Arts & Culture homepage The Assembly website Columbia University website

click here to search the site



 


>>>> CLICK HERE
to view the FULL VERSION of this report in PDF format

 


THE ONE HUNDREDTH AMERICAN ASSEMBLY
February 7-10, 2002
Arden House
Harriman, New York
Art, Technology, and Intellectual Property

PREFACE

On February 7, 2002, sixty-seven men and women gathered at Arden House in Harriman, New York for the 100th American Assembly entitled "Art, Technology, and Intellectual Property." The participants included artists, attorneys, foundation and government officials, representatives from the academic and communications communities, as well as from the for-profit and not-for-profit arts sectors. Consistent with The American Assembly's format, the participants came from across the country and represented a broad spectrum of views and interests.
The premise of the meeting was that in the twenty-first century transition to an information-driven economy, intellectual property is a critical resource. Most sectors of American society, including business, communications, government, science, medicine, and education are racing to deal with this new economy and to anticipate its consequences. The arts sector is poised to join the other sectors, but first, a closer examination of intellectual property issues is essential. While the for-profit arts have actively pursued their intellectual property interests and technological opportunities, the not-for-profit arts have been less able to secure a place at the policy and decision-making table. Both parts of the arts sector share common concerns about fostering creativity, but they often have different interests, values, perspectives, and resources. At the 100th American Assembly, leaders from the for-profit and not-for-profit arts met in structured discussions to explore these issues with authorities from other sectors, in the belief that understanding both common causes and varying interests is essential to the wise and productive development of America's creative assets in the twenty-first century. This is their report.


Alberta Arthurs, former director of Arts and Humanities at The Rockefeller Foundation, and senior associate at MEM Associates, and Frank Hodsoll, former chair of the National Endowment for the Arts, and principal of Hodsoll and Associates, served as co-chairs. Michael S. Shapiro, former General Counsel of the National Endowment for the Humanities and intellectual property consultant to arts organizations, and Margaret J. Wyszomirski, professor and director of the Arts Policy and Administration Program at The Ohio State University, assisted in the design and structure of the project, and wrote two papers, which served to focus the issues. Andrew Blau, principal of Flanerie Works, and Andrew Taylor, director of the Bolz Center for Arts Administration at the University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Business, joined the leadership and were invaluable in assisting in the Assembly's design. The project also benefited greatly from the advice and guidance of a distinguished steering committee whose names and affiliations are listed in the appendix of this report.


At the suggestion of the steering committee, and over a twenty-month period, The Assembly held two day-and-a-half-long meetings at Arden House to provide guidance and understanding on two critical areas at the confluence of art, technology, and intellectual property. The first focused on "The Arts Disciplines" and was attended by thirty representatives of various arts disciplines. The participants heard formal addresses by Elise Bernhardt, Howard Besser, and Mary Beth Peters. (Affiliations of these and other participants can be found in the appendix of this report.) Following the formal addresses, the participants listened to presentations from representatives of the various arts disciplines about the impact of technology and other issues. The participants divided into discussion groups to continue their dialogue. Later Messrs. Blau, Shapiro, and Taylor and Ms. Wyszomirski reported back to the entire group on the findings of the discussions.


The second day-and-a-half meeting focused on "Business Models" and was also attended by thirty participants who came together to discuss emerging models and how they are adjusting to rapid technological change. The participants heard formal addresses by Eric Scheirer, Andrew Blau, and Connie Cranos, followed by a panel moderated by Bruce Polichar and including Tod Cohen, Kevin Cunningham, Ann G. Kirschner, Tom Roli, and Kathleen Clark as panelists. As with the prior mini-Assembly, the participants were divided into two groups for structured discussions. At the conclusion of those sessions, Messrs. Blau and Taylor re ported the findings to the entire group.

With the success of these two meetings, and as the planning for the national meeting grew near, the co-chairs scheduled two day-long meetings with several participants from each of the two mini-Assemblies and other experts both to refine the issues and to set an agenda for the national Assembly. The participants in these two meetings are noted in the appendix.


For the national Assembly, Ms. Wyszomirski served as editor of the volume of background reading for the participants. This book is the first draft of a volume to be commercially published. Its table of contents is printed on the inside back cover of this report. Also, as part of this project, Mr. Shapiro was commissioned to write a book-length manuscript tentatively titled, The Cultural Bargain: Arts, Copyright, and the Public Inteerst, which is intended for publication. These materials will extend the discussions that took place at Arden House.


During the 100th American Assembly, participants heard a panel presentation and two keynote addresses, which provided additional background and informed their discussions. The panel built on much of the research gathered prior to the national meeting and set the parameters for the meeting. The panelists were Messrs. Blau, Shapiro, Taylor, and Ms. Wyszomirski. The two addresses were given by Debora L. Spar, professor at Harvard Business School and Lawrence Lessig, professor of law at Stanford University.


On February 10, 2002 the participants reviewed as a group the draft report, which contained their findings and recommendations. Their adopted draft of the report is available on the arts and culture section of The American Assembly's web site (www. americanassembly.org) along with reports from The Assembly's other arts projects. Visitors to the web site can also view the presentations by Professors Spar and Lessig, which were videotaped for this purpose by Streaming Culture, a project at the New Media Lab of the Graduate Center of the City University of New York.


It should be understood that in this report the Assembly defined the arts inclusively, as it did in its 1997 report "The Arts and the Public Purpose," which identified the arts as representing "…a spectrum from commercial to not-for-profit to volunteer, resisting the conventional dichotomies of high and low, fine and folk, professional and amateur, pop and classic…" and "…including the whole spectrum of artistic activity in the United States-from Sunday school Christmas pageants to symphony orchestras to fashion design to blockbuster movies . "


We gratefully acknowledge the generous support of The Rockefeller Foundation, The Pew Charitable Trusts, The David and Lucile Packard Foundation, The AT&T Foundation, AOL Time Warner, The Mary Duke Biddle Foundation, and eBay. We owe our special gratitude to the project's co-chairs, Alberta Arthurs and Frank Hodsoll, for their leadership in every aspect of this project. We would like to express our appreciation for the fine work of the discussion leaders and rapporteurs, who guided participants in their sessions and prepared the first draft of this report: Andrew Blau, Jeffrey Cunard, Kenneth Hamma, Ellen McCulloch-Lovell, Andrew Taylor, and Caroline Williams, and to Michael Shapiro and Margaret Wyszomirski for the work that they also did in bringing the report and this project to completion.


The American Assembly takes no position on any subjects presented here for public discussion. In addition, it should be noted the participants took part in this meeting as individuals and spoke for themselves rather than for the organizations and institutions with which they are affiliated.

David H. Mortimer
The American Assembly