.jpg[edit]

File appears to be personal in nature with no encyclopedic value. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 20:31, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:SoTBanner.gif[edit]

File looks promotional in nature using Wikipedia as if it were a WP:WEBHOST. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 21:01, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Eliott & Dick Dale.jpg[edit]

File appears to be personal in nature with no encyclopedic value. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 21:01, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:John Offerdahl 2008.jpg[edit]

Dubious copyright claim of unused file. Authorship is unclear as the file looks professional and commercial in nature. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 21:02, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Cover art for Trends or Tragedies first EP Album.jpg[edit]

Authorship is unclear as the file looks professional and commercial in nature. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 21:04, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Sukhadia circle.jpg[edit]

Dubious copyright claim of used file. File also looks to be derivative of a copyrighted work (3D object, lighting etc). -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 21:26, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Kevin Petit 2009.jpg[edit]

File appears to be personal in nature with no encyclopedic value. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 21:30, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Christinasicecreamshop.JPG[edit]

File appears to be personal in nature with no encyclopedic value. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 21:30, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Emerge Financial Wellness Logo.jpg[edit]

File looks promotional in nature using Wikipedia as if it were a WP:WEBHOST. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 21:34, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:FSGFront.gif[edit]

File appears to be personal in nature with no encyclopedic value. File is also very low in resolution without EXIF data, what you would expect stolen from a web page. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 21:40, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:FSGBar.gif[edit]

File appears to be personal in nature with no encyclopedic value. File is also very low in resolution without EXIF data, what you would expect stolen from a web page. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 21:40, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:FSGdiningRoom.gif[edit]

File appears to be personal in nature with no encyclopedic value. File is also very low in resolution without EXIF data, what you would expect stolen from a web page. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 21:40, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:FSGtikibar.gif[edit]

File appears to be personal in nature with no encyclopedic value. File is also very low in resolution without EXIF data, what you would expect stolen from a web page. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 21:40, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:FSGfish.gif[edit]

File appears to be personal in nature with no encyclopedic value. File is also very low in resolution without EXIF data, what you would expect stolen from a web page. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 21:41, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:FSGowner.gif[edit]

File appears to be personal in nature with no encyclopedic value. File is also very low in resolution without EXIF data, what you would expect stolen from a web page. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 21:41, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:FSGtiki.gif[edit]

File appears to be personal in nature with no encyclopedic value. File is also very low in resolution without EXIF data, what you would expect stolen from a web page. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 21:41, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:FSGwindow.gif[edit]

File appears to be personal in nature with no encyclopedic value. File is also very low in resolution without EXIF data, what you would expect stolen from a web page. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 21:41, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:DISCOP LOGO wiki.png[edit]

File looks promotional in nature using Wikipedia as if it were a WP:WEBHOST. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 21:42, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:GALA1.jpg[edit]

File looks promotional in nature using Wikipedia as if it were a WP:WEBHOST. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 21:42, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:MarketPlace.jpg[edit]

File looks promotional in nature using Wikipedia as if it were a WP:WEBHOST. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 21:42, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:SuiteDM.jpg[edit]

File looks promotional in nature using Wikipedia as if it were a WP:WEBHOST. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 21:42, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:DiscussionSC.jpg[edit]

File looks promotional in nature using Wikipedia as if it were a WP:WEBHOST. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 21:42, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:DiscopInternetCabines.jpg[edit]

File looks promotional in nature using Wikipedia as if it were a WP:WEBHOST. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 21:42, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:DiscopHotel2.jpg[edit]

File looks promotional in nature using Wikipedia as if it were a WP:WEBHOST. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 21:42, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:DiscopHotel.jpg[edit]

File looks promotional in nature using Wikipedia as if it were a WP:WEBHOST. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 21:43, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Cayley Glider Replica Flown By Derek Piggott 2.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F5 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Cayley Glider Replica Flown By Derek Piggott 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

Keep the file.

I think NFCC criterion #8 can be understood to allow the photograph to be used in the George Cayley article, from which it was deleted. No free alternative photo exists to my knowledge. The photo shows the re-creation of a milestone event in aviation history--the first documented flight of a manned glider. The event was due to the pioneering efforts of George Cayley. Although the event was a milestone, there is probably not enough referenced information available about the flight or the glider itself to create a standalone article on those topics. Therefore, the George Cayley article is an entirely appropriate place to use the photo. It would be unfortunate to lose this unique photo from the Encyclopedia due to an overly-strict application of Criterion #8. DonFB (talk) 22:34, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Image and File Page were deleted as orphaned (not because of copyright violation) after I started this entry. View the image here. | View the File page here. DonFB (talk) 02:39, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

February 25[edit]

File:FINALLY.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by DragonflySixtyseven (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Obviously not encyclopedic. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 01:44, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CueFile.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:05, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Unused personal image Magog the Ogre (t • c) 04:45, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
I agree. Delete. Eleazar~enwiki (talk) 12:18, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ChrisLeonidou.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:03, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

IP placed PROD tag requesting deletion and claiming to be uploader, as we have no way of tying it to the original account I'm sending it to FFD. Unencyclopedic anyways. — Train2104 (t • c) 04:49, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

I have now logged in under the original account and would have marked it for speedy deletion, I believe it meets the criteria as the only substantial edits have been made by me, with the others made by bots for admin purposes and you to bring it to the attention of this page. Crest of London ^(T|C|A) 05:15, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ornate ouece at Albergo d'Italia with Caraffa Statue.jpeg[edit]

unused, strange coloring, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 10:32, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Alaska-district-judges.jpg[edit]

Tagged with {{di-no source}} on February 11. Since there are derivative files on Commons and related files both here and on Commons that would be affected by any action on this file, I feel it should be discussed. I'm not holding out much hope, though. From what I've seen, FFD is not so much about genuine concern over copyright issues as it is another venue to further purge the encyclopedia of organic matter, leading towards making it a lazy repeat of some other place on the web (read: "missing clear and verifiable source information" = "no URL means no WP:V as far as we're concerned"). This is amplified by the fact that certain editors have strived to make our coverage of United States federal courts nothing more than a carbon copy of their own website. The revision history and my past experiences with WP:MCQ shows a pattern of anti-AGF behavior causing me to question whether you really want free content. Anyway, the catalog of the library I obtained this from shows that they still have a copy, so I will try to make an effort to provide whatever information you appear to be requesting (kinda hard for me to tell exactly from the robo-message). RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 05:03, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Since it is from a printed medium, ideally a 'full citation'. Thanks for checking. -FASTILY 08:13, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: @RadioKAOS:, I guess that http://www.worldcat.org/title/united-states-district-court-for-the-district-of-alaska-our-first-fifty-years/oclc/570203049 is the source work? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 13:17, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 13:17, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Smerconish CNN.jpg[edit]

Author David S. Holloway per metadata, evidence needed if this is the uploader. Uploader has had several previous uploads deleted for lack of permission [2]. January (talk) 14:28, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Smerconish On Air.jpg[edit]

Unlikely own work, relatively low resolution image with no metadata. Uploader has had several previous uploads deleted for lack of permission [3]. January (talk) 14:29, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

File:GAZ M20 Pobeda chassis (1946).jpg[edit]

The image is being used in an image gallery. There is no sourced commentary about this image or its purported use in the article so it fails WP:NFCC#8 Whpq (talk) 19:13, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

The purpose is to show its unibody construction, which is similar to Opel Kapitan. This is the image I could find, and it is very low-res. Mikus (talk) 19:25, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Hanomag-1,3-liter-1939.jpg[edit]

The fact that "[the] Hanomag 1,3 litre is the second German car to have unibody construction." is easily stated as text. Whpq (talk) 19:16, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

I may agree that this particular image is not the best - it is an ad, not an actual car, and it does not show unibody underneath it. My goal for adding an image of this car was to drive an idea that Hanomag did produce sophisticated designs for its time, because many including myself thought that the funny Komisbrot was the best they could do. I intend to still have an image of this car, but I will choose another one, a photo of a real vehicle. I wish I could find its unibody "X-ray" image. Mikus (talk) 19:23, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Volvo-PV444-chassis.jpg[edit]

There is no sourced discussion about this image that would establish the context needed to meet WP:NFCC#8 Whpq (talk) 19:17, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

I don't get what it means: "there is no sourced discussion". Please, elaborate. The purpose is to show the unibody construction, which is similar to Hanomag 1,3 litre. Mikus (talk) 19:26, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

File:PALPlus test card.jpg[edit]

There is no sourced commentary about this test card to establish. Fails WP:NFCC#8 Whpq (talk) 19:22, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

The image establishes the fact that PALPlus is 16:9. Mikus (talk) 19:29, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Satellite television system Ekran - a post stamp.jpg[edit]

There is no sourced commentary about this image. Fails WP:NFCC#8 Whpq (talk) 19:23, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Again, I don't get the meaning of the phrase: "There is no sourced commentary about this image". The aforementioned TV satellite system is discussed in the article. Mikus (talk) 19:29, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Mod tod file format.gif[edit]

Comments state "Source=JVC technical manuals, modified by me to reflect both standard definition and high definition video", so this would be a derivative of a copyrighted work. The uploader does not have the authority to release this in the public domain. Whpq (talk) 19:34, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

The image is my own work. The information that the image is built upon, came from JVC manuals. Is this clearer? Mikus (talk) 19:36, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Canon 30F.JPG[edit]

Comments states "This is a compilation of images from original Canon Instruction Manuals, modified for clarity and correctness" so this would be a derivative of a copyrighted work. Whpq (talk) 19:35, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

File:T.B. Hunt bequest newspaper report 1928.jpg[edit]

Unsure which newspaper, therefore cannot determine copyright renewal. — Train2104 (t • c) 20:45, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Bojana Bobusic.jpg[edit]

This is my own image, that is my own flickr account and I was the one who uploaded the photo. Keroks (talk) 01:29, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Priscilla Hon.jpg[edit]

Same as the Bojana Bobusic image, this is my own image, that is my own flickr account and I was the one who uploaded the photo.Keroks (talk) 01:30, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Alex Postcard.jpg[edit]

Contesting the {{PD-old-100}} license. Without knowing author and/or the creation date it's not possible to keep this image on Wikipedia as free. XXN, 21:39, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Zenger May 1993.jpg[edit]

Newspaper scan, unlikely to be own work. — Train2104 (t • c) 21:57, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Move to commons? Can this be moved appropriately, so it can be used to illustrate an article about the newspaper itself? -- The Hammer of Thor (talk) 22:41, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Revolutionary Times 1998.jpg[edit]

Newspaper scan, unlikely to be own work. — Train2104 (t • c) 21:57, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Move to commons? Can this be adjusted, appropriately, so it can be used to illustrate the article about an organization that published the newsletter? -- The Hammer of Thor (talk) 22:44, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

File:LegalMarijuanaNowLogo.jpg[edit]

Unlikely to be own work. — Train2104 (t • c) 22:00, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Keep I am the original creator and sole owner of this jpeg image, created in adobe photoshop. -- The Hammer of Thor (talk) 22:38, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

File:LegalMarijuanaNow.jpg[edit]

Unlikely to be own work. — Train2104 (t • c) 22:01, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Keep I am the original creator and sole owner of this jpeg image, created in adobe photoshop. -- The Hammer of Thor (talk) 22:37, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Relicense to non-free logo as likely owned by the Legal Marijuana Now Party. Salavat (talk) 02:22, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

File:TheCanvas.jpg[edit]

Unlikely to be own work. — Train2104 (t • c) 22:01, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Keep I am the original creator and sole owner of the newsletter pictured in this scan. I also created the scan. -- The Hammer of Thor (talk) 22:35, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

File:AndrewLang160.jpg[edit]

A personal photo, probably. Unused - out of project scope. XXN, 22:11, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

February 26[edit]

Footer[edit]

Today is February 26 2017. Put new nominations in Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 February 26 -- (new nomination)

If the current date's page has been started without the header, apply {{subst:Ffd log}} to the top of the day's page.

Please ensure "===February 26===" is at the very top of the new page so that internal page links from the main Files for discussion page (the one you're on now) work.

The page Wikipedia:Files for discussion/Today will always show today's log.

v t e Wikipedia community

For a listing of current collaborations, tasks, and news, see the Community portal. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the Dashboard.

About Wikipedia	Welcome! Administration Task Center Regional notice boards News The Signpost Goings-on In the media Meetups Mailing lists Awards Reward board Contests Wikipedians Statistics Milestones The Wikipedia Library Centralized discussion Village pump Idea lab Policy Proposals Technical Miscellaneous

Contents and grading	Requested articles Most-wanted articles Images needing articles Articles needing images Articles for creation Creation Help Vital articles Today's articles for improvement Peer review Good article nominations Featured article candidates Lists Pictures Portals Topics Article translation Pages Main Page Errors

WikiProjects and groups	Directory Culture and the arts Geographical History and society Science, technology and engineering Wikipedia assistance and tasks Patrols Recent changes Counter-Vandalism Unit Version 1.0 Editorial Team Accessibility

Maintenance tasks	Open tasks Cleanup Vandalism Database reports 'As of' Page Curation Recent changes Backlog Controversial issues Dusty articles

Administrators and noticeboards	Admin dashboard Admin requests Administrators' Incidents Edit warring Vandalism Requests for closure Revision deletion Oversight Request Page protection Sockpuppets User permissions Open proxies Usernames Changing Title blacklist OTRS Bureaucrats' Requests for adminship & bureaucratship Arbitration Committee Requests Enforcement

Content dispute resolution	Editor assistance Requests for comment Third opinion Dispute resolution noticeboard Biographies of living persons Conflict of interest External links Fringe theories Neutral point of view No original research Reliable sources Mediation

Other noticeboards and assistance	Requests for help Asking questions Teahouse Help desk Reference desk Adopt-a-user Online Ambassadors Copyright assistance Copyright investigations Text problems Media questions Paid editors Resource requests Mergers History mergers Moves Page importation Spam Blacklist Whitelist Bot owners' Education Incidents New pages patrol General sanctions Editor sanctions Long-term abuse

Deletion discussions	Guide Admin Today Articles Templates Files Categories Redirects Miscellany Speedy Proposed BLP Books Review Undeletion Arguments to avoid Arguments to make Article Rescue

Elections and votings	Requests for comment (meta) Wikimedia Foundation elections WP Democracy Voting is not evil Milestones

Directories and summaries	Departments Edit summary legend Editor's index Essays FAQs Glossary Abbreviations Help Manual of Style Simplified Rules Five pillars Policies Guidelines Shortcuts Template messages Citation templates Tips Today Tools Wikis Wiki markup

Wikipedia:Files for discussion

What not to list here[edit]

Contents

Instructions for discussion participation[edit]

Instructions for closing discussions[edit]

Old discussions[edit]

Discussions approaching conclusion

Recent nominations[edit]

February 20[edit]

File:In The Dust of This Planet.jpg[edit]

File:Sudheep.jpeg[edit]

February 21[edit]

File:Skylar moore.jpg[edit]

File:Jillian Sipkins in Peanut Butter Jelly by Galantis.png[edit]

File:Juliet Simms.jpg[edit]

File:Sokun Nisa1.jpg[edit]

File:Charles Edison (draft registration card, 1918).gif[edit]

File:Foreigner - Agent Provocateur.JPG[edit]

File:Collins Kids in Israel.jpg[edit]

February 22[edit]

File:The Real Housewives of Potomac (Official Season 2 Cast).png[edit]

File:The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills (Official Season 7 Cast).png[edit]

File:Scihub raven.png[edit]

File:Pike County Lake.jpg[edit]

File:Bhadane.png[edit]

File:Filuren Rouge 2005.jpg[edit]

File:Kibrit Creative Solutions, Logo.jpg[edit]

File:Temple guard Bali.jpg[edit]

File:The Real Housewives of Orange County season 11.png[edit]

File:Bhadane, Murbad.jpeg[edit]

File:IMac G5.svg[edit]

File:H2AZchromcompjpg.jpg[edit]

File:Walley Barnes.jpg[edit]

File:Colonel Christodoulou interrogates Bulgarian POWs.jpg[edit]

February 23[edit]

File:Thomas A. Zlaket.png[edit]

File:Amman in 1930.jpg[edit]

File:Astana Ministerium nach Brand.jpg[edit]

File:Fashion-net-mainpage-squircles-2016.png[edit]

File:Professor Amanda Fisher in 2016.jpg[edit]

File:White-rock larkspur.jpg[edit]

File:Screenshot from p.332 of MIT SP303 SoMA filing.png[edit]

File:Javad Bahonar.jpg[edit]

File:University as Family, sculpted by Oliver LaGrone 1975.jpg[edit]

File:Marla Malcolm Beck.jpg[edit]

February 24[edit]

File:Example of heavily software-censored news report.png[edit]

File:Webrex Trade Marks Search Result ipindiaonline.gov.in.pdf[edit]

File:Space Fighter Gameplay.jpg[edit]

File:Army of the Men of the Naqshbandi Order Officer.jpg[edit]

File:TimothyBarrGACongress.png[edit]

File:Clay Cox Official GA Congress photo.png[edit]

File:David Casas Official GA Congress photo.png[edit]

File:Manny Pacquiao in 1996 (screenshot).jpg[edit]

File:Wallis, Hold House Port Mear Square Island.jpg[edit]

File:Paoli boxeador.jpg[edit]

File:Paoli6anos.jpg[edit]

File:Naval Brigade of Rambler and Doris.jpg[edit]

File:Regarding the Pain of Others.jpg[edit]

File:Texaco Eaglet.jpg[edit]

File:Howard Hughes 1938 flight.jpg[edit]

File:Laura Ingalls aviator 2a.jpg[edit]

File:Boston Bruins 1939 Stanley Cup champions.jpg[edit]

File:PanchoVilla.jpg[edit]

File:Gary Martin Vikingur.jpg[edit]

File:ICARDA research farm.jpg[edit]

File:Patnala Lingamurthy.jpg[edit]

File:TRADGF.jpeg[edit]

File:Five By Nine.jpg[edit]

File:Arbolitos repetidos.jpg[edit]

File:ELMER disciples.jpeg[edit]

File:Louder Now Cover.jpg[edit]

File:Textfile 001.jpg.png[edit]

File:Matt McGinn around 1954.jpg[edit]

File:Pastor Jenkins (5).jpg[edit]

File:SueStroman 4-12-76 21small.jpg[edit]

File:Mike Gonsolin.jpg[edit]

File:Sheppard Mullin Logo 2011.jpg[edit]

File:TTjan.jpg[edit]

File:Queen of Free Thought Writing.jpg[edit]