|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
E-mail This Page | Tag This Page (del.icio.us) | Translate The Macgregor Briefings:
|
Slide Presentations Briefing for the Woodrow Wilson Center Briefing for the Transformation Task Force of the Rumsfeld/Marshall Review Briefing for the Raytheon Corporation The following slide presentations can be viewed one slide at a time in HTML format or can be downloaded as a complete set in PowerPoint format (.ppt files.) To view the .ppt file you will need to have the free PowerPoint Viewer available for Windows (2.8 MB) and for Macintosh (0.6 MB). 1. Transforming the U.S. Army: Why
and How 2. Types and Organization of Basic Combat units 3. Force Structure; Readiness and
Personnel Issues; Joint Operational Architecture; Command and Control 4. Illustrative Force Packages for
Theater War and Smaller Contingencies; Cooperation with Allies; Summary Points 5. Special Topics: Light Reconnaissance Strike Group (LRSG) -- the U.S. Army's RMA Vanguard Force (includes comparison of LRSG with prototypical "medium-weight" brigade) |
The 1997 publication of Breaking the Phalanx: A New Design for Landpower in the Twenty-First Century (Westport: Praeger, 1997) by Col. Douglas A. Macgregor was an unscheduled intervention in the US Army's troubled process of adapting to post-Cold War conditions. Col. Macgregor offered the vision of a modular Army comprising various types of basic combined-arms units that would be much smaller than today's divisions, but larger and more capable than today's brigades. Information units at all levels would help tie together these basic "building blocks" into larger, mission-tailored task forces. The information units also would facilitate the close cooperation of US Army forces with those of other services and other nations. Thus, this is a vision of an Army that is not only rapidly-adaptable and rapidly-deployable, but also "joint" and "combined" from the bottom up. Macgregor has made a compelling case that a revolution in military affairs involves much more than technological advancement: it also requires change in organizational structures, operational concepts, and leadership principles. Macgregor's vision helps clarifies the difference between a revolution and a shopping spree: his new Army would cost less than the current model and be able to deploy combat power much quicker. Colonel Macgregor's work has won accolades from both inside the Army and out. But his efforts are also a testament to the difficulty of institutionalizing a revolution in thinking (or anything else). The types of change he has proposed remain on the margin of the Army's efforts to reinvent itself. These Army efforts mostly have involved technological adjustment -- be it the digitization of divisions or the adoption of lighter wheeled combat vehicles. The Army's "medium weight initiative" differs substantially from Macgregor's ideas; it retains, for instance, the traditional division-brigade structure. Nonetheless, it does signal, in the aftermath of the Kosovo conflict, a broader and deeper recognition that the Army must change if it is to remain strategically relevant. In this context, the Project on Defense Alternatives offers this page with a variety of articles and slide presentations summarizing Col. Macgregor's ideas. As the nation turns to consider once again what type of Army it needs for the 21st century, these presentations can serve as both an inspiration and touchstone. Douglas A. Macgregor -- Bibliography and Military Career |
Publications Breaking the Phalanx
Some Reviews of Breaking the Phalanx: A Test Case for Bush's Military Reform Pledge? Resurrecting Transformation: A New Structure for Post-Industrial Warfare The Joint Force: A Decade, No Progress Should the U.S. Army "Lighten Up"?
Transformation and the Illusion of Change
Transforming Operational Architecture for the Information Age Command and Control for Joint Strategic Actions also of interest on the topic: The Failure of Reform in an Era of Change Wheels or Tracks? On the "Lightness" of Military Expeditions |
Publications:
US Defense Policy | Regional Security | Terrorism
Iraq & Afghanistan | Military & Strategic Studies
Alternative Security & Defense | Chronological
Buy Publications | Home | What's New | About PDA
Links | Search This Site | E-mail PDA
War Report | RMA Debate Page
Defense Strategy Review Page | Chinese Military Power Page
Terrorism, Counter-Terrorism, Homeland Security | Occupation Distress
The Project on Defense Alternatives, The Commonwealth Institute
P.O.Box 398105, Inman Square Post Office
Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
Phone 617/547-4474, Fax 617/868-1267
Email: pda(at)comw.org
Copyright © The Commonwealth Institute. All Rights Reserved.