Special Articles.

The new paper Thought Control shows that certain mental processes can be influenced by the actions of defined immaterial entities. These entities are identified and produce results similar to those discussed by Eccles and Robinson (The Wonder of Being Human, Our Brain and Our Mind, The Free Press, 1984). These processes are distinct from those used for the secular GGU-model and, hence, do not alter GGU-model conclusions.

Some important information on General Intelligent Design.

The PDF article The Inherent Dangers Manifested by Certain Belief Systems contains findings that were disseminated to various U. S. Federal government agencies and individual members in 1981. Originally, the conclusions were "confidential," but on 15 Aug 1981 they were presented at the annual meeting of the American Scientific Affiliation. Predictions are made that have occurred, are occurring today and most probably will continue to occur.

This partially technical paper shows that questions posed by the Templeton Prize winner Michael Heller have been answered previously. Terms taken from the above book are used. In the technical part, it is shown that, for a concept represented by a specific set of examples, there is an "ultraconcept" that rationally implies each of the examples. A few applications are given.

1. Professional Biography

1A. (G) The Wondrous Human Brain, Dyslexia and Other Stuff. This is a brief article as to my personal experiences with various speech and learning disorders and how I have compensated for their effects.

2. Readme. Before attempting to read any of the next articles, please read the following that explains the meaning of the symbols (G) and (T) that appear after each section heading.

2A. (T) The Best Possible Unification for Any Collection of Physical Theories, (Internat. J. Math. Math. Sci., 17(2004):861-872.) It is well known that even if the particle physics community produces a physical theory that unifies the four fundamental interactions (forces) that such a unification will not produce a unification for the set of all scientific physical theories that appear to govern appropriate natural-system behavior. On page 9 of 0306147v2.pdf, the material contained in the paragraph that follows Theorem 4.1 shows that the "best" unification for the set of all such physical theories exists. The definition for this unification also leads to a logic-system that yields the unification.

3. (G) "Christian" Testimony.

3A. (G - T) Modeling Divine Attributes. At the end of my testimony, I mention my 1978 mathematical modeling discoveries. This brief article explains the simplest aspects of how Divine attributes as well as various "trinity" notions can be mathematically modeled.

4. (G - T) What is Creationary Science? This brief article is relative to the basic methods used within theoretical science and how these methods relate to the contributes I have made in creationary science.

4A. (G - T) What is Science and the Methods I Use. What is a science? I tell you here what this term actually means and discuss the specific methods I use.

5. (G) Templeton Prize Nomination.

5a. (G) A John Templeton Foundation Exposé. In this article, the written words of John Marks Templeton, the founder of the John Templeton Foundation (a.k.a. Templeton Foundation), are analyzed. Theological concepts that govern the Templeton Foundation and their relation to basic Christian doctrine are fully investigated and the source of the Templeton Foundation theological doctrine is identified. At the end, a link to a recent but different analysis by AIG is also provided.

6. (G) A Major Paul Davies Hypothesis is Invalid. One of Paul Davies major hypotheses is the claim that the laws of nature have a special property called Turing computability and as such the universe in which we dwell can be simulated by what is technically called a universal Turing machine or computer. It has been stated that this hypothesis has lead to significant "Progress in Religion." However, such "Progress" has not occurred, since the Davies hypothesis is false. I specifically refute this hypothesis by using the 1977 Paris-Harrington theorem. Explicit examples are given that lead to tangible physical results that cannot be produced by a universal Turing machine.

7. (G - T) Important Comments on the Ministry of Hugh Ross Ph.D. In this comment, I have found it necessary to discuss the relation between the Hugh Ross ministry "Reasons to Believe," the concept of the false prophet or false apostle, and creationary models that have a form of godliness, but deny the power thereof.

8. (G) Science Declares Our Universe IS Intelligently Designed. I am the originator of the notion that mathematical analysis can be applied to establish that natural-system behavior is intelligently designed, and produced, sustained or guided by intelligent agents. This conclusion is one aspect of General Intelligent Design theory (GID). GID is an interpretation of the General Grand Unification model (GGU-model), the first general Theory of Everything. The GGU-model is physical in character. Indeed, the GGU-model can be considered as a "larger" more complex physical environment in which universes are embedded. However, the mathematical operators used for the physical model also have various intelligent agent signatures. The interpreted GGU-model is so highly scientific in character that when any individual conducts a scientific experiment and verifies an inductive or deductive statement, then this also verifies the GGU-model. Previously, all of my scientific results have appeared in "journal form." But, because of the false impression given by other individuals that they originated this notion, I have written a non-technical, yet, complete book on the GGU-model. This book contains a large amount of new information and many illustrations not available from any of my Internet articles or books. It covers the three basic interpretations - purely physical, intelligent design, and, in a brief 22 page section, some theological interpretations. This book is available as indicated above. GID is considerably more significant than the notion of "intelligent design" (restricted design theory) as championed by Behe, Dembski, Johnson and others. There are no mathematical "proofs" in this book, although all of my major results are predicted mathematically. The book presents in an informal conversational style, comprehensible by those with an advanced high school or two-year college education or equivalent, the complete detailed conclusions of this 22-year research project. On this Web site, I have various links that discuss aspects of GGU-model. If you wish to consider a rather technical article that establishes the significance of general design theory as compared with the restricted design theory being popularized by the Discovery Institute, please see (G) A Comparison: General Design Versus Restricted Design Theory. This is a summary of some of the results using an interpretation in terms of "intelligent agents" and "intelligent design." This is a more complete non-technical discussion of GID-model conclusions with a few illustrations and a not necessary yet significant Scriptural interpretation.

The paper (G) My Intelligent Design Priority establishes my priority in this area of intelligent design. Further, this is a Glossary of GGU-model terms.

The important paper (G - T) The Fundamental Universe-Generating Processes is an rather detailed GGU and GID-model outline for the construction of our universe.

In this book, I use the correct notion for information termed specific information. This brief paper shows how the results from this book "define" specific information.

9. Some free papers that you may download without restrictions. 0 (G) Scientific methods used. 1 (G) How was our universe created? 2 (G) Your endangered mind: The great scientific deception. (A brief secular discussion.) 3 (G - T) Mathematical Philosophy and evolutionary processes. 4 (G - T) A U-cosmology. 5 (T) A microeffect that could yield a world-wide flood. 6 (T) General relativity and possible contrary predictions. 7 (T) The facts about gravitational time-dilation. 8 (T) The present invalid nature of Humphreys' White Hole Cosmology. 9 (G - T) E = mc^2 is not Einstein's discovery. 10 (G - T) © reprint. The scientific existence of a higher intelligence. This is an older paper on a subject that now has been highly refined. You may download this with certain restrictions. 11 (G) Does God sustain fundamental physical behavior by discrete or non-smooth processes? 12 (T) The meaning of the physical metric ds and a theoretical verification of a time-dilation conjecture. 13 (G - T) The Existence of Ultimate Concepts.

Some arXiv.org Archival Papers

(1) The GGU-model and generation of development paradigms. URL. (2) General logic-systems and consequence operators. URL. (3) General logic-systems that determine significant collections of consequence operators. URL. (4) An Ultimate Hyperfinite Ultralogic Unification for all Physical Theories, URL. (5) A nonstandard derivation for the Special Theory of Relativity and more. URL. (6) Standard and hyperfinite unifications for physical theories, URL. (7) The wondrous design and non-random character of "chance events,"URL. (8) The Theory of Ultralogics - Part 1,URL; Part 2, URL. [Note: This is not the most recent corrected version. The corrected version appears on this Web site.] (9) A solution to the general grand unification problem, URL [Note: This is not the most recent corrected version. The corrected version appears on this Web site.] (10) General relativity and contrary predictions, URL. (11) The encoding of quantum state information within subparticles, URL. (12) Nonstandard consequence operators, URL.

For a complete list of archival papers that may be freely downloaded, see "Archives at arXiv" in the list of Published Papers.

Article 4, above, A U-Cosmology describes a Biblically literal model that reveals immensely powerful Divine creationary processes. This older article should be considered as subsidiary to the above book "Science Declares . . ." and other newer material that appears on this website. It was produced prior to this book. It does give a purely scientifically generated model for Biblical creation that could be useful and it describes those specific Divine mechanisms that allow God to have knowledge of the past, the present and the future, and still allow for great alterations in natural-system behavior as well as free-will.

9A. (G - T (Basic Calculus)) What do the Expressions - Space, Space-Time, Time-Dilation and an Expanding Universe - Actually Signify? In this PDF article, the science-fiction myths about these expressions are removed and their actually meanings are explained. It is shown that the geometric language used is only an analogue model for behavior - behavior that has physical meaning in terms of our everyday experiences.

10. (G - T) Simplifying the technical aspects of the G, D-world, GGU-models and the U-cosmology. This paper contains the general intuitive concepts needed before exploring the technical aspects of these models.

11. (G - T) A Short Course in the G and MA-models as They Relate to Theology This is an introductory course for the G and MA-models as they can be interpreted theologically. This short course consists of a series of 13 e-mail postings that were presented to a special Internet group.

12. (T) The Wondrous Design and Non-random Character of Chance Events. In this article, it is shown specifically that natural system chance events as represented by theory predicted (a priori) probabilistic statements used in such realms as modern particle physics, among others, are only random relative to the restricted language of the theory that predicts such behavior. It is shown that all such "chance" natural events are related one to another by a remarkably designed, systematic and wondrous collection of equations that model how the natural laws and processes specifically yield such natural events. A second result shows theoretically that all such "chance" behavior is caused by the application of well-defined ultralogics. These results show specifically that the fundamental underlying behavior associated with all natural systems that comprise our universe is controlled internally by processes that cannot be differentiated from those that mirror the behavior of an infinitely powerful mind. From a Scriptural viewpoint, these results reveal signatures for God that represent His continual presence and control over all aspects of the natural universe.

12A (G - T) Abuses of Randomness In this brief article, I show once again that the use of the terms "random" and "disorder" with their common meaning within scientific literature are used only for psychological and philosophic reasons. The basic meanings for these terms no longer exist from the view point of General Intelligent Design theory and, indeed, their use has never been necessary when describing natural-system behavior. A new term "mindom" is proposed as a replacement for both of these terms. Mindom is a term that describes the actual facts.

13. Randomness and Evolutionary Cosmology - A Strong Deception. This brief article is my attempt to eliminate the ignorance displayed by members of the atheistic, "probabilistic" or "evolutionary" scientific communities relative to "randomness" and "inanimate evolutionary cosmology" and exactly what my three complementary articles on this subject have established mathematically.

14. (G) A Personal Statement. These very significant statement describes the history of a miraculous event that has determined my entire theological endeavors from 30 June 1983 until the present. The last paragraph of this statement contains an important message to any individual who does not truly believe in the God of the Scriptures

14A. (G - T) A Miracle Producing Mechanism This one page article discusses a recent result that shows how a specific member of the General Grand Unification Model, when theologically interpreted, can be used to produce what would be acknowledged by many as miracles.

15. (G) Additional Personal Statements. Although the GGU-model rationally satisfies numerously many secular interpretations for the formation and evolutionary development of our universe, it also shows that various theological interpretations are rational possibilities. In these statements, I describe my acceptance of a specific creationary science scenario for the creation of our universe. In particular, I give evidence for the acceptance of one such interpretation that upholds the rationality of a strict literally interpreted Genesis 1 - 8, yields evidence for a "young" Earth and, yet, also yields a universe (including our local environment) that gives the appearance of being billions of years old.

15A. (G) What Can Be Known As fully explained in the above book, the GGU-model gives insight into a rational discussion of what humankind can actually "know," at present, about certain significant concepts. These brief remarks use the notion of "creation out of nothing" as a basic illustration.

16. (G) Your Endangered Mind: The Great Scientific Deception, Christian Version. Many members of the scientific community have tried frantically to prevent you from reading this very important book. This book as well as the one below contains material that is different from that which appears in "Science Declares Our Universe IS Intelligently Designed."

17. (G) Your Endangered Mind: The Great Scientific Deception, Original Secular Version. The basic personal conclusions established by the MA-model apply to every intelligent life form within the universe. The physical applications are independent from any other scientific theory. To show this, I present the original slightly more detailed secular version written in HTML and presented in one compressed zip file with images.

18. (T) Important Free Books in Math. and Science. 1 Elementary Mathematical Logic (a $60 value). 2 Modern Infinitesimal Modeling and Nonstandard Analysis ($180 value). 3 Ultralogics and More (a $150 value). 4 Einstein Corrected (a $60 value).

18A. (T) Nonstandard Analysis - A Simplified Approach. My General Intelligent Design (GID) theory requires, for the mathematics, Nonstandard Analysis. This book presents the simplest possible nonstandard approach to the material in a basic undergraduate first course in real analysis. This is one step beyond the usual calculus courses. After considering the material presented, you would need to continue to the next level of nonstandard analysis as contained in the other free books, in this subject, listed on this Web site. (GID theory requires the material in book #3 as listed above.) Although the material in this book is copyrighted, it may be reproduced in any form without payment of any fees as long as the material is properly credited to its author.

19. (G - T) Thought Control In this paper, scientifically described processes are used to show how certain mental processes can be influenced by the actions of the defined immaterial entities. These entities are theologically identified and produce results similar to those discussed by Eccles and Robinson (The Wonder of Being Human, Our Brain and Our Mind, The Free Press, 1984) and by Popper.

20. Published Papers

---

21. (T - G -T) Monograph M1

Solutions to the "General Grand Unification Problem ," and the Questions. "How Did Our Universe Come Into Being?" and "Of What is Empty Space Composed?".

Presented before the Mathematical Association of America at Western Maryland College, 12 NOV 1994.

This presents the first solution to these Patton and Wheeler questions as well as the basic question "Is physics legislated by a cosmogony." These questions, and others, are specifically answered by first generating a falsifiable cosmogony via mathematical modeling. Since such a cosmogony is capable of generating universes, not just the one in which we dwell, and their respective "physics," then the General Grand Unification model, with certain exceptions, must essentially be explanatory in its final form for it must predict the behavior of all natural-systems that reside in each universe. Abstract 1 Also see the scientific justification and need for a cosmogony.

---

22. (G - T) Modern Mathematics - Its Relation to Physical Science and Theology This is a very important discussion of the relation between mathematics and these other distinct disciplines. It removes all of the myths and misunderstandings relative to this relation. The facts discussed in this article are based upon the experiences of an expert in mathematical modeling. However, numerology and Bible codes are not discussed nor do I consider such concepts as valid
23. I have been an Biblical Apostolic Christian since 15 AUG 1983 and there are millions of Biblical Apostolic Christians throughout the world who are identified by many different labels. My acceptance of this fundamental doctrine is based upon my own personal analysis of the Scriptures. My acceptance of this doctrine does not imply that I accept any additional doctrine that is part of the canon of any religious organization that also accepts the following statements. As a Biblical Apostolic Christian, I only accept the final theological doctrine of the original Apostles including Paul. This Apostles doctrine is considered as sufficient for salvation. "Brothers, I want to remind you of the gospel I preached to you, the gospel that you received and in which you are firmly established; because the gospel will save you only if you keep believing exactly what I preached to you - believing anything else will not lead to anything." 1 Corinthians 15: 1-2 (Jerusalem Bible).((v.2) "It was that alone by which they could hope for salvation." Matthew Henry.) Generally, I do not proselytize. However, if you are truly interested in the circumstances that led to my accepting the Apostles doctrine and becoming a Biblical Apostolic Christian please consider this pdf file.

---

Ezekiel 33:6, 8 - 9.

24. (G - T) A Modern Manifestation of Absolute Evil; The New Age, the New This, the New That Movement. This is a revision of my 1982 scientific analysis of the ethics and "theology" of the New Age, New World, New "almost anything" occult movement using the writings of the founder of this movement, Alice A. Bailey. The concepts advocated by Bailey have become part of many so-called Christian organizations. Since "code word" titles and "names" for certain objects are being altered, identification by means of characteristics is necessary. This research is mainly concerned with those Bailey concepts that would most affect the conservative Christian community. Also detailed, with numerous exhibits, is the absolute evil intent of ALL of the concepts and methods employed within this movement. Important Internet examples are given.

25. (G) Another Manifestation of Absolute Evil, the "Psychic" and "Paranormal" Movement. This article will detail the true basis and extreme danger of the "Psychic this," the "Psychic that" and the "paranormal" movement. It is shown how these extremely dangerous occult concepts and practices are being made a part of our cultural environment; how to recognize the applications of these concepts, and how to avoid the deceptions that radiate from the "angel of light." Various Internet examples are given. [Since the material presented in this article is based upon personal experiences, this article will not be altered. Further, the conclusions cannot be eliminated by any form of logical argument.]

---

26. Presented Papers.

27. Published Abstracts

28. ** This statement is only for identification purposes. After 38 years of federal government service, I have officially retired from the faculty of United States Naval Academy. I am no longer officially associated with any Federal agency. Neither the United States Naval Academy nor any other Federal agency endorses any of the material that appears on this Web site.

---

Throughout all of the information contained within this Web site, strict logical argument is applied. As with many informal logical arguments, not all hypotheses are stated explicitly. Many such hypotheses come under the heading of "self-evident." Please do not assume additional hypotheses that are not intended and thereby produce erroneous enthymemes (i.e. logical arguments based upon hypotheses that are not assumed). Further, I accept a scientific hypothesis as fact only if there is an abundance of physical evidence that verifies the hypothesis.

---

---