Literateprograms.org strikes me as a much better-implemented site; as a wiki, it doesn't rely on being populated by an individual, and all the pages are locally hosted. It doesn't limit itself to a small set of programming languages, either. It could use a list like this, though.
Agreed - I only have minor gripes with the list, but given that only a handful of the algos have implementations, this thing would really need to be a wiki for it to have any hope of getting completed. Frankly, I'm not going to bother sending an email with new implementations and wait to see if it's approved, whereas I might have dropped by now and again to help populate a wiki.
" The goal is to provide a ready to run program for each one, or a description of the algorithm" - a noble aim - worth contributing to a resource like that.
While the list is noble, I have difficulty trusting the source. Other pages on the scriptol.org website are somewhat immature and, unsurprisingly, full of Scriptol propaganda.
