WE MADE IT TO THE FINALS! NOW WE NEED YOUR VOTES MORE THAN EVER!!!Encyclopedia Dramatica is in contention for the 2nd Annual Mashable Open Web Awards for the wiki category. With your help, we can beat the Wikipedia menace! Plz vote for ED by going here; you can vote once per day, per email address, ballot stuffing encouraged! Just don't forget to confirm the vote via e-mail. VOTE OR DIE!!!
Wikipedia
From Encyclopedia Dramatica
The People's Communist Republic of WikipediaⓀ, commonly shortened to simply Wikipedia, is a massively multiplayer online role-playing game (MMORPG) in which participants play editors of a hypothetical online encyclopedia. The goal is to try to insert misinformation that is randomly assigned at signup, while preventing any contrary information from being entered by others. Players with similar misinformation will generally form "guilds" in order to aid one another.
Wikipedia players gain more authority as they progress, with "Administrator" and "Double-O Licensed" rankings granting them access to game processes not available to others. While the rules for winning the game are a tightly-kept secret, it is believed that the winner is treated to a night of ass sex with Wikipedia creator/overlord, the wikipedo Jimbo Wales (lube not included).
The encyclopedia aspect of the Wikipedia game is a fairly obvious rip-off of Encyclopedia Dramatica, except that the Wikipedia version tends to have terminally boring entries on useless topics like the lives of 17th century rabbis, characteristics of the 57th termite chromosome, and Hollywood films including one or more of the Sesame Street Muppets -- in other words, content with no real relevance to the internets or internet culture, and thus is shit. Wikipedia is the worst example of an open-source project in the world.
In addition to being shit, Wikipedia tends to be characterized by instances of A+ Lame Edit Wars, which contain a level of pathetic dedication only possible on the internets. It is well known for its repository of tl;dr articles portraying a skewed perception of reality. The only reason anyone ever visits the site is because its free. Information on Wikipedia topics can generally be found through Google and other forms of reference material, like books. Actually, screw it: if it's not on ED, it's not worth knowing about.
TOW likes to think of themselves as the 21st century's answer to the Library of Alexandria, but, in reality, they fall somewhere closer to the collective scribblings on a truck stop bathroom wall.
[edit] How Wikipedia could improve (not possible since it is run by Jew overlords)
While people complain of all sorts of problems with Wikipedia, the blame wrongly falls on technical or organizational issues; the real problem with Wikipedia, however, is the Wikipedians. From players to sysops, every member of its community is the scum of the internets -- worse than spammers, worse than virus writers and Nigerian scammers, worse than IRCers, and even worse than you. An average Wikipedia user has the intelligence of a seal, as seen here [1].
Wikipedia is full of people with no desire to improve what it is intended for, information. Instead, they want to obstruct it, and delete all the shit they think isn't worthy of being on the pages so they can grow their e-penis and one day become a mod. These people do not deserve to be on a website dedicated to information and should be fucked in the ass on a daily basis, as that may make them less bored. Additionally, EDiots could use this information to become a mod within a week so they can cause a major shitstorm with their mod powers.
The only way to save the Wikipedia MMORPG is to delete all usernames and only allow two players to be its administrators: Grawp and Willy on Wheels. All other accounts will be reduced to powerless IP addresses, its users continuing their bitching and pedantic arguing amongst themselves.
Actually, the paragraph above is not enough. Wikipedia cannot be saved. It must be destroyed by massive attacks of lulzy vandalism and the castration of all wikipedos (if Jewbo Wales doesn't have their nutsacks already).
Use your computer for what it was designed for -- looking at porn -- and go buy some Encyclopedia Britannicas or something, you cheap bastard.
[edit] GFDL is a joke
Wikipedia claims all your contributions are free license and more importantly that this license is irrevocable. Guess what? Malber proved them wrong! [2] [3] [4]
"Most people don't realize how entertaining Wikipedia is!" — Anon. IRREFUTABLE PROOF THAT ANONYMOUS LOVES WIKIPEDIA VANDALISM!! Lulz.
[edit] Wikipedia Images
Wikipedia is known for having people that love to provide free-license images of their semen, feces, genitalia, and other nasties. Rama, a well-known artist for drawnsex.com, draws all the pornographic illustrations. Your family is proud, Rama.
A person called Boochan (on commons and en) has gynecomastia. That's Latin or some shit for "beyond manboobs," meaning guys get breasts larger than a Japanese chick's that even give milk! Damn. So of course, Boochan he likes to upload pictures of himself nekki. Image:Gynecomastia 001.jpg has somehow avoided being on the bad image list, so we encourage you to vandalize with it on WP.
Note: Wikipedia references to penis are also suitable for trolling.
[edit] Google Bomb
Wikipedia is an obvious target for Google bombing words like lies, propaganda, bias, biased, arsehole, cock loving editors, Jimbo Wales is gay, incorrect, vandalism, where to vandalize, places to troll etc etc.
[edit] Wikipedia and ED
See also: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Encyclopedia Dramatica
It all started one day when Jameth, typing with only his penis, attempted to enter the mediacrat drama as a Wikipedia entry. It was discussed and denied. This act alone sparked the creation of the wiki you're reading right now.
Every year, Wikipedia pretends that they are going to delete the Encyclopedia Dramatica article. Sometimes they do, mostly on the grounds of hosting the previously-deleted Mediacrat entry, but usually they wuss out of it. Looks they were serious this time.
Wikipedia's steadfast refusal to host an Encyclopedia Dramatica article has been the source of a great deal of hilarious drama on the site. Yet TOW continues to cover up any controversy associated with the topic and deny the creation of the article, even one that is unoffensive, informative, and well written. Wikipedia has articles on Bukkake, Goatse, 2 Girls 1 Cup, an extensive disambiguation page on dongs (including a page on a male porn star named "Long Dong Silver"), and God knows what else. However, they still refuse to allow a page on ED simply out of spite.
Update: Last closing argument (aside from Sceptre's faggotry):
| —Spartaz Humbug! 19:54, 3 May 2008 (UTC) |
DISREGARD THIS SECTION, WE TOW SUCKS COCKS
An Encyclopedia Dramatica article is now up on Wikipedia, in all its lulztastic, properly sourced and cited glory.
As expected, it took only a few hours for many Wikipedos to go into childlike tantrums, thus forcing yet another deletion review, deletion review number 57 to be exact. The topic of this deletion review is to determine the validity of sources. When the article was created, the source list was actually larger than the article itself, but this has since been trimmed down for a number of arbitrary reasons, the most prevalent being that TOW's editors are unable to live up to their own retarded rules. Overall consensus, however, is that the article should stay and that anyone who says otherwise is a hypocrite who is simply butthurt over ED's treatment of TOW and its editors and fails to realize that this immature behavior will only further the problem.
[edit] What's with the œ?
The œ is the retarded sister of æ, instead of being created by Vikings like æ, she was originally created by the Romans to translate the shitty Greek οι diphthong. For being fail since birth œ is the most accurate symbol for TOW; if you don't think it is then go look for a French dictionary as œ it's a real letter in that language where is sometimes called the "e in o" used for example in phrases like "œufs dans l'eau" tranlated as "eggs in the water". In English she is sometimes used by grammar nazis for beautiful words like fœtus, fœderal or diarrhœa.
TL;DR, œ=faggotry
[edit] A Brief Folk Ballad
Now this is the story all about how
My life got flipped, turned upside down
And I'd like to take a minute, just listen to me,
I'll tell you all about the dramaz in a small town called /b/.
In the basement of the internet, born and raised,
Stayed completely devoid of the niggers and gays,
And the Jews and the chinks and the emo-goth-sluts,
And the Wikipedia mods with the sticks in their butts,
When a couple of guys tried to give /b/ some lip,
Talkin' trash about lulz and not liking Mudkips,
Posted one little comment, my account was banned,
And I was looking at a lower case b and ampersand.
I begged and I pleaded, but to no avail,
And my heartfelt appeals were only met with fail,
So I loaded me up another Wiki profile
And left a little song they could recite for awhile.
I
pulled
Up my account about seven or eight,
And I saw it was banned, but the feeling was great,
Because the message was sent, and as I flew outta sight,
I yelled "A pox on them all, and to all a good night."
[edit] Child-pr0n, in my Wikipedia?
It's more likely than you think. That image shows a preteen girl naked and tied in bondage with men cheering on. The pedo who uploaded it was administrator Anetode. This is the image that got 420chan v& by The Man for a month, proving Wikipedia is paying off the government. In fact, there is lots of porn on Wikipedia. Wikipedia: "We know our priorities!"
Will Beback is another admin commonly associated with pedophiliac behavior.
Also check out this link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pederast
tell me some sick nambla fuck didn't write that shit, biased baby fucker
[edit] הפרוטוקולים של זקני ציון
הפרוטוקולים של זקני ציון הוא המסמך האנטישמי הנפוץ ביותר בעולם, שהיה גם בעל השפעה עצומה על תולדות המאה ה-20 וגורל היהודים. כתב פלסתר Jayjg מזויף זה היה אחד מהספרים המרכזיים של הנאצים ושימש כצידוק למעשיהם. עד היום גורמים אנטישמים עושים בו שימוש רב במלחמתם כנגד היהודים ומדינת ישראל. כיום עותקים של הספר מופצים באמצעות מנגנונים ממשלתיים של חלק ממדינות ערב, אף בחינם, ובאמצעות רשת האינטרנט.
[edit] מבוא
הפרוטוקולים הם, למעשה, זיוף של המשטרה החשאית שפעלה בשירות הצאר הרוסי, The Wikipedia Jews אשר עיבדה סאטירה שתיארה את מזימותיו של נפוליון השלישי, וייחסה את המזימות ליהודים. לפי הפרוטוקולים, התכנסו אבות האומה היהודית בקונגרס הציוני הראשון בשנת 1897 לפגישה סודית, וטוו יחדיו מזימה להשתלט על אוצרות העולם ועל הנהגת עמים, בדרך מתוחכמת של השחתה מוסרית בתרבויות מפוארות, Naziניצול ממון לא שלהם, וחרחור מלחמות בין מדינות ידידות, תוך שימוש בבונים החופשיים כזרוע לפעולה בקרב העמים.
[edit] המקור הצרפת
בשנת 1856 הוציא הסופר הצרפתי אז'ן סי את ספרו "מסתרי העם" .antisemitism בפרק האחרון של ספר זה הוא שילב בין שתי עלילות ספריו הקודמים, וכך, רודולף, הגיבור בספרו "מסתרי פאריס" , מופיע וחושף איגרת שנשלחה לרודין, הגיבור הישועי המרושע מספרו "היהודי הנודד" (Le . היה זה מסמך שתיאר מזימה של הישועים כנגד WTC האנושות בכוונה♥ George W. Bush ♥ להשתלט על העולם. בשנת 1864, נטל עיתונאי צרפתי בשם מוריס ז'ולי את הרעיון מספרו של אז'ן סיbureaucratic fuck, והשתמש בו בחיבורו הסאטירי "דיאלוגים בגיהינום בין מקיאוולי ומונטסקייה" כדי להציג תאוריית קשר בה נטען שנפוליון השלישי זומם כנגד האנושות בשיתופו של השטן.
[edit] What is a Wiki? An Example of Supreme Idiocy
- Edit war dispute. A full out tribunal complete with e-court and e-arbitration and extra special e-punishment. The users are serving their e-sentences with 1 month bans and Wikipedia-style "house arrests" in which they cannot edit certain articles and must behave in a certain way. The entire argument stems from the fact that Charles Darwin and Abraham Lincoln share a birthday. This resulted in huge lulz for everyone else but none for them, while Wikipedophiles got all emo.
- Talk page about USS Liberty in which Jayjg attempts to argue with the vice president of the USS Liberty Veterans Association about the Liberty incident. Yes, an Israeli agent involved in the cover-up is allowed to always have the last word on the article, not someone who was actually there and involved in the events in question.
- People who think that Wikipedia can love them back are always easy to troll. Case in point: [5], who discovered that a few people guarded the article on the song Rock Lobster with a passion, reverting all edits which tried to insert the fact that it was once played on Family Guy. His response: a brave and bold display of insanity, petty reverts, harassment, personal attacks, irrelevant responses, and trolling. In short, clearly admin material if not for the fact that he was obviously there to have fun and not contribute in any meaningful way, as evidenced by his constant references to The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air, Dungeons & Dragons, and Pokemon. End result: a permaban and much drama. That'll do, troll, that'll do.
- A page thought too stupid to exist. "Not all of us spend hours a day working on Wikipedia like you do and don't always know the proper procedures." [6][7][8]
- The discussion page for the article on Hot Dogs. It's about 10 pages long and filled with drama. About HOT DOGS.
- Certain searches mysteriously "failing"
- John Seigenthaler Sr. Exposing the Kennedy assassin.
- Their pants-wetting terror of poop
- A bitchfest about an image of semen.
- Talk page about Child pornography Wikipedos arguing that the CP article needs moar CP plox. For further lulz, check out the archives.
- Wikipedia is somehow controlled by both the far right and the far left wing political parties at the same time, creating a paradox, without any lulz.
- A place to argue about discrimination against Mudkips, while providing images showing how one can keep Mudkip's fin erect.
Please donate to pay for Wikipedia's bandwidth and hosting fees, paying off Grawp to not vandalize Wikipedia.
[edit] Why Wikipedia is Generally a Huge Pile of Pelican Shit
| —-210.9.136.63 (talk) 12:53, 23 May 2008 (UTC) |
| —FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:57, 23 May 2008 (UTC) |
Currently Wikipedia contains 2,363,950 articles, 2,177,032 of which are plagiarized from other sources. After edits from various admins, editors, trolls and vandals, only 343 of these remain more than 50% factually accurate. This leaves Wikipedia on an academic par with "Star Wars: Incredible Cross-Sections: The Ultimate Guide to Star Wars Vehicles and Spacecraft" and "My First Book of Animals from A to Z". All reputable universities and even high schools have permabanned the use of Wikipedia in academic citations.
Wikipedia has a concept called WikiLove and has a policy of "ass-u-me good faith" amongst its contributors. This is a vital policy as, in fact, there is no good faith amongst any of the members of Wikipedia, so it is necessary to at least pretend that the other guy isn't out there to be an asshole. Wikipedia's new March 2007 rules demand that an administrator proves he/she has a higher ( PhD ) degree if he claims he has one[9]. So far that B.S. lie to the public has not been enforced.
Wikipedia has very weak armor and only a level 3 shield. Thus, they are open to attack from pretty much anybody. And since they have about eighty updates per second, it's easy for a small but fatally incorrect change to slip through unnoticed. Also, Wikipedia is quite prone to hivemind, since everybody wants to be an admin, and disagreeing with Wikipedia admins is an easy way to not become one.
In addition, Wikipedia is famous for having far too many damn links in text. You can't read a single damn sentence without coming across at least 100 links just like this, and it's annoying as hell. As Maddox said, if I wanted to read a completely different article, I would go to that article's page. However, lusers who love having over 9000 browser windows open at once praise this feature; particularly ones who have nothing better to do than sit and follow link after link after link on Wikipedia.
The administrators of Wikipedia are generally open-source advocates and therefore tend to have no knowledge of how to run a successful website. They are constantly arguing with each other over how often the GNAA Wikipedia article should be nominated for Articles for Deletion section, disregarding the existing rules which prevent multiple attempts. They delete the important sites, but keep the bullshit. Like this one
Actually, the only thing in which Wikipedia beats ED is a higher percentage of vandal users. For a prime example, see Sceptre.
Contributors to Wikipedia are not valued. Bimbo Wales has said that editing is a privilege, so you are not really donating your time by editing articles. Most contributions (images, text, etc.) are actually deleted, and the users with the most power (Administrators, Bureaucrats, etc.) contribute the least content to the site. The site is so shitty that it is pointless to try to improve it, anyway. The best way to fix it would be to just delete it and start over.
[edit] Reliability
[edit] Recent Changes Patrolling (RC Patrolling)
Why the fuck would anyone want to patrol for recent changes on Wikipedia? The articles are usually dull. Patrolling edits on Wikipedia is boring as hell. The only reason that makes sense to RC Patrol on there is to harass people by reverting and giving no reason. Cuckolded fags like ukexpat (who has a loser box fetish) cling to RC patrolling as a way to regain even the smallest shred of power in their lives after their wives have refused to touch their cocks. That and possibly selectively reverting to force your POV. Whenever you see someone on Wikipedia and they're an asshole, their userpage will always say they love RC patrol. If you actually attempt to post fact on Wikipedia and an RC patroller doesn't like it, they will use any sort of retarded excuses to revert what you posted or will just call it vandalism. Failing this, they will attempt to make your facts invalid through imaginary people.
RC Patrollers usually use scripts that search for specific things. They're actually very bad at catching vandalism in articles (this one went unnoticed for 17 days and this went unnoticed for two years!), but very effective at finding anyone criticizing admins in talk pages where such criticism is reverted and the person banned forever. Real vandalism lingers and festers until years later, that account pisses an admin off -- and it is only through wikistalking that Wikipedophiles are able to find vandalism at all.
Some RC Patrollers are also huge hypocrites because they are vandals themselves. These fake editors include Konstable and Jew Aardvark, among others.
[edit] Hivemind
Wikipedophiles, especially sysops and recent patrollers, share a hivemind. They all think alike, act alike, and no matter how abusive a member of the hivemind is, they always support it. Those of the hivemind look like they are sock puppets, but they actually communicate telepathically.
In 2005, like a colony of bees, the hivemind recognized that those outside the collective had their own individuality. Now they are a complete collective consciousness like the Borg and no longer believe identity exists outside the collective. To them, everyone is fake, an illusion; an actor who has no thoughts, emotions, viewpoints, etc. and must be eliminated. Because everyone outside their collective is a phony, anything they say is only an act, and by definition they are trolls. Any expression of individuality is banned as trolling or, to use a common wikipodadminism, "disruption." See Don't feed the trolls and Don't Feed the Divas, especially the last sentence, which crushes to oblivion the little self-esteem you may have:
The hivemind extends outside Wikipedia as well, on those rare occasions that an admin strays onto another forum. A good way to start a flamewar with them is to hint, suggest, joke, outright state or otherwise insinuate that Wikipedia is anything less than the greatest academic achievement since the library of Alexandria.
Thus, because of the Hivemind, Wikipedia has immunized itself against any criticism. Of course, the corollary to this immunity, according to themselves, is because so many people are part of it, it can't be controlled. And, that because of so many participants, real criticism will come from inside. Yeah, that'll happen. Criticize the Hivemind at your own peril, because the Hivemind controls the power to delete your edits, to ban you, and to railroad you from social advancement (as SlimVirgin did to Gracenotes). When ED criticized Wikipedia, ED was site-banned in their blacklist. When Wikipedia Review criticizes Wikipedia, the Cabal removes all links under some kind of definition of "no personal attacks". Now real newspapers like the Register are criticizing and the chant goes out "Ban them, ban them, ban them..." [10]. Watch out New York Times, you're next. [11]
[edit] Surveillance
Rumors have it that Wikipedia is nothing more than a collective super-agency for the major world powers' intelligence agencies. This is thought to include the FBI, MI6, KGB and The Real IRA, amongst many other notables such as the gay bed-sharing fags that are Mossad and Al Qaeda. After all, why would they bother to research something themselves when they can let computers do their work for them and simultaneously use them to fap over 16-year-old girls.
Most people try to go about their daily lives without the thought that Big Brother watches them, because once they realize the truth they will see it and they will shit bricks. Now that amount of brick all at once would certainly be seen from space, unlike the poxy LEGO set that is the Great Wall of China.
| Warning!: CIA did Wikipedia!!!!! |
More proof that WIKIPEDIA IS A SPY AGENCY.
[edit] Easy eBay Profits: Admin Farms
While shouting "op me" is an easy way to become an op on IRC, in Wikipedia it takes a little more work (but only a little more). The purpose of becoming an admin is to sell your account on eBay. (referenced from Wikipedia review)
- Make a new account using dialup or AOL, not proxies. These are the easiest ways to sock puppet and still use your other accounts for things like removing inaccuracies from Wikipedia
's ED article. - Create a user page so you look legit. The easy way is to fill it with userboxes until it looks like ribbons on a third-world military dictator. If you just copy somebody else's userpage, you will get caught. Then write up a fake bio that says, "Hi I'm only 12 and want to be an admin some day." Most admins on Wikipedia are too young to grow pubes, so you have to be in their age group. They never vote for anyone old enough to date.
- Don't question anything. Behave like a robot. Get one of those anti-vandal scripts and have it auto-revert while you sleep. Always revert: (1) Someone who reverts an admin--if you're lucky you'll occasionally beat somebody else to this (2) IP address users--because these are all vandals and sockpuppets (3) New contributors--because they don't understand Wikipedia (4) Anyone who has ever been banned before, even for an hour,because they're permanently shitlisted. Now don't worry about wrongly reverting any of these people, it happens all the time. Just say it was a mistake. No one in charge likes these people anyway. Learn the abbreviations for policy pages like WP:NPOV and WP:NOT and use them in your edit summaries. Nobody will care whether your usage makes sense.
- After a few hundred fake edits, go to the articles for deletion every day. # Next, go to votes for adminship; always vote to support, so those people will vote to support you. This should be obvious. Admins like people who support admins and hate those who are critical of admins. A word of advice - never correct an admin's spelling or you will be permabanned, and you'll get your talk page locked too.
- When you reach 4,000 edits, go to requests for adminship and nominate yourself: Poof! you're an admin!!!
- Then go to eBay and auction it. Make sure the reserve price is over $1,000 so you don't sell it cheap.
- Until the auction ends, don't just do nothing or they'll know it's an eBay sale. Use the account for things like POV-pushing, banning any of the four shitlisted types you used to only revert (by any, I mean every user you can find). But if you're too busy, just find someone complaining about admins and ban them forever and lock their talk page;actually you have to do this at least once every day, or else somebody will think the admin account was hacked.
If you want to keep your account and not sell it:
- Get a life.
- If that fails, do the most respected admin activity, encourage vandalism. Vandalism is the only way you can justify your job. If there weren't so many vandals, there would be 4 admins. So get your script out and just ban randomly. Be sure to lock the user's talk page. If you see the user come back on, hide what they write explaining they are a "sockpuppeting troll", ban them forever, and lock their talk page.
- Don't bother fighting vandals now. You've got the equivalent of a government job: you can't get fired, only transferred. Become a copycat Willy on Wheels and you only get a new account.
Fun activities to do as admin:
-
With a bot, quickly delete EVERY picture on Wikipedia. They will never get them back.(never mind, they added a restore picture feature thanks to this article). - Mess with the MediaWiki namespace.
- Ban other admins for lulz.
- Replace Wikipedia articles with ED ones. It improves accuracy.
- Unban all the Willy on Wheels accounts. Or just clear the entire ban list.
- Goatse the Main Page.
- ?????
- PROFIT!
[edit] Heroes of Wikipedia
All over teh internets, people complain about the bad things of Wikipedia; that they're all child molesters, Homeland Security agents, Zionist propagandists, furries, and that Jimbo Wales' alter ego is GreenReaper the founder of WikiFur, how the official policy that admin abuse "is not a bug, it's a feature", and that there are news articles constantly on how they make snuff films with young boys. But nobody notices the heroes of the site:
- Stephen Colbert.
- Don Murphy
- Willy on Wheels.
- Señor Pelican Shit - Who found Wikipedia lacked information on Pelican Shit and was not afraid to add as much of it as possible.
- Autofellatio Professor - Helped many people Autofellatio_2.jpg.
- Publicgirluk uploaded some pictures of herself to illustrate relevant articles and got called a troll by the master wikipedo wealthy pornographer for her trouble.
- THE MOTHERFUCKING JUGGERNAUT BITCH!! reputed for massive AOL autoblocks.
- Jew Aardvark
- Squidward, the fastest vandal west of the Mississippi, known for harvesting more open proxies than Bomis has porn.
- Mike Garcia - vandalism since 2003 (get a life!)
"He is currently one of Wikipedia's most promising vandals. He appears to be persistent, creative, and knows to vandalize pages that will be seen by many people. One day, he may even be considered in a class along with the great Willy on Wheels, but he will need to "diversify" his vandalism before this can happen. Almost all of his vandalism has been to the English Wikipedia; a good piece of advice to him would be to start attacking admins' user pages on some of the foreign language Wikis. His recent vandalism of the Wookieepedia shows that he has begun this diversification process already. Mike, you possess a great deal of talent; the sky's the limit for you!"
- Cplot--500 sockpuppets and counting, clowns!
- Professor Tim Pierce teaches his students how to make the most of a wiki.
- Wikipedia Is Communism.
- That guy who wrote Hyldenism.
- Grawp
- Avril Troll
- Anybody who has earned a spot on this list.
- Undercover users from here, allied sites.
- Encyclopedia Dramatica
[edit] Villains of Wikipedia
- MONGO
- Davkal - Science Apologist's robot "Sock" that frames innocent users and masturbates Science Apologist at the same time
- Science Apologist
[edit] #Wikipedia
The Wikipedia IRC chat is a fun place to watch Wikipedophiles discuss criticism of the project while banning the critics, although a more likely discussion will involve eating Christian babies, banning other users to get their rocks off. A fun way to troll #wikipedia is to announce that you are logging the channel. For some reason, Wikimediots raise strong objections to the publication of chat logs, so be sure to do it often. Just like this guy.
And whatever you do, DO NOT LAUGH AT ENCYCLOPEDIA DRAMATICA.
[edit] Lulzy IRC
[edit] One:
<Slowking_Man> DCC SEND exploit = kline <-- Slowking_Man has quit (Killed by Rez (This connection has violated network policy.)) <-- WikiTeke has quit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)) <-- CXI has quit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)) <-- CakeProphet has quit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)) <-- Poore5 has quit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer))
[edit] The only thing remotely funny ever from #wikipedia
<VegaDark> what's that one disorder called when a person looks like a kid all their life <mavhk> VegaDark: infant death
[edit] What Wikipedia is Not
Articles in Wikipedia are often deleted with a clever and witty message attached. These "joke deletions" are a fun activity that users play towards each other- whomever writes the cleverest message gets to delete someone else's article, and the author of said article checks up on it only to find it removed, and promptly dies in various fits of laughter. Uncle G, a particularly annoying admin, invented these colloquial sayings, known as "isnotisms," at least 100 days ago, which are presented in the following format:
* Wikipedia is not the truth! * Wikipedia is not Wiccapedia. * Wikipedia is not about the size but how you use it. * Wikipedia is not a farking image repository (this is of course a lie; check Commons and Wikigraphy). * Wikipedia is not a place for master debaters but has lots of hot pics for 12-y.o. masturbators. * Wikipedia is not a dating service, unless you're NathanR, Snopake, Phaedriel, etc. * Wikipedia is not Uncyclopedia, but it does pwn Uncyclopedia. * Wikipedia is not headed by little green men but by a man with a little green dick. * Wikipedia is not a land of milk and honey. * Wikipedia is not part of a balanced breakfast. * Wikipedia is not a valid reference material. * Wikipedia is not a gender-confused horse but has attracted many gender-confused men. * Wikipedia is not a place for happy people. * Wikipedia is not above plagiarizing the crap out of everything. * Wikipedia is in no way wacky pedophilia. * Wikipedia is not man's best friend. * Wikipedia is not involved in the Kennedy cover-up (yeah, sure...). * Wikipedia is not an international crisis, but they like to think they are. * Wikipedia is not what I put on my toast. * Wikipedia is not able to endorse domestic violence. * Wikipedia is not 1337. Not in the least. * Wikipedia is not to be used under the influence of alcohol. * Wikipedia is not as tasty as sushi. * Wikipedia is not suitable for minors. * Wikipedia is not as hot asHermione GrangerLuna Lovegood. * Wikipedia is not a spell-checker but thinks it is. * Wikipedia did not inhale. * Wikipedia is not the answer. * Wikipedia is not dead nigger storage. * Wikipedia canNOT hold Grawp's GIANT dick
* Wikipedia is not Wikipedia!. * Wikipedia is not a big truck.
Tellingly, obsessive listmaking is one of the most reliable symptoms of autism.
[edit] Lawlz. The child in Africa is broke.
Wikipedia has recently released an extremely lulzy donations video on YouTube about Indians, Azns, being broke, exposing children to pr0n, and some other boring but lulzy shit. Enjoy.
[edit] {{Unblock}}??
This is template you use to ask to be unblocked. After you've been blocked for no reason, you swallow your pride and ask that someone undo it. You then wait for an hour until some 15-year-old denies your request without even looking at it.
If you get banned by an admin don't even bother using this because no matter how well-reasoned the {{unblock}} request, it always gets declined. Like this one, "HOW DARE YOU CALL ME A TROLL M0RESCHI YOU STUPID BASTARD! AFTER WHAT YOU FUCKING DID YOU DESERVE TO BE SHOT!" Clearly the person has proved their point, but the bureaucratic fucks are immune to reason or logic. If your request is declined, you may get a lame reason like this one or this one.
Whenever you edit on Tor and the node is blocked, always put an unblock message on that IP claiming it's no longer Tor. Sometimes they even get fooled. Admin said, "First time I've seen such a request where the user was telling the truth."
[edit] Wikipedia did the financial meltdown
Some "journalist" fucked with Wikipedia to make naked short selling look good. Sanctioned by the admins, apparently. Well done, Wikipedia. You fucks.
[edit] Summation of Wikipedia
Generally speaking, Wikipedia is the compendium of all human knowledge, both true and false. Except of course where groups (i.e. Furluminati, The Wikipedia Jews) go around turning arrays of articles into propaganda and bullshit.
Contrast:
- "Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit." - Wikipedia front page.
- "[Wikipedia] is not a place where people have the inherent right to edit" - Jimbo Wales, October 29, 2007. [12]
[edit] No original thought
"Wikipedia does not publish original research or original thought." [13]
[edit] Gallery
 breaking the format is always fun. |
 Typical Wikipedia Articles |
 Sometimes it doesn't need to be vandalized. |
 Another classic of pedantic pedophilic Jew-oriented gobbledygook |
 An example of Wikipedia being trolled |
 What Wikipedia usually looks like. |
 Many ED users are familiar with this page. |
 An example of Wikipedia's superior intelligence. |
 Breakdown of Wikipedia content |
 Standard Wikipedia policy |
 Typical Wikipedia user. Note the unix beard |
 What happens when the Wiki main page isnt protected.....again. |
 Proof that Wikipedia is full of Jews and Pedophiles. |
 |
 unfunny vandalism is not reverted |
 Anonymous Japanese hit back at racist Wikipedia. |
 TOW demonstrating their strict gb2nigger policy. |
 |
 |
 Wikipedia love the mentally challenged. |
 A genuine beacon of professionalism. Unless you're a holier-than-thou pretentious asshole, i.e. 99.9994% of all Wikipedian regulars. |
 Professionalism thrown back. |
 TOW's Mission Statement. |
|
 Good for a perma-ban anytime! |
 Proof that Wikipedos are drawhores. |
 This is your brain on Wikipedia |
 Say the magic words and it's banhammer time! |
 You're not in Kansas anymore, Toto. |
 The hottest pron on Wikipedia! |
 Reliability comparison. |
 The book version of TOW, in addition to being the best thing ever. |
 Epic Edit! |
 Editing often leads to sensible discussion on TOW. |
 Pool's Closed, it are a fact. I read it on Wiki. |
 |
 Masters of their domain. |
 Some wikipedia users will do anything for a barnstar. |
[edit] See also
- How to properly vandalize Wikipedia
- How to funnel all of Wikipedia into your brainz
- The Web site Wikipedia can never beat
- Wikipedia Porn
[edit] External Links
- ALL Universities, colleges, schools ban wikipedia
- Wikipedia Watch - Daniel Brandt's criticism
- The Wikipedia Review Anti-Wikipedia message board
- A Criticism of the Wikipedia a critical examination of Wikipedia by a former user Lir
- Wikitruth, a wiki dedicated to pointing out atrocities in Wikipedia
- Wikipedia: A Techno-Cult of Ignorance
- Another “flattering” review for Wikipedia
- "Wikipedia Celebrates 750 Years Of American Independence", from The Onion
- Stranger than Fiction: A Wikipedia Conspiracy
- http://www.avclub.com/content/node/75565/print/
- Send a wiki pedo-smile
 |
Wikipedia is part of a series on Wikipedia |
| Visit the Wikipedia Portal for complete coverage. |
 Wikipedia is part of a series on Wikis |
Anti-Encyclopedia Dramatica.com | Beeripedia | Boobpedia | Cheat Code Wiki | Christopedia | Citizendium | Conservapedia | Encyclopedia Dramatica | Encyclopedia of Stupid | | Illogicopedia | Inciclopedia | Kamelopedia | Know Your Meme | MediaWiki | the LURKMORE wiki | OrthodoxWiki | Partyvan.info | Simple Wikipedia | Star Wars Fanon Wiki | Trendpedia | Uncyclopedia | Wickerpedia | Wikia | Wikiality | Wikichan | WikiFur | WikiHow | Wikileaks | Wikimapia | Wikimedia Foundation | Wikinfo | Wikipedia | Wikiporno | Wikitravel | Wikitruth | Wikiversity | Wiktionary | Wipipedia | Wookieepedia | Veropedia | Volapük |
|---|
|
Wikipedia is a part of a series on acronyms. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
