What is GamerDad?
Why do Kids Love Games? Are Games Harmful? You'll find the answers here. At GamerDad, we believe in Gaming with Children.
Email Us, Visit our FAQ, learn About Us, Bookmark us now and join our message board. We update daily!
|
Donate to help Hurricane Surivivors
Buy something from Amazon using this link, and GamerDad gets a percentage!
|
|
Home >
Review Archive >
Video Games
> Results: Coded Arms
|
by Michael Anderson
July 17, 2005
Coded Arms combination of terrible controls and boring and repetitive levels makes it a mediocre first-person shooter on the PSP.
Reviewed for PSP.
|
Format For Printing | Tell A Friend
Scroll down for our Kid Factor.
Somewhere there is a first-person shooter god looking down, having a good chuckle at my incessant pursuit of good FPS games for every platform I own. Occasionally I am rewarded (Duke Nukem Advance for the GBA), often I am disappointed (Serious Sam Advance for the GBA) and sometimes I'm downright punished (scratching the screen of my first iPaq playing Quake). I was most recently somewhat rewarded by the excellent controls in Rogue Agent for Nintendo DS, but it was clear from the moment I started playing Coded Arms on the Sony PSP that my luck had quickly run out.
The story is basic sci-fi pulp. In the future, people directly connect their brains to computer networks by ‘jacking in'. At the same time, some mega-conglomerate has been waging a top secret war against aliens on a distant planet. They have developed a combat simulation program called A.I.D.A. Predictably, the program would not shut down when instructed, and has a fatal bug—anyone who dies in the simulator loses his or her personality. As a result, interaction with the system is outlawed and only top hackers, called ‘Coded Ones', dare to enter in search of riches. You are one such hacker. Thus begins your role in Coded Arms, and ends any attempt at storytelling or plot from the game. It is all run-and-gun from beginning to end, and not very satisfying either.
My half-joking question for the game makers is—which battle should be harder, the one against the enemies or the one against the controls? The default controls use the analog stick for motion and the ‘shape' buttons for aiming. There are four control sets available, in the hope that one might actually make the game more playable. None of them do. You are constantly forced to choose between fluid motion or precise aiming. If I were left handed, perhaps control set ‘C', aiming with the analog stick and moving with the shape buttons, would work. But instead I never found a set I liked, and stuck with the defaults because the handedness of that control scheme at least made sense to my brain.
The game has an upgrade mechanism reminiscent of Tron 2.0 You gather file fragments and assemble them to upgrade your weapons and armor. Files you pickup can also increase your maximum health capacity. You can get infected with a virus, in which case you need a virus cleaner file. The levels remind me again of a point of contention I have with so many new games. They claim that random area generation lends replayability, but what about the first play? The game's levels and areas are dull and repetitive, unimaginatively laid out, cramped and boxy. You just trudge along through halls from room battle to room battle, looking to kill the gatekeeper to unlock the level end gate. Then you repeat that on level two.
The game features multiplayer modes based only on the PSP's ad hoc network mode, meaning you must be near your opponent to play. That is too bad, as the ability to run through the maps against friends seems the only hope for any value in this game. In order to test the multiplayer, I had to rent a copy for a coworker to play at lunch. It was my first PSP multiplayer, and it wasn't as smooth an experience as Rogue Agent on the DS. Hooking up went well enough, but now you had two clueless people battling the controls hoping to get a frag we could be proud of (you know, one where the other person isn't obviously struggling with the controls to find you?). Worse still, we were experiencing lagging gameplay, which makes no sense to me. After a bit of the single player and some multiplayer, my friend threw the game down and said, "You can return this today if you want. I don't want to touch that game again". That was a feeling I experienced often while playing the game.
I really had a mixed experience with Coded Arms which was only good because I love the FPS genre, and bad because of most everything else, especially the poor controls. At times I thought I had it all down, and found myself enjoying the mindless run and gun style similar to Painkiller on the PC. But frequently reality set in, and I had enemies high, middle and low, and found that a single touch of the shape button would take me from missing right to missing left, and the ‘aim snap' wasn't always much help. The single player section is only a few hours long, and the multiplayer is only fun if you have friends close by and all have similar skills. There might be a good FPS for the PSP someday, but after wrestling with the controls in this one, I know this isn't that game. For now, if you are a shooter fan with a PSP, and have experience dealing with single analog stick game systems like the N64, you might get a few hours enjoyment from Coded Arms. At best, it could be worth a rental.
The game has no dialogue, no real plot, no blood or language or adult themes, just run and gun action. It is akin to Unreal Tournament but with bad levels and controls. The intense action deserves the T rating.
Format For Printing | Tell A Friend
Home >
Review Archive >
Video Games
> Results: Coded Arms
|
Best Games of 2005!
Read the GamerDad 2005 Holiday Guide!
Visit the GamerDad Store and Buy Stuff!
|
|
