New International Version
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| New International Version | |
|---|---|
|
|
| Full name: | New International Version |
| Abbreviation: | NIV |
| NT published: | 1973 |
| OT published: | 1978 |
| Complete Bible published: | 1978 |
| Textual Basis: | NT: Medium Correspondence to Nestle-Aland Greek New Testament. OT: Biblia Hebraica Masoretic Hebrew Text, Dead Sea Scrolls, Samaritan Pentateuch, Aquila, Symmachus and Theodotion, Latin Vulgate, Syriac Peshitta, Aramaic Targums, for Psalms Juxta Hebraica of Jerome. |
| Translation type: | Formal & Dynamic Equivalence |
| Reading Level: | 7.80[1] |
| Publisher: | Zondervan |
| Copyright status: | Copyright 1973, 1978, 1984 International Bible Society |
| Genesis 1:1-3 | |
| In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters. And God said, "Let there be light," and there was light. | |
| John 3:16 | |
| For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. | |
The New International Version is an English translation of the Christian Bible. Published by Zondervan, it became one of the most popular modern translations made in the twentieth century.[2]
When Evangelical Protestants received the Revised Standard Version (RSV), which first appeared in whole in 1952, it was criticized by conservative Evangelicals. Certain texts regarding the virginity of Mary, and other Old Testament passages whose Christian interpretation referred to Jesus did not follow traditional Evangelical translation.[3][4] The New International Version project was begun after a meeting in 1965 in Palos Heights, Illinois between the Christian Reformed Church, National Association of Evangelicals, and a group of international scholars.[5]
The New York Bible Society (now the Colorado Springs-based International Bible Society) was selected to do the translation. The New Testament was released in 1973 and the full Bible in 1978. It underwent minor revision in 1984.
Contents |
[edit] Features
The NIV is an explicitly Protestant translation. The deuterocanonical books are not included in the translation. It preserved traditional Evangelical theology on many contested points for which the RSV has been criticized. Apart from these theological issues, the manuscript base of the NIV is similar to the RSV, using older Greek New Testament texts rather than the later Textus Receptus.
[edit] Translation philosophy
The core translation group consisted of fifteen Biblical scholars. The translation took ten years and involved a team up to 100 people from the USA, Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand, and South Africa. The range of those participating included over twenty different denominations such as Baptists, Evangelicals, Methodists, Lutherans, Anglicans, and more.[6]
The intent of the translators was to produce an accurate and readable translation that would fall between formal equivalence (colloquially known as "literal" or "word-for-word") and dynamic equivalence (colloquially known as "meaning" or "thought-for-thought").[7][8]
The text used for the Old Testament was the Biblia Hebraica Masoretic Hebrew Text. Other ancient texts consulted were the Dead Sea Scrolls, the Samaritan Pentateuch, the Aquila, Symmachus and Theodotion, the Latin Vulgate, the Syriac Peshitta, the Aramaic Targums, and for the Psalms the Juxta Hebraica of Jerome. The text used in translating the New Testament was the Nestle-Aland Greek New Testament.[9] Recent archaeological and linguistic discoveries helped in understanding traditionally difficult passages to translate. Familiar spellings of traditional translations were generally retained.[10]
[edit] Circulation
According to Zondervan, publisher of the NIV, the translation has become the most popular modern English translation of the Bible, having sold more than 215 million copies worldwide. It is especially popular among American Evangelicals. It continues to be one of the top ten selling Bibles.[2][11]
There are numerous study Bibles available with extensive notes on the text and background information to make the Biblical stories more comprehensible. Among these are the NIV Spirit of the Reformation Study Bible, the Zondervan published NIV Study Bible, the Wesleyan revision, Reflecting God Study Bible, as well as the Life Application Study Bible.
[edit] Criticism
It is sometimes claimed that the NIV works in apologetics to smooth out apparent biblical contradictions in more precise translations, such as between Acts 9:7 and 22:9.[12] Examples given of precise translations in the aforementioned criticism are the King James Version and the NRSV[12]. Defenders of the NIV argue that the New American Standard Bible and the English Standard Version use almost the exact same wording as the NIV in regards to Acts 9:7 and 22:9.[13][14]
Bruce M. Metzger criticizes[15] the addition of just into Jeremiah 7:22, which appears to change the meaning.[16]
King James Only critics criticize the NIV for using eclectic texts instead of the later Textus Receptus.
Some Christians dislike the NIV because they consider it a loose translation that lacks a word-for-word translation style.
[edit] See also
| The Bible in English |
| Old English (pre-1066) |
| Middle English (1066-1500) |
| Early Modern English (1500-1800) |
| Modern Christian (1800-) |
| Modern Jewish (1853-) |
| Miscellaneous |
- Today's New International Version
- New International Reader's Version
- New International Version Inclusive Language Edition (NIVI)
[edit] References
- ^ "New International Version (Stats & History)". Retrieved on 2008-04-16.
- ^ a b "CBA Best Sellers 2007". Christian Business Association. Retrieved on 2007-11-25. New International Version #1 in dollar and unit sales
- ^ "A Critique of the Revised Standard Version". "There are two fatal weaknesses in the Revised Standard Version of the Old Testament which inevitably make it unacceptable to evangelical Christians. The first is its attitude toward the reliability of the Hebrew or Massoretic Text of the Old Testament; the second is its method of translating that Text.", Merrill F. Unger, Th.D., Ph.D.
- ^ "In Discordance with the Scriptures: American Protestant Battles over Translating the Bible". "The battleground concerning the RSV centered on the translation of Isaiah 7:14, where the RSV dared to render the Hebrew word “young woman” instead of “virgin.”", Peter J. Thuesen, Oxford University Press, 1999, p238.
- ^ "biblegateway.com New International Version Information".
- ^ "Background of the New International Version (NIV) Bible".
- ^ "New International Version (NIV) Information from Zondervan". pg. 4,5
- ^ "Bible Translation Chart".
- ^ "History of the English Bible by Ben Irwin".
- ^ "Background of the New International Version (NIV) Bible". "Although archaeological and linguistic discoveries in this century aid in understanding difficult passages", "As for other proper nouns, the familiar spellings of the King James Version are generally retained" Paragraphs 14 & 17
- ^ "Best-Selling Bibles". Feb 2006, New International Version #1 best-seller
- ^ a b Barker, Dan (1994). "Did Paul's Men Hear a Voice?". The Skeptical Review. Retrieved on 2007-11-25.
- ^ Slick, Matthew J. "Did the men with Paul hear the voice or not?". Christian Apologetics & Research Ministry. Retrieved on 2008-04-11.
- ^ "Acts 9:7; Acts 22:9 (English Standard Version)". BibleGateway.com. Retrieved on 2008-04-11.
- ^ Metzger, Bruce: The Bible in Translation (Baker Academic, 2001)
- ^ Jeremiah 7:22 (NIV) at BibleGateway.com
[edit] External links
- Official Website
- Zondervan
- Zondervan Bible Search
- Zondervan Bible Translation Frequently Asked Questions
- BibleGateway.com Version Information
- The NIV The Making of a Contemporary Translation, Barker, Kenneth L. (ed.), International Bible Society
- Is Your Modern Translation Corrupt? Answering the Allegations of KJV Only Advocates by James R. White
|
|||||||||||||||||
