|
Politics |
Politics, freedom, government, and law, with a hacker spin.
|
|
|
McCain passes amendment to end torture of detainees; Bush threatens veto (Politics)
By mcc Fri Oct 7th, 2005 at 01:52:52 AM EST
|
|
|
If you look at the Army Field Manual's section on interrogation techniques, you will find an enlightening little passage on the subject of "coercive" interrogation, which says in part:
The use of force, mental torture, threats, insults, or exposure to unpleasant and inhumane treatment of any kind is prohibited by law and is neither authorized nor condoned by the US Government. Experience indicates that the use of force is not necessary to gain the cooperation of sources for interrogation. Therefore, the use of force is a poor technique, as it yields unreliable results, may damage subsequent collection efforts, and can induce the source to say whatever he thinks the interrogator wants to hear.
Here is the short version of the article which follows from this point: Early in the "War on Terror", the Bush Administration made a decision that the U.S. military would not be bound by the Geneva Convention in the fights that were to come. When the fights came, the "detainees" that the military picked up were met with treatment that some supporters of the Bush Administration called "coercive" and some other persons called "torture".Yesterday evening, John McCain passed an amendment to the next military appropriations bill which if followed would end such practices by simply requiring the treatment of detainees to be held to the standards in the Army field manual. Bush claims he's going to veto it. This would mean the first, and so far only, veto of Bush's entire presidency would be performed in support of torture.
Full Story (214 comments, 3144 words in story)
|
|
|
One event, two versions (Politics)
By DarthSilly Thu Sep 22nd, 2005 at 07:31:10 AM EST
|
|
|
Iraqi version
On Monday, two persons were approached for suspicious activity. They fired at police, killing one and wounding another. They attempted to flee in a car, after which they were apprehended and photographed. It was discovered that though the two were in civilian clothes, they were in fact British soldiers. Explosives were found in their car, and it is believed that they were in the process of planting explosives for the purpose of inciting violence. It is for this reason they are believed to have fled from the Iraqi authorities.
These events set off other violence, including the bombing of British tanks, and clashing with Iraq Basra police. UK demands for the release of their soldiers led to fighting between UK and Iraq Basra police. The UK mounted an armed raid, consisting of twelve tanks, and brutally overtook the police station, allowing hundreds to escape and extracting their soldiers. The UK and US is currently in the process of damage control, claiming that the operation was a "rescue" and further attempting to eliminate any other evidence or opposition.
UK official version
Iraqi police had arrested two off-duty British soldiers, and after some negotiations, they were released into British custody.
Sources
Google News
Washington Post,
phillyburbs.com,
Kuna.net,
ABC News (US).
Comments (122 comments)
|
|
|
Moving 8000 People 10 Kilometres (Politics)
By stuaart Tue Aug 16th, 2005 at 07:38:51 AM EST
|
|
|
The Israeli disengagement from the Gaza Strip is here after weeks upon weeks
of preparation, both political and physical. The face of the practical task
seems trivial: move 8000 people approximately 10km, withdrawing them from settlements (these are marked in red on this map). History, however, weighs
heavily on the shoulders of the soldiers involved in forcibly evicting Jewish
settlers in the Strip, the settlers themselves, the politicians responsible for
developing the plan, the Palestinians still living there, and the Israeli
public. But how did it come to this, and why is it happening?
Full Story (252 comments, 1629 words in story)
|
|
|
Ratification, Sortition and Crowd Wisdom (Politics)
By cam Sat Jul 16th, 2005 at 10:23:22 PM EST
|
|
|
Steven Pearlstein has an article in the Washington Post titled, "Aid Recipients Might Have the Best Ideas About Allocation" which covers alternate methods to allocate aid funding to needy states. The article challenges the orthodoxy that a small group of specialists are the best to determine what to do with donor money. Instead, GlobalGiving is using technology and the "wisdom of the crowds" to produce outcomes that are more efficient. This methodology has political implications, especially for models which incorporate ratification and sortition.
Full Story (37 comments, 1120 words in story)
|
|
|
Remodeling the political spectrum (Politics)
By David Bruhn Sat Jul 9th, 2005 at 02:40:13 PM EST
|
|
|
With the rise of ideologies such as paleoconservatives, neolibertarians, and radical centrists, creating a political spectrum model that can describe them all has become more challenging. No longer does the simple left-right axis suffice, nor even the ever popular Nolan Chart.
This article proposes a new model that attempts to accurately describe all known ideologies using a three dimensional spectrum.
Full Story (151 comments, 3514 words in story)
|
|
|
Intellectual Property Is Costing Me My Life (Politics)
By Rudi Cilibrasi Mon Jul 4th, 2005 at 06:37:31 AM EST
|
|
|
In an unbelievable twist of fate, a combination of terrible drug laws, intellectual property laws, and misguided patents and copyrights have come together to prevent me from receiving lifesaving medecine. I need your help to publicize this issue, take it to the mainstream, and let it start the ball rolling to take out this immoral copyright system. The story of the death of my family and my current life-threatening illness, caused in no small part by IP law, is a perfect starting point to bring this into the next level of public discourse. Let's expose the copyright barons for what they are. It's not just me; 200 million others are also infected, and 95% don't know the problem, yet. It could even be you. Let's become lifesavers.
Full Story (72 comments, 1068 words in story)
|
|
|
Thank God, I Thought We'd Never Get Rid of the Fifth Amendment (Politics)
By nlscb Wed Jun 29th, 2005 at 10:20:48 AM EST
|
|
|
With the decline in stock returns lately, as a
rich white Episcopalian male whose family made it big running
liquor during prohibition, I have had a lot of trouble finding
good places to put my money. The damn hedge funds are all imploding. Pretty soon,
the regulators will be all over them like a plague of locusts.
Anyway, I thought I had found a solution to getting decent returns.
Some smart guy in my research department figured out a treatment
for glaucoma. Now that we have the patent, we plan to charge $100
a pill for it. Keeping one's sight is priceless, right?
In order to produce the pills,
I found a perfect place to build a new pharmaceutical plant
in a neighborhood blighted
by blue collar workers, but there's this group of minority families (how do
they get into this country?) living there that have caused me no end of heartache.
They won't sell and keep whining endlessly about "carcinogenic run-off".
I have tried bribing the building code enforcers to condemn
the houses as uninhabitable. The local police are of no use. I gave them
thousands under the table to "persuade" the locals to move. Still,
the bastards stuck around. The mayor says he will not give me the tax breaks
if I can not get the land.
Full Story (93 comments, 910 words in story)
|
|
|
|