SUBSCRIBE TO NEW SCIENTIST

Opinion

Feeds

Home |Opinion |Life | Opinion

Why did our species survive the Neanderthals?

ONCE upon a time, a race of cavemen ruled Europe and Asia, then mysteriously vanished, leaving little but bones and stone tools behind.

The history of the Neanderthals isn't a Brothers Grimm fairy tale, but much of what has been written about the ancient human species may as well be, says evolutionary ecologist Clive Finlayson in his informative monograph.

Take their disappearance, which a team led by Finlayson has pinpointed to the rock of Gibraltar, between 28,000 and 24,000 years ago. Since the discovery of the first Neanderthal bones in Belgium in 1829, anthropologists have proposed any number of explanations for their extinction.

Some said Neanderthals were too dim-witted to survive climatic upheaval or the arrival of our ancestors from Africa. Others contended that their diet - big mammals that were also becoming rare - did them in, while Homo sapiens's more catholic diet gave them the edge to survive. Some even argued that Neanderthals didn't go extinct at all, but interbred with H. sapiens.

None of these just-so stories quite add up, Finlayson says. There is no clear indication that Neanderthals were any less intelligent than H. sapiens, and genetic evidence has shown that they share with humans key changes in Foxp2, a gene involved in speech and language. The distinction between Neanderthal and human technology isn't as clear-cut as palaeoanthropologists sometimes suggest, and Neanderthals hunted smaller game and seafood where it was available. Meanwhile, a first-draft sequence of the Neanderthal genome offers no sign that they contributed to our gene pool.

So why did Neanderthals go extinct? Finlayson argues that it was a deadly combination of bad luck and climate change. They were a species caught in the wrong place at the wrong time in a rapidly changing world. "By the time the classic Neanderthals had emerged," Finlayson laments, "they were already a people doomed to extinction."

A series of ice ages ate away the forest habitats where Neanderthals and their predecessors, Homo heidelbergensis, made a living sneaking up on big game. As their numbers declined, those who remained took refuge in warmer parts of Europe, nearer the Mediterranean. But a final drop in temperatures that began around 50,000 years ago made even this meagre living unsustainable.

Finlayson does not rule out the possibility that Neanderthals and H. sapiens met. Neanderthals, our ancestors and other archaic human species probably overlapped. But such contact was unlikely to play a pivotal part in the Neanderthal's disappearance and our dominance, which Finlayson chalks up largely to luck. That may not be a fairy tale, but at least, for us, there's a happy ending.

Issue 2733 of New Scientist magazine
  • Subscribe to New Scientist and you'll get:
  • New Scientist magazine delivered to your door
  • Unlimited access to all New Scientist online content -
    a benefit only available to subscribers
  • Great savings from the normal price
  • Subscribe now!

If you would like to reuse any content from New Scientist, either in print or online, please contact the syndication department first for permission. New Scientist does not own rights to photos, but there are a variety of licensing options available for use of articles and graphics we own the copyright to.

Have your say
Comments 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

Novel Theory

Sun Nov 08 11:26:49 GMT 2009 by sciencebod
http://www.colinb-sciencebuzz.blogspot.com

There's another theory - namely that our Homo sapiens ancestors viewed Neantherdals as "devils of the forest" and dealt with them accordingly (fired up no doubt with their newly-discovered home brew).

Scientific opinion? Nope, but probably every bit as valid, if not more so, than any of the above woolly speculation.

So whom do we have to thank for the older idea? Why, none other than Nobel Prize winning English author and schoolteacher William Golding in his "The Inheritors".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Inheritors_%28William_Golding%29

Novel Theory

Sun Nov 08 23:14:05 GMT 2009 by Simon

I haven't encountered Golding's idea before this, but I have to say it has a distinct ring of plausibility.

It'd be ironic, wouldn't it, if our closest genetic neighbours turned out to be one of the first casualties in the long and relentlessly growing list of human-induced extinctions...

Novel Theory

Mon Nov 09 02:56:02 GMT 2009 by Don Jennings

I think we are biased by our depressingly huge population where we have millions and billions of people at each others throats constantly for thousands of years now. 50-60,000 years ago or 100,000 years ago the population of both groups were very small compared to today, so the idea modern humans killed off Neandertals is just a bit off scale, just like the other extinction theory of humans wiping out mastadons when there were hardly any humans on the western continent, like a couple thousand ancients 12,000 years ago could have killed off the mastadons, just a bit egoistic.

Novel Theory

Mon Nov 09 13:54:17 GMT 2009 by Gil

One theory I'd read about that sought to explain why megafauna died out coincident with the spread of ancient man, without there being a sufficient population of humans to actually hunt them out, was disease.

Disease could probably have played a roll in the extinction of the Neandertals, too. Across closely related species you can see important differences in morbidity and mortality with common disease.

Novel Theory

Mon Nov 09 14:56:22 GMT 2009 by Liza

Absolute numbers are not that important, it's population density compared to the carrying capacity of the land, what seems very few people to us may well be all that can make a living there in a sustainable way giving their lifestyle and level of technology. As to the mastodons, if they were already under pressure from changing climate, and humans appear that start taking out the easiest victims, ie the calves, for a slow-breeding species that may well be enough to push population numbers below what it viable.

Novel Theory

Tue Nov 10 07:03:45 GMT 2009 by John

Well buffalo hunters in the american west drove numbers down from 15 million to a few hundred in just a few years. I would never underestimate our ability to destroy other species or our own, it's what we're good at.

Novel Theory

Mon Nov 09 02:30:45 GMT 2009 by Mike Colling

Strangely, I independently had the same idea that Golding had, and also thought that it would make a great story. I thought about setting it from the perspective of a group of homo sapiens living in proximity to neanderthals.

Genocide is seemingly integral to what it means to be human. Is there any reason to think that this hasn't always the case? Not that I know of. And what better "out group" than a genetically distinct species or sub-species.

Novel Theory

Mon Nov 09 09:19:45 GMT 2009 by Tom

Go read 'Sex and War' by Potts and Hayden

and then try and imagine the Neanderthals dies at any hand other than Homo .Sapiens.

Though suicide in the face of Homo Sapiens is a possibility I suppose.

Novel Theory

Mon Nov 09 13:15:30 GMT 2009 by Oji

On the other hand, multiple hominid species had been co-existing for hundreds of thousands of years before this. I guess some evidence would be required before jumping to plausible-sounding conclusions...

Novel Theory

Mon Nov 09 14:08:30 GMT 2009 by sciencebod
http://www.colinb-sciencebuzz.blogspot.com

Give me time, give me time, Oji. First I have to find a suitable cave (Cheddar Gorge?). Then it's a case of "uncovering" some fuzzy indistinct wall paintings with H.sapiens in hand-to-hand-combat with H.neandertalis, against a frieze of leaping bison, grazing mammoths etc. Then it's a case of negotiating discover's rights with Somerset County Council re entry fees, car parking arrangements etc.

Novel Theory

Mon Nov 09 18:36:17 GMT 2009 by KathyJ

You mention Golding; I feel I should mention Auel.

Her fictional thesis was up-to-date in terms of the anthro research consensus of the 70s.

Novel Theory

Mon Nov 09 19:07:46 GMT 2009 by sciencebod
http://www.colinb-sciencebuzz.blogspot.com

As you say, a real perfectionist, Kathy, - putting one in mind of Tolkien with the background of solid scholarship - which inevitably attracts the revisionists! From wiki:

"Jean Auel's books have been commended for their anthropological authenticity and their ethnobotanical accuracy. However, recent archaeological research may suggest that some prehistorical details in the series are inaccurate and others fictional, and that specifications of prehistorical milestones are sometimes arbitrary and inconsistent. For example, the differences between Neanderthals and Homo sapiens may have been exaggerated or underestimated in the series; it has been found that Neanderthals had a hyoid bone and may thus have been capable of using vocal language and not as dependent on sign language as portrayed in the series (the existence of a Neanderthal hyoid bone wasn't confirmed until 1983, some years after the first book in the series was published)."

Novel Theory

Mon Nov 09 22:42:47 GMT 2009 by MacLir

Along those lines, let me throw in an observation I came to while reading to my daughter.

The fossil record tells us that Europe was the home of humanoid creatures who lived in caves and natural shelters, who were short, stocky, powerful, had large noses, and followed a meat-oriented diet. Neandertals.

European folklore features humanoid creatures who live in caves and natural shelters (and under bridges) who are short, stocky, powerful, have large noses, and follow a meat-oriented diet. Trolls.

Coincidence? Or is the folk lore actually "fossilized" history?

Novel Theory

Tue Nov 10 02:26:58 GMT 2009 by Liza

Are you suggesting that Neanderthals went extinct because modern humans lured them out into the sunlight and they all turned into stone?

PS: Trolls are not really "European" folklore. They are Skandinavian folklore.

Interbreeding

Sun Nov 08 12:11:20 GMT 2009 by Charles Benjamin

If Neanderthals and Homo Sapiens did interbreed 25 thousand years ago, surely it would only take several generations for any genetic trace of neanderthal DNA to completely disappear within the human gene pool, especially as the human population began to colonize the rest of the globe and diversify into the different races, then begin to merge back in on itself with different races overlapping, to form yet more modern races of people. How do we know that neanderthal DNA didn't make a contribution but get lost in the great swirling pool of the human genome over the subsequent 25 thousand years?

Interbreeding

Sun Nov 08 12:35:59 GMT 2009 by Dimitris

This "how" is simple. Genome analysis and statistics.

Interbreeding

Mon Nov 09 12:03:01 GMT 2009 by Ugg

It is obvious that Neatherthal / Human interbreeding happened. Just visit any UK town center on a Saturday night and see for yourselves...

Interbreeding

Tue Nov 10 06:08:10 GMT 2009 by Dave

Maybe they did breed with us, now and then i see very hairy and solid men with close set eyes and skulls that resemble the neanderthals, could be a throw back?

Neanderthals Demise

Sun Nov 08 13:28:25 GMT 2009 by Brian Johnson

I was under the impression that a virus like the common cold or measles brought by h. sapiens wiped out the neanderthals

Neanderthals Demise

Mon Nov 09 01:47:52 GMT 2009 by Dann

Based on what evidence?

Viral infections rarely leave any trace on the bones (if at all), and finding viral DNA would be unlikely even if a neanderthal *did* die from a virus. Even if you could detect viral DNA fragments in the remains, there's no way to be sure that the neanderthal in question actually died from the virus it was carrying.

Comments 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

All comments should respect the New Scientist House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please use the "Report" link in that comment to report it to us.

If you are having a technical problem posting a comment, please contact technical support.

ADVERTISEMENT

Andrea Marshall: Queen of manta raysMovie Camera

14:41 10 November 2009

The marine ecologist discusses diving, underwater beauty parlours and the discovery of a new species

Stop selling out science to commerce

14:08 09 November 2009

Corporate might and commercial pressures are undermining research. It's time for scientists to blow the whistle, say Stuart Parkinson and Chris Langley

Malcolm Gladwell's miscellany of myths

11:00 07 November 2009

Superstar writer Malcolm Gladwell teases out complexities behind the obvious and fun in the mundane in his collection of essays, What the Dog Saw

The music of Life on EarthAudio Speaker

10:00 07 November 2009

Edward Williams's music for Life on Earth is as atmospheric and innovative as the classic 1979 David Attenborough TV series it was composed for

Latest news

Will probe's upcoming fly-by unlock exotic physics?

18:17 10 November 2009

All eyes will be on the Rosetta comet-chasing probe when it flies by Earth on Friday – a past fly-by revealed a mysterious speed boost that general relativity cannot explain

Today on New Scientist: 10 November 2009

18:00 10 November 2009

Today's stories on newscientist.com, at a glance, including: the rise of Cinderella fruit, the super-efficient cars racing to win the X prize, and the usefulness of the Sahara being wet

Healthcare reform bill now faces Senate test

17:24 10 November 2009

Barack Obama's landmark healthcare reform legislation passed the US House of Representatives but faces a stern test to get through the Senate

Why smells from childhood mean so much

17:05 10 November 2009

The first scent you associate with an object may be given privileged status in the brain

TWITTER

New Scientist is on Twitter

Get the latest from New Scientist: sign up to our Twitter feed

ADVERTISEMENT

Partners

We are partnered with Approved Index. Visit the site to get free quotes from website designers and a range of web, IT and marketing services in the UK.

Login for full access